Image analysis method to evaluate beak and head motion of broiler chickens during feeding

Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

Volumn 114, Issue , 2015, Pages 88-95

  Abdanan Mehdizadeh, S ^a   Neves, D P ^b   Tscharke, M ^c   Naas I A ^b   Banhazi, T M ^c  

^a University of Agriculture and Natural Resources   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Eating behaviour; High speed camera; Image analysis; Jaw apparatus

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; CAMERAS; COMPUTER VISION; FEEDING; HIGH SPEED CAMERAS; KINEMATICS; MOTION ANALYSIS; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPEED;

ANATOMICAL FEATURES; AUTOMATIC MEASUREMENTS; BIOMECHANICAL MOTIONS; EATING BEHAVIOUR; IMAGE ANALYSIS METHOD; JAW APPARATUS; KINEMATIC MEASUREMENTS; KINEMATICS VARIABLES;

IMAGE ANALYSIS;

ANATOMY; AUTOMATION; BENCHMARKING; BIOMECHANICS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; KINEMATICS; PHYSICAL PROPERTY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; VIDEOGRAPHY; VISUALIZATION;

AVES; GALLUS GALLUS;

EID: 84926660690     PISSN: 01681699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2015.03.017     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Addo A., Bart-Plange A., Akowuah J.O. Particle size evaluation of feed ingredient produced in the Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana. ARPN J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2012, 7:177-181.
2. Amerah A.M., Ravindran V., Lentle R.G., Thomas D.G. Feed particle size: implications on the digestion and performance of poultry. World Poult. Sci J 2007, 63:439-451.
3. Berdoy M. Defining bouts of behaviour: a three process model. Anim. Behav. 1993, 46:387-396.
4. Bermejo R., Allan R.W., Houben D., Deich J.D., Zeigler H.P. Prehension in the pigeon I: descriptive analysis. Exp. Brain Res. 1989, 75:569-576.
5. Buskirk D.D., Zanella A.J., Harrigan T.M., Van Lente J.L., Gnagey L.M., Kaercher M.J. Large round bale design affects hay utilization and beef cow behavior. J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 81:109-115.
6. Cobb-Vantress. 2009. Manual de manejo de frangos de corte (Broiler Management Guide). L-1020-02 PT.
7. Dawson M.M., Metzger K.A., Baier D.B., Brainerd E.L. Kinematics of the quadrate bone during feeding in mallard ducks. J. Exp. Biol. 2011, 214:2036-2046.
8. Emmans G., Kyriazakis I. Consequences of genetic change in farm animals on food intake and feeding behavior. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2001, 60:115-125.
9. Estrella S.M., Masero J.A. The use of distal rhyncokinesis by birds feeding in water. J. Exp. Biol. 2007, 210:3757-3762.
10. FAO. 2012. Food Outlook, Rome: Trade and Market Division of FAO.
11. Greenwood M.W., Cramer K.R., Clark P.M., Behnke K.C., Beyer R.S. Influence of feed form on dietary lysine and energy intake and utilization of broilers from 14 to 30 days of age. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2004, 3:189-194.
12. Gussekloo S.W.S., Bout R.G. Cranial kinesis in palaeognathous birds. J. Exp. Biol. 2005, 208:3409-3419.
13. Hall S.J. Basic Biomechanics 1999, Mcgraw-Hill, Singapore. third ed.
14. Heysea T.J., El-Zayata B.F., Corteb R.De, Scheys L., Chevalierd Y., Fuchs-Winkelmanna S., Labeye L. Biomechanics of medial unicondylar in combination with patellofemoral knee Arthroplasty. Knee 2014, 21(S1):53-59.
15. Horster W., Krumm E., Mohr C., Delius D.J. Conditioning the pecking motions of pigeons. Behav. Process 2002, 58:27-43.
16. Lu T., Chang C. Biomechanics of human movement and its clinical applications. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 2012, 28:S13-S25.
17. Mclester J., Pierre P.S. Applied Biomechanics: Concepts and Connections 2008, Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont.
18. Natchev N., Heiss E., Lemell P., Stratev D., Weisgram J. Analysis of prey capture and food transport kinematics in two Asian box turtles, Cuora amboinensis and Cuora flavomarginata (Chelonia, Geoemydidae), with emphasis on terrestrial feeding patterns. Zoology 2009, 112:113-127.
19. Neves D.P., Nääs I.A., Vercellino R.A., Moura D.J. Do broilers prefer to eat from a certain type of feeder?. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2010, 12:179-187.
20. Nielsen B.L. On the interpretation of feeding behaviour measures and the use of feeding rate as an indicator of social constraint. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999, 63:79-91.
21. Nielsen B.L., Lawrence A.B., Whittemore C.T. Effects of single-space feeder design of feeding behaviour and performance of growing pigs. Anim. Sci. 1995, 61:575-579.
22. Nir I., Melcion J.P., Picard M. Effect of particle size of sorghum grains on feed intake and performance of young broilers. Poult. Sci. 1990, 69:2177-2184.
23. Nir I., Hillel R., Shefet G., Nitsan Z. Effect of grain particle size on performance. 2. Grain texture interactions. Poult. Sci. 1994, 73:781-791.
24. Nir I., Shefet G., Aaroni Y. Effect of particle size on performance. 1. Corn. Poult. Sci. 1994, 73:45-49.
25. Otsu N. A threshold selection method from grey level histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cyb. 1979, 9:62-66.
26. Paxton H., Daley M.A., Corr S.A., Hutchinson J.R. The gait dynamics of the modern broiler chicken: a cautionary tale of selective breeding. J. Exp. Biol. 2013, 216:3237-3248.
27. Pennycuick C.J. Newton Rules Biology: A Physical Approach to Biological Problems 1992, Oxford University Press, New York.
28. Perez H., Oliva-Teles A. Utilization of raw and gelatinized starch by European sea bass (Dicentrarchuslabrax) juveniles. Aquaculture 2002, 205:287-299.
29. Robertson D.G.E., Caldwell G.E. Planar kinematics. Research Methods in Biomechanics 2004, 9-52. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, USA. D.G.E. Robertson, G.E. Caldwell, J. Hamill, G. Kamen, S.N. Whittlesey (Eds.).
30. Roll V.F.B., Dai Prá M.A., Roll A.A.P., Xavier E.G., Rossi P., Anciuti M.A., Rutz F. Effect of tubular feeder height on ingestive behavior of broiler. Arch. Zootec. 2010, 59:115-122.
31. Ropert-Coudert Y., Kato A., Liebsch N., Wilson R.P., Muller G., Baubet E. Monitoring jaw movements: a cue to feeding activity. Game Wildlife Sci. 2004, 20:1-19.
32. Sakatani T., Isa T. PC-based high-speed video-oculography for measuring rapid eye movements in mice. Neurosci. Res. 2004, 49:123-131.
33. Schaerlaeken V., Meyers J.J., Herrel A. Modulation of prey capture kinematics and the role of lingual sensory feedback in the lizard Pogona vitticeps. Zoology 2007, 110:127-138.
34. Skinner-Noble D.O., Mckinney L.J., Teeter R.G. Predicting effective caloric value of non-nutritive factors: III. Feed form affects broiler performance by modifying behavior patterns. Poult. Sci. 2005, 84:403-411.
35. Slater P.J.B. The temporal pattern of feeding in the Zebra finch. Anim. Behav. 1974, 22:506-515.
36. Stefen C., Ibeb P., Fischer M.S. Bi-planar X-ray motion analysis of the lower jaw movement during incisor interaction and mastication in the beaver (Castor fiber L. 1758). Mamm. Biol. 2011, 76:534-539.
37. Thomas M., Van Vliet T., van der Poel A.F.B. Physical quality of pelleted animal feed 3. Contribution of feedstuff components. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1998, 70:59-78.
38. Tran H.Q., Mehta R.S., Wainwright P.C. Effects of ram speed on prey capture kinematics of juvenile Indo-Pacific tarpon, Megalops cyprinoides. Zoology 2010, 113:75-84.
39. USDA. 2012. Livestock and Poultry: World Markets and Trade, s.l.: USDA.
40. Van Der Heuvel W.F., Berkhoudt H. Pecking in the chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) motion analysis and stereotypy. Neth. J. Zool. 1998, 48:273-303.
41. Wainwright P.C. Ecomorphology: experimental functional anatomy for ecological problems. Am. Zool. 1991, 31:680-693.
42. Wassenbergh S.V., Rechter D.D. Piscivorous cyprinid fish modulates suction feeding kinematics to capture elusive prey. Zoology 2011, 114:46-52.
43. Wolter B.F., Ellis M., Curtis S.E., Parr E.N., Webel D.M. Feeder location did not affect performance of welling pigs in large groups. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 78:2784-2789.
44. Yo T., Vilariño M., Faure J.M., Picard M. Feed pecking in young chickens: new techniques of evaluation. Physiol. Behav. 1997, 61:803-810.
45. Zang J.J., Piao X.S., Huang D.S., Wang J.J., Ma X., Ma Y.X. Effects of feed particle size and feed form on growth performance, nutrient metabolizability and intestinal morphology in broiler chickens. Asian Austral J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 22:107-112.
46. Zweers G.A. Pecking of the pigeon (Columba livia L.). Behaviour 1982, 81:173-230.