Audio-visual interactions in environment assessment

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 523, Issue , 2015, Pages 191-200

  Preis, Anna ^a   Kociński, Jedrzej ^a   Hafke Dys, Honorata ^a   Wrzosek, Małgorzata ^a  

^a ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Audio visual assessment; Environmental noise; Soundscape; Subjective assessment of environment

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; POLLUTION;

AUDIO-VISUAL; AUDIO-VISUAL INTERACTIONS; ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE; OBJECT IDENTIFICATION; PSYCHOPHYSICAL EXPERIMENTS; SOUNDSCAPES; SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENTS;

AUDIO ACOUSTICS;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; NOISE; VISUAL ANALYSIS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM FUNCTION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANDSCAPE; MALE; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION; ACOUSTICS; CITY; ENVIRONMENT; PROCEDURES;

POLAND; POZNAN [WIELKOPOLSKIE]; WIELKOPOLSKIE;

ACOUSTICS; CITIES; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; NOISE;

EID: 84926614882     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.128     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Anderson L.M., Mulligan B.E., Goodman L.S., Regen H.Z. Effects of sounds on preferences for outdoor settings. Environ. Behav. 1983, 15(5):539-556.
2. Asdrubali F., D'Alessandro F., Baldinelli G., Schulte-Fortkamp B. From the soundscape to the architectural redevelopment of an outdoor public space. Forum Acusticum 2014 2014, Polish Acoustical Society, Krakow, Poland.
3. Axelsson Ö. The ISO 12913 series on soundscape. Forum Acusticum, Aalborg, Denmark 2011.
4. Ballas J.A. Common factors in the identification of an assortment of brief everyday sounds. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1993, 19(2):250-267.
5. Bangjun Z., Lili S., Guoqing D. The influence of the visibility of the source on the subjective annoyance due to its noise. Appl. Acoust. 2003, 64(12):1205-1215.
6. Berglund B., Berglund U. Scaling loudness, noisiness, and annoyance of community noises. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1976, 60(5):1119-1126.
7. Brambilla G., Maffei L. Responses to noise in urban parks and in rural quiet areas. Acta Acustica United Acustica 2006, 92:881-886.
8. Brown A.L. Soundscapes and environmental noise management. Noise Control Eng J. 2010, 58(5):1-8.
9. Brown A.L. Advancing the concepts of soundscapes and soundscape planning. ACOUSTICS 2011 2011, The Australian Acoustical Society, Queensland Division, Gold Coast, Australia.
10. Carles J.L., Bernáldez F., de Lucioc J. Audio-visual interactions and soundscape preferences. Landsc. Res. 1992, 17(2):52-56.
11. Carles J.L., Lopez Barrio I., de Lucio J.V. Sound influence on landscape values. Landsc. Urban Plan. 1999, 43:191-200.
12. Colavita F.B. Human sensory dominance. Percept. Psychophys. 1974, 16:409-412.
13. de Ruiter E.P.J. Noise control in the compact city. 7th International Congress on Sound and Vibration (ICSV7. Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany 2000.
14. de Ruiter E.P.J. Reclaiming land from urban traffic noise impact zones, "The great canyon" 2004, Technische Universiteit Delft, Zoetermeer.
15. Dittrich K., Oberfeld D. A comparision of the temporal weighting of annoyance and loudness. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2009, 126(6):3168-3178.
16. Driver J., Spence C. Cross-modal links in spatial attention. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1998, 353(1373):1319-1331.
17. Dubois D. Categories as acts of meaning: the case of categories in olfaction and audition. Cogn. Sci. Q. 2000, 1:25-68.
18. Dubois D., Guastavino C., Raimbault M. A cognitive approach to urban soundscapes: using verbal data to access everyday life auditory categories. Acta Acustica United Acustica 2006, 92(6):865-874.
19. Easteal M., Bannister S., J., K., Aletta F., Lavia L., Witchel H. Urban sound planning in Brighton and Hove. Forum Acusticum 2014 2014, Polish Acoustical Society, Krakow, Poland.
20. European Environment Agency Good Practice Guide on Noise Exposure and Potential Health Effects 2010.
21. European Parliment Directive 2002/49/EC, 2002. Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 Relating to the Assessment and Management of Environmental Noise 2002.
22. Evans G., Lercher P., Meis M., Ising H., Kofler W. Typical community noise exposure and stress in children. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2001, 109(3):1023-1027.
23. Fastl H. Audio-visual interactions in loudness evaluation. International Congress on Acoustics 2004, Acoustical Society of Japan, Japan.
24. Fastl H., Zwicker E. Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models 2007, Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
25. Gaver W. What in the world do we hear? An ecological approach to auditory event perception. Ecol. Psychol. 1993, 1-29.
26. Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A., Öhrström E. Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: the potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2007, 83(2-3):115-126.
27. Gygi B., Shafiro V. The incongruency advantage for environmental sounds presented in natural auditory scenes. J. Exp. Psychol. 2011, 37:551-565.
28. Hashimoto T., Hatano S. Effect of factors other than sound to the perception of sound quality. International Congress on Acoustics 2001, Acoustical Society of Italy, Rome, Italy.
29. Hatano S., Hashimoto T., Kimura Y., Tanaka T. Sound quality evaluation of construction machine. International Congress on Acoustics 2001, (Rome, Italy).
30. Herranz-Pascual K., Aspuru I., Garcia I. Proposed conceptual model of environmental experience as framework to study the soundscape. InterNoise 2010, Portuguese Acoustical Society and Spanish Acoustical Society, Lisbon, Portugal.
31. Hong J.Y., Jeon J.Y. Designing sound and visual components for enhancement of urban soundscapes. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2013, 134(3):2026-2036.
32. Hong J.Y., Jeon J.Y. The effects of audio-visual factors on perceptions of environmental noise barrier performance. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2013, 125:28-37.
33. Janssen S.A., Vos H., Eisses A.R., Pedersen E. A comparison between exposure-response relationships for wind turbine annoyance and annoyance due to other noise sources. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2011, 130(6):3746-3753.
34. Kang J. Urban Sound Environment 2006, Taylor & Francis, London; New York.
35. Karlsson H. The acoustic environment as public domain. Soundscape. J. Acoust. Ecol. 2000, 1/2:10-13.
36. Kayser C., Petkov C., Lippert M., Logothetis N. Mechanisms for allocating auditory attention: an auditory saliency map. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:1943-1947.
37. Kihlman T., Kropp W., Öhrström E., Berglund B. Soundscape Support to Health. A Cross-disciplinary Research Programme. 30th international congress and exposition on noise, control engineering 2001, 3:1237-1242.
38. Lercher P., Widmann U. Association and moderation of self-reported hypotension with traffic noise exposure: a neglected relationship. Noise Health 2013, 15(65):205-216.
39. Lercher P., Botteldooren D., Widmann U. Cardiovascular effects of environmental noise: Research in Austria. Review of studies in Alpine valleys over 25years - exposure response and effect modification. Noise Health 2011, 13:234-250.
40. Lercher P., Evans G., Widmann U. The ecological context of soundscapes for children's blood pressure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2013, 134(1):773-781.
41. Maffei L., Romero V.P., Brambilla G., di Gabriele M., Gallo V. Characterization of the Soundscape of Urban Waterfronts Krakow, Poland 2014.
42. Maffiolo A.V., Castellengo M., Dubois D. Qualitative judgements of urban soundscapes. Inter-Noise 99 1999, (Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA).
43. Marquis-Favre C., Premat E., Aubree D. Noise and its effects - a review on qualitative aspects of sounds. Part II. Noise and annoyance. Acta Acustica United Acustica 2005, 91:626-642.
44. McGurk H., McDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 1976, 264:746-748.
45. Miedema H.M.E., Oudshoorn C.G.M. Annoyance from transportation noise: relationship with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. Environ. Health Perspect. 2001, 109(4):409-416.
46. Miedema H.M.E., Vos H. Noise annoyance from stationary sources: relationships with exposure metric day-evening-night level (DENL) and their confidence intervals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 116(1):334-343.
47. Nilsson M.E. Soundscape quality in urban open spaces. Inter-Noise 2007 2007, Turkish Acoustical Society, Instanbul.
48. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities European commission working group on dose-effect relations, 2002. Position Paper on Dose Response Relationships between Transportation Noise and Annoyance 2002, (Luxembourg).
49. Oldoni D., De Coensel B., Boes M., Rademaker M., De Baets B., Van Renterghem T., Botteldooren D. A computational model of auditory attention for use in soundscape research. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2013, 134(1):852-861.
50. Porteous J.D., Mastin J.F. Soundscape. J. Archit. Plan. Res. 1985, 2(3):169-186.
51. Preis A., Hafke H., Kaczmarek T. Influence of sound source recognition on annoyance judgment. Noise Control Eng. J. 2008, 56(4).
52. Raimbault M. Qualitative judgements of urban soundscapes: questioning questionnaires and semantic scales. Acta Acustica United Acustica 2006, 92(6):929-937.
53. Raimbault M., Dubois D. Urban soundscapes: experiences and knowledge. Cities 2005, 22(5):339-350.
54. Santangelo V., Spence C. Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2007, 33(6):1311-1321.
55. Santangelo V., Fagioli S., Macaluso E. The costs of monitoring simultaneously two sensory modalities decrease when dividing attention in space. NeuroImage 2010, 49:2717-2727.
56. Schafer R.M. The Tuning of the World 1977, Knopf, Alfred A, New York.
57. Skoda S., Steffens J., Becker-Schweitzer J. Road traffic noise annoyance in domestic environments can be reduced by water sounds. Forum Acusticum 2014 2014, Polish Acoustical Society, Krakow, Poland.
58. Southworth The sonic environment of cities. Environ. Behav. 1969, 1:49-70.
59. Talsma D., Senkowski D., Soto-Faraco S., Woldorff M.G. The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14(9):400-410.
60. Thurlow W.R., Jack C.E. Certain determinants of the "ventriloquism" effect. Percept. Motor Skills 1973, 36:1171-1184.
61. Traux B. "Models and strategies for acoustic design", Stockholm, Hey Listen! 1998, The Royal Swedish Academy of Music.
62. Truax B. Handbook for Acoustic Ecology 1999, Cambridge Street Publishing.
63. Tsai K.T., Lai P.R. The research of the interactions between the environmental sound and sight. International Congress on Acoustics 2001, Acoustical Society of Italy, Rome, Italy.
64. Van Renterghem T., Bockstael A., De Weirt V., Botteldooren D. Annoyance, detection and recognition of wind turbine noise. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 456-57:333-345.
65. Viollon S., Lavandier C., Drake C. Influence of visual setting on sound ratings in an urban environment. Appl. Acoust. 2002, 63(5):493-511.
66. WHO Regional Office for Europe Night Noise Guidelines for Europe 2009, (Copenhagen).
67. Yang W., Kang J. Acoustic comfort evaluation in urban open public spaces. Appl. Acoust. 2005, 66:211-229.