The rule of law as a political weapon

Democracy and the Rule of Law

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 261-301

  Maravall, José María ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927030156     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511610066.012     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Baker v. Carr. 1962. 369 U.S. 186.
2. Barreiro, B., and I. Sánchez-Cuenca. 1998. “Análisis del cambio del voto al PSOE en las elecciones de 1993.” Revista Espahola de Investigaciones Sociológicas 82: 191-211.
3. Belloch, S. 1998. Interior. Barcelona: Ediciones B.
4. Burnett, S. H., andL. Mantovani. 1998. The Italian Guillotine. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.
5. Cebrián, J. L. 1999. “El fin del silencio.” El País, 15-16 October.
6. Correa Sutil, J. 1993. “The Judiciary and the Political System in Chile: The Dilemmas of Judicial Independence during the Transition to Democracy.” In I. P. Stotzky (ed.), Transitions to Democracy in Latin America: The Role of the Judiciary, 90-106. Boulder: Westview Press.
7. Dahl, R. A. 1957. “Decision Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6: 279-95.
8. Dahl, R. A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
9. della Porta, D. 2001. “A Judges’ Revolution? Political Corruption and the Judiciary in Italy.” European Journal of Political Research 39, 1: 1-21.
10. Di Palma, G. 1990. To Craft Democracies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11. Dworkin, R. 1985. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
12. Dyzenhaus, D. 1997. “Legal Theory in the Collapse of Weimar: Contemporary Lessons?” American Political Science Review 91, 1: 121-34.
13. Ehrmann, H. W. 1987. “Judicial Activism in a Divided Society: The Rule ofLaw in the Weimar Republic.” In J. R. Schmidhauser (ed.), Comparative Judicial Systems, 75-92. London: Butterworth.
14. Esquith, S. L. 1999. “Toward a Democratic Rule of Law. East and West.” Political Theory 27, 3: 334-56.
15. Federalist Papers. 1961. New York: New American Library.
16. Fernández Enguita, M. 1998. “Mirando hacia atrás sin ira.” El País, 29 July.
17. Fish, S. 1993. “On Legal Autonomy.” Mercer Law Review 44: 737-41.
18. Flemming, R. B., and B. D. Wood. 1997. “The Public and the Supreme Court: Individual Justice Responsiveness to American Policy Moods.” American Journal of Political Science 41, 2: 468-98.
19. Franklin, C., and L. Kosaki. 1989. “Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion.” American Political Science Review 83, 3: 751-71.
20. Friedrich, C. J. 1958. La démocratie constitutionelle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
21. Guarnieri, C., and P. Pederzoli. 1999. Los jueces y la politica. Poder judicial y democ- racia. Madrid: Taurus.
22. Hart, H. L. A. 1958. “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Norms.” Harvard Law Review 71, 4: 593-629.
23. Hayek, F. 1994. The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Heller, H. 1972. Teoria del estado. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Econo mica. Spanish translation of Staatslehre (1934).
25. Hilbink, L. N.d. “Exploring the Links between Institutional Characteristics of the Judiciary and the Substance of Judicial Decision-Making.” University of California, San Diego. Unpublished manuscript.
26. Hoekstra, V., and J. Segal. 1996. “The Shepherding of Local Public Opinion: The Supreme Court and Lamb’s Chapel.” Journal of Politics 58, 4: 1079-102.
27. Jackson, G. 1998. “Los destinos de Clinton y González.” El País, 5 August, 9-10.
28. Kaniowski, A. 1999. “Lustration and Decommunization.” In M. Krygier and A. Czarnota (eds.), The Rule ofLaw after Communism, 211-47. Aldershot: Ashgate.
29. Karl, T. L., and P. C. Schmitter. 1991. “Modes of Transition in Latin America, Southern and Eastern Europe.” International Social Science Journal 128: 269-83.
30. Kelsen, H. 1977. Esencia y valor de la democracia. 2d ed. Madrid: Guadarrama. Spanish translation of Grundrib einer allgemeinen Theorie des Staates (1926).
31. Kelsen, H. 1979. Teoria general del estado. Mexico: Editora Nacional. Spanish translation of Allgemeine Staatslehre (1925).
32. Larkins, C. 1998. “The Judiciary and Delegative Democracy in Argentina.” Comparative Politics 30, 4: 423-42.
33. Lepsius, R. 1978. “From Fragmented Party Democracy to Government by Emergency Decree and National Socialist Takeover: Germany.” In J. J. Linz and A. Stepan (eds.), The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Europe, 34-79. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
34. Linz J. J., and A. Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
35. López Aguilar, J. F. 1999. “¿Hacen politica los jueces?” Claves de Razón Práctica 96: 8-15.
36. Magalhàes, P. C. 1999. “The Politics of Judicial Reform in Eastern Europe.” Comparative Politics 32, 1: 43-62.
37. Manin, B., A. Przeworski, and S. C. Stokes. 1999. “Elections and Representation.” In A. Przeworski, S. C. Stokes, and B. Manin (eds.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, 29-54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Mishler, W., and R. Sheehan. 1993. “The Supreme Court as a Counter-Majoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review 87, 1: 87-101.
39. Mishler, W., and R. Sheehan. 1996. “Public Opinion, the Attitudinal Model, and Supreme Court Decision-Making: A Micro-Analytic Perspective.” Journal of Politics 58, 1: 169-200.
40. Montesquieu, C. L. 1951. De lesprit des lois. Vol. 2. Paris: Gallimard (Pléiade).
41. Morawski, L. 1999. “Positivist or Non-Positivist Rule of Law?” In M. Krygier and A. Czarnota (eds.), The Rule of Law after Communism, 39-54. Aldershot: Ashgate.
42. Müller, I. 1991. Hitler’s Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
43. Novoa Monreal, E. 1992. Los resquicios legales. Santiago: Ediciones BAT.
44. O’Donnell, G., 1994. “Delegative Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 5, 1: 56-69.
45. O’Donnell, G., 1999. “Polyarchies and the (Un)Rule of Law in Latin America.” In J. E. Méindez, G. O’Donnell, and P. S. Pinheiro (eds.), The (Un)Rule of Law and the Underprivileged in Latin America, 303-37. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
46. O’Donnell, G., and P. C. Schmitter. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
47. Ott, W., and F. Buob. 1993. “Did Legal Positivism Render German Jurists Defenceless during the Third Reich?” Social & Legal Studies 2, 1: 91-104.
48. Pederzoli, P., and C. Guarnieri. 1997. “Italy: A Case of Judicial Democracy?” International Social Science Journal 152: 253-70.
49. Pizzorno, A. 1992. “La corruzione nel sistema politico.” In D. della Porta (ed.), Lo scambio occulto. Bologna: II Mulino.
50. Pradera, J. 1999. “La Alegre Muchachada.” El Pals, 17 October.
51. Przeworski, A. 1991. Democracy and the Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Radin, M. J. 1989. “Reconsidering the Rule of Law.” Boston University Law Review 69, 4: 781-819.
53. Raz, J. 1979. The Authority of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
54. Raz, J. 1994. Ethics in the Public Domain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
55. Rehnquist, W. H. 1986. “Constitutional Law and Public Opinion.” Suffolk University Law Review 20, 4: 751-69.
56. Riker, W. H. 1982. Liberalism against Populism. Prospect Heights, 11l.: Waveland Press.
57. Roussel, V. 1998. “Les magistrats dans les scandales politiques.” Revue Frangaise de Science Politique 48, 2: 245-73.
58. Rubio Llorente, F. 1991. “La igualdad en la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional.” Revista Espahola de Derecho Constitucional 31: 9-36.
59. Schmitt, C. 1985. La dictadura. Madrid: Alianza Editorial. Spanish translation of Die Diktatur: Von den Anfangen des Modernen Souveranitatsgedankens bis zum Proletarischen Klassenkampf (1922).
60. Shklar, J. N. 1987. “Political Theory and the Rule ofLaw.” In A. C. Hutchinson and P. Monahan (eds.), The Rule of Law: Ideal or Ideology. Toronto: Carswell.
61. Silva Cimma, E. 1977. El tribunal constitucional de Chile (1971-1973). Caracas: Editorial Jurldica Venezolana.
62. Sonner, M. W., and C. Wilcox. 1999. “Forgiving and Forgetting: Public Support for Bill Clinton during the Lewinsky Scandal.” PS. Political Science & Politics 32, 3: 554-7.
63. Smulovitz, C. 2002. “The Discovery of Law. Political Consequences in the Argentinian Case.” In Y. Dezalay and B. Garth (eds.), Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
64. Tocqueville, A. de. 1969. Democracy in America. New York: J. P. Mayer.
65. Toharia, J. J. 1999. “La independencia judicial y la buena justicia.” Justicia y Sociedad 3: 9-32.
66. Valenzuela, A. 1989. “Chile: Origins, Consolidation, and Breakdown of a Democratic Regime.” In L. Diamond, J. J. Linz, and S. M. Lipset (eds.), Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America, 159-206. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
67. Weingast, B. 1997. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law.” American Political Science Review 91, 2: 245-63.