Do broilers prefer to eat from a certain type of feeder?

Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Avicola / Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 179-187

  Neves, D P ^a   Naas I A ^a   do Vercellino, R A ^a   de Moura, D J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Activity; Broiler behavior; Feeder efficiency; Feeding strategic

Indexed keywords

AVES;

EID: 78649787667     PISSN: 1516635X     EISSN: 18069061     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1516-635X2010000300007     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Baião NC. Efeitos da densidade populacional sobre o ambiente das instalações avícolas. Anais do Simpósio Internacional sobre Ambiência e Instalação na Avicultura Industrial; 1995; Campinas. São Paulo. Brasil. p.67.
2. Berdoy M. Defing bouts of behaviour: a three process model. Animal Behaviour 1993; 46:387-396.
3. Bigelow JA, Houpt TR. Feeding and drinking patterns in young pigs. Physiology & Behavior 1988; 43:99-109.
4. Bley TAG, Bessei W. Recording of individual feed intake and feeding behavior of Pekin ducks kept in groups. Poultry Science 2008; 87:215-221.
5. Bouvarel I, Valle C, Chagneau AM, Constantin P, Lescoat P, Ferreira G, LEterrier C. Effects of various energy and protein levels during sequential feeding on feed preferences in meat-type chickens. Animal 2008; 11:1674-1681.
6. Cahaner A, Pinchasov Y, Nir I. Effects of dietary protein under high ambient temperature on body weight, breast meat yield and abdominal fat deposition on broiler stock differing in growth rate and fatness. Poultry Science 1995; 74:968-975.
7. Curtis SE. Environmental management in animal agriculture. Iowa: Iowa State University Press; 1983.
8. Curto FPF, Nääs IA, Pereira DF, Salgado DD. Estimativa do padrão de preferência térmica de matrizes pesadas (frango de corte). Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 2007; 11 (2):211-216.
9. Davis NJ, Prescott NB, Savory CJ, Wathes CM. Preferences of growing fowls for different light intensities in relation to age, strain and behaviour. Animal Welfare 1999; 8:193-203.
10. Emmans GC, Kyriazakis I. Consequences of gentic change in farm animals on food intake and feeding behaviour. Proceedings of Nutricion Society. Cork, Republic of Ireland 2001; (60):115-125.
11. FARM ANIMAL. WELFARE COUNCIL. Report on the welfare of broiler chickens. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food; 1992. p.9.
12. Fiscus Le Van N, Esteves I, Strickling WR. Use oh horizontal and angled perches by broiler chickens. Applied Animal. Behaviour Science 2000; 65:359-365.
13. Goldflus F, Ariki J, Krona SN. Efeitos de diferentes densidades populacionais nas estações fria e quente do ano sobre o desempenho de frangos de corte. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 1997; 26(5):948-954.
14. Goliomytis M, Panopoulou E, Rogdakis E. Growth curves for body weight and major component parts, feed consumption, and mortality of male broiler chickens raised to maturity. Poultry Science 2003; 82:1061-1068.
15. Harlander-Matauschek A, Häusler K. Understanding feather eating behavior in laying hens. Applied. Animal. Behaviour Science 2009; 117:35-41.
16. Howie JA, Tolkamp BJ, Avendaño S, Kyriazakis I. A novel flexible method to split feeding behavior into bouts. Applied. Animal. Behaviour. Science 2009; 116:101-109.
17. Hyun Y, Ellis M. Effect of group size and feeder type on growth performance and feeding patterns in finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 2002; 80:568-574.
18. Hyun Y, Ellis M, Johnson RW. Effects of feeder type, space allowance and mixing on the growth performance and feed intake pattern of growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 1998; 76:2771-2778.
19. Neves DP, Nääs IA, Tamura JY, Trevisan GP. Equipamento manual para avicultura. BR n. PI0806115-7. Campinas, SP: UNICAMP; 2008.
20. Jaenisch FRF. Biossegurança e cuidados sanitários para frangos. Concórdia, SC. EMBRAPA_CNPSA; 1998. p.1-2. (Instrução Técnica para o Avicultor, 6).
21. Keeling L. Behaviour of fowl and other domesticated birds. In Jensen, P, editor. The ethology of domestic animals: an introductory text. Oxon: Cabi Publishing; 2002. p.107-108.
22. Kidd MT, Corzo A, Hoehler D, Emiller ER, Dozier WA. Broiler responsiveness (Ross × 708) to diets varying in amino acid density. Poultry Science 2005; 84:1389-1396.
23. Koene P. When feeding is just eating: how do farm and zoo animal use their spare time. Proceedings of the 5th Zodiac Symposium on Regulation of Feed Intake; 1998; Wageningen. Holanda. p.13-19.
24. Kristensen HH, Prescott NB, Perry GC, Ladewig J, Ersbøll AK, Overvad KC, Wathes CM. The behavior of broiler chickens in different light sources and illuminances. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 2007; 103:75-89.
25. Lana GRQ, Silva Junior RGC, Valerio SR, Lana AMQ, Cordeiro ECGB. Efeito da Densidade e de Programas de Alimentação sobre o Desempenho de Frangos de Corte. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 2001; 30(4):1258-1265.
26. Lasiewski A, Acosta L, Bernstein MH. Evaporative water loss in birds I. Characteristics of the open flow method of determination, and their relation to estimates of thermoregulatory ability. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 1966; 19(1):445-457.
27. Lucchese Filho A. Criação de frangos de corte em alta densidade: pré requisitos, vantagens e desvantagens do sistema. Anais do Manejo de Frangos de Corte; 1997; Campinas. São Paulo. Brasil. Campinas:FACTA; 1997. p.13-22.
28. Macari M, Furlan RL. Ambiência na produção de aves em clima tropical. In: Silva IJO, editor. Ambiência na produção de aves em clima tropical: Série Engenharia Agrícola Construções Rurais. Piracicaba, SP: SBEA; 2001. p. 31-87.
29. Martrenchar A, Huonnic D, Cotte JP, Boilletot E, Morisse JP. Influence of stoking density, artificial dusk and group size on the perching behavior of broilers. Brazilian Poultry Science 2000; 41:125-130.
30. MINITAB. Version 15.1.0.0; 2005.
31. Mortari AC, Rosa AP, Zanella I, Neto CB, Visentini PR, Brites LBP. Desempenho de frangos de corte criados em diferentes densidades populacionais, no inverno, no sul do Brasil. Ciência Rural 2002; 32 (3):493-497.
32. Murakami AE, Nerilo N, Furlan AC, Scapinello C, Barbosa MJB, Cardoso A. Desempenho, rendimento de carcaça, cortes e desossa de três linhagens comerciais de frangos de corte. Anais da Conferência APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas; 1995; Curitiba. Paraná. Brasil. p.279-280.
33. Neves DP, Trevisan GP. Redesign de comedouros utilizados na criação de frangos de corte no Brasil [monografia]. Curitiba(PR): Universidade Positivo; 2007.
34. Nielsen BL. On the interpretation of feeding behaviour measures and the use of feeding rate as an indicator of social constraint. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 1999; 63:79-91.
35. Nielsen BL, Lawrence AB, Whittemore CT. Effects of single-space feeder design of feeding behaviour and performance of growing pigs. Animal Science 1995; 61:575-579.
36. Pagel M, Dawkins MS. Peck orders and group size in laying hens: future contracts for non-aggression. Behavioural Processes 1997; 40:13-25.
37. Pereira DF, Nääs IA, Salgado DD, Gaspar CR, Bighi CA, Penha NLJ. Correlations among behavior, performance and environment in broiler breeders using multivariate analysis. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 2007; 9(4):207-213.
38. Picard M, Melcion JP, Bertrand D, Faure JM. Visual and tactile cues perceived by chickens. Poultry Feedstuffs 2002; (supply):279-298.
39. Prayitno DS, Phillips CJC, Omed H. The effects of color of lighting on the behaviour and production oh meat chickens. Poultry Science 1997; 76:1674-1681.
40. Prescott NB, Watches CM. Reflective properties of domestic fowl (Gallus g. domesticus), the fabric of their housing and the characteristics of the light environment in the environmentally controlled poultry houses. Brazilian Poultry Science 1999; 40:185- 193.
41. Rutz F. Aspectos fisiológicos que regulam o conforto térmico de aves. Anais da Conferência APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas; 1994. Santos. São Paulo. Brasil. p.99-100.
42. Savory JC, Kostal L. Broiler breeder chickens show apparently abnormal behaviours when subjected to routine quantitative food restriction during rearing. Physiology & Behaviour 2006; 88(4- 5):473-478.
43. Sherwin CM. Environmental enrichment for laying hens - spherical objects in the feed trough. Animal Welfare 1995; 4:41-51.
44. Sherwin CM, Lewis PD, Perry GC. The effects of environmental enrichment and intermittent lighting on the behavior and welfare of male domestic turkeys, Applied Animal Behaviour Science 1999; 62:319-333.
45. Siegel PB, Picard M, Nir I, Dunnington EA,Willemsen MHA, Williams PEV. Responses of meat-type chickens to choice feeding of diets differing in protein and energy from hatch to market weight. Poultry Science 1997; 76:1183-1192.
46. Simon VA. Aspectos sanitários de criações em altas densidades. Anais do Simpósio sobre Ambiência, Sanidade E qualidade de Carcaça de Frangos de Corte; 1997; Concórdia. Santa Catarina. Brasil. p.14-18.
47. Slater PJB. The temporal pattern of feeding in the Zebra nch. Animal Behaviour 1974; 22:506-515.
48. Sowell BF, Bowman JGP, Branine ME, Hubbert ME. Radio frequency technology to measure feeding behavior and health of feedlot steers. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 1998; 59:277-284.
49. Vandenberg C, Widowski TM. Hen's preferences for high-intensity high-pressure sodium or low- intensity incandescent lighting. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 2000; 9: 172-178.
50. Vieira SL, Lemme A, Goldenberg DB, Brugalli I. Responses of growing broilers to diets with increased sulfur amino acids to lysine ratios at two dietary protein levels. Poultry Science 2004; 83:1307-1313.
51. Wolter BF, Ellis M, Curtis SE, Parr EN, Webel DM. Feeder location did not affect performance of weaning pigs in large groups. Journal of Animal Science 2009; 78:2784-2789.
52. Yeatles MP, Tolkamp BJ, Allcroft DJ, Kyriazakis I. The use of mixed distribution models to determine bout criteria for analyses of animal behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2001; 213:413-435.
53. Yo T, Vilarino M, Faure JM, Picard M. Feed pecking in young chickens: new techniques of evaluation. Physiology & Behavior 1997; 61: 803-810.