Use and evaluation of FCM as a tool for long term socio ecological research

Intelligent Systems Reference Library

Volumn 54, Issue , 2014, Pages 221-236

  Wildenberg, Martin ^a   Bachhofer, Michael ^b   Isak, KirstenG Q ^c   Skov, Flemming ^d  

^a Umweltforschungsinstitut GLOBAL 2000 ^*  (Austria)

^b FCMappersnet   (Japan)

^c NIRAS A S   (Denmark)

^d AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927560552     PISSN: 18684394     EISSN: 18684408     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39739-4_13     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Cooke, B., Kothari, U., (eds).: Participation. The new tyranny? Zed Books, London (2001).
2. Epstein, J. M.: Why Model?. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 11(4), 12 (2008) http://jasss. soc. surrey. ac. uk/11/4/12. html.
3. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Weisz, H.: Society as hybrid between material and symbolic realms. toward a theoretical framework of society-nature interaction. Advances Hum. Ecol. 8, p215-251 (1999).
4. Franklin, J. F.: Preserving biodiversity: species, ecosystems, or landscapes? Ecol. Appl. 3(2), 202-205 (1993).
5. Furman, E., Taru P., Riku V., (eds).: Interdisciplinary research framework for identifying research needs. Case: bioenergy-biodiversity interlinkages. The Finish Environment 17| 2009. The Finish Environment Institute, Helsinki (2009).
6. Gaube, V., Kaiser, C., Wildenberg, M., Adensam, H., Fleissner, P., Kobler, J., Lutz, J., Schaumberger, A., Schaumberger, J., Smetschka, B., Wolf, A., Richter, A., Haberl, H., Combining agent-based and stock-flow modelling approaches in a participative analysis of the integrated land system in Reichraming, Landscape Ecology, Austria. (2009a).
7. Gaube, V., Wildenberg, M., Vadineanu, A., Diaz, R., Peterseil, J., Haberl, H., An integrated modelling approach to integrate socioeconomic dynamics with ecosystem processes and biodiversity in Long-Term Socio-Ecological Research (LTSER). Alter-Net final report (2009b).
8. Haberl, H., Gaube, V., Díaz-Delgado, R., Krauze, K., Neuner, A., Peterseil, J., Singh, S. J., Vadineanu, A.: Towards an integrated model of socioeconomic biodiversity drivers, pressuresand impacts. A feasibility study based on three european long-term socio-ecological research platforms. Ecol. Econ. (2009) (In Press).
9. Hansen-Møller, J.: Natursyns model: a conceptual framework and method for analysing and comparing views of nature. Landsc. Urban Plan. 89, 65-74 (2009).
10. Hossain, M. S., Chowdhury, S. R., Das, N. G., Sharifuzzaman, S. M., Sultana, A.: Integration of GIS and multicriteria decision analysis for urban aquaculture development in Bangladesh. Landsc. Urban Plan. (2009) doi: 10. 1016/j. landurbplan. 2008. 10. 020.
11. Isak, K. G. Q.: Investigating fuzzy cognitive mapping as a participatory tool for conceptual landscape modelling. MSc Thesis in Landscape Management. Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen. http://www. dmu. dk/NR/rdonlyres/EDC835B7-45B4-40A1-91B4-AF2EA5ADA682/70637/Speciale_Kirsten_Isak_2008. pdf(2008). Accessed 06 Feb 2009.
12. Isak, K. G. Q., Wildenberg, M., Adamescu, C. M., Skov, F., De Blust, G.: Manual for applying Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping-experiences from ALTER-Net. Internal working paper. A Long-Term Biodiversity, Ecosystem and Awareness Research Network. (2009) Further information and contacts available through the internet: .
13. Kaner, S., Lind, L., Toldi, C., Fisk, S., Berger, D.: Facilitator's guide to participatory decisionmaking. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island (1996).
14. Kontogianni, A., Papageorgiou, E., Salomatina, L., Skourtos, M., Zanou, B.: Risks for the black sea marine environment as perceived by ukrainian stakeholders: a fuzzy cognitive mapping application. Ocean Coast. Manag. J. Elsevier. (2012a) doi: 10. 1016/j. ocecoaman. 2012. 03. 006 (IF=1. 661).
15. Kontogianni, A., Papageorgiou, E. I. Tourkolias, C.: How do you perceive environmental change? fuzzy cognitive mapping informing stakeholder analysis for environmental policy making and non-market valuation in Appl. Soft Comput. (2012b) doi: 10. 1016/j. asoc. 2012. 05. 003 (in press, IF=2. 64).
16. Kvale, S., Brinkmann, S.: Inter Views: Learning The Craft Of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage Publications Ltd, London (2008).
17. Hassan, R., Scholes, R., Ash, N (eds.): Ecosystems and HumanWell-being: Current State and Trends, Vol. 1, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island press, Washington (2004) http://www. millenniumassessment. org/en/Condition. aspx.
18. Müller, F., Baessler, C., Schubert, H., Klotz, S. (eds.): Long-Term Ecological Research: Theory and Application. Springer, Berlin (2010).
19. Nordberg-Schultz, C.: Genius Loci. Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. Academy Edition, London, (1980) (SBN: 85670 700 7).
20. Özesmi, U., Özesmi, S.: A participatory approach to ecosystem conservation: Fuzzy cognitive maps and stakeholder group analysis in Uluabat Lake. Turkey. Environ. Manag. 31(4), 518-531 (2003).
21. Özesmi, U., Özesmi, S. L.: Ecological models based on people's knowledge: a multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach. Ecol. Model. 176(1-2), 43-64 (2004).
22. Papageorgiou E. I., Kontogianni, A.: Using fuzzy cognitive mapping in environmental decisionmaking andmanagement: amethodological primer and an application, In book: Environmental Change, InTech, open access publisher, (2012) http://www. intechopen. com/articles/show/title/using-fuzzy-cognitive-mapping-in-environmental-decision-making-and-managementa-methodological-prime.
23. Papageorgiou E. I., Salmeron, J. L.: A review of fuzzy cognitive map research at the last decade, in IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. (IEEE TFS), 211 (2013) (in press).
24. Reckien, D., Wildenberg, M., Bachhofer, M. l., Subjective realities of climate change: how mental maps of impacts deliver socially sensible adaptation options. Sustainability Science April 2013, 8(2), 159-172 (2013).
25. Redman, C. L., Grove, J. M., Kuby, L. H.: Integrating social science into the long-termecological-research (LTER) network: Social dimension of ecological change and ecological dimension of social change. Ecosyst. 7, 161-171 (2004).
26. Stephenson, J.: The cultural valuemodel: an integrated approach to value in landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 84, 127-139 (2008).
27. Sterman, J. D.: All models are wrong: reflections on becoming a systems scientist. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 18(4), 501-531 (2002).
28. Wallington, T. J., Hobbs, R. J., Moore, S. A.: Implications of current ecological thinking forbiodiversity conservation: a review of the salient issues. Ecol. Soc. 10(1), 15 (2005). http://www. ecologyandsociety. org/vol10/iss1/art15/.
29. Westley, F., Carpenter, S. R., Brock, W. A., Holling, C. S., Gunderson L. H.: Why systems ofpeople and nature are not just social and ecological systems. In Gunderson L. H., C. S. Holling (Eds.) Panarchy: Understanding Transformation in Human and Natural Systems. Island Press, Washington (2002).
30. Wildenberg, M.: Die Modellierung sozial-ökologischer Systeme im Kontext der Nachhaltigkeitsforschung. Universität Klagenfurt, Dissertation (2012).