Comparative effectiveness of robotically assisted compared with laparoscopic adnexal surgery for benign gynecologic disease

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 124, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 886-896

  Wright, Jason D ^a,b   Kostolias, Alessandra ^a   Ananth, Cande V ^a   Burke, William M ^a   Tergas, Ana I ^a   Prendergast, Eri ^a   Ramsey, Scott D ^a   Neugut, Alfred I ^a   Hershman, Dawn L ^a  

^a College of Physicians ^*  (United States)

^b New York Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADNEXA SURGERY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BACTEREMIA; BLADDER INJURY; BLOOD VESSEL INJURY; CARDIOPULMONARY ARREST; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CYSTECTOMY; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC DISEASE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; ILEUS; INTESTINE INJURY; INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; KIDNEY FAILURE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; OVARIECTOMY; OVARY CYST; OVARY INFLAMMATION; OVARY TORSION; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; RESPIRATORY FAILURE; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; SALPINGITIS; SEPSIS; SHOCK; URETER INJURY; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; WOUND COMPLICATION; ADOLESCENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; FACTUAL DATABASE; GENITAL DISEASES, FEMALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROBOTICS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; GENITAL DISEASES, FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); OVARIECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROBOTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84927547542     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000483     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Hu JC, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, Barry MJ, D'Amico AV, Weinberg AC, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy. JAMA 2009;302:1557-64.
2. Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, Burke WM, Lu YS, Neugut AI, et al. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA 2013;309:689-98.
3. Wright JD, Burke WM, Wilde ET, Lewin SN, Charles AS, Kim JH, et al. Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:783-91.
4. Yu HY, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Kowalczyk KJ, Hu JC. Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. J Urol 2012;187:1392-8.
5. Breitenstein S, Nocito A, Puhan M, Held U, Weber M, Clavien PA. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study. Ann Surg 2008;247:987-93.
6. Sarlos D, Kots LA. Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: a review of recent comparative studies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2011;23:283-8.
7. Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs-the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med 2010;363:701-4.
8. Wright JD, Neugut AI, Wilde ET, Buono DL, Tsai WY, Hershman DL. Use and benefits of laparoscopic hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer among Medicare beneficiaries. J Oncol Pract 2012;8:e89-99.
9. Gal D, Lind L, Lovecchio JL, Kohn N. Comparative study of laparoscopy vs. laparotomy for adnexal surgery: efficacy, safety, and cyst rupture. J Gynecol Surg 1995;11:153-8.
10. Medeiros LR, Stein AT, Fachel J, Garry R, Furness S. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008;18:387-99.
11. Pittaway DE, Takacs P, Bauguess P. Laparoscopic adnexectomy: a comparison with laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:385-9.
12. Vilos GA, Alshimmiri MM. Cost-benefit analysis of laparoscopic versus laparotomy salpingo-oophorectomy for benign tubo-ovarian disease. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1995;2:299-303.
13. Lindenauer PK, Pekow PS, Lahti MC, Lee Y, Benjamin EM, Rothberg MB. Association of corticosteroid dose and route of administration with risk of treatment failure in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. JAMA 2010;303:2359-67.
14. Van Walraven C, Austin PC, Jennings A, Quan H, Forster AJ. A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data. Med Care 2009;47:626-33.
15. Stukenborg GJ, Kilbridge KL, Wagner DP, Harrell FE Jr, Oliver MN, Lyman JA, et al. Present-at-admission diagnoses improve mortality risk adjustment and allow more accurate assessment of the relationship between volume of lung cancer operations and mortality risk. Surgery 2005;138:498-507.
16. Rothberg MB, Pekow PS, Lahti M, Brody O, Skiest DJ, Lindenauer PK. Antibiotic therapy and treatment failure in patients hospitalized for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. JAMA 2010;303:2035-42.
17. U. S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index. 2011. Available at: www.bls.gov/cpi/. Retrieved September 1, 2011.
18. Kollef MH, Hamilton CW, Ernst FR. Economic impact of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a large matched cohort. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:250-6.
19. Hemmila MR, Birkmeyer NJ, Arbabi S, Osborne NH, Wahl WL, Dimick JB. Introduction to propensity scores: a case study on the comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Arch Surg 2010;145:939-45.
20. Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 2011;46:399-424.
21. Koenker R. Quantile regression. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 2005.
22. AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide. AAGL position statement: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in benign gynecology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013;20:2-9.
23. Carvalho L, Abrão MS, Deshpande A, Falcone T. Robotics as a new surgical minimally invasive approach to treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review. Int J Med Robot 2012;8:160-5.
24. Magrina JF, Espada M, Munoz R, Noble BN, Kho RM. Robotic adnexectomy compared with laparoscopy for adnexal mass. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:581-4.
25. Nezhat C, Lewis M, Kotikela S, Veeraswamy A, Saadat L, Hajhosseini B, et al. Robotic versus standard laparoscopy for the treatment of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2010;94:2758-60.
26. Schiavone MB, Kuo EC, Naumann RW, Burke WM, Lewin SN, Neugut AI, et al. The commercialization of robotic surgery: unsubstantiated marketing of gynecologic surgery by hospitals. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207:174.e1-7.
27. Ayloo S, Roh Y, Choudhury N. Robotic cholecystectomy: training of residents in use of the robotic platform. Int J Med Robot 2014;10:88-92.
28. Cutler DM, Ghosh K. The potential for cost savings through bundled episode payments. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1075-7.
29. Pearson SD, Bach PB. How Medicare could use comparative effectiveness research in deciding on new coverage and reimbursement. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:1796-804.