Risk assessment methods for cardiac surgery and intervention

Nature Reviews Cardiology

Volumn 11, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 704-714

  Thalji, Nassir M ^a   Suri, Rakesh M ^a   Greason, Kevin L ^a   Schaff, Hartzell V ^a  

^a Mayo Clinic College of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; COUNSELING; DATA BASE; EUROSCORE; EUROSCORE II; HEART SURGERY; HEART VALVE SURGERY; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR PROCEDURE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; STS SCORE; SURGICAL MORTALITY; THORACIC AORTA SURGERY; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84927564491     PISSN: 17595002     EISSN: 17595010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.136     Document Type: Review

References (149)

1. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Executive Summaries [online], http://www.sts.org/sts-national-database/database-managers/executive-summaries (2014).
2. The Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland. Blue Book Online [online], http://bluebook.scts.org (2014).
3. Hammermeister, K. E., Burchfiel, C., Johnson, R. & Grover, F. L. Identification of patients at greatest risk for developing major complications at cardiac surgery. Circulation 82 (5 Suppl.), IV380-IV389 (1990).
4. Iezzoni, L. I. The risks of risk adjustment. JAMA 278, 1600-1607 (1997).
5. Iezzoni, L. I, Ash, A. S., Shwartz, M., Landon, B. E. & Mackiernan, Y. D. Predicting in-hospital deaths from coronary artery bypass graft surgery: do different severity measures give different predictions? Med. Care 36, 28-39 (1998).
6. Luft, H. S. & Romano, P. S. Chance, continuity, and change in hospital mortality rates: coronary artery bypass graft patients in California hospitals, 1983 to 1989. JAMA 270, 331-337 (1993).
7. Tu, J. V., Sykora, K. & Naylor, C. D. Assessing the outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery: how many risk factors are enough? Steering committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 30, 1317-1323 (1997).
8. Shahian, D. M. et al. Cardiac surgery risk models: a position article. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 78, 1868-1877 (2004).
9. Beyersdorf, F. The future is here: the European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery presents its first app. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 39, 617-618 (2011).
10. Hannan, E. L., Racz, M. J., Jollis, J. G. & Peterson, E. D. Using Medicare claims data to assess provider quality for CABG surgery: does it work well enough? Health Serv. Res. 31, 659-678 (1997).
11. Dubois, R. W., Rogers, W. H., Moxley, J. H. 3rd, Draper, D. & Brook, R. H. Hospital inpatient mortality: is it a predictor of quality? N. Engl. J. Med. 317, 1674-1680 (1987).
12. Griffith, B. P. et al. The need for accurate risk-adjusted measures of outcome in surgery. Ann. Surg. 222, 593-599 (1995).
13. Sox, H. C. & Greenfield, S. Annals of internal medicine comparative effectiveness research: a report from the Institute of Medicine. Ann. Intern. Med. 151, 203-205 (2009).
14. Garber, A. M. & Tunis, S. R. Does comparative-effectiveness research threaten personalized medicine? N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 1925-1927 (2009).
15. CMS.gov. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) [online], http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coverage/Coverage-with-Evidence-Development/Transcatheter-Aortic-Valve-Replacement-TAVR-.html (2014).
16. Van Mieghem, N. M. & Serruys, P. W. The art of risk stratification in TAVI. Eur. Heart J. 34, 1859-1861 (2013).
17. Shahian, D. M. et al. Public reporting of cardiac surgery performance: part 2-implementation. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 92 (3 Suppl.), S12-S23 (2011).
18. Shahian, D. M., Silverstein, T., Lovett, A. F., Wolf, R. E. & Normand, S.-L. T. Comparison of clinical and administrative data sources for hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards. Circulation 115, 1518-1527 (2007).
19. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. STS National Database [online], http://www.sts.org/national-database (2014).
20. Bridgewater, B., Society of Cardiothoracic Surgery in GB and Ireland. Cardiac registers: the adult cardiac surgery register. Heart 96, 1441-1443 (2010).
21. Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland. Audit and Outcomes [online], http://www.scts.org/professionals/audit-outcomes.aspx (2014).
22. O'Brien, S. M. et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2-isolated valve surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 88 (1 Suppl.), S23-S42 (2009).
23. Shahian, D. M. et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1-coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 88 (1 Suppl.), S2-S22 (2009).
24. Shahian, D. M. et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 3-valve plus coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 88 (1 Suppl.), S43-S62 (2009).
25. Rankin, J. S. et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk model for operative mortality after multiple valve surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 95, 1484-1490 (2013).
26. Magee, M. J., Wright, C. D., McDonald, D., Fernandez, F. G. & Kozower, B. D. External validation of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 96, 1734-1739 (2013).
27. Tong, B. C. & Harpole, D. Audit, quality control, and performance in thoracic surgery : a North American perspective. Thorac. Surg. Clin. 17, 379-386 (2007).
28. Shahian, D. M. et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. Heart 99, 1494-1501 (2013).
29. Shahian, D. M. et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Adult Cardiac Database: a continuing commitment to excellence. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 140, 955-959 (2010).
30. Brenner, H., Schmidtmann, I. & Stegmaier, C. Effects of record linkage errors on registry-based follow-up studies. Stat. Med. 16, 2633-2643 (1997).
31. Jacobs, J. P. et al. Successful linking of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database to centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare data. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 90, 1150-1157 (2010).
32. Barringhaus, K. G., Zelevinsky, K., Lovett, A., Normand, S. L. & Ho, K. K. Hospital-specific estimates of risk-adjusted mortality in Massachusetts. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 4, 92-98 (2011).
33. Jacobs, J. P. et al. Successful linking of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database to Social Security data to examine survival after cardiac operations. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 92, 32-39 (2011).
34. Mack, M. J. et al. Does reporting of coronary artery bypass grafting from administrative databases accurately reflect actual clinical outcomes? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 129, 1309-1317 (2005).
35. Herbert, M. A., Prince, S. L., Williams, J. L., Magee, M. J. & Mack, M. J. Are unaudited records from an outcomes registry database accurate? Ann. Thorac. Surg. 77, 1960-1964 (2004).
36. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons STS National Database and Outcomes Program Participation Manual [online], http://www.sts.org/sites/default/files/documents/Database Manual 2011.pdf (2011).
37. Schaff, H. V, Brown, M. L. & Lenoch, J. R. Data entry and data accuracy. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 140, 960-961 (2010).
38. Stark, J. F & Stark, J. Databases for congenital heart disease: A beginner's guide. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. Pediatr. Card. Surg. Annu. 3, 110-116 (2000).
39. Gallivan, S., Stark, J., Pagel, C., Williams, G. & Williams, W. G. Dead reckoning: can we trust estimates of mortality rates in clinical databases? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 33, 334-340 (2008).
40. Brown, M. L., Lenoch, J. R. & Schaff, H. V. Variability in data: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 140, 267-273 (2010).
41. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Adult Cardiac Surgery Data Specifications [online], http://www.sts.org/sts-national-database/database-managers/adult-cardiac-surgery-database/data-collection (2014).
42. Roques, F. et al. Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 15, 816-822 (1999).
43. Roques, F., Michel, P., Goldstone, A. R. & Nashef, S. A. The logistic EuroSCORE. Eur. Heart J. 24, 881-882 (2003).
44. Nashef, S. A. et al. EuroSCORE II. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 41, 734-744 (2012).
45. Osswald, B. R. et al. Overestimation of aortic valve replacement risk by EuroSCORE: implications for percutaneous valve replacement. Eur. Heart J. 30, 74-80 (2009).
46. CMS.gov. MEDPAR [online], http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/MedicareFeeforSvcPartsAB/MEDPAR.html (2013).
47. Fetter, R. & Freeman, J. Diagnosis related groups: product line management within hospitals. Acad. Manag. Rev. 11, 41-54 (1986).
48. UHC. UHC.edu [online], https://www.uhc.edu/about (2014).
49. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Overview of the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) [online], http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp (2014).
50. Raftery, J., Roderick, P. & Stevens, A. Potential use of routine databases in health technology assessment. Health Technol. Assess. 9, 1-92 (2005).
51. Romano, P. S. et al. The California Hospital Outcomes Project: using administrative data to compare hospital performance. Jt Comm. J. Qual. Improv. 21, 668-682 (1995).
52. Aylin, P., Bottle, A. & Majeed, A. Use of administrative data or clinical databases as predictors of risk of death in hospital: comparison of models. BMJ 334, 1044 (2007).
53. Hannan, E. L, Kulburn, H. Jr., Lindsey, M. L. & Lewis, R. Clinical versus administrative data bases for CABG surgery. Does it matter? Med. Care 30, 892-907 (1992).
54. Geraci, J. M. et al. Mortality after cardiac bypass surgery: prediction from administrative versus clinical data. Med. Care 43, 149-158 (2005).
55. Siregar, S. et al. The Dutch hospital standardised mortality ratio (HSMR) method and cardiac surgery: benchmarking in a national cohort using hospital administration data versus a clinical database. Heart 100, 702-710 (2014).
56. Pagano, D. & Gale, C. P. The death of administrative data for benchmarking cardiothoracic mortality? Heart 100, 680-682 (2014).
57. Hartz, A. J. & Kuhn, E. M. Comparing hospitals that perform coronary artery bypass surgery: the effect of outcome measures and data sources. Am. J. Public Health 84, 1609-1614 (1994).
58. Jones, R. H. et al. Identification of preoperative variables needed for risk adjustment of short-term mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 28, 1478-1487 (1996).
59. Pasquali, S. K. et al. Differential case ascertainment in clinical registry versus administrative data and impact on outcomes assessment for pediatric cardiac operations. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 95, 197-203 (2013).
60. Hawker, G. A., Coyte, P. C., Wright, J. G., Paul, J. E. & Bombardier, C. Accuracy of administrative data for assessing outcomes after knee replacement surgery. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 50, 265-273 (1997).
61. Lawthers, A. G. et al. Identification of in-hospital complications from claims data. Is it valid? Med. Care 38, 785-795 (2000).
62. Iezzoni, L. I. et al. Identifying complications of care using administrative data. Med. Care 32, 700-715 (1994).
63. Kozower, B. D. et al. Predicted risk of mortality models: surgeons need to understand limitations of the University HealthSystem Consortium models. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 209, 551-556 (2009).
64. Iezzoni, L. I. et al. Comorbidities, complications and coding bias: does the number of diagnosis codes matter in predicting in-hospital mortality? JAMA 267, 2197-2203 (1992).
65. Iezzoni, L. I. Using risk-adjusted outcomes to assess clinical practice: an overview of issues pertaining to risk adjustment. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 58, 1822-1826 (1994).
66. Iezzoni, L. I. Assessing quality using administrative data. Ann. Intern. Med. 127, 666-674 (1997).
67. Zhan, C., Elizhauser, A., Friedman, B., Houchens, R. & Chiang, Y. P. Modifying DRG-PPS to include only diagnoses present on admission: financial implications and challenges. Med. Care 45, 288-291 (2007).
68. Romano, P. S. & Chan, B. K. Risk-adjusting acute myocardial infarction mortality: are APR-DRGs the right tool? Heal. Serv. Res. 34, 1469-1489 (2000).
69. Hannan, E. L. et al. Assessment of coronary artery bypass graft surgery performance in New York. Is there a bias against taking high-risk patients? Med. Care 35, 49-56 (1997).
70. Parsonnet, V., Dean, D. & Bernstein, A. D. A method of uniform stratification of risk for evaluating the results of surgery in acquired adult heart disease. Circulation 79, I3-I12 (1989).
71. Kowalik, M. M. & Lango, R. Genotype assessment as a tool for improved risk prediction in cardiac surgery. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 28, 163-168 (2014).
72. Nilsson, J. et al. Risk factor identification and mortality prediction in cardiac surgery using artificial neural networks. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 132, 12-19 (2006).
73. Shroyer, A. L. et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons: 30-day operative mortality and morbidity risk models. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 75, 1856-1864 (2003).
74. O'Connor, G. T. et al. A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. JAMA 275, 841-846 (1996).
75. Hannan, E. L. et al. The New York risk score for in-hospital and 30-day mortality for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 95, 46-52 (2013).
76. Nilsson, J., Algotsson, L., Höglund, P., Lührs, C. & Brandt, J. Comparison of 19 pre-operative risk stratification models in open-heart surgery. Eur. Heart J. 27, 867-874 (2006).
77. Adams, D. H. et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. N. Engl. J. Med. 370, 1790-1798 (2014).
78. Kolh, P. Importance of risk stratification models in cardiac surgery. Eur. Heart J. 27, 768-769 (2006).
79. Clark, R. E. Calculating risk and outcome: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 62 (Suppl.), S2-S5 (1996).
80. Harrell, F. E. Jr, Lee, K. L., Matchar, D. B. & Reichert, T. A. Regression models for prognostic prediction: advantages, problems, and suggested solutions. Cancer Treat. Rep. 69, 1071-1077 (1985).
81. Ranucci, M., Castelvecchio, S., Menicanti, L., Frigiola, A. & Pelissero, G. Risk of assessing mortality risk in elective cardiac operations: age, creatinine, ejection fraction, and the law of parsimony. Circulation 119, 3053-3061 (2009).
82. Block, P. C. et al. Identification of variables needed to risk adjust outcomes of coronary interventions : evidence-based guidelines for efficient data collection. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 17, 721-722 (1998).
83. Dupuis, J. Y. Predicting outcomes in cardiac surgery: risk stratification matters? Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 23, 560-567 (2008).
84. Ivanov, J., Tu, J. V. & Naylor, C. D. Ready-made, recalibrated, or remodeled? Issues in the use of risk indexes for assessing mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 99, 2098-2104 (1999).
85. Brown, M. L. et al. Is the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation model valid for estimating the operative risk of patients considered for percutaneous aortic valve replacement? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 136, 566-571 (2008).
86. Osnabrugge, R. L. et al. Performance of EuroSCORE II in a large US database: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 46, 400-408 (2014).
87. Dewey, T. M. et al. Reliability of risk algorithms in predicting early and late operative outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 135, 180-187 (2008).
88. Hickey, G. L. et al. Dynamic prediction modeling approaches for cardiac surgery. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 6, 649-658 (2013).
89. Siregar, S. et al. Performance of the original EuroSCORE. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 41, 746-754 (2012).
90. Leontyev, S. et al. Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: utility of risk stratification with EuroSCORE. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 87, 1440-1445 (2009).
91. Afilalo, J. et al. Addition of frailty and disability to cardiac surgery risk scores identifies elderly patients at high risk of mortality or major morbidity. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 5, 222-228 (2012).
92. Hartz, R. S., Rao, A. V, Plomondon, M. E., Grover, F. L. & Shroyer, A. L. W. Effects of race, with or without gender, on operative mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting: a study using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National database. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 71, 512-520 (2001).
93. Prabhakar, G. et al. The risks of moderate and extreme obesity for coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes: a study from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons' database. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 74, 1125-1130 (2002).
94. Hannan, E. L., Kumar, D., Racz, M., Siu, A. L. & Chassin, M. R. New York State's Cardiac Surgery Reporting System: four years later. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 58, 1852-1857 (1994).
95. Hannan, E. L., Kilburn, H., Racz, M., Shields, E. & Chassin, M. R. Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State. JAMA 271, 761-766 (1994).
96. Altman, L. K. Heart-surgery death rates decline in New York. [online], http://www.nytimes.com/1990/12/05/nyregion/heart-surgery-death-rates-decline-in-new-york.html (1990).
97. Hannan, E. L., Siu, A. L., Kumar, D., Kilburn, H. Jr. & Chassin, M. R. The decline in coronary artery bypass graft surgery mortality in New York State. The role of surgeon volume. JAMA 273, 209-213 (1995).
98. Peterson, E. D., DeLong, E. R., Jollis, J. G., Muhlbaier, L. H. & Mark, D. B. The effects of New York's bypass surgery provider profiling on access to care and patient outcomes in the elderly. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 32, 993-999 (1998).
99. Shahian, D. M. et al. Public reporting of cardiac surgery performance: part 1-history, rationale, consequences. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 92 (Suppl.), S2-S11 (2011).
100. Fung, C. H., Lim, Y. W., Mattke, S., Damberg, C. & Shekelle, P. G. Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care. Ann. Intern. Med. 148, 111-123 (2008).
101. Schneider, E. C. & Epstein, A. M. Influence of cardiac-surgery performance reports on referral practices and access to care: a survey of cardiovascular specialists. N. Engl. J. Med. 335, 251-256 (1996).
102. Guru, V., Naylor, C. D., Fremes, S. E., Teoh, K. & Tu, J. V. Publicly reported provider outcomes: the concerns of cardiac surgeons in a single-payer system. Can. J. Cardiol. 25, 33-38 (2009).
103. Burack, J. H., Impellizzeri, P., Homel, P. & Cunningham, J. N. Jr. Public reporting of surgical mortality: a survey of New York State cardiothoracic surgeons. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 68, 1195-1200 (1999).
104. Romano, P. S. et al. Impact of public reporting of coronary artery bypass graft surgery performance data on market share, mortality, and patient selection. Med. Care 49, 1118-1125 (2011).
105. Omoigui, N. A. et al. Outmigration for coronary bypass surgery in an era of public dissemination of clinical outcomes. Circulation 93, 27-33 (1996).
106. Li, Z. et al. Impact of public reporting on access to coronary artery bypass surgery: the California Outcomes Reporting Program. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 89, 1131-1138 (2010).
107. Hannan, E. L., Sarrazin, M. S., Doran, D. R. & Rosenthal, G. E. Provider profiling and quality improvement efforts in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the effect on short-term mortality among Medicare beneficiaries. Med. Care 41, 1164-1172 (2003).
108. Grover, F. L. et al. A decade's experience with quality improvement in cardiac surgery using the Veterans Affairs and Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Databases. Ann. Surg. 234, 464-474 (2001).
109. Guru, V. et al. Public versus private institutional performance reporting: what is mandatory for quality improvement? Am. Heart J. 152, 573-578 (2006).
110. Cribier, A. et al. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation 106, 3006-3008 (2002).
111. Cribier, A. et al. Early experience with percutaneous transcatheter implantation of heart valve prosthesis for the treatment of end-stage inoperable patients with calcific aortic stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 43, 698-703 (2004).
112. Leon, M. B. et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 1597-1607 (2010).
113. Smith, C. R. et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 2187-2198 (2011).
114. Kodali, S. K. et al. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 1686-1695 (2012).
115. Makkar, R. R. et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 1696-1704 (2012).
116. Moat, N. E. et al. Long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: the U.K. TAVI (United Kingdom Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) Registry. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 58, 2130-2138 (2011).
117. Gilard, M. et al. Registry of transcatheter aortic-valve implantation in high-risk patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 1705-1715 (2012).
118. Popma, J. J. et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a self-expanding bioprosthesis in patients with severe aortic stenosis at extreme risk for surgery. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 63, 1972-1981 (2014).
119. US National Library of Medicine. Clinicaltrials.gov [online], http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01586910 (2014).
120. US National Library of Medicine. Clinicaltrials.gov [online], http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01314313 (2014).
121. Iung, B. & Vahanian, A. Towards improved risk scores: the quest for the grail continues. Eur. Heart J. 34, 10-12 (2013).
122. Ye, J., Soon, J. L. & Webb, J. Aortic valve replacement vs. transcatheter aortic valve implantation: patient selection. Ann. Cadiothorac. Surg. 1, 194-199 (2012).
123. van Gameren, M. et al. Do we need separate risk stratification models for hospital mortality after heart valve surgery? Ann. Thorac. Surg. 85, 921-930 (2008).
124. Howell, N. J. et al. The new EuroSCORE II does not improve prediction of mortality in high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a collaborative analysis of two European centres. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 44, 1006-1011 (2013).
125. Piazza, N. et al. Relationship between the logistic EuroSCORE and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score in patients implanted with the CoreValve ReValving system-a Bern-Rotterdam Study. Am. Heart J. 159, 323-329 (2010).
126. Antman, K. et al. Selection bias in clinical trials. J. Clin. Oncol. 3, 1142-1147 (1985).
127. Peach, G., Griffin, M., , Jones, K. G., Thompson, M. M. & Hinchliffe, R. J. Diagnosis and management of peripheral arterial disease. BMJ 345, e5208 (2012).
128. Kumar, A. & Srivastava, U. Role of routine laboratory investigations in preoperative evaluation. J. Anaesthesiol. Clin. Pharmacol. 27, 174-179 (2011).
129. McCarney, R. et al. The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 7, 30 (2007).
130. Roethlisberger, F. J., Dickson, W. J., Wright, H. A. & Pforzheimer, C. H. Management and the Worker: an Account of a Research Program Conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works, Chicago (Harvard University Press, 1939).
131. Choi, E. K. et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography as a screening tool for the detection of occult coronary artery disease in asymptomatic individuals. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 52, 357-365 (2008).
132. Macaron, C. et al. Safety of cardiac surgery for patients with cirrhosis and Child-Pugh scores less than 8. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 10, 535-539 (2012).
133. Kempfert, J. et al. Transapical aortic valve implantation: therapy of choice for patients with aortic stenosis and porcelain aorta? Ann. Thorac. Surg. 90, 1457-1461 (2010).
134. Girardi, L. N., Krieger, K. H., Mack, C. A. & Isom, O. W. No-clamp technique for valve repair or replacement in patients with a porcelain aorta. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 80, 1688-1692 (2005).
135. van Mieghem, N. M. et al. The SURTAVI model: proposal for a pragmatic risk stratification for patients with severe aortic stenosis. EuroIntervention 8, 258-266 (2012).
136. Sündermann, S. et al. Comprehensive assessment of frailty for elderly high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 39, 33-37 (2011).
137. Sündermann, S. H. et al. Frailty is a predictor of short-and mid-term mortality after elective cardiac surgery independently of age. Interact.Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 18, 580-585 (2014).
138. Afilalo, J. et al. Gait speed as an incremental predictor of mortality and major morbidity in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 56, 1668-1676 (2010).
139. Fried, L. P. et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 56, M146-M156 (2001).
140. Ahmed, N., Mandel, R. & Fain, M. J. Frailty: an emerging geriatric syndrome. Am. J. Med. 120, 748-753 (2007).
141. Jain, R., Duval, S. & Adabag, S. How accurate is the eyeball test? A comparison of physician's subjective assessment versus statistical methods in estimating mortality risk after cardiac surgery. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 7, 151-156 (2014).
142. Gabrielle, F. et al. Is the Parsonnet's score a good predictive score of mortality in adult cardiac surgery: assessment by a French multicentre study. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 11, 406-414 (1997).
143. Grover, F. L., Shroyer, A. L. W. & Hammermeister, K. E. Calculating risk and outcome: the Veterans Affairs database. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 62, S6-S11 (1996).
144. Higgins, T. L. et al. Stratification of morbidity and mortality outcome by preoperative risk factors in coronary artery bypass patients. A clinical severity score. JAMA 267, 2344-2348 (1992).
145. Magovern, J. A. et al. A model that predicts morbidity and mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 28, 1147-1153 (1996).
146. O'Connor, G. T. et al. Multivariate prediction of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Circulation 85, 2110-2118 (1992).
147. Ambler, G. et al. Generic, simple risk stratification model for heart valve surgery. Circulation 112, 224-231 (2005).
148. Kötting, J. et al. German Aortic Valve Score: a new scoring system for prediction of mortality related to aortic valve procedures in adults. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 43, 971-977 (2013).
149. Capodanno, D. et al. A simple risk tool (the OBSERVANT score) for prediction of 30-day mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Am. J. Cardiol. 113, 1851-1858 (2014).