The impact of reproductive health legislation on family planning clinic services in Texas

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 105, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 851-858

  White, Kari ^a   Hopkins, Kristine ^b   Aiken, Abigail R A ^b   Stevenson, Amanda ^b   Hubert, Celia ^b   Grossman, Daniel ^c   Potter, Joseph E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^c IBIS REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTION; ECONOMICS; FAMILY PLANNING; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION; TEXAS;

CONTRACEPTION; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; TEXAS;

EID: 84926680106     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: 15410048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302515     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Gold RB. The role of family planning centers as gateways to health coverage and care. Guttmacher Policy Rev. 2011;14(2):15-19.
2. Flynn A. The Title X Factor: Why the Health of America's Women Depends on More Funding for Family Planning. New York, NY: Roosevelt Institute; 2013.
3. Gold RB. Back to center stage: ACA decision gives new significance to Medicaid family planning expansions. Guttmacher Policy Rev. 2012;15(4):13-17.
4. Gold RB. Besieged family planning network plays pivotal role. Guttmacher Policy Rev. 2013;16(1):13-18.
5. Nash E, Gold RB, Rowan A, Rathbun G, Vierboom, Y. Laws Affecting Reproductive Health and Rights: 2013 State Policy Review. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2013.
6. Guttmacher Institute. Monthly state update: major developments in 2014. 2014. Available at: http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/updates/index.html#fprestrictions. Accessed August 28, 2014.
7. Tan T. Day 15: Texas family planning funding slashed. 2011. Available at: http://www.texastribune.org/2011/08/15/day-15. Accessed September 1, 2014.
8. Kost K, Henshaw S. U. S. Teenage Pregnancies, Births and Abortions, 2008: State Trends by Age, Race and Ethnicity. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2013.
9. Passel JS, Cohn D. Unauthorized Immigrant Population: National and State Trends, 2010. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center; 2011.
10. Tan T. State releases reduced list of women's health clinics. 2012. Available at: http://www.texastribune.org/2012/01/17/state-releases-family-planningcontractor-list. Accessed September 1, 2014.
11. Ramshaw E, Tan T. The storm over women's health care had been brewing. 2012. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/23/us/storm-overwomens-health-care-in-texas-had-beenbrewing.html?pagewanted=all&-r=0. Accessed September 1, 2014.
12. Ramshaw E. Feds: TX Women's Health Program Funding Ends Dec.31. 2012. Available at: http://www.texastribune.org/2012/11/08/cindymann-funding-whp-expires-years-end. Accessed September 1, 2014.
13. Dalton VK, Jacobson PD, Berson-Grand J, Weisman CS. Threats to family planning services in Michigan: organizational responses to economic and political challenges. Womens Health Issues. 2005;15(3):117-125.
14. Jacobson PD, Dalton VK, Berson-Grand J, Weisman CS. Survival strategies for Michigan's health care safety net providers. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(3):923-940.
15. Blumenthal PD, Voedisch A, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Strategies to prevent unintended pregnancy: increasing use of longacting reversible contraception. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(1):121-137.
16. Committee on Adolescent Health Care Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Working Group; the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee opinion no. 539: adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(4):983-988.
17. White K, Grossman D, Hopkins K, Potter J. Cutting family planning in Texas. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(13):1179-1181.
18. Secura GM, Allsworth JE, Madden T, Mullersman JL, Peipert JF. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(2):115.e1-e7.
19. White K, Potter JE, Hopkins K, Grossman D. Variation in postpartum contraceptive method use: results from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). Contraception. 2012;86(3):309-310.
20. Frost J, Zolna MR, Frohwirth L. Contraceptive Needs and Services, 2010. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2013.
21. Hadley B, Fox J. Memorandum to the Office of State Representative Dawnna Dukes. 2011. Available at: http://www.lrl.state.tx.us/scanned/archive/2011/15623.pdf. Accessed May 30, 2014.
22. Beeson T, Wood S, Bruen B, Goetz Goldberg D, Mead H, Rosenbaum S. Accessibility of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). Contraception. 2014;89(2):91-96.
23. Wood S, Beeson T, Bruen B, et al. Scope of family planning services available in federally qualified health centers. Contraception. 2014;89(2):85-90.
24. Frost JJ, Gold RB, Frohwirth L, Blades N. Variation in Service Delivery Practices Among Clinics Providing Publicly Funded Family Planning Services in 2010. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2012.