Microbial biodiversity of the liquid fraction of rumen content from lactating cows

Animal

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 572-579

  Sandri, M ^a   Manfrin, C ^b   Pallavicini, A ^b   Stefanon, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UDINE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

16S rRNA; dairy cows; Next Generation Sequencing; rumen bacteria community; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; BACILLUS (BACTERIUM); BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); FIRMICUTES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

RNA 16S; VOLATILE FATTY ACID;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; BIODIVERSITY; BOVINE; DAIRYING; DIET; ENDOSPORE-FORMING RODS AND COCCI; FEMALE; GENETICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; LACTATION; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; MILK; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RUMINANT STOMACH; VETERINARY;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; CATTLE; DAIRYING; DIET; FATTY ACIDS, VOLATILE; FEMALE; GRAM-POSITIVE ENDOSPORE-FORMING RODS; LACTATION; MILK; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; RUMEN;

EID: 84927578581     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1751731114000056     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bach A, Iglesias C and Devant M 2007. Daily rumen pH pattern of loose-housed dairy cattle as affected by feeding pattern and live yeast supplementation. Animal Feed Science and Technology 136, 146-153.
2. Baker GC, Smith JJ and Cowan DA 2003. Review and re-analysis of domain-specific 16S primers. Journal of Microbiological Methods 55, 541-555.
3. Brulc JM, Antonopoulos DA, Berg Millera ME, Wilsona MK, Yannarella AC, Dinsdaled EA, Edwardsd RE, Frankh ED, Emersoni JB, Wacklini P, Coutinhoj PM, Henrissatj B, Nelsoni KE and White BA 2009. Gene-centric metagenomics of the fiber-adherent bovine rumen microbiome reveals forage specific glycoside hydrolases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 106, 1948-1953.
4. Chao A 1984. Non-parametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 11, 783-791.
5. Chung YH, Walker ND, McGinn SM and Beauchemin KA 2011. Differing effects of 2 active dried yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) strains on ruminal acidosis and methane production in nonlactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 2431-2439.
6. Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, Farris RJ, Kulam-Syed-Mohideen AS, McGarrell DM, Marsh T, Garrity GM and Tiedje JM 2008. The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 37, D141-D145.
7. Dann HM, Drackley JK, McCoy GC, Hutjens MF and Garrett JE 2000. Effects of yeast cultures (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on prepartum intake and postpartum intake and milk production of Jersey cows. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 123-127.
8. Desnoyers M, Giger-Reverdin S, Bertin G, Duvaux-Ponter C and Sauvant D 2009. Meta-analysis of the influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on ruminal parameters and milk production of ruminants. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 1620-1632.
9. Erasmus LJ, Botha PM and Kistner A 1992. Effect of yeast culture supplementation on production, rumen fermentation, and duodenal nitrogen flow in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 3056-3065.
10. Fernando SC, Purvis HT II, Najar FZ, Sukharnikov LO, Krehbiel TG, Nagaraja TG, Roe BA and DeSilva U 2010. Rumen microbial population dynamics during adaptation to a high - grain diet. Journal of Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76, 7482-7490.
11. Fuhrman JA 2009. Microbial community structure and its functional implications. Nature 459, 193-199.
12. Hobson PN (ed.) 1988 The rumen microbial ecosystem. Elsevier Applied Science, England.
13. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) 1988. Alimentation des bovins, ovins et caprins. INRA, Paris.
14. Jami E and Mizrahi I 2012. Composition and similarity of bovine rumen microbiota across individual animals. PLoS One 7, e33306.
15. Khafipour E, Li S, Plaizier JC and Krause DO 2009. Rumen microbiome determined used two nutritional models of subacute ruminal acidosis. Journal of Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75, 7115-7124.
16. Kong Y, Teather R and Forster R 2010. Composition, spatial distribution, and diversity of the bacterial communities in the rumen of cows fed different forages. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 74, 612-622.
17. Kumar PS, Brooker MR, Dowd SE and Camerlengo T 2011. Target region selection is a critical determinant of community fingerprints generated by 16S pyrosequencing. PLoS One 6, e20956.
18. Liu Z, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL and Knight R 2008. Accurate taxonomy assignments from 16S rRNA sequences produced by highly parallel pyrosequencers. Nucleic Acids Research 36, e120.
19. Liu Z, Lozupone C, Hamady M, Bushman FD and Knight R 2007. Short pyrosequencing reads suffice for accurate microbial community analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 35, e120.
20. Longuski RA, Ying Y and Allen MS 2009. Yeast culture supplementation prevented milk fat depression by a short-term dietary challenge with fermentable starch. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 160-167.
21. Marden JP, Julien C, Monteils V, Auclair E, Moncoulon R and Bayourthe C 2008. How does live yeast differ from sodium bicarbonate to stabilize ruminal pH in high yielding dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 3528-3535.
22. Mosoni P, Martin C, Forano E and Morgavi DP 2011. Long-term defaunation increases the abundance of cellulolytic rumino cocci and methanogens but does not affect the bacterial and methanogen diversity in the rumen of sheep. Journal of Animal Science 89, 783-791.
23. Mwenya B, Santoso B, Sar C, Pen B, Morikawa R, Takaura K, Umetsu K, Kimura K and Takahashi J 2005. Effects of yeast culture and galactooligosaccharides on ruminal fermentation in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 1404-1412.
24. Newbold CJ, Wallace RJ, Chen XB and McIntosh FM 1995. Different strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae differ in their effects on ruminal bacterial numbers in vitro and in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 73, 1811-1818.
25. Pitta DW, Pinchak WE, Dowd SE, Osterstock J, Gontcharova V, Youn E, Dorton K, Yoon I, Min BR, Fulford JD, Wickersham TA and Malinowski DP 2010. Rumen bacterial diversity associated with changing from Bermuda grass hay to grazed winter wheat diets. Microbial Ecology 59, 511-522.
26. Robinson PH and Erasmus LJ 2009. Effects of analyzable diet components on responses of lactating dairy cows to Saccharomyces cerevisiae based yeast products: a systematic review of the literature. Animal Feed Science and Technology 149, 185-198.
27. RossME,Moate PJ, Bath CR, Davidson SE, Sawbridge TI, Guthridge KM, Cocks BG and Hayes BJ 2012. High throughput whole rumen metagenome profiling using untargeted massively parallel sequencing. BMC Genetics 13, 53-67.
28. Sawanon S and Kobayashi Y 2006. Synergistic fibrolysis in the rumen by cellulolytic Ruminococcus flavefaciens and non-cellulolytic Selenomonas ruminantium: evidence in defined cultures. Animal Science 77, 208-214.
29. Sawanon S, Koike S and Kobayashi Y 2011. Evidence for the possible involvement of Selenomonas ruminantium in rumen fiber digestion. FEMS Microbiology Letters 325, 170-179.
30. Shannon CE and Weaver W 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
31. SPSS Advanced Statistic 7.5 1997. SPSS Base 7.5 for Windows User's Guide. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.
32. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER and Gordon JI 2006. An obesity associated gut microbiome with increased capacity of energy harvest. Science 444, 1027-1031.
33. Vilo C and Dong Q 2012. Evaluation of the RDP Classifier Accuracy Using 16S rRNA Gene Variable Regions. Metagenomics 1, 1-5.
34. Woelders H, Te Pas MFV, Bannink A, Veerkamp RF and Smits MA 2011. Systems biology in animal sciences. Animal 5, 1036-1047.
35. Wohlt JE, Corcione TT and Zajac PK 1998. Effect of yeast on feed intake and performance of cows fed diets based on corn silage during early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 1345-1352.