Custom in medieval law

The Nature of Customary Law

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 151-175

  Ibbetson, David ^a  

^a University of Cambridge   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926992728     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511493744.008     Document Type: Chapter

References (79)

1. J. Gilissen, La Coutume (Turnhout: Brepols, 1982), 17.
2. A. K. R. Kiralfy, ‘Custom in Mediaeval English Law’ (1988) 9Journal of Legal History26.
3. A. K. R. Kiralfy, ‘Custom in Mediaeval English Law’, in La Coutume (Brussels, Recueils de la Societe Jean Bodin, 1990), vol. 2, 379.
4. Paul Brand, ‘Local Custom in the Early Common Law’, in P. Stafford, J. Nelson and J. Martindale (eds.), Law, Laity and Solidarities: Essays in Honour of Susan Reynolds (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2001), 150.
5. F. A. Greer, ‘Custom in the Common Law’ (1893) 9 LQR 153.
6. E. K. Braybrooke, ‘Custom as a Source of English Law’ (1951) 50Michigan Law Review71.
7. C. K. Allen, Law in the Making (7th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1964), 67-111, at 152-156.
8. W. S. Holdsworth, History of English Law (London: Methuen, 1903-66), 2.375-91, 3.256-75.
9. S. Brie, Die Lehre vom Gewohnheitsrecht(Breslau: Marcus, 1899).
10. H. Pissard, Essai sur la Connaissance et la Preuve des Coutumes (Paris: Rousseau, 1910).
11. F. Calasso, Medio Evo del Diritto(Milan: Giuffre, 1954), 181-214.
12. E. Córtese, La Norma Giuridica (Milan: Giuffre, 1962-4), 2.101-67.
13. J. Gilissen, Introduction Historique au Droit(Brussels: Bruyant, 1979), 231-76.
14. J. Gilissen, La Coutume (Turnhout: Brepols, 1982)
15. R. Garre, Consuetudo: Das Gewohnheitsrecht in der Rechtsquellen- und Methodenlehre des Späten Ius Commune in Italien (16.-18. Jahrhundert) (Studien zur Europaischen Rechtsgeschichte, vol. 183) (Vittorio Klostermann: Frankfurt, 2005), 53-86.
16. Gilissen G, Coutume,22-4.
17. Calasso C, Medio Evo del Diritto,184.
18. F. Calasso, Il Negozio Giuridico (Milan: Giuffre, 1959), 90-1.
19. J. Gilissen, ‘Loi et Coutume: Esquisse de l’Evolution des Sources du Droit en Belgique du XlIe au XXe Siecle’, VIe Congres International de Droit Compare (1962) 39Revue de Droit International et Droit Comparé1, at 7.
20. E.-J. Tardif, Coutumiers de Normandie (Rouen/Paris: A. Lestringant/A. Picard, 1896), vol. 2-6.
21. R. Wehrle, De la Coutume dans le Droit Canonique (Paris: Sirey, 1928), 87-93
22. C. G. Fürst, ‘Zur Rechtslehre Gratians’ (1971) 88Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte (Kanonistische Abteilung)276, at 280-1.
23. L. Waelkens, La Théorie de la Coutume chez Jacques de Révigny (Leiden: Brill, 1984), 421-2.
24. L. Mayali, ‘La Coutume dans la Societe Romaniste’, in La Coutume, vol. 2, 11, 18-19.
25. Gilissen G. Coutume,25-7.
26. Gilissen G, Coutume,86-92.
27. A. Gouron, ‘La Coutume en France au Moyen Age’, in La Coutume, vol. 2, 193, at 203-204
28. J. Boutillier, Somme Rural (Paris 1603), 3
29. P. Wielant, Praktijke Civile, Inleiding, cap. 29
30. H. P. Glenn, On Common Laws (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 16-20.
31. Cortese C, La Norma Giuridica,2.122-6.
32. G. Dilcher et al., Gewohnheitsrecht und Rechtsgewohnheiten im Mittelalter (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1992).
33. Mayali M, ‘La Coutume dans la Societe Romaniste’, in La Coutume, vol. 2, 11-24
34. A. LeBrun, La Coutume (Librairie Generale: Paris, 1932), 45, n. 5.
35. W. Ullmann, ‘Bartolus on Customary Law’ (1940) 52Juridical Review265-275.
36. cf. Mayali, ‘La Coutume’, 25, n. 63.
37. G. Garancini, ‘Consuetudo et Statutum Ambulant Pari Passu: La Consuetudine nei Diritti Italiani del Basso Medio Evo’ (1985) 58Rivista di Storia del Diritto Italiano19- 42.
38. W. Ullmann, Principles of Government and Politics in the Middle Ages (London: Methuen, 1966), 20-1, 280-7.
39. P. Stein, The Teaching of Roman Law in England around 1200 (London: Selden Society, 1990), 58-61.
40. Brie B, Gewonheitsrecht,67-78.
41. Pissard P, Coutumes,52-9.
42. D. Werkmuller, ‘Gewohnheitsrecht in Deutschen Weistiimern’, in La Coutume, vol. 2, 311.
43. A. Gouron, ‘La Coutume en France au Moyen Age’, in La Coutume, vol. 2, 193, at 198-207.
44. J. P. Dawson, A History of Lay Judges (Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1960), 94-102.
45. Gilissen G, ‘La Preuve de la Coutume dans l’Ancien Droit Belge’, in Hommage au Professeur Paul Bonenfant (Limal, G. Despy, chemin de Messe: Brussels, 1965), 563.
46. R. Filhol, ‘La Preuve de la Coutume dans l’Ancien Droit Francais’, in La Preuve (Brussels: Recueils de la Societe Jean Bodin, 1965), vol. 2, 357.
47. L. Waelkens, ‘L’Origine de l’Enquete par Turbe’ (1985) 53Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis337.
48. J.-F. Poudret, ‘Reflexions sur la Preuve de la Coutume devant les Jurisdictions Royales Françaises aux XlIIe et XlVe Siecles, notamment le Rôle de l’Enquete par Turbe’ (1987) 65Revue Historique de Droit Français et Etranger (4th series) 71.
49. John of Ibelin, Le Livre des Assises(ed. P. W. Edbury; Leiden: Brill, 2003), 69-110, 624-5. P.1.2.5
50. E. Lambert, Etudes de Droit Commun Legislatif(V. Giard and E. Briaere: Paris, 1903), 208-804
51. P.-C. Timbal, ‘Coutume et Jurisprudence en France au Moyen Age’, in La Coutume, vol. 2, 227.
52. P. Stein, ‘The Civil Law Doctrine of Custom and the Growth of Case Law’, in Scintillae Iuris: Studi in Memoria di Gino Gorla (Milan: Giuffrè, 1994), 1.371.
53. G. E. Woodbine, S. E. Thorne, trans., Bracton on the Laws and Customs of England(Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1968)
54. F. W. Maitland, Select Passages from the Works of Bracton and Azo (Selden Society, vol. 8, London, 1895), 18-42.
55. J. H. Baker, ntroduction to English Legal History (4th edn, London: Butterworths, 2002), 489-90.
56. A. W. B. Simpson, ‘The Common Law and Legal Theory’, in Legal Theory and Legal History (Hambledon Press: London and Roncevert, WV, 1987), 359.
57. J. H. Baker, The Law’s Two Bodies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 59-90.
58. S. E. Chrimes, ed. and trans., Sir John Fortescue, De Laudibus Legum Anglie (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1949), 36-41.
59. L. Poos and L. Bonfield, Select Cases in Manorial Courts (Selden Society, vol. 114, London, 1998).
60. J. S. Beckerman, ‘Procedural Innovation and Institutional Change in Medieval English Manorial Courts’ (1992) 10Law and History Review197.
61. F. W. Maitland, Select Pleas in Manorial Courts (Selden Society, vol. 2, London, 1888), 29.
62. L. Bonfield, ‘The Nature of Customary Law in the Manorial Courts of Medieval England’ (1989) 31 Comparative Studies in Society and History 514.
63. “Customary Law”?, in Z. Razi and R. Smith, eds., Medieval Society and the Manor Court (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996), 103.
64. P. Hyams, ‘What Did Edwardian Villagers Understand by “Law”?’, in Razi and Smith, eds., Medieval Society and the Manor Court, 101-2.
65. G. Homans, English Villagers of the Thirteenth Century, 126-7.
66. P. Tucker, ‘London’s Courts of Law in the Fifteenth Century: The Litigants’ Perspective’, in C. Brooks and M. Lobban, eds., Communities and Courts in Britain, 1150-1900 (London and Rio Grande: Hambledon Press, 1997), 25.
67. P. Brand, The Origins of the English Legal Profession (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992), 114-15.
68. T. Robinson, The Common Law of Kent: Or the Customs of Gavelkind(1931), 38-9.
69. N. Neilson, ‘Custom and the Common Law in Kent’ (1924-5) 38 Harvard Law Review 482.
70. R. Pennington, Stannary Law (Newton Abbot: David & Charles, 1973), 13-21.
71. J. Manwood, Treatise and Discourse of the Lawes of the Forrest(1598).
72. C. Hart, The Verderers and Forest Law of the Dean (Newton Abbot: David & Charles, 1971).
73. J.H. Baker, ‘The Law Merchant and the Common Law before 1700’, in The Legal Profession and the Common Law (London and Roncerverte: Hambledon Press, 1986), 341, 345-52.
74. C. Donahue, ‘Medieval and Early Modern Lex Mercatoria: An Attempt at the Probatio Diabolica’ (2004) 5Chicago Journal of International Law21, at 26-31.
75. M. Basile, J. Bestor, D. Coquillette and C. Donahue, Lex Mercatoria and Legal Pluralism: A Late Thirteenth-Century Treatise and Its Afterlife (Cambridge, MA: Ames Foundation, 1998), especially at 23-34.
76. P.E. Jones, ed., Calendar of Plea and Memoranda Rolls, 1437-1457 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1954), 149.
77. D. W. Sutherland, Quo Warranto Proceedings in the Reign of Edward I (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963), 70-110.
78. R. C. Palmer, The County Courts of Medieval England (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982), 293, n. 112.
79. Robinson R, Gavelkind,260.