Migration as a new metaphor in comparative constitutional law

The Migration of Constitutional Ideas

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-36

  Choudhry, Sujit ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926954287     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511493683.001     Document Type: Chapter

References (59)

1. International Journal of Constitutional Law - I cite both as appropriate.
2. A conversation between U.S. Supreme Court justices (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 519
3. Transcript of Discussion Between U.S. Supreme Court Justices Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer, American University Washington College of Law, available at http://domino. american.edu/AU/media/mediarel.nsf/0/1F2F7DC4757FD01E85256F890068E6E0?OpenDocument.
4. Printz v. United States, 521 US 898 (1997).
5. Knight v. Florida, 528 US 990 (1990).
6. Foster v. Florida, 537 US 990 (2002).
7. Knight, at 463.
8. Foster, at 472.
9. Knight, at 459.
10. Foster, at 470.
11. Lawrence, at 2483.
12. M. Ramsey, International Materials and Domestic Rights: Reflections on Atkins and Lawrence (2004) 98 American Journal of International Law 69.
13. Roper v. Simmons, 543 US 551 (2005).
14. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (2nd edn, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 1986).
15. Constitutional Goods (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004), p. viii.
16. R. Posner, No Thanks, We Already Have Our Own Laws, Legal Affairs, July/August 2004.
17. P. Kahn, Comparative Constitutionalism in a New Key (2003) 101 Michigan Law Review 2677 at 2685-6
18. K. Kersch, The New Legal Transnationalism, The Globalized Judiciary, and the Rule of Law (2005) 4 Washington University Global Studies Law Review 345.
19. R. Alford, Misusing International Sources to Interpret the Constitution (2004) 98 American Journal of International Law 57 at 59.
20. S. Breyer, The Supreme Court and The New International Law, speech, 97th annual meeting of the American Society of International Law, available at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/publicinfo/speeches/sp_04-04-03.html.
21. The Globalization of Freedom (2001) 26 Yale Journal of International Law 305 at 306.
22. Q. Hillyer, Constitutional Irrelevance: Forfeiting sovereignty for sodomy, National Review Online, 7 July 2003.
23. T. Wu, Foreign Exchange: Should the Supreme Court care what other countries think?, Slate, 9 April 2004.
24. S. O'Connor, remarks, Southern Center for International Studies, available at http://www. southerncenter.org/OConnor_transcript.pdf.
25. R. Ginsburg, Looking Beyond Our Borders: The Value of a Comparative Perspective in Constitutional Adjudication (2004) 22 Yale Law and Policy Review 329 at 337.
26. H. Koh, International Law as Part of Our Law (2004) 98 American Journal of International Law 43 at 56.
27. V. Jackson and M. Tushnet, Comparative Constitutional Law (Foundation Press, New York, 1999)
28. N. Dorsen et al., Comparative Constitutionalism: Cases and Materials (Thomson/West, St Paul, MN, 2003).
29. Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004).
30. The Constitution of Independence: The Development of Constitutional Theory in Australia, Canada and New Zealand (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005).
31. Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001).
32. Allan, Constitutional Justice, preface.
33. Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law (Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh, 1974).
34. P. Legrand, What 'Legal Transplants' in D. Nelken and J. Feest (eds.), Adapting Legal Cultures (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2001), p. 55 at p. 59.
35. P. Legrand, The Same and the Different in P. Legrand and R. Munday (eds.), Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003), p. 240.
36. K. Zweigert and H. Kötz, Introduction to Comparative Law, T. Weir translator (3rd rev. edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1988), pp. 39-40.
37. Foreign Law and Comparative Methodology: A Subject and a Thesis (Hart Publishing, Oxford, 1997), p. 6.
38. The Neo-Romantic Turn in P. Legrand and R. Munday (eds.), Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003), p. 312, pp. 341-2.
39. D. Nelken, Comparatists and Transferability in P. Legrand and R. Munday (eds.), Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003), p. 437 at p. 442.
40. B. Friedman and C. Saunders, Editors' Introduction, p. 177
41. D. Davis, Constitutional Borrowing: The Influence of Legal Culture and Local History in the Reconstitution of Comparative Influence: The South African Experience, p. 181
42. L. Epstein and J. Knight, Constitutional Borrowing and Nonborrowing, p. 196
43. Y. Hasebe, Constitutional Borrowing and Political Theory, p. 224.
44. W. Osiatynski, Paradoxes of Constitutional Borrowing, p. 244
45. C. Rosenkrantz, Against Borrowings and Other Nonauthoritative Uses of Foreign Law, p. 269
46. K. Lane Scheppele, Aspirational and Aversive Constitutionalism: The Case for Studying Cross-constitutional Influence Through Negative Models, p. 296.
47. V. Jackson, Comparative Constitutional Federalism and Transnational Judicial Discourse (2004) 2 International Journal of Constitutional Law 91
48. W. Eskridge, United States: Lawrence v. Texas and the Imperative of Comparative Constitutionalism (2004) 2 International Journal of Constitutional Law 555
49. D. Law, Generic Constitutional Law (2005) 89 Minnesota Law Review 652.
50. Globalization in Search of Justification: Toward a Theory of Comparative Constitutional Interpretation (1999) 74 Indiana Law Journal 819 at 835
51. Lochner Era and Comparative Constitutionalism (2004) 2 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1 at 52.
52. V. Jackson, Constitutional Comparisons: Convergence, Resistance, Engagement (2005) 119 Harvard Law Review 109.
53. E. Young, Foreign Law and the Denominator Problem (2005) 119 Harvard Law Review 148.
54. J. Waldron, Foreign Law and the Modern Jus Gentium (2005) 119 Harvard Law Review 129 at 129.
55. Reflection (Symposium: Comparative Avenues in Constitutional Law Borrowing) (2004) 82 Texas Law Review 1737 at 1758.
56. G. Jacobsohn, The Permeability of Constitutional Borders (2004) 82 Texas Law Review 1763.
57. Roper, at 1200 (emphasis added).
58. R. Alford, In Search of a Theory for Constitutional Comparativism (2005) 52 UCLA Law Review 639 at 641.
59. R. Alford, Roper v. Simmons and Our Constitution in International Equipoise (2005) 53 UCLA Law Review 1.