Robotic cholecystectomy: Training of residents in use of the robotic platform

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 88-92

  Ayloo, Subhashini ^a   Roh, Younghoon ^b   Choudhury, Nabajit ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b Dong A University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Resident training; Robotic cholecystectomy; Surgical education

Indexed keywords

BASIC PROCEDURE; MEAN AGES; RESIDENT TRAINING; ROBOTIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; ROBOTIC PLATFORMS; ROBOTIC SURGICAL SYSTEMS; ROBOTIC TECHNOLOGIES; SURGICAL EDUCATION; TERTIARY CENTERS; TRAINING PROGRAM;

ROBOTIC SURGERY;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TRAINING; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; WEIGHT;

RESIDENT TRAINING; ROBOTIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; SURGICAL EDUCATION;

ADULT; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE;

EID: 84895815013     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1525     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Jacobs LK, Shayani V, Sackier JM. Determination of the learning curve of the AESOP robot. Surg Endosc 1997; 11(1): 54-55.
2. Huffmanm LC, Pandalai PK, Boulton BJ, et al. Robotic Heller myotomy: a safe operation with higher postoperative quality-of-life indices. Surgery 2007; 142(4): 613-618; discussion 8-20.
3. Melvin WS, Dundon JM, Talamini M, Horgan S. Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery minimizes esophageal perforation during Heller myotomy. Surgery 2005; 138(4): 553-558; discussion 8-9.
4. Abboudi H, Khan MS, Aboumarzouk O, et al. Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators - a systematic review. BJU Int 2012; 111(2): 194-205.
5. Lallas CD, Davis JW, Members of the Society of Urologic Robotic Surgeons. Robotic surgery training with commercially available simulation systems in 2011: a current review and practice pattern survey from the society of urologic robotic surgeons. J Endourol 2012; 26(3): 283-293.
6. Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Kerbl DC, et al. Validation study of a virtual reality robotic simulator - role as an assessment tool? J Urol 2012; 187(3): 998-1002.
7. Selber JC, Baumann DP, Holsinger FC. Robotic latissimus dorsi muscle harvest: a case series. Plastic Reconstruct Surg 2012; 129(6): 1305-1312.
8. Bonatti J, Wehman B, de Biasi AR, et al. Totally endoscopic quadruple coronary artery bypass grafting is feasible using robotic technology. Annals Thoracic Surg 2012; 93(5): e111-2.
9. Boggi U, Signori S, Vistoli F, et al. Laparoscopic robot-assisted pancreas transplantation: first world experience. Transplantation 2012; 93(2): 201-206.
10. Boggi U, Signori S, Vistoli F, et al. Current perspectives on laparoscopic robot-assisted pancreas and pancreas-kidney transplantation. Rev Diabetic Studies: RDS 2011; 8(1): 28-34.
11. Mehrabi A, Yetimoglu CL, Nickkholgh A, et al. Development and evaluation of a training module for the clinical introduction of the da Vinci robotic system in visceral and vascular surgery. Surg Endosc 2006; 20(9): 1376-1382.
12. Moles JJ, Connelly PE, Sarti EE, Baredes S. Establishing a training program for residents in robotic surgery. Laryngoscope 2009; 119(10): 1927-1931.
13. De Ugarte DA, Etzioni DA, Gracia C, Atkinson JB. Robotic surgery and resident training. Surg Endosc 2003; 17(6): 960-963.
14. Stefanidis D, Wang F, Korndorffer JR, Jr, et al. Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload. Surg Endosc 2010; 24(2): 377-382.
15. Gigot J, Etienne J, Aerts R, et al. The dramatic reality of biliary tract injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. An anonymous multicenter Belgian survey of 65 patients. Surg Endosc 1997; 11(12): 1171-1178.
16. Regoly-Merei J, Ihasz M, Szeberin Z, et al. Biliary tract complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A multicenter study of 148 biliary tract injuries in 26, 440 operations. Surg Endosc 1998; 12(4): 294-300.
17. Ihasz M, Regoly-Merei J, Szeberin Z, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy causing injury to biliary tracts. Analysis of the results of 26, 440 operations in Hungary. Orvosi hetilap 1996; 137(18): 955-963.
18. Breitenstein S, Nocito A, Puhan M, et al. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study. Ann Surg 2008; 247(6): 987-993.
19. Vidovszky TJ, Smith W, Ghosh J, Ali MR. Robotic cholecystectomy: learning curve, advantages, and limitations. J Surg Res 2006; 136(2): 172-178.
20. Jayaraman S, Davies W, Schlachta CM. Getting started with robotics in general surgery with cholecystectomy: the Canadian experience. Canadian J Surg 2009; 52(5): 374-378.
21. Talamini MA, Chapman S, Horgan S, Melvin WS. A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 2003; 17(10): 1521-1524.
22. Ruurda JP, Broeders IA, Simmermacher RP, et al. Feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: an evaluation of 35 robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Laparosc, Endosc Percutan Techn 2002; 12(1): 41-45.
23. Yi F, Jin WS, Xiang DB, et al. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and its prevention: a review and experience of 400 cases. Hepato-Gastroenterol 2012; 59(113): 47-50.
24. Hamad MA, Nada AA, Abdel-Atty MY, Kawashti AS. Major biliary complications in 2, 714 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative cholangiography: a multicenter retrospective study. Surg Endosc 2011; 25(12): 3747-3751.
25. Pesce A, Portale TR, Minutolo V, et al. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative cholangiography: a retrospective study on 1, 100 selected patients. Digestive Surg 2012; 29(4): 310-314.