Global structures: Markets, organizations, networks – and communities?

Transnational Communities: Shaping Global Economic Governance

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 37-54

  Mayntz, Renate ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926968665     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511778100.003     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. Adler, E. 1992. “The emergence of cooperation: National epistemic communities and the international evolution of the idea of nuclear arms control,” International Organization 46 (1): 101–45.
2. Bartley, T. 2003. “Certifying forests and factories: States, social movements, and the rise of private regulation in the apparel and forest product field,” Politics & Society 31: 433–64.
3. Buckler, S. 2007. “Theory, ideology, rhetoric: Ideas in politics and the case of ‘community’ in recent political discourse,” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9 (1): 36–54.
4. Crouch, C. 2005. Capitalist diversity and change: Recombinant governance and institutional entrepreneurs. Oxford University Press.
5. Epstein, P. J. 1997. “Beyond policy community: French agriculture and the GATT,” Journal of European Public Policy 4 (3): 355–72.
6. Etzioni, A. 1993. The spirit of community: Rights, responsibilities, and the communitarian agenda. New York: Crown.
7. Etzioni, A. (ed.) 1995. New communitarian thinking: Persons, virtues, institutions, and communities. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
8. Fuchs, D. 2005. Understanding business power in global governance. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
9. Geiger, T. 1960. Die Gesellschaft zwischen Pathos und Nüchternheit. Copenhagen: Universitetsforlaget.
10. Gläser, J. 2006. Wissenschaftliche Produktionsgemeinschaften: Die soziale Ordnung der Forschung. Frankfurt a.M: Campus.
11. Haas, P. M. 1992a. “Banning chlorofluorocarbons: Epistemic community efforts to protect stratospheric ozone,” International Organization 46 (1): 187–223.
12. Haas, P. M. 1992b. “Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination,” International Organization 46 (1): 1–35.
13. Hillery, G. A. 1955. “Definitions of community: Areas of agreement,” Rural Sociology 20: 111–23.
14. Jessop, B. and Ngai-Ling, S. 2006. Beyond the regulation approach: Putting capitalist economies in their place. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
15. Jordan, G. 1990. “Sub-governments, policy communities and networks. Filling the old bottles?,” Journal of Theoretical Politics 2 (3): 319–38.
16. Kessler, J. 2007. Globalisierung oder Integration: Korrespondenzprobleme bei der empirischen Erfassung von Globalisierunsprozessen. Bremen: TransState Working Papers No.53.
17. Knorr Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Knorr Cetina, K. 2005. “How are global markets global? The architecture of the flow world,” in Knorr Cetina, K. and Preda, A. (eds.), The sociology of financial markets. Oxford University Press, pp. 38–61.
19. Kogut, B. and Metiu, A. 2001. “Open source software development and distributed innovation,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 17 (2): 248–64.
20. Mayntz, R. 2001. “Die Bestimmung von Forschungsthemen in Max-Planck-Instituten im Spannungsfeld wissenschaftlicher und außerwissenschaftlicher Interessen: Ein Forschungsbericht.” MPIfG Discussion Paper 01/8. Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
21. Mayntz, R. 2003. “New challenges to governance theory,” in Bang, H. P. (ed.), Governance as social and political communication. Manchester University Press, pp. 27–40.
22. Quack, S. 2007. “Legal professionals and transnational law-making: A case of distributed agency,” Organization 14 (5): 643–66.
23. Rhodes, R. A. W. 1990. “Policy networks. A British perspective,” Journal of Theoretical Politics 2 (3): 293–317.
24. Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Wenger, E. 2001. “Communities of practice,” in International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 2339–42.
26. Wiesenthal, H. 2000. “Markt, Organisation und Gemeinschaft als ‘zweitbeste’ Verfahren sozialer Koordination,” in Werle, R. and Schimank, U. (eds.), Gesellschaftliche Komplexität und kollektive Handlungsfähigkeit. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus, pp. 44–73.