Is Bigger Always Better? Potential Biases of Big Data Derived from Social Network Sites

Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Volumn 659, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 63-76

  Hargittai, Eszter ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

biased sample; big data; digital inequality; Internet skills; sampling; sampling frame; social network sites

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927139182     PISSN: 00027162     EISSN: 15523349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002716215570866     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Anderson Chris.The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete.Wired Magazine. 2008;:
2. Asur Sitaram,Huberman Bernardo A.Predicting the future with social media.Paper presented at the 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology; 2010; 2010.
3. Backstrom Lars,Kleinberg Jon.Romantic partnerships and the dispersion of social ties: A network analysis of relationship status on Facebook.Paper presented at the CSCW; 2014Baltimore, MD; 2014.
4. Bail Christopher A.The cultural environment: Measuring culture with big data.Theory and Society. 2014;43:465-82
5. BaymNancy. 2013. Data not seen: The uses and shortcomings of social media metrics. First Monday18 (10). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i10.4873.
6. Bell Stephen,McDiarmid Alisdair,Irvine James.Nodobo: Mobile phone as a software sensor for social network research.IEEE Xplore. 2011;:
7. Bollen Johan,Mao Huina,Zeng Xiao-Jun.Twitter mood predicts the stock market.Journal of Computational Science. 2011;2 (1): 1-8
8. Bowker GeoffreyMemory practices in the sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2005:
9. boyd danah,Crawford Kate.Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon.Information, Communication & Society. 2012;15 (5): 662-79
10. Brenner Joanna,Smith Aaron72% of online adults are social networking site users. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center Internet & American Life Project; 2013:
11. Burke Moira,Kraut Robert.Using Facebook after losing a job: Differential benefits of strong and weak ties.Paper presented at the CSCW ’13; 2013San Antonio, TX; 2013.
12. Correa Teresa.The participation divide among “online experts”: Experience, skills and psychological factors as predictors of college students’ web content creation.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2010;16 (1): 71-92
13. Crawford Kate.The hidden biases of big data.Harvard Business Review. 2013;:
14. Ellison Nicole B.,Steinfield Charles,Lampe Cliff.Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices.New Media & Society. 2011;13 (6): 873-92
15. “Raw data” is an oxymoron. Lisa Gitelman, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2013:
16. Granovetter Mark S.The strength of weak ties.American Journal of Sociology. 1973;78 (6): 1360-80
17. Harford Tim.Big data: Are we making a big mistake?.FT Magazine. 2014;:
18. Hargittai Eszter.Survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy.Social Science Computer Review. 2005;23 (3): 371-79
19. Hargittai Eszter.An update on survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy.Social Science Computer Review. 2009;27 (1): 130-37
20. Hargittai EszterMedia perspectives for the 21st century. Papathanassopoulos S., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2011:231-40.
21. Hargittai Eszter,Hinnant Amanda.Digital inequality: Differences in young adults’ use of the Internet.Communication Research. 2008;35 (5): 602-21
22. Hargittai Eszter,Hsieh Yuli PatrickA networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites. Papacharissi Zizi, ed. London: Routledge; 2010a:146-68.
23. Hargittai Eszter,Hsieh Yuli Patrick.Predictors and consequences of differentiated practices on social network sites.Information, Communication & Society. 2010b;13 (4): 515-36
24. Hargittai Eszter,Hsieh Yuli Patrick.Succinct survey measures of web-use skills.Social Science Computer Review. 2012;30 (1): 95-107
25. Hargittai Eszter,Hsieh Yuli PatrickOxford handbook for Internet research. Dutton W. H., ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013:129-50.
26. Hargittai Eszter,Litt Eden.The tweet smell of celebrity success: Explaining variation in Twitter adoption among a diverse group of young adults.New Media & Society. 2011;13 (5): 824-42
27. Hargittai Eszter,Litt Eden.New strategies for employment? Internet skills and online privacy practices during people’s job search.IEEE Security & Privacy. 2013;11 (3): 38-45
28. Hidalgo Cesar A.Saving big data from big mouths.Scientific American. 2014;:
29. Lazer David,Pentland Alex,Adamic Lada,Aral Sinan,Barabási Albert-László,Brewer Devon,Christakis Nicholas,Contractor Noshir,Fowler James,Gutmann Myron.Computational social science.Science. 2009;323 (5915): 721-23
30. Mayer-Schonberger Viktor,Cukier KennethBig data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. New York, NY: Houghton Miffline Harcourt; 2013:
31. General Social Survey Information Society Module. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center; 2000:
32. Neff Gina.Why big data won’t cure us.Big Data. 2013;1 (3): 117-23
33. Park Yong Jin.Digital literacy and privacy behavior online.Communication Research. 2013;40 (2): 215-36
34. Rainie Lee,Brenner Joanna,Purcell KristenPhotos and videos as social currency online. Washington, DC: Pew Center Internet & American Life Project; 2012:
35. SchneierBruce. 2006. The future of privacy. Available from https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/03/the_future_of_p.html.
36. Schwartz H. Andrew,Eichstaedt Johannes C.,Kern Margaret L.,Dziurzynski Lukasz,Ramones Stephanie M.,Agrawal Megha,Shah Achal,Kosinski Michal,Stillwell David,Seligman Martin E. P.Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: The open-vocabulary approach.PLOS ONE. 2013;8 (9): e73791
37. Smith AaronWhy Americans use social media. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2011:
38. Tufekci Zeynep.Fishing in a sea of numbers.The European. 2013;:
39. Tumasjan Andranik,Sprenger Timm O.,Sandner Philipp G.,Welpe Isabell M.Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment.Paper presented at the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media; 2010Washington, DC; 2010.
40. U.S. News and World Report. America’s best colleges 2010. 2009;:
41. Wald Randall,Khoshgoftaar Taghi,Sumner Chris.Machine prediction of personality from Facebook profiles.Paper presented at the IEEE 13th International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI); 2012Las Vegas, NV; 2012.
42. Wasserman Ira M.,Richmond-Abbott Marie.Gender and the Internet: Causes of variation in access, level, and scope of use.Social Science Quarterly. 2005;86 (1): 252-70
43. Welles Brooke Foucault,Devender Anne Van,Contractor Noshir.Is a friend a friend? Investigating the structure of friendship networks in virtual worlds.Paper presented at the CHI ’10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2010; 2010.
44. Williams Dmitri,Kennedy Tracy L. M.,Moore Robert J.Behind the Avatar: The patterns, practices and functions of role playing in MMOs.Games and Culture. 2011;6 (2): 171-200