Cutting family planning in Texas

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 367, Issue 13, 2012, Pages 1179-1181

  White, Kari ^a   Grossman, Daniel ^b,c   Hopkins, Kristine ^d   Potter, Joseph E ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b IBIS REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIRTH CONTROL; BUDGET; CONTRACEPTION; COST CONTROL; FAMILY PLANNING; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROGRAM; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SHORT SURVEY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84866760627     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1207920     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Mohllajee AP, Curtis KM, Morrow B, Marchbanks PA. Pregnancy intention and its relationship to birth and maternal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:678-86. (Pubitemid 46339408)
2. Gipson JD, Koenig MA, Hindin MJ. The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: a review of the literature. Stud Fam Plann 2008;39:18-38.
3. Frost J, Finer LB, Tapales A. The impact of publicly funded family planning clinic services on unintended pregnancy and government cost savings. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2008;19:778-96.
4. Winner B, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, et al. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1998-2007.
5. Foster DG, Hulett D, Bradsberry M, Darney P, Policar M. Number of oral contraceptive pill packages dispensed and subsequent unintended pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:566-72.