The globalization of private knowledge goods and the privatization of global public goods

International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology Under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 3-45

  Reichman, Jerome H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926979692     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511494529.002     Document Type: Chapter

References (144)

1. Nicholas Stern, International Action for Fighting Poverty: An Historic Opportunity, Lecture given at Duke University (2 Sept. 2003).
2. J.H. Reichman, Managing the Challenge of a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime, Paper presented to the Second Bellagio Meeting on Intellectual Property and Development, UNCTAD/ICTSD, 17–20 Sept. 2003 (discussing Stern’s thesis)
3. David Dollar & Aart Kraay, Trade, Growth, and Poverty, Development Research Group, The World Bank (2001) (unpublished manuscript, on file with authors).
4. Oxfam, RiGged Rules And Double Standards: Trade, Globalisation, And The Fight Against Poverty (2002).
5. Annex LC, Legal Instruments – Results Of The Uruguay Round vol. 31, 33 I.L.M. 81 (1994) [hereinafter TRIPS Agreement].
6. J.H. Reichman, Universal Minimum Standards of Intellectual Property Protection under the TRIPS Component of the WTO Agreement, in INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE: THE TRIPS AGREEMENT 21 (C.M. Correa & A. Yusuf eds., 1998)
7. JAYASHREE WATAL, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE WTO AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES (2001)
8. CARLOS M. CORREA, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, THE WTO AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES (2000).
9. Peter Drahos, Developing Countries and International Intellectual Property Standard- Setting, 5 J.WORLD INTELL. PROP. 765 (2002)
10. Keith E. Maskus, Strengthening Intellectual Property Rights in Lebanon, in CATCHING uP wI TH THE COMPET I T ION: TRADE OPPORTUNIT IES AND CHALLENGES FOR ARAB COUNTRIES 251–52 (B. Hoekman & J. Zarrouk eds., 2000).
11. KEITH E. MASKUS, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMY 109–42 (Institute for International Economics 2000) [hereinafterMASKUS, IP RI GHTS].
12. Commission on Intellectual Property Rights (CIPR), Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy 8–9, 11–27 (2002)
13. PROVI DING GLOBAL PUBLIC GOODS: MANAGING GLOBALIZATION (Inge Kaul et al. eds., United NationsDevelopment Program2003)
14. Daniel G. Arce, Leadership and the Aggregation of International Collective Action, 53 OXFORD ECON. PAPERS 114 (2001).
15. See Paul A. Samuelson, The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure, 36 REV. ECON. & STAT. 387 (1954)
16. TODD SANDLER, COLLECTIVE ACTION: THEORY and APPLICAT IONS (1992).
17. MASKUS, IP RIGHTS, above n. 8, at 36–38.
18. Keith E. Maskus, Regulatory Standards in the WTO: Comparing Intellectual Property Rights with Competition Policy, Environmental Protection, and Core Labor Standards, 1 WORLD TRADE REV. 135 (2002).
19. Philip McCalman, National Patents, Innovation, and International Agreements, 11 J. INT’ L TRADE &DEV. 1 (2002)
20. Gene M. Grossman & Edwin L.-C. Lai, International Protection of Intellectual Property (2002) (unpublished manuscript)
21. Suzanne Scotchmer, The Political Economy of Intellectual Property Treaties (2002) (unpublished manuscript).
22. J.H. Reichman, From Free Riders to Fair Followers: Global Competition under the TRIPS Agreement, 29 N.Y.U. J. INT’ L L. & POL. 11 (1997) [hereinafter Reichman, Free Riders to Fair Followers].
23. World Bank, Global Economic Prospects and the Developing Countries 2002, at 37–64 (2001).
24. Carlos M. Correa, Internationalization of the Patent System and New Technologies, 20WI S. INT’ L L.J. 523, 544–50 (2002).
25. Philip McCalman, Reaping What You Sow: An Empirical Analysis of International Patent Harmonization, 55 J. INT’ L ECON. 161 (2001).
26. Pamela J. Smith, How Do Foreign Patent Rights Affect U.S. Exports, Affiliate Sales, and Licenses?, 55 J. INT’ L ECON. 411 (2001).
27. Keith E. Maskus, Encouraging International Technology Transfer, draft report to UNCTAD/ICTSD (2003) [hereinafter Maskus, Encouraging International Technology].
28. James R. Markusen & Keith E. Maskus, General EquilibriumApproaches to the Multinational Firm: A Review of Theory and Evidence, in HANDBOOK OF INTERNAT IONAL TRADE 320 (K. Choi&J. Harrigan eds., 2003)
29. A. ARORA ET AL., MARKETS FOR TECHNOLOGY: THE ECONOMICS oF INNOVATION AND CORPORATE STRATEGY 115–42 (2001).
30. Jonathan Eaton & Samuel Kortum, Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD, 40 J. INT’ L ECON. 251 (1996).
31. J.H. Reichman & Paul Uhlir, A Contractually Reconstructed Research Commons for Scientific Data in a Highly Protectionist Intellectual Property Environment, 66 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 315 (2003) [hereinafter A Contractually Reconstructed Research Commons].
32. THE ROLE oF SC IENTI FIC AND TECHNICAL DATA AND INFORMATION IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (J.M. Esanu & Paul Uhlir eds., National Research Council 2003) [hereinafter ROLE OF S CIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL DATA].
33. I. Horstmann & J.R. Markusen, Licensing versus Direct Investment: A Model of Internalization by the Multinational Enterprise, 20 CAN. J. ECON. 464 (1987)
34. A. Arora, Contracting for Tacit Knowledge: The Provision of Technical Services in Technology Licensing Contracts, 50 J. DEV. ECON. 233 (1996).
35. Carlos M. Correa, Can the TRIPS Agreement Foster Technology Transfer to Developing Countries? [this volume].
36. Keith E. Maskus, The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Encouraging Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Transfer, 9 DUKE J. COMPAR. & INT’ L L. 109 (1998)
37. Kamal Saggi, International Technology Transfer: National Policies, International Negotiations, and Multilateral Disciplines, report to Commonwealth Secretariat (2003).
38. Keith E. Maskus & Mohan Penubarti, How Trade-Related are Intellectual Property Rights?, 39 J. INT’ L ECON. 227 (1995).
39. Guifang Yang & Keith E. Maskus, Intellec tual Property Rights and Licensing: An Econometric Investigation, 127 WELTWI RTSCHAFTLICHES ARCHIV 58 (2001)
40. Michael Nicholson, Intellectual Property Rights and International Technology Transfer: The Impact of Industry Characteristics (2002) (unpublished manuscript, on file with U.S. Federal Trade Commission).
41. Maskus, Encouraging International Technology, above n. 25.
42. Z. Khan, Intellectual Property and Economic Development: Lessons from American and European History, Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, Background Paper 1A (2002)
43. N. Kumar, Intellectual Property Rights, Technology and Economic Development: Experiences of Asian Countries, Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, background paper 1B (2002).
44. Janusz A. Ordover, A Patent System for Both Diffusion and Exclusion, 5 J. ECON. PERSP. 43 (1991).
45. Linsu Kim, Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Rights: Lessons from Korea’s Experience, UNCTAD/ICTSD Working Paper (2002).
46. Maskus, IP RIGHTS, above n. 8, at 143–60.
47. Rebecca S. Eisenberg, Bargaining over the Transfer of Proprietary Research Tools: Is this Market Failing or Emerging?, in EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: INNOVATION POLICY fOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY 223 (Rochelle Dreyfuss et al. eds., 2001) [hereinafter EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF IP]
48. J.H. Reichman, Database Protection in a Global Economy, 2002 REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE DROIT ECONOMIQUE 455 (2002) [hereinafter Reichman, Database Protection]
49. J.H. Reichman & Pamela Samuelson, Intellectual Property Rights in Data ?, 50 VAND. L. REV. 51 (1997).
50. Multilateral Agreements on Trade in Goods, 15 Apr. 1994, WTO Agreement, Annex 1A, 33 I.L.M. 1154 (1994) [hereinafter GATT 1994]
51. JOSEPH STIGLITZ, GLOBAL IZATION AND I T S DI SCONTENTS (2002).
52. Lehman, The Theory of Property Rights and the Protection of Intellectual and Industrial Property, 16 INT’ L REV. INDUS. PROP. ©RIGHT (IIC) 525 (1985)
53. Edmund Kitch, Nature and Function of the Patent System, 30 J.L. & ECON. 265 (1977).
54. JAMES BOYLE, SHAMANS, SOFTWARE AND SPLEENS: LAW AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INFORMATION SOCIETY 25–46 (1996) [hereinafter BOYLE, SHAMANS, SOFTWARE & SPLEENS]
55. John H. Barton, The Economics of TRIPS: International Trade in Information-Intensive Products, 33 GEO. WASH. INT’ L L. REV. 473 (2001)
56. Roberto Mazzoleni & Richard R. Nelson, Economic Theories About the Benefits and Costs of Patents, 32 J. ECON. IS SUES 1031 (1998).
57. Arti K. Rai, Fostering Cumulative Innovation in the Biopharmaceutical Industry: The Role of Patents and Antitrust, 16 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 813 (2001)
58. James Boyle, Enclosing the Genome: What the Squabbles over Genetic Patents Could Teach Us, in PERSPECT IVES ON PROPERTI E S OF THE HUMAN GENOME PROJECT 97 (F. Scott Kieff ed., 2003)
59. James Boyle, The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain, 66 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 33 (2003)
60. Joseph Stiglitz, Knowledge as a Public Good, in GLOBAL PUBL I C GOODS: INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN THE 21 ST CENTURY (Inge Kaul et al. eds., 1999)
61. Paul David, The Political Economy of Public Science, in THE REGULATION OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 38 (Helen Lawton Smith ed., 2001).
62. J. H. Reichman, Intellectual Property in International Trade: Opportunities and Risks of a GATT Connection, 22 VAND. J. TRANSNAT’ L L. 747 (1989).
63. Mark Lemley, Ex Ante versus Ex Post Justification for Intellectual Property, working paper (2003).
64. Frederick Abbott, The Future of IPRs in the Multilateral Trading System, in TRADING IN KNOWLEDGE 36, 44 (C. Bellman et al. eds., 2003)
65. Carlos Correa, Formulating Effective Pro-development National Intellectual Property Policies, in TRADING IN KNOWLEDGE, above n. 53, at 209-214 (criticizing WIPO Secretariat for emphasizing).
66. Sisule F. Musungu & Graham Dutfield, Multilateral Agreements and a TRIPS-plus World: The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Quaker U.N. Office, Geneva, TRIPS Issues papers No. 3 (2003).
67. papers presented at UNCTAD/ICTSD Second Bellagio Conference, 17–20 Sept. 2003.
68. Laurence R. Helfer, Regime Shifting: The TRIPS Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking, 29 YALE J. INT’ L L. 1 (2004).
69. John Barton, Integrating IPR Policies in Development Strategies, in TRADING IN KNOWLEDGE, above n. 53, at 57, 60–64.
70. Frederick M. Abbott, Trade Diplomacy, the Rule of Law and the Problem of Asymmetric Risks in TRIPS, Quaker United Nation Office Occasional Paper 13 (Sept. 2003), available at http://www.geneva.quno.info/pdf/OP13 Abbottfindft rev_1.pdf (visited 1 May 2003)
71. J.H. Reichman, Legal Hybrids between the Patent and Copyright Paradigms, 94 COLUM. L. REV. 2432 (1994)
72. J.H. Reichman, Charting the Collapse of the Patent- Copyright Dichotomy, 13 CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L.J. 475 (1995)
73. JAMES BOYLE, SHAMANS, SOFTWARE, & SPLEENS, above n. 48, at 119–44
74. Pamela Samuelson et al., A Manifesto Concerning the Legal Protection of Computer Programs, 94 COLUM. L. REV. 2308 (1994).
75. Nelson and Merges, On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope, 90 COLUM. L. REV. 839 (1990).
76. Samuelson & Scotchmer, The Law and Economics of Reverse Engineering, 111 YALE L. J. 157 (2003).
77. Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc., 376 U.S. 234 (1964).
78. David S. Mowery & Nathan Rosenberg, The U.S. National Innovation System, in NATIONAL INNOVATION S YSTEMS 29–75 (Richard R. Nelson ed., 1993).
79. Pamela Samuelson, Mapping the Digital Public Domain: Threats and Opportunities, 66 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 147 (2003).
80. J.H. Reichman & Jonathan Franklin, Privately Legislated Intellectual Property Rights: Reconciling Freedom of Contract with Public Good Uses of Information, 147 U. PA. L. REV. 875 (1999)
81. Nina Elkin-Koren, A Public-Regarding Approach to Contracting Over Copyrights, in EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF IP, above n. 41, at 191
82. Jane C. Ginsburg, U.S. Initiatives to Protect Works of Low Authorship, in EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF IP, above n. 41, at 55.
83. J.H. Reichman, Of Green Tulips and Legal Kudzu: Repackaging Rights in Subpatentable Innovation, 53 VAND. L. REV. 1743 (2000).
84. Boyle, Second Enclosure Movement, above n. 50.
85. Michael A. Heller & Rebecca S. Eisenberg, Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research, 280 SCIENCE 698 (1998)
86. Rebecca S. Eisenberg, Bargaining over the Transfer of Proprietary Research Tools, in EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF IP, above n. 41
87. Walter W. Powell, Networks of Learning in Biotechnology: Opportunities and Constraints Associated with Relational Contracting in a Knowledge-Intensive Field, in EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF IP, above n. 41.
88. Paul David & Michael Spence, Towards Institutional Infrastructures for E-Science: The Scope of the Challenge, OXFORD INTERNET INST ITUTE (14 Sept. 2002).
89. SUSAN K. SELL, POWER AND IDEAS: NORTH-SOUTH POLICIES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND ANTITRUST (1998)
90. SUSAN K. SELL, PRIVATE POWER, PUBLIC LAW: THE GLOBALIZATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (2003).
91. Arti K. Rai, Engaging Facts and Policy: A Multi-Institutional Approach to Patent System Reform, 103 COLUM. L. REV. 1035 (2003)
92. Jay P. Kesan, The Private and Social Costs of the Patent System: Why Bad Patents Survive in the Market and How We Should Change, working paper (2004) (citing articles by Thomas, Leung, Quillen and Ogden, Baird and others)
93. Jay P. Kesan, Carrots and Sticks to Create a Better Patent System, 17 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 763 (2002)
94. Robert Merges, As Many as Six Impossible Patents before Breakf ast: Property Rights for Business Concepts and Patent System Reform, 14 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 577 (1999)
95. John Allison & Mark Lemley, The Growing Complexity of the United States Patent System, 82 BOSTON U. L. REV. 77 (2002).
96. John K. Barton, Reforming the Patent System, 287 SCIENCE 1933 (2000)
97. John P. Walsh et al., Effects of Research Tool Patents and Licensing on Biomedical Innovation, in PATENTS IN THE KNOWLEDGE-BASED ECONOMY 285–340 (W.M. Cohen & S.A. Merrill eds., National Research Council 2001).
98. James Gleick, Patently Absurd, NEW YORK TIMES MAGAZINE, 12 Mar. 2000, at 44.
99. Paul Edward Geller, An International Patent Utopia?, 25 E.I.P.R. 515 (2003).
100. Mark A. Lemley, Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office, 95 NW. U. L. REV. 1 (2001).
101. Gerald Sobel, Competition Policy in Patent Cases and Antitrust, in PERSPECTIVES ON PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN GENOME PROJECT, above n. 49, at 23, 26–41 (“The Federal Circuit’s transformation of the law”).
102. Ruth L. Okediji, Public Welfare and the Role of the WTO: Reconsidering the TRIPS Agreement, 17 EMORY INT’ L L. REV. 821, 822–25 (2003).
103. Yochai Benkler, Through the Looking Glass: Alice and the Consti tutional Foundations of the Public Domain, 66 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 173 (2003)
104. Jacqueline Lipton, Balancing Private Rights and Public Policies: Reconceptualizing Property in Databases, 18 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 773 (2003).
105. International Task Force on Global Public Goods, Report of the First Meeting, 25–26 Sept. 2003, available at http://www.gpgtaskforce.org/bazment.aspx (visited 21 Dec. 2003).
106. Rebecca S. Eisenberg, Public Research and Private Development: Patents and Technology Transfer in Government-Sponsored Research, 82 VA. L. REV. 1663 (1996).
107. Arti K. Rai & Rebecca S. Eisenberg, Bayh-Dole Reform and the Progress of Biomedicine, 66 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 289 (2003).
108. Decision of the South African Competition Commission concerning AIDS medicines, av ai la ble at www.cptech.org/ip/health/sa/settlement12092003.pdf (visited 7 Feb. 2004).
109. J.H. REICHMAN WITH CATHERINE HASENZAHL, NON-VOLUNTARY LI CENS ING OF PATENTED INVENTIONS: THE LAW AND PRACTICE OF THE UNITED STATES (UNCTAD/ICTSD 2003) (discussing broad reliance on government use provisions in U.S. law).
110. Duncan Matthews, WTO Decision on Implementation of Paragraph 6 of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health: A Solution to the Access to Essential Medicines Problem?, 7 JIEL 73 (2004).
111. Audrey R. Chapman, The Human Rights Implications of Intellectual Property Protection, 5 JIEL 861-867 (2002)
112. Alan O. Sykes, TRIPs, Pharmaceuticals, Developing Countries and the Doha “Solution,” 3 CHI. J. INT’ L L. 47 (2002).
113. James Love & Tim Hubbard, From TRIPS to RIPS: A Better Trade Framework to Support Innovation in Medical Technologies, presented at the workshop on economic issues related to access to HIV/AIDS care in developing countries, Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le Sida, Marseille, France (2003), available at http://www.cptech.org/ip/health/rndtf/trips2rips.pdf (visited 30 Jan. 2004).
114. Thomas Cottier & Marion Panizzon, Legal Perspectives on Traditional Knowledge: The Case for Intellectual Property Protection [this volume].
115. Robert Howse, The Canadian Generic Medicines Panel: A Dangerous Precedent in Dangerous Times, 3 J. WORLD INTELL. PROP. 493 (2002)
116. JOOST PAULWELYN, CONFLICT OF NORMS IN INTERNAT IONAL LAW: HOW WTO LAW RELATES TO OTHER RULES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW (Cambridge University Press 2003).
117. J. H. Reichman, Securing Compliance with the TRIPS Agreement after U.S. v. India, 1 JIEL 585, 594–97 (1998).
118. Graeme B. Dinwoodie, The Architecture of the International Intellectual Property System, 77 CHI. KENT L. REV. 993, 1005–06 (2002)
119. LAURENCE LESSIG, THE FUTURE OF IDEAS: THE FATE OF THE COMMONS IN A CONNECTED WORLD (2002).
120. Herbert Hovenkamp et al., Anticompetitive Settlements of Intellectual Property Disputes, 87 MINN L. REV. 1719 (2003).
121. UNCTAD, THE TRIPS AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES 15–28 (1996).
122. Reichman, From Free Riders to Fair Followers, above n. 20.
123. Richard Epstein, Steady the Course: Property Rights in Genetic Material, in PERSPECTIVES ON PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN GENOME PROJECT, above n. 49, at 153–93.
124. Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss, Varying the Course in Patenting Genetic Material: A Counter-Proposal to Richard Epstein’s Steady Course, in PERSPECTIVES ON PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN GENOME PROJECT, above n. 49, at 195–208.
125. Reichman, Saving the Patent Law from Itself, above n. 49.
126. Dan L. Burk & Mark A. Lemley, Policy Levers in Patent Law, 89 VA. L. REV. 1575 (2003).
127. Niva Elkin-Korin, A Public Regarding Approach to Contracting over Copyrights, in EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF IP, above n. 41, at 191, 195–98
128. Richard R. Nelson, Intellectual Property Protection for Cumulative Systems Technology, 94 COLUM. L. REV. 2674 (1994)
129. Accord: John F. Duffy, Harmony and Diversity in Global Patent Law, 17 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 685, 709–25 (2002)
130. STEPHEN P. LADAS, PATENTS, TRADEMARKS AND R ELATED R IGHTS – NATIONAL AND I NTERNATIONAL P ROTECTION 9–16 (1975)
131. Graeme B. Dinwoodie, ANew Copyright Order: Why National Courts Should Create Global Norms, 149 U. PA. L. REV. 469, 514–15 (2000)
132. Yochai Benkler, Coase’s Penguin, 112 YALE L. REV. 369 (2002)
133. Peter Gerhart, Distributive Values and Institutional Design in the Provision of Global Public Goods [this volume]
134. Beyond the Treaties: A Symposium on Compliance with International Intellectual Property Law, 32 CASE W. RES. J. INT’ L L. 357 (2000).
135. Gail E. Evans, Intellectual Property as a Trade Issue: The Making of the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property, 18 WORLD COMPET I T ION, L.&ECON. REV. 137 (1994).
136. UNCTAD, THE TRIPS AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, above n. 136, at 32
137. World Bank, Global Economic Prospects and the Developing Countries 2002, above n. 22, at 140–44.
138. Reichman, Free Riders to Fair Followers, above n. 20.
139. J.H. Reichman, Ruth Okediji, and Jayasharee Watal, Draft UNDP Flagship Program on Innovation, Culture, Traditional Know-How and Bioresources, prepared for the Special Unit for Technical Cooperation Among Developing Countries (TCDC), Apr.–May 2000.
140. Michael Callon, Is Science a Public Good ?, 19 SCI. & HUM. VALUES 395, 400 (1994)
141. John H. Barton, The Economics of TRIPS: International Trade in Information Intensive Products, 33 GEO. WASH. INT’ L REV. 473, 486–91 (2001).
142. Peter Weiss, Conflicting International Public Sector Information Policies and Their Effects on the Public Domain and the Economy, in ROLE OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL DATA, above n. 28, at 129–32.
143. Paul A. David, Will Building “Good Fences” Really Make “Good Neighbors” in Science? Digital Technologies, Collaborative Research on the Internet and the EC’s Push for the Protection of Intellectual Property, Stanford Institute for Econ. Pol’y Res., Discussion Paper No. 00–33 (2000), available at http://www-econ.stanford.edu/faculty/workp/swpo/005.html (last visited 1 Aug. 2004)
144. Josh Lerner, The New New Financial Thing: The Sources of Innovation Before and After “State Street,” N.B.E.R. Working Paper No. W10223 (Jan. 2004).