The protective function of the state in the United States and Europe: The constitutional question

European and US Constitutionalism

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 156-194

  Michelman, Frank I ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927108194     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511493904.012     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Case of Z (2001) 10 Butterworths Human Rights Cases 384, para. 73
2. Morris R. Cohen, ‘Property and Sovereignty’ (1927) 13 Cornell Law Quarterly, 8
3. Walter W. Cook, ‘Privileges of Labor Unions in the Struggle For Life’ (1918) 27 Yale Law Journal, 779.
4. Bernhard Schlink, ‘German Constitutional Culture in Transition’, in Michel Rosenfeld (ed.), Constitutionalism, Identity, Difference, and Legitimacy (Durham: Duke University Press, 1994), p. 197
5. Frank I. Michelman, ‘Reflection’ (2004) 82 Texas Law Review, 1737.
6. Stephen E. Gottlieb, ‘Compelling Governmental Interests and Constitutional Discourse’ (1992) 55 Albany Law Review, 549.
7. Stephen E. Gottlieb, ‘Compelling Governmental Interests: an Essential but Unanalyzed Term in Constitutional Discourse’ (1988) 65 Boston University Law Review, 917.
8. Richard H. Fallon Jr., ‘Individual Rights and the Powers of Government’ (1993) 27 Georgia Law Review, 343, 389
9. Lawrence Sager, Justice in Plainclothes: a Theory of American Constitutional Practice (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004)
10. Lawrence Sager, ‘The Domain of Constitutional Justice’, in Larry Alexander (ed.), Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 235, 240-1.
11. Sujit Choudhry, ‘The Lochner Era and Comparative Constitutionalism’ (2004) 2 no. 1 International Journal of Constitutional Law, 4-15.
12. Ulrich K. Preuss, ‘Patterns of Constitutional Evolution and Change in Eastern Europe’, in Joachim J. Hesse and Nevil Jonson (eds.), Constitutional Policy and Change in Europe (Oxford, 1995) p. 95, 101-3.
13. M. Tushnet, ‘The Issue of State Action/Horizontal Effect in Comparative Constitutional Law’ (2003) 1 International Journal of Constitutional Law, 79.
14. F. Michelman, ‘The protective function of the state in the United States and Europe: the constitutional question’, in this volume p. 156.
15. M. Villiger, Handbuch der EMRK (Zurich: Schulthess, 1993), note 100, 572, 634, 646.
16. C. Dröge and T. Marauhn, ‘Soziale Grundrechte in der Europäischen Grundrechtecharta - aus der Perspektive der EMRK’, in Bundesministerium der Arbeit et al. (eds.), Soziale Rechte in der Europäischen Union (2001), pp. 77-94, 90-1.
17. J. Frowein, ‘Wirtschaftliche und soziale Rechte in der Rechtsprechung der Straßburger Organe’, in S. Vassilouni (ed.), Aspects of the Protection of Individual and Social Rights (Athens: Hestin, 1995), pp. 203-17
18. C. Calliess, ‘Die Charta der Grundrechte der Europïischen Union’ (2001) Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 261, 265.
19. I. Pernice, ‘Eine Grundrechtecharta fur die Europaische Union’ (2000) Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt, 847, 853.
20. P. Tettinger, ‘Die Charta der Grundrechte der Europaischen Union’ (2001) 14 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 1010, 1014.
21. A. Weber, ‘Die Europäische Grundrechtecharta’ (2000) 8 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 537, 540-1.
22. C. Dröge, PositiveVerpflichtungen der Staaten in der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention (Berlin: Springer, 2003), 264-5.
23. D. Currie, ‘Positive and Negative Constitutional Rights’ (1986) 53 The University of Chicago Law Review, 864, 889
24. C. Starck, ‘Art. 1 Sect. 3’, in H. v. Mangoldt, F. Klein, C. Starck (eds.), Das Bonner Grundgesetz: Kommentar (4th edn, 3 vols., Munich: Vahlen, 1999), vol. I, note 154.
25. L. Jaeckel, Schutzpflichten im deutschen und europäischen Recht (Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag-Ges., 2001), 166-7.
26. C. Dröge, Positive Verpflichtungen, above, note 13, p.379.
27. B. Hofstötter, ‘European Court of Human Rights: Positive Obligations in E and others v. United Kingdom’ (2004) 2 International Journal of Constitutional Law, 525, 527
28. G. Robbers, Sicherheit als Menschenrecht (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1987), pp. 46.
29. C. Starck, Praxis der Verfassungsauslegung (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1994), pp. 47.
30. Starck, Verfassungsauslegung, above, note 33, pp.53-4
31. A. Clapham, Human Rights in the Private Sphere (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 145
32. G. Ress, ‘The Duty to Protect and to Ensure Human Rights Under the European Convention on Human Rights’, in E. Klein (ed.), The Duty to Protect and to Ensure Human Rights (Berlin Verlag Spitz, 2000), pp. 165
33. Dröge, Positive Verpflichtungen, above, note 13, pp. 189-92
34. Jaeckel, Schutzpflichten, above, note 25, p.139
35. Robbers, Sicherheit, above, note 33, p. 25.
36. W. Streuer, Die positiven Verpflichtungen des Staates (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2003), pp. 322
37. Wiesbrock, Menschenrechte, above, note 25, p. 188.
38. O. Lepsius, The Relationship between Security and Civil Liberties in the Federal Republic of Germany after September 11 (Washington, DC: American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, 2002); also available at http://www.aicgs.org/publications/PDF/lepsiusenglish.pdf., pp. 19-20.
39. Starck, Verfassungsauslegung, above, note 33, p.83
40. Starck, Verfassungsauslegung, above, note 33, p. 78.
41. E. Brems, ‘The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Case-Law of the ECHR’ (1996) 56 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 240-314.
42. Michelman, ‘Protective functions’, in this volume pp. 162.
43. Donald P. Kommers, The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany (2nd edn, Durham: Duke University Press, 1997), pp. 336-7
44. Currie, ‘Constitutional Rights’, above, note 14, pp. 871-2.
45. Michelman, ‘Protective functions’, in this volume p. 166.
46. K. Partsch, ‘Die Rechte und Freiheiten aus der Europaischen Menschenrechtskonvention’, in K. Bettermann (ed.), Die Grundrechte (1st edn, 3 vols., Berlin, 1966), vol. I, pp. 235
47. Hofstötter, ‘Positive obligations’, above, note 32, 527.
48. F. Michelman, ‘Protective funtions’, in this volume p. 170.
49. Hofstötter, ‘Positive obligations’, above, note 32, 527
50. Tushnet, ‘State Action’, above, note 1, 88.
51. Dröge, ‘Positive Verpflichtungen’, above, note 13, pp. 215
52. Michelman, ‘Protective funtions’, this volume pp. 170, 178
53. J. Isensee, Das Grundrecht auf Sicherheit: zu den Schutzpflichten des freiheitlichen Verfassungsstaates (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1983).
54. I. Berlin, ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’, in I. Berlin, Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990), p. 122.
55. Dröge, Positive Verpflichtungen, above, note 13, pp. 215
56. Hofstötter, ‘Positive obligations’, above, note 32, 534.