Natursyns model: A conceptual framework and method for analysing and comparing views of nature

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 89, Issue 3-4, 2009, Pages 65-74

  Hansen Møller, Jette ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Ecosemiotics; Environment; Landscape concepts; Qualitative investigation; Umwelt

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; ECOLOGY;

ECOSEMIOTICS; ENVIRONMENT; LANDSCAPE CONCEPTS; QUALITATIVE INVESTIGATION; UMWELT;

PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; HUMAN BEHAVIOR; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; PERCEPTION; STAKEHOLDER; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 58149462030     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Bains P. Umwelten. Semiótica 134 1/4 (2001) 137-168
2. Bruun J. Nature, National Identity and Engagement in Environmental Problems (2000), Danmarks Pædagogiske Institut, København (in Danish)
3. Buchecker M., Hunziker M., and Kienast F. Participatory landscape development: overcoming social barriers to public involvement. Landscape Urban Plan. 64 15 June (1-2) (2003) 29-46
4. Buijs A.E., Pedroli B., and Luginbühl Y. From hiking through farmland to farming in a leisure landscape: changing social perceptions of the European landscape. Landscape Ecol. 21 April (3) (2006) 375-389
5. Callicott J.B., Crowder L.B., and Mumford K. Current normative concepts in conservation. Conserv. Biol. 13 February (1) (1999) 22-35
6. Castree N. Marxism, capitalism, and the productions of nature. In: Castree N., and Braun B. (Eds). Social Nature: Theory, Practice, and Politics (2001), Blackwell, Malden, MA, USA 189-207
7. Corner J. The agency of mapping: speculation, critique and invention. In: Cosgrove D. (Ed). Mappings (1999), Reaction, London 213-253
8. Cronon W. Introduction: in search of nature. In: Cronon W. (Ed). Uncommon Ground. Toward Reinventing Nature. Rethingking the Human Place in Nature (1995), Northon & Company, New York 23-56
9. Deely J. Semiotics and Jakob von Uexküll's concept Umwelt. Sign Syst. Stud. 32 1-2 (2004) 11-34
10. Deleuze G., and Guattari F. What is Philosophy? (1996), Gyldendal, København, Denmark (in Danish)
11. Dinesen A.M. C.S. Peirce. Phenomenology, Semiotics and Logic (1991), Nordisk Sommeruniversitet, Århus, Denmark (in Danish)
12. Dinesen A.M. Fundamental Semiotics (1994), Akademisk, København, Denmark (in Danish)
13. Dinesen A.M. Nature semiotics according to Peirce (in Danish). In: Dinesen A.M., and Thellefsen T.L. (Eds). Semiotic investigations (2004), Hans Reitzels, København, Denmark (in Danish)
14. Emmeche C. Bioinvasion, globalization, and the contingency of cultural and biological diversity: some ecosemiotic observations. Sign Syst. Stud. 29 1 (2001) 237-262
15. Farina A. Principles and Methods in Landscape Ecology. Towards a Science of Landscape (2006), Springer, The Netherlands
16. Farina A., Bogaert J., and Schipani I. Cognitive landscape and information: new perspectives to investigate the ecological complexity. BioSystems 79 January-March (1-3) (2005) 235-240
17. Farnum, J., Hall, T., Kruger, L., 2005. Sense of Place in Natural Resource Recreation and Tourism: An Evaluation and Assessment of Research Findings. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-660, US. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
18. Gorlée D.L. Semiotics and the Problem of Translation. With Special Reference to the Semiotics of Charles S. Peirce (1994), Rodopi, Amsterdam/Atlanta
19. Hansen, J.S., 1989. Views of Nature and Planning. SBI-Byplanlægning 58, Statens Byggeforskningsinstitut, Hørsholm, Denmark (in Danish).
20. Hornborg A. Vital signs: an ecosemiotic perspective on the human ecology of Amazonia. Sign Syst. Stud. 29 1 (2001) 121-150
21. Højring, K., Caspersen, O.H., 1999. Agriculture and Landscape Aesthetics. The Development of Agriculture 1950-1996 and its Consequences for the Potentials of Experiences in Landscape. Park og Landskabsserien 25-1999. Forskningscentret for Skov & Landskab, Hørsholm, Denmark (in Danish).
22. Kaae, B.C., Madsen, L.M., 2003. Attitudes and Wishes to Danish Nature. By-og Landskabsserien 21-2003. Forskningscentret for Skov & Landskab, Hørsholm, Denmark (in Danish).
23. Keulartz J.V.d., Windt H., and Swart J. Concepts of nature as communicative device: the case of Dutch Nature Policy. Environ. Value February (13) (2004) 81-99
24. Kitchin R. Cognitive maps: what are they and why study them?. J. Environ. Psychol. 1-4 (1994) 1-19
25. Kull K. Semiotic ecology: different natures in the semiosphere. Sign Syst. Stud. 26 (1998) 344-371
26. Kull K. On semiosis, Umwelt, and Semiosphere. Semiótica 120 3/4 (1998) 299-310
27. Kvale S. Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing (1996), Sage, London
28. Kyle G., Graefe A., Manning R., and Bacon J. An examination of the relationship between leisure activity and place attachment among hikers along the Appalachian Trail. J. Leisure Res. 35 3 (2003) 249-273
29. Nordberg-Schulz C. Genius Loci. Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture (1980), Rizzoli, Academy Edition, New York, London
30. Nöth W. Ecosemiotics. Sign Syst. Stud. 26 (1998) 332-343
31. Nöth W. Semiotic Dictionary. 2nd ed. (2000), J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart, Germany (in German)
32. Nöth W. Protosemiotics and physicosemiosis. Sign Syst. Stud. 29 1 (2001) 13-26
33. Nöth W. Ecosemiotics and the semiotics of nature. Sign Syst. Stud. 29 1 (2001) 71-81
34. Oelschlaeger M. Ecosemiotics and the sustainability tradition. Sign Syst. Stud. 29 1 (2001) 219-236
35. Olwig K.R. Landscape, Nature, and the Body Politic. From Britain's Renaissance to America's New World (2002), The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, USA
36. Oustrup, L., 2007. [Danes views on forest in general and in forest legislation]. Forest & Landscape Research, 38-2007. Danish Centre for Forest, Landscape and Planning, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, (in Danish).
37. Palang H., Printsmann A., Gyuró E., Urbanc M., Skowronek E., and Woloszyn W. The forgotten rural landscapes of Central Eastern Europe. Landscape Ecol. 21 April (3) (2006) 347-357
38. Palek B. The map: its sign and their relations. Semiótica 59 1-2 (1986) 13-33
39. Peirce C.S. In: Buchler J. (Ed). Philosophical Writings of Peirce (1955), Dover, New York
40. Peirce, C.S., 1994. Collected Papers 1931-1958, vols. I-VI, Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P. (Eds.); vols. VII-VIII, Burks, A.W. (Ed.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. [Quoted as: CP].
41. Pinto-Correia T., Gustavsson R., and Pirnat J. Bridging the gap between centrally defined policies and local decisions-towards more sensitive and creative rural landscape management. Landscape Ecol. 21 April (3) (2006) 333-346
42. Ploeg J.D.v.d. Styles of farming: an introductory note on concepts and methodology. In: Ploeg J.D.v.d., and Long A. (Eds). Born From Within-Practice and Perspectives of Endogenous Rural Development (1994), Van Gorcum, Assen, The Netherlands 7-31
43. Rolston III H. Value in nature and the nature of value. In: Light A., and Rolston III H. (Eds). Environmental Ethics. An Anthology (2002), Blackwell, Malden, MA 143-153
44. Santaella L. "Matter as effete mind": Peirce's synechistic ideas on the semiotic threshold. Sign Syst. Stud. 29 1 (2001) 49-62
45. Schlictmann H. Characteristic traits of the semiotic system "Map Symbolism". Cartogr. J. 22 1 (1985) 23-30
46. In: Seale C., Gobo G., Gubrium J.F., and Silverman D. (Eds). Qualitative Research Practice (2004), Sage, London
47. Sebeok T.A. Biosemiotics: its roots, proliferation, and prospects. Semiótica 134 1/4 (2001) 61-78
48. Simmons I.G. Interpreting Nature. Cultural Constructions of the Environment (1996), Routledge, London
49. Soper K. What is Nature: Culture Politics and the Non-human. 2nd ed. (1998), Blackwell, Oxford, UK
50. Spirn A.W. The authority of nature: conflict, confusion and renewal in landscape architecture and ecology. In: Hill K., and Johnson B.R. (Eds). Ecology and Design: Frameworks for Learning (2001), Island Press, Washington, DC, USA 29-50
51. Stenmark M. Anthropocentric environmental ethics. In: Stenmark M. (Ed). Environmental Ethics and Policy Making (2002), Uppsala University, Sweden 103-139
52. Stjernfelt F. A natural symphony? To what extent is Uexküll's Bedeutungslehre actual for the semiotics of our time?. Semiótica 134 1/4 (2001) 79-103
53. Tress B., Tress G., Déchamo H., and d'Hauteserre A.M. Bridging human and natural sciences in landscape research. Landscape Urban Plan. 57 December (3-4) (2001) 137-141
54. Tuan Y.-F. Space and Place. The Perspective of Experience (1977), University of Minnesota Press, USA
55. Tuan Y.-F. Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes and Values (1990), Columbia University Press, USA
56. Uexküll J.v. The theory of meaning. Semiótica 42 1 (1982) 25-82
57. Uexküll J.v. An introduction to Umwelt. Semiótica 134 1/4 (2001) 107-110
58. van Koppen K.C.S.A. Resource, Arcadia, Lifeworld. Nature concepts in environmental sociology. Sociol Ruralis 40 July (3) (2000) 300-318
59. Weber A. Cognition as expression: on the autopoietic foundations of an aesthetic theory of nature. Sign Syst. Stud. 29 1 (2001) 153-168
60. Webster. The Webster's New Encyclopaedic Dictionary of English Language. 2nd ed. (1977), The Publishers Guild, New York
61. Whatmore S. Farm household strategies and styles of farming: assessing the utility of farm typologies. In: Ploeg J.D.v.d., and Long A. (Eds). Born From Within-Practice and Perspectives of Endogenous Rural Development (1994), Van Gorcum, Assen, The Netherlands 187-282
62. Williams D.R., and Vaske J.J. The measurement of place attachment: validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Sci. 49 6 (2003) 830-840