Patient and public involvement in health research: Ethical imperative and/or radical challenge?

Journal of Health Psychology

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 149-158

  Rose, Diana ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

consumer involvement; health; mental health; power; research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONSUMER INVOLVEMENT; ETHICS; HEALTH; HUMAN; MENTAL HEALTH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; POWER; RESEARCH; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM;

CONSUMER INVOLVEMENT; HEALTH; MENTAL HEALTH; POWER; RESEARCH;

COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; ENGLAND; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE;

EID: 84891100355     PISSN: 13591053     EISSN: 14617277     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1359105313500249     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Arnstein SR. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 1969; 35 (4). 216-224
2. Beresford P It's Our Lives: A Short Theory of Knowledge, Distance and Experience. London: Citizen Press in association with Shaping Our Lives; 2003:
3. Beresford P, Wallcraft J Doing Disability Research. Barnes C Mercer G, ed. Leeds: The Disability Press; 1997: 66-87.
4. Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, et al The PIRICOM Study: A Systematic Review of the Conceptualisation, Measurement, Impact and Outcomes of Patients and Public Involvement in Health and Social Care Research. London: UKCRC; 2010:
5. Callon C, Lascoumes P, Barthe Y Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press; 2001:
6. Cornwall A, Jewkes R. What is participatory research?. Social Science & Medicine. 1995; 41 (12). 1667-1676
7. Davies S Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. Staley K, ed. Eastleigh: INVOLVE; 2009: 4-5.
8. Epstein S Impure Science: AIDS, Activism and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley, CA: UCLA Press; 1996:
9. Evans J, Rose D, Flach C, et al. VOICE: Developing a new measure of service users' perceptions of inpatient care, using a participatory methodology. Journal of Mental Health. 2012; 21 (1). 57-71
10. Faulkner A, Layzell A Strategies for Living. London: Mental Health Foundation; 2001:
11. Foucault M History of Madness. London: Routledge; 2006:
12. Gillard S, Borschmann R, Turner K, et al. What difference does it make? Finding evidence of the impact of mental health service user researchers on research into the experiences of detained psychiatric patients. Health Expectations. 2010; 13: 185-194
13. Greenhalgh J, Long AF, Flynn R. The use of patient reported outcome measures: Lack of impact or lack of theory?. Social Science & Medicine. 2005; 60 (4). 833-843
14. Greenwood KE, Sweeney A, Williams S, et al. CHoice of outcome In Cbt for psychosEs (CHOICE): The development of a new service user-led outcome measure of CBT for psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2010; 36 (1). 126-135
15. Feminism & Methodology. Harding S, ed. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; 1987:
16. Harding S Feminist Epistemologies. Alcoff L Potter E, ed. London: Routledge; 1993:
17. Heath D, Rapp R, Taussig K-S Companion to the Anthropology of Politics. Nugent D Vincent J, ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 2004: 152-166.
18. Henkel H, Stirrat R Participation: The New Tyranny?. Cooke B Kothari U, ed. London: Zed Books; 2001: 168-184.
19. Hofmann D, Ibrahim F, Rose D, Scott DL, Cope A, Wykes T, Lempp H. Expectations of new treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: developing a patient-generated questionnaire. Health Expectations. 2013;:
20. Jones N, Harrison J, Aguiar R, et al Community Psychology and Community Mental Health: Towards Transformative Change. Nelson E Kloos B Ornelas J, ed. New York: Oxford University Press;
21. Kerr RA, McGrath JJ, O'Kearnery A, et al. ECT: Misconceptions and attitudes. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 1982; 16: 43-49
22. Mason R, Boutilier M. The challenge of genuine power sharing in participatory research: The gap between theory and practice. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health. 1996; 15 (2). 145-152
23. Novas C, Rose N. Genetic risk and the birth of the somatic individual. Economy and Society. 2000; 29 (4). 485-513
24. Pawson R, Tilley N Realistic Evaluation. London: SAGE; 1997:
25. Pettinati HM, Tamburello BA, Ruetsch CR, et al. Patient attitudes toward electroconvulsive therapy. Psychopharmacology Bulletin. 1994; 30: 471-475
26. Rappaport J. Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology. 1987; 15 (2). 121-148
27. Riordan DM, Barron P, Bowden MF. ECT: A patient-friendly procedure?. Psychiatric Bulletin. 1993; 17: 531-533
28. Rose D Users' Voices: The Perspectives of Mental Health Service Users on Hospital and Community Care. London: Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health; 2001:
29. Rose D, Crawford M, Barnes M. Evaluating National Service User Involvement in England.:
30. Rose D, Evans J, Sweeney A, et al. A model for developing outcomes measures from the perspective of mental health service users. International Review of Psychiatry. 2011; 23 (1). 41-46
31. Rose D, Fleischmann P, Wykes T. Consumers' perspectives on ECT: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Mental Health. 2004; 13 (3). 285-294
32. Rose D, Sweeney A, Leese M, et al. Developing a user-generated measure of continuity of care: Brief report. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2009; 119 (4). 320-324
33. Rose D, Wykes T, Bindman J, et al. Information, consent and perceived coercion: Consumers' views on ECT. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2005; 186: 54-59
34. Rose D, Wykes T, Leese M, et al. Patients' perspectives on electroconvulsive therapy: Systematic review. British Medical Journal. 2003; 326: 1363-1366
35. Sayce L From Psychiatric Patient to Citizen: Overcoming Discrimination and Social Exclusion. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2000:
36. Scott JW Feminists Theorize the Political. Butler J Scott JW, ed. New York: Routledge; 1992:
37. Staley K Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. Eastleigh: INVOLVE; 2009:
38. Sweeney A, Rose D, Clement S, et al. Understanding service user-defined continuity of care and its relationship to health and social measures: A cross-sectional study. BMC Health Services Research. 2012; 12 (1). 145
39. Tyrer P. Commentary: Research into mental health services needs a new approach. Psychiatric Bulletin. 2002; 26: 406-407