Performance of EuroSCORE II in a large US database: Implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation

European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 400-408

  Osnabrugge, Ruben L ^a   Speir, Alan M ^b   Head, Stuart J ^a   Fonner, Clifford E ^c   Fonner, Edwin ^d   Kappetein, A Pieter ^a   Rich, Jeffrey B ^e  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b INOVA HEART AND VASCULAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c ARMUS Corporation   (United States)

^d Virginia Cardiac Surgery Quality Initiative   (United States)

^e SENTARA HEART HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Aortic valve replacement; Coronary artery bypass grafting; Decision making; Risk prediction; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; DATA BASE; EUROSCORE II; FEMALE; HEART SURGERY; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; LOW RISK PATIENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL MORTALITY; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; UNITED STATES; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; AORTA VALVE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FACTUAL DATABASE; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGERY;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84907351810     PISSN: 10107940     EISSN: 1873734X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu033     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Nilsson J, Algotsson L, Hoglund P, Luhrs C, Brandt J. Comparison of 19 pre-operative risk stratification models in open-heart surgery. Eur Heart J 2006;27:867-74.
2. Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, Gauducheau E, Lemeshow S, Salamon R. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16:9-13.
3. Roques F, Michel P, Goldstone AR, Nashef SA. The logistic EuroSCORE. Eur Heart J 2003;24:881-2.
4. Dewey TM, Brown D, Ryan WH, Herbert MA, Prince SL, Mack MJ. Reliability of risk algorithms in predicting early and late operative outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:180-7.
5. Siregar S, Groenwold RH, de Heer F, Bots ML, van der Graaf Y, van Herwerden LA. Performance of the original EuroSCORE. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012;41:746-54.
6. Nashef SA, Roques F, Sharples LD, Nilsson J, Smith C, Goldstone AR et al. EuroSCORE II. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012;41:734-44; discussion 44-5.
7. Barili F, Pacini D, Capo A, Ardemagni E, Pellicciari G, Zanobini M et al. Reliability of new scores in predicting perioperative mortality after isolated aortic valve surgery: a comparison with the society of thoracic surgeons score and logistic EuroSCORE. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;95:1539-44.
8. Barili F, Pacini D, Capo A, Rasovic O, Grossi C, Alamanni F et al. Does EuroSCORE II perform better than its original versions? A multicentre validation study. Eur Heart J 2013;34:22-9.
9. Biancari F, Vasques F, Mikkola R, Martin M, Lahtinen J, Heikkinen J. Validation of EuroSCORE II in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;93:1930-5.
10. Chalmers J, Pullan M, Fabri B, McShane J, Shaw M, Mediratta N et al. Validation of EuroSCORE II in a modern cohort of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;43:688-94.
11. Grant SW, Hickey GL, Dimarakis I, Trivedi U, Bryan A, Treasure T et al. How does EuroSCORE II perform in UK cardiac surgery; an analysis of 23 740 patients from the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland National Database. Heart 2012;98:1568-72.
12. Kirmani BH, Mazhar K, Fabri BM, Pullan DM. Comparison of the EuroSCORE II and Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 risk tools. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;44:999-1005.
13. Howell NJ, Head SJ, Freemantle N, van der Meulen TA, Senanayake E, Menon A et al. The new EuroSCORE II does not improve prediction of mortality in high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a collaborative analysis of two European centres. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;44:1006-11.
14. Speir AM, Rich JB, Crosby I, Fonner E Jr. Regional collaboration as a model for fostering accountability and transforming health care. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;21:12-9.
15. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 1976;16:31-41.
16. Kind T, Faes TJ, Vonk-Noordegraaf A, Westerhof N. Proportional relations between systolic, diastolic and mean pulmonary artery pressure are explained by vascular properties. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 2011;2:15-23.
17. Hickey GL, Grant SW, Murphy GJ, Bhabra M, Pagano D, McAllister K et al. Dynamic trends in cardiac surgery: why the logistic EuroSCORE is no longer suitable for contemporary cardiac surgery and implications for future risk models. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;43:1146-52.
18. Hickey GL, Grant SW, Bridgewater B. Validation of the EuroSCORE II: should we be concerned with retrospective performance? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;43:655.
19. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983;148:839-43.
20. Friedman JH. A Variable Span Smoother. Technical Report LCS 5, Stanford University, Statistics Department, Stanford, CA, 1984.
21. Shahian DM, O'Brien SM, Filardo G, Ferraris VA, Haan CK, Rich JB et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1- coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:S2-22.
22. Rosenhek R, Iung B, Tornos P, Antunes MJ, Prendergast BD, Otto CM et al. ESC Working Group on Valvular Heart Disease Position Paper: assessing the risk of interventions in patients with valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2012;33:822-8. 28a, 28b.
23. Osnabrugge RL, Head SJ, Bogers AJ, Kappetein P. Patient selection for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: what does the future hold? Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2012;10:679-81.
24. Osswald BR, Gegouskov V, Badowski-Zyla D, Tochtermann U, Thomas G, Hagl S et al. Overestimation of aortic valve replacement risk by EuroSCORE: implications for percutaneous valve replacement. Eur Heart J 2009;30:74-80.
25. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2187-98.