A prospective randomized peri- and post-operative comparison of the minimally invasive anterolateral approach versus the lateral approach

Orthopedic Reviews

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 87-92

  Landgraeber, Stefan ^a   Quitmann, Henning ^a   Güth, Sebastian ^a   Haversath, Marcel ^a   Kowalczyk, Wojciech ^a   Kecskeméthy, Andrés ^a   Heep, Hansjörg ^a   Jäger, Marcus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Hip approach; Hip arthroplasty; Minimally invasive

Indexed keywords

IBUPROFEN;

AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD VOLUME; BODY MASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; NOCICEPTION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PHYSIOTHERAPY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS; X RAY FILM;

EID: 84927531041     PISSN: 20358237     EISSN: 20358164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4081/or.2013.e19     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bertin KC, Rottinger H. Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004:248-55.
2. Dorr LD, Maheshwari AV, Long WT, et al. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1153-60.
3. Gravius S, Wirtz DC, Maus U, et al. [Minimally invasive approaches to the hip joint for total hip arthroplasty: state of the art within the scope of the OrthoMIT project for the development of an integrated platform for smart interventional orthopaedic surgery and traumatology]. Z Orthop Unfall 2007;145:608-14. [Article in German].
4. Mow CS, Woolson ST, Ngarmukos SG, et al. Comparison of scars from total hip replacements done with a standard or a mini-incision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 441:80-5.
5. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, et al. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86A:1353-8.
6. Watson-Jones R. The classic: Fractures and Joint Injuries by Sir Reginald Watson-Jones, taken from Fractures and Joint Injuries, by R. Watson-Jones, Vol. II, 4th ed., Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins Company, 1955. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1974:4-10.
7. Martin R, Clayson PE, Troussel S, et al. Anterolateral minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study with a follow-up of 1 year. J Arthroplasty 2011;26:1362-72.
8. Wohlrab D, Droege JW, Mendel T, et al. [Minimally invasive vs. transgluteal total hip replacement. A 3-month follow-up of a prospective randomized clinical study]. Orthopade. 2008;37:1121-6. [Article in German].
9. D'Arrigo C, Speranza A, Monaco E, et al. Learning curve in tissue sparing total hip replacement: comparison between different approaches. J Orthop Traumatol 2009; 10:47-54.
10. Leuchte S, Luchs A, Wohlrab D. [Measurement of ground reaction forces after total hip arthroplasty using different surgical approaches]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2007;145:74-80.
11. Thomine JM, Duparc F, Dujardin F, Biga N. [Transgluteal approach to the hip by anterior hemimyotomy of the gluteus medius]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1999;85:520-5. [Article in German].
12. Gordon DB, Stevenson KK, Griffie J, et al. Opioid equianalgesic calculations. J Palliat Med 1999;2:209-18.
13. Tannast M, Zheng G, Anderegg C, et al. Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;438:182-90.
14. Widmer KH. A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:387-90.
15. McLaren RH. Prosthetic hip angulation. Radiology 1973;107:705-6.
16. Barrack RL, Mulroy RD Jr., Harris WH. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992;74:385-9.
17. Mulroy WF, Estok DM, Harris WH. Total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called secondgeneration cementing techniques. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1845-52.
18. Charnley J. Total hip replacement by lowfriction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1970;72:7-21.
19. Coventry MB. Late dislocations in patients with Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67:832-41.
20. D'Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, et al. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82:315-21.
21. Harris WH. Advances in surgical technique for total hip replacement: without and with osteotomy of the greater trochanter. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980:188-204.
22. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60:217-20.
23. Seki M, Yuasa N, Ohkuni K. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation. J Orthop Res 1998;16:513-7.
24. Smith TO, Blake V, Hing CB. Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. Int Orthop 2011;35:173-84.
25. Bergin PF, Doppelt JD, Kephart CJ, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:1392-8.
26. Inaba Y, Kobayashi N, Yukizawa Y, et al. Little clinical advantage of modified watson-jones approach over modified miniincision direct lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011;26:1117-22.
27. Cheng T, Feng JG, Liu T, Zhang XL. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Int Orthop 2009;33:1473-81.
28. Szendroi M, Sztrinkai G, Vass R, Kiss J. The impact of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty on the standard procedure. Int Orthop 2006;30:167-71.