Noise and its effects - A review on qualitative aspects of sound. Part II: Noise and annoyance

Acta Acustica united with Acustica

Volumn 91, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 626-642

  Marquis Favre, C ^a   Premat, E ^a,c   Aubredue D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^b Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment ^*  (France)

^c Centre d'Etudes Techniques de l'Equipement de Lyon   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC ENERGY; ACOUSTIC PARAMETERS; PSYCHOACOUSTIC INDICES; QUALITATIVE ASPECTS OF SOUND;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; HEALTH; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; QUALITY ASSURANCE; SOCIAL ASPECTS; STATISTICS;

ACOUSTIC NOISE;

EID: 23044512145     PISSN: 16101928     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (204)

1. P. Sardin, P. Bar: Aspects de la gêne due au bruit de la circulation routière. Ministère de l'Equipement, Direction des Routes et de la Circulation Routière, SETRA, IRT. France, 1976.
2. D. Aubrée, S. Auzou, J. M. Rapin: Le bruit des rues et la gêne exprimée par les riverains. Cahiers du CSTB, 1174, Paris, France, 1973.
3. R. Guski: Psychological determinants of train noise annoyance. Proc. Euro-Noise, Munich, 1998, 1, 573-576.
4. B. Berglund: Community noise in a public health perspective. Proc. Inter-Noise, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998, 1, 19-24.
5. R. F. S. Job: Community response to noise: a review of factors influencing the relationship between noise exposure and reaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 83 (1988) 991-1001.
6. P. Lercher: Deviant dose-response curves for traffic noise in 'sensitive areas'. Proc. Inter-Noise, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998, 2, 1141-1144.
7. C. Levy-Leboyer: La gêne due au bruit, mesure et signification. Ministère de l'environnement S.R.E.T.I.E., Paris, 1988.
8. J. M. Fields, R. G. Dejong, A. L. Brown, I. H. Flindell, T. Gjestland, R. F. S. Job, S. Kurra, P. Lercher, A. Schuemer-Kohrs, M. Vallet, T. Yano: Guidelines for reporting core information from community noise reaction surveys. Journal of Sound and Vibration 206 (1997) 685-695.
9. European Parliament and Council: Directive 2002/49/EC of the 25th June 2002. 2002.
10. T. J. Schultz: Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 64 (1978) 377-405.
11. K. D. Kryter: Community annoyance from aircraft and ground vehicle noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 72 (1982) 1222-1242.
12. H. M. E. Miedema, H. Vos: Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 104 (1998) 3432-3445.
13. J. Lambert, F. Simonnet, M. Vallet: Patterns of behaviour in dwellings exposed to road traffic noise. Journal of Sound and Vibration 92 (1984) 159-172.
14. D. Bertoni, A. Franchini, M. Magnoni, P. Tartoni, M. Vallet: Reaction of people to urban traffic noise in Modena, Italy. Proc. Noise as a Public Health Problem, Nice, 1993, 593-596.
15. J. M. Fields: Effect of personal and situational variables on noise annoyance in residential areas. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93 (1993) 2753-2763.
16. aeq in the evaluation of train noise. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 5, 2199-2204.
17. K. Holmberg, U. Landstrom, A. Kjellberg, M. Tesarz: Phase effect on roughness sensation of complex tones. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, 1996, 5, 2521-2524.
18. M. Bjorkman, R. Rylander: Maximum noise levels in road traffic noise. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 5, 2325-2328.
19. J. M. Fields: The effect of numbers of noise events on people's reactions to noise: an analysis of existing survey data. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 75 (1984) 447-467.
20. G. Brambilla, F. Pedrielli: Community reactions to noise and vibrations from railway traffic. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 5, 2531-2536.
21. G. Kerry, P. Wheeler, C. Lomax, D. James: The assessment of noise from low flying military jet aircraft in the community. Proc. Inter-Noise, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998, 2, 1195-1198.
22. D. Gottlob: German standards for rating low-frequency noise immissions. Proc. InterNoise, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998, 3, 1679-1684.
23. S. Nakamura, Y. Tokita: Frequency characteristics of subjective responses to low frequency sound. Proc. InterNoise, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1981, 2, 735-738.
24. G. Van den Berg: Sound exposure measurements in cases of low frequency noise complaints. Proc. Inter-Noise, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998, 2, 995-998.
25. A. Verzini, C. Frassoni, A. Skarp: A field research about effects of low frequency noises on man. Proc. Forum Acusticum & ASA joint meeting, Berlin, Germany, 1999, CD ISBN 3-9804568-5-4, Paper 1PNSA-7.
26. H. Ochiai, Y. Tokita, S. Yamada: Study on evaluation method of infra and low frequency noise. Proc. InterNoise, Fort Lauderdale, USA, 1999, 2, 1153-1158.
27. H. P. Gruetz, A. Said, D. Fleischer, H. Kilcher, H. Fastl, K. Degen: Perception of railway-induced building vibrations. Proc. Euronoise, Naples, Italy, 2003, CD ISBN 88-88942-00-9, Paper ID 458-IP.
28. B. Berglund, P. Hassmen, R. F. S. Job: Sources and effects of low-frequency noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99 (1996) 2985-3002.
29. P. Schomer: Revision to the ISO 1996 series-description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise. Proc. Inter-Noise, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998, 3, 1685-1690.
30. J. M. Fields: Reactions to environmental noise in an ambient noise context in residential areas. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 104 (1998) 2245-2260.
31. A. Preis: Measurement of annoyance components. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 5, 2289-2294.
32. S. Fidell, L. Silvati, K. Pearsons: Noticeability of a decrease in aircraft noise. Noise Control Eng. J. 46 (1998) 49-56.
33. S. Fidell, L. Silvati, E. Haboly: Social survey of community response to step change in aircraft noise exposure. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111 (2002) 200-209.
34. J. Lambert, P. Champelovier, I. Vernet: Assessing the railway bonus: the need to examine the "new infrastructure" effect. Proc. Inter-Noise, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998, 2, 1665-1668.
35. R. Guski: Limits of utility of dosage-response analysis for predicting the prevalence of annoyance. Proc. Forum Acusticum & ASA joint meeting, Berlin, Germany, 1999, CD ISBN 3-9804568-5-4, Paper 2ANSA-1.
36. M. Vallet: Annoyance after changes in airport noise environment. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 5, 2329-2334.
37. R. Tonin: A method of strategic traffic noise impact analysis. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 5, 2395-2400.
38. F. H. Hall, S. Birnie, S. Taylor, J. Palmer: Direct comparison of community response to road traffic noise and to aircraft noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 70 (1981) 1690-1698.
39. K. D. Kryter: Rebuttal by Karl D. Kryter to comments by Schultz. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 72 (1982) 1253-1257.
40. W. Herrmann, V. Knall, K. Zeichart: Field studies regarding the effect of freight trains and high speed trains on annoyance reactions. Proc. Euronoise, Munich, Germany, 1998, 1, 577-580.
41. J. M. Fields, J. G. Walker: The response to railway noise in residential areas in Great Britain. Journal of Sound and Vibration 85 (1982) 177-255.
42. T. Yano, T. Yamashita, K. Izumi: Social survey on community response to railway noise - Comparison of responses obtained with different annoyance scales. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 5, 2299-2302.
43. S. Kurra, M. Morimoto, Z. I. Maekawa: Transportation noise annoyance. A simulated-environment study for road, railway and aircraft noises, part 1: overall annoyance. Journal of Sound and Vibration 220 (1999) 251-278.
44. M. A. Sattler, J. A. A. Rott: Social survey on traffic noise for the city of Porto Alegre, Brazil. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 5, 2371-2374.
45. M. Recuero, E. Blanco-Martin, J. Grundman: Study of the acoustical environment of a city. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 5, 2367-2370.
46. M. Vallet, B. Vincent: La gêne due au bruit des avions autour des aéroports. Méthodologie de l'enquête auprés des riverains de Roissy et d'Orly. Echo Bruit 88 (1999) 34-36.
47. B. Berglund, U. Berglund, T. Lindvall: Scaling loudness, noisiness, and annoyance of aircraft noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 57 (1975) 930-934.
48. B. Berglund, U. Berglund, T. Lindvall: Scaling loudness, noisiness, and annoyance of community noises. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 60 (1976) 1119-1125.
49. B. Berglund, U. Berglund, M. Goldstein, T. Lindvall: Loudness (or annoyance) summation of combined community noises. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 70 (1981) 1628-1634.
50. H. Fastl: The psychoacoustics of sound-quality evaluation. Acta Acustica 83 (1997) 754-764.
51. U. Widman: Evaluation of noise emissions of cars based on loudness. Proc. InterNoise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 5, 2205-2210.
52. R. Hellman, N. Broner: Assessment of the loudness and annoyance of low-frequency noise from a psychoacousti cal perspective. Proc. Inter-Noise, Fort Lauderdale, 1999, 3, 1893-1898.
53. T. Filippou: Comparison of subjective and physical evaluation of tennis-noise. Proc. Inter-Noise, Fort Lauderdale, USA, 1999, 3, 1881-1886.
54. N. L. Carter: Approaches to the study of noise induced sleep disturbance. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 5, 2277-2282.
55. R. Weber: Characterization of complex transportation noise with psycho-acoustical parameters. Proc. InterNoise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 5, 2525-2530.
56. P. Daniel, R. Weber: Psychoacoustical roughness: Implementation of an optimized model. Acta Acustica 83 (1997) 113-123.
57. K. Genuit: The use of psychoacoustic parameters combined with A-weighted SPL in noise description. Proc. Inter-Noise, Fort Lauderdale, USA, 1999, 3, 1887-1892.
58. N. Broner: Low frequency noise loudness vs annoyance. Proc. Inter-Noise, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998, 2, 1103-1106.
59. C. Beidl, W. Stücklschwaiger: Application of the AVL-annoyance index for engine noise quality development. Acta Acustica 83 (1997) 789-795.
60. E. Zwicker: On the dependence of unbiased annoyance on loudness. Proc. Inter-Noise 89, Newport Beach, USA, 1989, 2, 809-814.
61. B. Berglund, A. Preis: Is perceived annoyance more subject-dependent than perceived loudness? Acta Acustica 83 (1997) 313-319.
62. A. Moch-Sibony: Les effets du bruit sur l'homme. Revue d'Acoustique 55 (1980) 251-257.
63. H. M. E. Miedema, H. Vos: Demographic and attitudinal factors that modify annoyance from transportation noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105 (1999) 3336-3344.
64. P. Nelson: Transportation noise. Reference book. Butterworths, University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1987.
65. T. Yamashita, T. Yano, K. Izumi: Comparison of community response to road traffic noise in warmer and colder areas in Japan. Proc. Inter-Noise, Sydney, Australia, 1991, 2, 903-906.
66. A. Hellmann: Judged loudness of moving sound sources. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 5, 2211-2214.
67. S. Fidell: An assessment of the effect of residential acoustic insulation on prevalence of annoyance in an airport community. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89 (1991) 244-247.
68. K. Kalveram, J. Dassow, J. Vogt: How information about the source influences noise annoyance. Proc. Forum Acusticum & ASA joint meeting, Berlin, Germany, 1999, CD ISBN 3-9804568-5-4, Paper 1PNSA-8.
69. B. Schulte-Fortkamp: Combined methods to investigate effects of noise exposure and subjective noise assessment. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 5, 2351-2356.
70. F. J. Langdon: Noise nuisance caused by road traffic in residential areas. Journal of Sound and Vibration 47 (1976) 243-282.
71. J. Jeon, F. Fricke: Developing sensitivity criteria for road traffic noise in residential areas. Proc. Inter-Noise, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998, 2, 1063-1066.
72. R. F. S. Job, J. Hatfield, N. L. Carter, P. Peploe, R. Taylor, S. Morrell: Reaction to combined noise sources: the roles of general and specific noise sensitivities. Proc. InterNoise, Fort Lauderdale, USA, 1999, 2, 1189-1194.
73. J. Hatfield, R. F. S. Job, N. L. Carter, P. Peploe, R. Taylor, S. Morrell: General sensitivity to stimulation influences sensitivity to the psychological and physiological effects of noise exposure. Proc. Inter-Noise, Fort Lauderdale, USA, 1999, 2, 1231-1236.
74. R. Guski: Personal and social variables as co-determinants of noise annoyance. Journal of Noise and Health 3 (1999) 45-56.
75. R. F. S. Job: Noise sensitivity as a factor influencing human reactions to noise. Journal of Noise and Health 3 (1999) 57-68.
76. H. M. E. Miedema, H. Vos: Noise sensitivity and reactions to noise and other environmental conditions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113 (2003) 1492-1504.
77. U. Widman: Scaling annoyance of street traffic noise as a function of loudness and speech intelligibility. Proc. InterNoise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 5, 2215-2220.
78. B. Schulte-Fortkamp: Measurements of noise annoyance: Decisions on appropriate evaluation procedures in field and laboratory settings. Proc. Forum Acusticum & ASA joint meeting, Berlin, Germany, 1999, CD ISBN 3-9804568-5-4, Paper 2ANSA-4.
79. R. Klaeboe, M. Kolbenstvedt, P. Lercher, S. Solberg: Changes in noise reactions - Evidence for an area-effect? Proc. Inter-Noise, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998, 2, 1133-1136.
80. T. Sato: A path analysis of the effect of vibration on road traffic noise annoyance. Proc. Noise as a public health problem, Nice, France, 1993, 2, 411-414.
81. E. Ohrström: Community reactions to noise and vibrations from railway traffic. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 2339-2344.
82. J. Quehl, A. Schick, V. Mellert, B. Schulte-Fortkamp, H. Remmers: Combined effects of helicopter and aircraft interior sound and vibration on passengers' well-being and comfort sensation. Proc. Forum Acusticum & ASA joint meeting, Berlin, Germany, 1999, CD ISBN 3-9804568-5-4, Paper 2PPPA-12.
83. M. Bellmann, V. Mellert, C. Reckhardt, H. Remmers: Perception of sound and vibration at low frequency. Proc. Forum Acusticum & ASA joint meeting, Berlin, Germany, 1998, CD ISBN 3-9804568-5-4, Paper 4PPB-3.
84. M. Sanders, J. Gustanski, M. Lawton: Effect of ambient illumination on noise level of groups. Journal of Applied Psychology 59 (1974) 527-528.
85. M. Puslar-Cudina, M. Cudina: Noise and colors. Proc. 6th International Congress of Sound and Vibration, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1999, 3, 1163-1170.
86. C. Patsouras, T. G. Filippou, H. Fastl: Influences of color on the loudness judgement. Proc. Forum Acusticum, Sevilla, Spain, 2002, CD ISBN 84-87985-06-8, Paper PSY-05-002-IP.
87. M. J. Griffin, H. V. C. Howarth: Subjective response to combined noise and vibration: summation and interaction effects. Journal of Sound and Vibration 143 (1990) 443-454.
88. R. Weber, I. Baumann, M. Bellmann, V. Mellert: The influence of sound perception thresholds and JNDs of whole-body vibrations. Proc. I.C.A., Rome, Italy, 2001, CD ISBN 88-88387-03-X, 10-11.
89. N. Chateau: Contribution of perceived audio-visual spatial fusion to subjective audio-visual quality. Proc. Forum Acusticum & ASA joint meeting, Berlin, Germany, 1999, CD ISBN 3-9804568-5-4, Paper 5ASPA-9.
90. M. Söderholm, D. Västfjäll: The influence of sound quality on expected visual impression. Proc. Forum Acusticum & ASA joint meeting, Berlin, Germany, 1999, CD ISBN 3-9804568-5-4, Paper 3PPPB-2.
91. A. Fyhri, R. Klaeboe: Exploring the impact of visual aesthetics on the soundscape. Proc. Inter-Noise, Fort Lauderdale, 1999, 2, 1261-1264.
92. K. Abe, K. Ozawa, Y. Suzuki, T. Sone: The effects of visual information on the impression of environmental sounds. Proc. Inter-Noise, Fort Lauderdale, USA, 1999, 2, 1177-1182.
93. S. Viollon, C. Lavandier, C. Drake: Vision influences the sound perception in an urban environment: an audio-visual approach. Proc. I.C.A. & ASA joint meeting, Seattle, USA, 1998, 2, 1141-1142.
94. M. Couic, J. J. Delétré: An intersensory approach to urban analysis and design. Proc. Forum Acusticum & ASA joint meeting, Berlin, Germany, 1999, CD ISBN 3-9804568-5-4, Paper 4PNSC-2.
95. R. Volz: Interaction between picture and sound on the perception of an observer - a video installation. Proc. Forum Acusticum, Sevilla, Spain, 2002, CD ISBN 84-87985-06-8, Paper NOI-07-003-IP.
96. S. Viollon: Two examples of audio-visual interactions in an urban context. Proc. Euronoise, Naples, Italy, 2003, CD ISBN 88-88942-00-9, Paper ID 073-IP.
97. S. Cohen: Environmental load and the allocation of attention. - In: Avances in Environmental Psychology, Vol.1, The Urban Environment. A. Baum, J. E. Singer, S. Valins (eds.). 1978.
98. J. S. Bradley, H. Jonah: The effects of site selected variables on human response to traffic noise, part I: type of housing by traffic noise level. Journal of Sound and Vibration 66 (1979) 589-604.
99. A. Alexandre: An assessment of certain causal models used in surveys on aircraft noise annoyance. Journal of Sound and Vibration 44 (1976) 119-125.
100. R. Rylander, S. Sorensen, A. Kajland: Annoyance reaction from aircraft noise exposure. Journal of Sound and Vibration 24 (1972) 419-444.
101. J. Nemecek, B. Wehrli, V. Turrian: Effects of the noise of street traffic in Switzerland, a review of four surveys. Journal of Sound and Vibration 78 (1981) 223-234.
102. T. Gjestland: Regional differences in noise annoyance assessments. Proc. Inter-Noise, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998, 2, 1129-1132.
103. S. Kuwano, S. Namba, M. Florentine, Z. Da Rui, H. Fastl, A. Schick, R. Weber, H. Höge: A cross-cultural study of the factors of sound quality of environmental noise. Proc. Forum Acusticum & ASA joint meeting, Berlin, Germany, 1999, CD ISBN 3-9804568-5-4, Paper 2PPPA-1.
104. S. Kurra: Introduction to experiences with international co-operation: reconciliation of different approaches. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 5, 2505-2510.
105. U. Felscher-Suhr, R. Guski, R. Schuemer: Constructing equidistant annoyance scales - An international study. Proc. Inter-Noise, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998, 2, 1067-1070.
106. J. M. Fields, R. G. Dejong, T. Gjestland, I. H. Flindell, R. F. S. Job, S. Kurra, P. Lercher, M. Vallet, T. Yano, R. Guski, U. Felscher-Suhr, R. Schumer: Standardized general-purpose noise reaction questions for community noise surveys: research and a recommendation. Journal of Sound and Vibration 242 (2001) 641-679.
107. B. Frusthorfer: Daytime noise stress and subsequent night sleep: interference with sleep patterns, endocrine function and serotoninergic system. Proc. Noise as a public health problem, Turin, Italy, 1983, 4, 1015-1018.
108. J. Mouret, M. Vallet: Les effets du bruit sur la santé. Ministère des affaires sociales de la santé et de la ville, 1995.
109. K. Kalveram, J. Wiemers, J. Vogt: Relationship between physical noise level, experienced annoyance, and physiological reaction. Proc. 6th International Congress of Sound and Vibration, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1999, 3, 1141-1146.
110. M. S. Khan, O. Johansson, U. Sundback: Evaluation of annoyance response to engine sounds using different rating methods. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 5, 2517-2520.
111. M. Maurin, J. Lambert: Exposure of the French population to transport noise. Noise Control Engineering Journal 35 (1990) 5-18.
112. I. D. Griffiths, F. J. Langdon, M. A. Swan: Subjective effects of traffic noise exposure: reliability and seasonal effects. Journal of Sound and Vibration 71 (1980) 227-240.
113. R. Guski: Activity interference and noise annoyance: contradictory results and possible interpretations. Proc. EuroNoise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 5, 2357-2362.
114. M. Vallet, I. Vernet, P. Champelovier, M. Maurin: A road traffic noise index for the night time. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, 1996, 5, 2345-2356.
115. J. Hatfield, R. Job, N. Carter, P. Peploe, R. Taylor, S. Morrell: Attitude-mediated reaction to noise influences physiological responses: evidence supporting causality. Proc. Inter-Noise, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998, 2, 1163-1166.
116. F. H. Hall, S. M. Taylor: Reliability of social survey data on noise effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 72 (1982) 1212-1221.
117. D. Green, S. Fidell: Variability in the criterion for reporting annoyance in community noise surveys. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89 (1991) 234-243.
118. D. Botteldooren, T. Gjestland: Uncertainty in dosage-annoyance relations. Proc. Forum Acusticum & ASA joint meeting, Berlin, Germany, 1999, CD ISBN 3-9804568-5-4, Paper 2PNSF-2.
119. U. Moehler, M. Liepert, R. Schuemer, B. Griefahn: The effects of determination of acoustic data in field studies. Proc. Forum Acusticum & ASA joint meeting, Berlin, Germany, 1999, CD ISBN 3-9804568-5-4, Paper 4ANSA-4.
120. S. S. Stevens: Mathematics, measurements and psychophysics. - In: Handbook of experimental psychology. S. S. Stevens (ed.). John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1951.
121. S. S. Stevens: Psychophysics: introduction to its perceptual, neural and social aspects. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1975.
122. W. S. Torgerson: Theory and methods of scaling. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1958.
123. J. C. Baird, E. Noma: Fundamentals of scaling and psychophysics. J. Wiley and Sons, New York, 1978.
124. E. Zwicker, R. Feldtkeller: Psychoacoustique. L'oreille récepteur d'information. Masson, Paris, 1981.
125. C. Bonnet: Manuel pratique de psychophysique. Armand Colin, 1986.
126. R. D. Luce, E. Galanter: Discrimination, psychological scaling. - In: Handbook of mathematical psychology, 1. Luce, Bush, Galanter (eds.). J. Wiley, 1963, 191-243 and 245-307.
127. C. H. Coombs, R. M. Dawes, A. Tversky: Mathematical psychology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliff, New-Jersey, 1970.
128. J. C. Falmagne: Elements of psychophysical theory. Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, 1985.
129. M. Maurin: Echelles de catégories ordonnées et intervalles successifs. I.R.T.- C.E.R.N.E., Bron, 1984.
130. E. Adams, S. Messick: An axiomatic formulation and generalisation of successive intervals scaling. Psychometrika 23 (1958) 355-368.
131. P. Suppes, J. L. Zinnes: Basic measurement theory. - In: Handbook of math. Psychology, 1. Luce, Bush, Galanter (eds.). J. Wiley, 1963, 1-76.
132. J. M. Fields: Measuring residents' reactions to noise with a magnitude scale. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 5, 2383-2388.
133. R. F. S. Job, A. Topple, N. L. Carter, P. Peploe, R. Taylor, S. Morrell: Test-retest reliability of psychological scales (sensitivity and attitude) related to community reaction noise. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 5, 2413-2418.
134. R. F. S. Job, J. Hatfield, N. L. Carter, P. Peploe, R. Taylor, S. Morrell: General scales of community reaction to noise (dissatisfaction and perceived affectedness) are more reliable than scales of annoyance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 110 (2001) 939-946.
135. S. Kuwano, S. Namba: On the loudness of road traffic noise of longer duration (20 min) in relation to instantaneous judgement. Proc. ASA & ASJ joint meeting, Honolulu, Hawaii, in JASA, 64, 1978, 127-128.
136. S. Kuwano, S. Namba, H. Fastl: On the judgement of loudness, noisiness and annoyance with actual and artificial noises. J. Sound Vib. 127 (1988) 457-465.
137. H. Fastl: Average loudness of road traffic noise. Proc. Inter-Noise, Newport Beach, USA, 1989, 2, 815-820.
138. R. Weber: The continuous loudness judgement of temporally variable sounds with an "analog" category procedure. Proc. 5th Oldenburg Symposium on psychological acoustics, Oldenburg, Germany, 1991, 267-294.
139. L. Gros, N. Chateau: Instantaneous and overall judgements for time-varying speech quality: assessments and relationships. Acta Acustica 87 (2001) 367-377.
140. P. Susini, S. McAdams, B. K. Smith: Global and continuous loudness estimation of time-varying levels. Acta Acustica 88 (2002) 536-548.
141. E. Parizet, N. Hamzaoui, L. Ségaud, J. R. Koch: Continuous evaluation of noise uncomfort in a bus. Acta Acustica 89 (2003) 900-907.
142. L. L. Thurstone: A law of comparative judgement. Psychol. Rev. 34 (1927) 273-286.
143. L. L. Thurstone: The method of paired comparisons for social values. J. Abn. and Soc. Psychol. 21 (1927) 385-400.
144. H. A. David: The method of paired comparisons. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1988.
145. A. Zeitler, J. Hellbrück: Sound quality assessment of every day noises by means of psychological scaling. Proc. Inter-Noise, 1999, 3, 1291-1296.
146. F. J. Roberts: Measurement theory. Add. Wesley P. Co., Reading Massachussetts, 1979.
147. G. Canévet: La psychoacoustique. Aspects fondamentaux et exemples d'applications. Acoustiques et techniques 5 (1996) 7-14.
148. Y. Yamada: Loudness, noisiness and annoyance of complex sounds (comparison of Japanese with German). Proc. Inter-Noise, Munich, Germany, 1985, 2, 977-980.
149. R. Bisping: Car interior sound quality: experimental analysis by synthesis. Acta Acustica 83 (1997) 813-818.
150. B. Berglund, C. A. Eriksen, M. E. Nilsson: Perceptual characterization of soundscapes in residential areas. Proc. I.C.A., Rome, Italy, 2001, CD ISBN 88-88387-02-1, 6-7.
151. E. Zwicker, H. Fastl: Psychoacoustics: Facts and models. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999.
152. S. S. Stevens: Cross-modality validations of subjective scales for loudness, vibrations and electric shock. Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (1959) 201-209.
153. C. M. Harris: Handbook of acoustical measurements and noise control, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991.
154. P. Susini, S. McAdams: Psychophysical validation of a proprioceptive device by cross-modal matching of loudness. Acta Acustica 86 (2000) 515-525.
155. R. Guski: Psychological methods for evaluating sound quality and assessing acoustic information. Acta Acustica 83 (1997) 765-774.
156. O. Heller: Hörfeldautiometrie mit dem Verfahren der Kategorienunterteilung (KU). Psychologische Beiträge 27 (1985) 478-493.
157. A. Sebald, J. Hellbrück: Temporary loudness shifts measured with a psychological category scale. Proc. InterNoise, Munich, Germany, 1985, 2, 989-991.
158. C. E. Osgood: The nature and measurement of meaning. Psychological Bulletin 49 (1952) 197-237.
159. S. Kuwano, S. Namba: Temporal change of timbre of helicopter noise. Proc. Inter-Noise, Gothenburg, Sweden, 1990, 2, 1177-1180.
160. A. Zeitler, J. Hellbrück: Semantic attributes of environmental sounds and their correlations with psychoacoustic magnitudes. Proc. ICA, Rome, Italy, 2001, CD ISBN 88-88387-03-X, 6-7.
161. S. Viollon, C. Lavandier: Multidimensional assessment of the acoustic quality of urban environments. Proc. Inter-Noise, Nice, France, 2000, 4, 2279-2284.
162. I. Lopez, R. Martin, J. D. Guillén: Assessment of soundscape in children: Affective and cognitive determinants. Proc. Euronoise, Naples, Italy, 2003, CD ISBN 88-88942-00-9, Paper ID 200.
163. B. Schulte-Fortkamp: Loudness judgements on the background of subjective experience with environmental sounds. Proc. Inter-Noise, Yokohama, Japan, 1994, 2, 791-796.
164. B. Schulte-Fortkamp: The context effect of assessments on noise annoyance. Proc. Inter-Noise, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998, 2, 1123-1128.
165. P. Muckel, L. Ensel, B. Schulte-Fortkamp: Exploration of associated imaginations on sound perception (AISP): a method for helping people to describe and to evaluate their sound perceptions. Proc. Forum Acusticum & ASA joint meeting, Berlin, Germany, 1999, CD ISBN 3-9804568-5-4, Paper 4PNSB-6.
166. B. Schulte-Fortkamp, P. Muckel, N. Chouard, L. Ensel: Subjective evaluation methods: the meaning of the context in evaluation of sound quality and an appropriate test procedure. Proc. 6th International Congress of Sound and Vibration, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1999, 7, 3681-3684.
167. S. Kuwano, S. Namba: Long-term evaluation of noise. Proc. I.C.A., Trondheim, Norway, 1995, 2, 169-172.
168. S. Namba, S. Kuwano: Temporal change of noisiness of helicopter noise. Proc. Inter-Noise, Gothenburg, Sweden, 1990, 2, 1171-1176.
169. P. Susini, I. Perry, S. Vieillard, S. Winsberg, S. McAdams, X. Rodet: Sensory evaluation of air-conditioning noise: sound design and psychoacoustic evaluation. Proc. I.C.A., Rome, Italy, 2001, CD ISBN 88-88387-02-1, 20-21.
170. O. Axelsson, B. Berglund, M. E. Nilsson: Towards green labelling of soundscapes in residential areas. Proc. Euronoise, Naples, 2003, CD ISBN 88-88942-00-9, paper ID415.
171. J. D. Carroll, J. J. Chang: How to use indscal: a computer program for canonical decomposition of n-way tables and individual differences in multidimensional scaling. Bell Telephone laboratories, 1972.
172. J. B. Kruskal, M. Wish: Multidimensional scaling. Sage Publications, London, 1978.
173. S. S. Schiffman, M. L. Reynolds, F. W. Young: Introduction to multidimensional scaling. Theory, methods and applications. New York Academic Press, 1981.
174. A. P. M. Coxon: The user's guide to multidimensional scaling. Heinemann, London, 1982.
175. S. Winsberg, G. De Soete: A latent class approach to fitting the weighted Euclidean model, CLASCAL. Psychometrika 58 (1993) 315-330.
176. B. Efron: Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Annals of statistics 7 (1979) 1-26.
177. S. L. Weinberg, J. D. Carroll, H. S. Cohen: Confidence regions for INDSCAL using the jackknife and bootstrap techniques. Psychometrika 49 (1984) 475-491.
178. M. Bacelon, C. Lamure: La gêne due au bruit de circulation automobile, une enquête auprès des riverains d'autoroutes. Cahiers du C.S.T.B., 88, Paris, 1967.
179. M. Vallet: L'évolution des exigences humaines en matière de bruit routier. Journal d'Acoustique 3 (1990) 281-286.
180. B. Vincent: Contexte acoustique et environnemental dans l'évaluation des variations de la gêne due au bruit autoroutier, essai de modélisation. Thèse de Doctorat en Psychologie, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, 1994.
181. R. B. Bullen, A. J. Hede: Reliability and validity of reaction variables in community noise research. Proc. Noise as a Public Health Problem, Turin, Italy, 1983, 2, 1105-1114.
182. J. M. Fields: Proposed guidelines for reporting core information from community noise reaction surveys. Proc. I.C.A., Trondheim, Norway, 1995, 2, 89-92.
183. H. O. Finke, R. Guski, B. Rohrmann: Betroffenheit einer Stadt durch Lärm. Bericht über eine interdisziplinäre Untersuchung. Forschungsbericht 80-10501301, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig, 1980.
184. T. J. Schultz: Comments on K. D. Kryter's paper, "Community annoyance from aircraft and ground vehicle noise". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 72 (1982) 1243-1252.
185. S. Kuwano, S. Namba, M. Florentine: Introduction to experiences with efforts to standardize social noise surveys. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 4, 2047-2052.
186. R. Guski, U. Felscher-Suhr, R. Schuemer: The concept of noise annoyance: what international experts tell. Proc. Inter-Noise, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998, 2, 1045-1048.
187. R. Guski, U. Felscher-Suhr, R. Schuemer: The concept of noise annoyance: how international experts see it. Journal of Sound and Vibration 223 (1999) 513-527.
188. J. M. Fields, R. G. Dejong, I. H. Flindell, T. Gjestland, R. F. S. Job, S. Kurra, A. Schuemer-Kohrs, M. Vallet, T. Yano: Recommendation for shared annoyance questions in noise annoyance surveys. Proc. Noise as a Public Health Problem, Sidney, Australia, 1998, 2, 481-486.
189. P. Champelovier: Conception d'une échelle de gêne due au bruit des transports - Contribution française à l'"international scaling study". Rapport INRETS-LTE no.9908, INRETS, Bron, France, 1999.
190. T. Yano, K. Masden, J. M. Fields, K. Kanda, K. Kawai: An experiment on the equivalence of noise annoyance scales in English and Japanese. Proc. Inter-Noise, Fort Lauderdale, USA, 1999, 3, 1331-1336.
191. R. Guski, U. Felscher-Suhr, R. Schuemer: Measuring retrospective annoyance in fields studies: prerequisites, procedures and problems. Proc. Forum Acusticum & ASA joint meeting, Berlin, Germany, 1999, CD ISBN 3-9804568-5-4, Paper 4ANSA-7.
192. M. Bodden: Psychoacoustics and industry: instrumentation versus experience? Acta Acustica united with Acustica 85 (1999) 604-607.
193. J. B. Ollerhead: Predicting public reaction to noise from mixed sources. Proc. InterNoise, San Francisco, USA, 1978, 579-584.
194. J. Vos: Annoyance caused by simultaneous impulse, road-traffic, and aircraft sounds: a quantitative model. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91 (1992) 3330-3345.
195. C. A. Powell: A summation and inhibition model of annoyance response to multiple community noise sources. NASA Technical paper 1479, 1979.
196. S. Solberg: Total noise rating at Oslo airport Gardermoen. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 5, 2501-2504.
197. T. Ronnebaum, B. Schulte-Fortkamp, R. Weber: Synergetic effects of noise from different sources: a literature study. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 5, 2241-2246.
198. S. M. Taylor: A comparison of models to predict annoyance reactions to noise from mixed sources. Journal of Sound and Vibration 81 (1982) 123-138.
199. J. Kaku, T. Kato, S. Kuwano, S. Namba: Predicting overall reaction to multiple noise sources. Proc. Forum Acusticum & ASA joint meeting, Berlin, Germany, 1999, CD ISBN 3-9804568-5-4, Paper 2ANSA-6.
200. B. Berglund, M. Nilsson: Total annoyance models for community noises
201. J. G. Slama, D. S. Sousa: Fuzzy sets and screening diagrams. Proc. Inter-Noise, Liverpool, England, 1996, 4, 2461-2464.
202. D. Botteldooren, A. Verkeyn: Using approximate reasoning techniques to model noise annoyance. Proc. Inter-Noise, Fort Lauderdale, USA, 1999, 3, 1351-1356.
203. D. Botteldooren, A. Verkeyn: Fuzzy models for accumulation of reported community noise annoyance from combined sources. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 112 (2002) 1496-1508.
204. C. Thirard, B. Vincent: Vers une évaluation en temps réel de la gêne sonore basée sur la technique des réseaux neuronaux. Rapport S.R.E.T.I.E. 9245, France, 1991.