-
1
-
-
84879551332
-
Current Use and Surgical Efficacy of Laparoscopic Colectomy in Colon Cancer
-
Sticca RP, Alberts SR, Mahoney MR, et al. Current Use and Surgical Efficacy of Laparoscopic Colectomy in Colon Cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(1):56-62.
-
(2013)
J Am Coll Surg
, vol.217
, Issue.1
, pp. 56-62
-
-
Sticca, R.P.1
Alberts, S.R.2
Mahoney, M.R.3
-
2
-
-
84861573375
-
Adoption of Laparoscopy for Elective Colorectal Resection: A Report from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program
-
Kwon S, Billingham R, Farrokhi E, et al. Adoption of Laparoscopy for Elective Colorectal Resection: A Report from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(6):909-918.
-
(2012)
J Am Coll Surg
, vol.214
, Issue.6
, pp. 909-918
-
-
Kwon, S.1
Billingham, R.2
Farrokhi, E.3
-
3
-
-
84865596215
-
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A better look into the latest trends
-
Kang CY, Halabi WJ, Luo R, Pigazzi A, Nguyen NT, Stamos MJ. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A better look into the latest trends. Arch Surg. 2012;147(8):724-731.
-
(2012)
Arch Surg
, vol.147
, Issue.8
, pp. 724-731
-
-
Kang, C.Y.1
Halabi, W.J.2
Luo, R.3
Pigazzi, A.4
Nguyen, N.T.5
Stamos, M.J.6
-
4
-
-
0037193831
-
Laparoscopyassisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: A randomised trial
-
Lacy AM, Garc?-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopyassisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9325):2224-2229.
-
(2002)
Lancet
, vol.359
, Issue.9325
, pp. 2224-2229
-
-
Lacy, A.M.1
Garc-Valdecasas, J.C.2
Delgado, S.3
-
5
-
-
2342475760
-
A Comparison of Laparoscopically Assisted and Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer
-
Group CS. A Comparison of Laparoscopically Assisted and Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer. New Engl J Med. 2004;350(20):2050-2059.
-
(2004)
New Engl J Med
, vol.350
, Issue.20
, pp. 2050-2059
-
-
Group, C.S.1
-
6
-
-
21344468396
-
Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: Short-term outcomes of a randomised trial
-
Group CS. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(7):477-484.
-
(2005)
Lancet Oncol
, vol.6
, Issue.7
, pp. 477-484
-
-
Group, C.S.1
-
7
-
-
19344368841
-
Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): Multicentre, randomised controlled trial
-
Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9472):1718-1726.
-
(2005)
Lancet
, vol.365
, Issue.9472
, pp. 1718-1726
-
-
Guillou, P.J.1
Quirke, P.2
Thorpe, H.3
-
8
-
-
33747050092
-
Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer
-
Reza MM, Blasco JA, Andradas E, Cantero R, Mayol J. Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93(8):921-928.
-
(2006)
Br J Surg
, vol.93
, Issue.8
, pp. 921-928
-
-
Reza, M.M.1
Blasco, J.A.2
Andradas, E.3
Cantero, R.4
Mayol, J.5
-
9
-
-
34748829142
-
Laparoscopic Colectomy for Cancer Is Not Inferior to Open Surgery Based on 5-Year Data from the COST Study Group Trial
-
Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, et al. Laparoscopic Colectomy for Cancer Is Not Inferior to Open Surgery Based on 5-Year Data From the COST Study Group Trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246(4):655-664.
-
(2007)
Ann Surg
, vol.246
, Issue.4
, pp. 655-664
-
-
Fleshman, J.1
Sargent, D.J.2
Green, E.3
-
10
-
-
57749190009
-
Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: Long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial
-
Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group BM
-
Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group BM, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, P?lman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(1):44-52.
-
(2009)
Lancet Oncol
, vol.10
, Issue.1
, pp. 44-52
-
-
Veldkamp, R.1
Hop, W.C.2
Kuhry, E.3
Jeekel, J.4
Haglind, E.5
Plman, L.6
Ma, C.7
Msika, S.8
Morino, M.9
Lacy, A.10
Bonjer, H.J.11
-
11
-
-
78049382296
-
Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer
-
Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97(11):1638-1645.
-
(2010)
Br J Surg
, vol.97
, Issue.11
, pp. 1638-1645
-
-
Jayne, D.G.1
Thorpe, H.C.2
Copeland, J.3
Quirke, P.4
Brown, J.M.5
Guillou, P.J.6
-
12
-
-
0037116647
-
For the Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study G. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: A randomized trial
-
Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G, for the Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study G. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: A randomized trial. JAMA. 2002;287(3):321-328.
-
(2002)
JAMA
, vol.287
, Issue.3
, pp. 321-328
-
-
Weeks, J.C.1
Nelson, H.2
Gelber, S.3
Sargent, D.4
Schroeder, G.5
-
13
-
-
84868586543
-
A meta-analysis of the short-and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer
-
Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y, Nishiguchi Y, Maeda K, Hirakawa K. A meta-analysis of the short-and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. J Cancer. 2012;3:49-57.
-
(2012)
J Cancer
, vol.3
, pp. 49-57
-
-
Ohtani, H.1
Tamamori, Y.2
Arimoto, Y.3
Nishiguchi, Y.4
Maeda, K.5
Hirakawa, K.6
-
14
-
-
4444292803
-
Meta-analysis of shortterm outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer
-
Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of shortterm outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2004;91(9):1111-1124.
-
(2004)
Br J Surg
, vol.91
, Issue.9
, pp. 1111-1124
-
-
Abraham, N.S.1
Young, J.M.2
Solomon, M.J.3
-
15
-
-
33947392987
-
Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: A meta-analysis
-
Transatlantic Laparoscopically Assisted vs Open Colectomy Trials Study GHJB
-
Transatlantic Laparoscopically Assisted vs Open Colectomy Trials Study GHJB, Wim C. J. Hop, Heidi Nelson, Daniel J. Sargent, Antonio M. Lacy, Antoni Castells, Pierre J. Guillou, Helen Thorpe, Julia Brown, Salvadora Delgado, Esther Kuhrij, Eva Haglind, Lars P?lman, Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: A meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2007;142(3):298-303.
-
(2007)
Arch Surg
, vol.142
, Issue.3
, pp. 298-303
-
-
Hop, J.W.C.1
Heidi, N.2
Sargent, D.J.3
Lacy, A.M.4
Antoni, C.5
Guillou, P.J.6
Helen, T.7
Julia, B.8
Salvadora, D.9
Esther, K.10
Eva, H.11
Lars, P.12
-
16
-
-
21244464388
-
Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancer
-
Group CS. Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancer. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(5):687-692.
-
(2005)
Surg Endosc
, vol.19
, Issue.5
, pp. 687-692
-
-
Group, C.S.1
-
17
-
-
77649190857
-
Hospital volume as a surrogate for laparoscopically assisted colectomy
-
Singla A, Simons J, Carroll J, et al. Hospital volume as a surrogate for laparoscopically assisted colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(3):662-669.
-
(2010)
Surg Endosc
, vol.24
, Issue.3
, pp. 662-669
-
-
Singla, A.1
Simons, J.2
Carroll, J.3
-
18
-
-
70349427034
-
Impact of Hospital Case Volume on the Quality of Laparoscopic Colectomy in Japan
-
Kuwabara K, Matsuda S, Fushimi K, Ishikawa K, Horiguchi H, Fujimori K. Impact of Hospital Case Volume on the Quality of Laparoscopic Colectomy in Japan. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(9):1619-1626.
-
(2009)
J Gastrointest Surg
, vol.13
, Issue.9
, pp. 1619-1626
-
-
Kuwabara, K.1
Matsuda, S.2
Fushimi, K.3
Ishikawa, K.4
Horiguchi, H.5
Fujimori, K.6
-
19
-
-
84878263775
-
Comparison of Cases Captured in the National Cancer Data Base with Those in Population-based Central Cancer Registries
-
Lerro C, Robbins A, Phillips J, Stewart A. Comparison of Cases Captured in the National Cancer Data Base with Those in Population-based Central Cancer Registries. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(6):1759-1765.
-
(2013)
Ann Surg Oncol
, vol.20
, Issue.6
, pp. 1759-1765
-
-
Lerro, C.1
Robbins, A.2
Phillips, J.3
Stewart, A.4
-
20
-
-
77958594752
-
Introduction to propensity scores: A case study on the comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic vs open appendectomy
-
Hemmila MR, Birkmeyer NJ, Arbabi S, Osborne NH, Wahl WL, Dimick JB. Introduction to propensity scores: A case study on the comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Arch Surg. 2010;145(10):939-945.
-
(2010)
Arch Surg
, vol.145
, Issue.10
, pp. 939-945
-
-
Hemmila, M.R.1
Birkmeyer, N.J.2
Arbabi, S.3
Osborne, N.H.4
Wahl, W.L.5
Dimick, J.B.6
-
21
-
-
84874016082
-
RObotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease
-
Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, et al. RObotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA. 2013;309(7):689-698.
-
(2013)
JAMA
, vol.309
, Issue.7
, pp. 689-698
-
-
Wright, J.D.1
Ananth, C.V.2
Lewin, S.N.3
-
22
-
-
39149110583
-
The National Cancer Data Base: A powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States
-
Bilmoria KY SA, Winchester DP, Ko CY. The National Cancer Data Base: A powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:683-690.
-
(2008)
Ann Surg Oncol
, vol.15
, pp. 683-690
-
-
Bilmoria, K.Y.S.A.1
Winchester, D.P.2
Ko, C.Y.3
-
23
-
-
52249089214
-
Use and outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for cancer in the united states
-
Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Nelson H, et al. Use and outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for cancer in the united states. Arch Surg. 2008;143(9):832-840.
-
(2008)
Arch Surg
, vol.143
, Issue.9
, pp. 832-840
-
-
Bilimoria, K.Y.1
Bentrem, D.J.2
Nelson, H.3
-
24
-
-
63049100788
-
Is laparoscopic colectomy a good operation for colon cancer?
-
Attiyeh FF. Is laparoscopic colectomy a good operation for colon cancer? Arch Surg. 2009;144(3):289-292.
-
(2009)
Arch Surg
, vol.144
, Issue.3
, pp. 289-292
-
-
Attiyeh, F.F.1
-
25
-
-
79955872862
-
Minimally Invasive Surgery Is Underutilized for Colon Cancer
-
Robinson C, Chen GJ, Balentine C, et al. Minimally Invasive Surgery Is Underutilized for Colon Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(5):1412-1418.
-
(2011)
Ann Surg Oncol
, vol.18
, Issue.5
, pp. 1412-1418
-
-
Robinson, C.1
Chen, G.J.2
Balentine, C.3
-
26
-
-
80755142750
-
Utilization of Laparoscopy in Colorectal Surgery for Cancer at Academic Medical Centers: Does Site of Surgery Affect Rate of Laparoscopy?
-
Carmichael JC, Masoomi H, Mills S, Stamos MJ, Nguyen NT. Utilization of Laparoscopy in Colorectal Surgery for Cancer at Academic Medical Centers: Does Site of Surgery Affect Rate of Laparoscopy? Am Surg. 2011;77(10):1300-1304.
-
(2011)
Am Surg
, vol.77
, Issue.10
, pp. 1300-1304
-
-
Carmichael, J.C.1
Masoomi, H.2
Mills, S.3
Stamos, M.J.4
Nguyen, N.T.5
-
27
-
-
84894592801
-
Is minimally invasive colon resection better than traditional approaches?: First comprehensive national examination with propensity score matching
-
Juo Y, Hyder O, Haider AH, Camp M, Lidor A, Ahuja N. Is minimally invasive colon resection better than traditional approaches?: First comprehensive national examination with propensity score matching. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(2):177-184.
-
(2014)
JAMA Surg
, vol.149
, Issue.2
, pp. 177-184
-
-
Juo, Y.1
Hyder, O.2
Haider, A.H.3
Camp, M.4
Lidor, A.5
Ahuja, N.6
-
28
-
-
79958035214
-
Association between time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
-
Biagi JJ, Raphael MJ, Mackillop WJ, Kong W, King WD, Booth CM. Association between time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;305(22):2335-2342.
-
(2011)
JAMA
, vol.305
, Issue.22
, pp. 2335-2342
-
-
Biagi, J.J.1
Raphael, M.J.2
MacKillop, W.J.3
Kong, W.4
King, W.D.5
Booth, C.M.6
-
29
-
-
84555219736
-
A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery
-
Rawlinson A, Kang P, Evans J, Khanna A. A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery. Ann Royal Coll Surg Engl. 2011;93(8):583-588.
-
(2011)
Ann Royal Coll Surg Engl
, vol.93
, Issue.8
, pp. 583-588
-
-
Rawlinson, A.1
Kang, P.2
Evans, J.3
Khanna, A.4
-
30
-
-
79953020393
-
Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery
-
Feb 16
-
Spanjersberg WR RJ, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJ. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Feb 16 2011;16(2):CD007635.
-
(2011)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
, vol.16
, Issue.2
, pp. CD007635
-
-
Spanjersberg, W.R.R.J.1
Keus, F.2
Van Laarhoven, C.J.3
-
31
-
-
84857045810
-
Adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategies for colorectal surgery at academic teaching hospitals and impact on total length of hospital stay
-
Aarts M-A, Okrainec A, Glicksman A, Pearsall E, Charles Victor J, McLeod R. Adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategies for colorectal surgery at academic teaching hospitals and impact on total length of hospital stay. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(2):442-450.
-
(2012)
Surg Endosc
, vol.26
, Issue.2
, pp. 442-450
-
-
Aarts, M.-A.1
Okrainec, A.2
Glicksman, A.3
Pearsall, E.4
Charles Victor, J.5
McLeod, R.6
-
32
-
-
81855182093
-
Laparoscopy in Combination with Fast Track Multimodal Management is the Best Perioperative Strategy in Patients Undergoing Colonic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial (LAFA-study)
-
Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, et al. Laparoscopy in Combination with Fast Track Multimodal Management is the Best Perioperative Strategy in Patients Undergoing Colonic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg. 2011;254(6):868-875.
-
(2011)
Ann Surg
, vol.254
, Issue.6
, pp. 868-875
-
-
Vlug, M.S.1
Wind, J.2
Hollmann, M.W.3
-
33
-
-
84860990324
-
EnROL: A multicentre randomised trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme
-
Kennedy RH, Francis A, Dutton S, et al. EnROL: a multicentre randomised trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:181.
-
(2012)
BMC Cancer
, vol.12
, pp. 181
-
-
Kennedy, R.H.1
Francis, A.2
Dutton, S.3
-
34
-
-
84861403768
-
The Methods of Comparative Effectiveness Research
-
Sox HC, Goodman SN. The Methods of Comparative Effectiveness Research. Ann Rev Public Health. 2012;33(1):425-445.
-
(2012)
Ann Rev Public Health
, vol.33
, Issue.1
, pp. 425-445
-
-
Sox, H.C.1
Goodman, S.N.2
-
35
-
-
77951622706
-
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
-
ROSENBAUM PR, RUBIN DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70(1):41-55.
-
(1983)
Biometrika
, vol.70
, Issue.1
, pp. 41-55
-
-
Rosenbaum, P.R.1
Rubin, D.B.2
-
36
-
-
79953200758
-
Hospital Variation in 30-Day Mortality after Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Denmark: The Contribution of Hospital Volume and Patient Characteristics
-
Osler M, Iversen LH, Borglykke A, et al. Hospital Variation in 30-Day Mortality After Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Denmark: The Contribution of Hospital Volume and Patient Characteristics. Ann Surg. 2011;253(4):733-738.
-
(2011)
Ann Surg
, vol.253
, Issue.4
, pp. 733-738
-
-
Osler, M.1
Iversen, L.H.2
Borglykke, A.3
-
37
-
-
84899489709
-
Hospital Center Effect for Laparoscopic Colectomy among Elderly Stage I-III Colon Cancer Patients
-
Zheng Z, Hanna N, Onukwugha E, Bikov KA, Mullins CD. Hospital Center Effect for Laparoscopic Colectomy Among Elderly Stage I-III Colon Cancer Patients. Ann Surg. 2014;259(5):924-929.
-
(2014)
Ann Surg
, vol.259
, Issue.5
, pp. 924-929
-
-
Zheng, Z.1
Hanna, N.2
Onukwugha, E.3
Bikov, K.A.4
Mullins, C.D.5
|