The incompatibility of benefit–cost analysis with sustainability science

Sustainability Science

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 33-41

  Anderson, Mark ^a   Teisl, Mario ^a   Noblet, Caroline ^a   Klein, Sharon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Benefit cost analysis (BCA); Epistemology; Future stakeholders; Ideology; Methodology; Ontology; Philosophy of science

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926506262     PISSN: 18624065     EISSN: 18624057     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11625-014-0266-4     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Ackerman F, Heinzerling L (2002) Pricing the priceless: cost–benefit analysis of environmental protection. Univ Pa Law Rev 150(5):1553–1584
2. Anderson MW (2013) Intergenerational bargains: negotiating our debts to the past and our obligations to the future. Futures 54:43–52
3. Anderson MW, Teisl M (2012) Values. Berkshire encyclopedia of sustainability. In: The future of sustainability, vol 10, pp 212–218
4. Anderson MW, Teisl M, Noblet C (2012) Giving voice to the future in sustainability: retrospective assessment to learn prospective stakeholder engagement. Ecol Econ 84:1–6
5. Atkinson G, Mourato S (2008) Environmental cost-benefit analysis. Annu Rev Environ Resour 33:317–344
6. Ballet J, Bazin D, Dubois JL, Mahieu FR (2011) A note on sustainability economics and the capability approach. Ecol Econ 70:1831–1834
7. Bettencourt LM, Kaur J (2011) Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(49):19540–19545
8. Biglan A (1973) Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. J Appl Psychol 57(3):204–213
9. Bromley DW (1990) The ideology of efficiency: searching for a theory of policy analysis. J Environ Econ Manag 19(1):86–107
10. Bromley DW (1998) Searching for sustainability: the poverty of spontaneous order. Ecol Econ 24(2):231–240
11. Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Mitchell R (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(14):8086–8091
12. Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, van der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Turner RK (2014) Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob Environ Change 26:152–158
13. Daily GC (ed) (1997) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC
14. Davidson MD (2013) On the relation between ecosystem services, intrinsic value, existence value and economic valuation. Ecol Econ 95:171–177
15. Farrow S (1998) Environmental equity and sustainability: rejecting the Kaldor–Hicks criteria. Ecol Econ 27(2):183–188
16. Foster KR, Vecchia P, Repacholi MH (2000) Science and the precautionary principle. Science 288(5468):979–981
17. Fuller T, Loogma K (2009) Constructing futures: a social constructionist perspective on foresight methodology. Futures 41(2):71–79
18. Gardner SK (2013) Paradigmatic differences, power, and status: a qualitative investigation of faculty in one interdisciplinary research collaboration on sustainability science. Sustain Sci 8:1–12
19. Gibson CC, Ostrom E, Ahn TK (2000) The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey. Ecol Econ 32(2):217–239
20. Gowdy JM (2004) The revolution in welfare economics and its implications for environmental valuation and policy. Land Econ 80(2):239–257
21. Gowdy JM (2007) Toward an experimental foundation for benefit–cost analysis. Ecol Econ 63(4):649–655
22. Gowdy J, Rosser JB Jr, Roy L (2013) The evolution of hyperbolic discounting: implications for truly social valuation of the future. J Econ Behav Organ 90:S94–S104
23. Groom B, Hepburn C, Koundouri P, Pearce D (2005) Declining discount rates: the long and the short of it. Environ Resour Econ 32(4):445–493
24. Howarth RB (2007) Towards an operational sustainability criterion. Ecol Econ 63(4):656–663
25. Hubacek K, Mauerhofer V (2008) Future generations: economic, legal and institutional aspects. Futures 40(5):413–423
26. Hugé J, Waas T, Eggermont G, Verbruggen A (2011) Impact assessment for a sustainable energy future-reflections and practical experiences. Energy Policy 39:6243–6253
27. Jerneck A, Olsson L, Ness B, Anderberg S, Baier M, Clark E, Persson J (2011) Structuring sustainability science. Sustain Sci 6(1):69–82
28. Just RE, Hueth DL, Schmitz A (1982) Applied welfare economics and public policy. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
29. Kates RW (2011) What kind of a science is sustainability science? Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(49):19449–19450
30. Kates RW (2012) From the unity of nature to sustainability science: ideas and practice. In: Weinstein MP, Turner RE (eds) Sustainability science: the emerging paradigm and the urban environment. Springer, New York, pp 3–19
31. Kates RW, Clark WC, Correll R, Hall JM, Jeager CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber J, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC, Grubler A, Huntley B, Jeger J, Jodha N, Kasperson RE, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H, MoreeIII B, O”Riordan T, Svedin U (2001) Sustain Sci. Science 292:641–642
32. Knetsch JL (2005) Gains, losses, and the US-EPA economic analyses guidelines: a hazardous product? Environ Resource Econ 32(1):91–112
33. Knetsch JL (2007) Biased valuations, damage assessments, and policy choices: the choice of measure matters. Ecol Econ 63:684–689
34. Kuhn TS (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press Chicago
35. Leiserowitz AA, Kates RW, Parris TM (2006) Sustainability values, attitudes, and behaviors: a review of multinational and global trends. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:413–444
36. Miller TR (2013) Constructing sustainability science: emerging perspectives and research trajectories. Sustain Sci 8:1–15
37. Mishan EJ (1981) Introduction to normative economics. Oxford University Press, New York
38. Nordhaus WD (2007) A review of the “Stern review on the economics of climate change”. J Econ Liter 45:686–702
39. Norgaard RB (1989) The case for methodological pluralism. Ecol Econ 1(1):37–57
40. Norton BG (1994) Economists’ preferences and the preferences of economists. Environ Values 3(4):313–332
41. Norton B (2005) Sustainability: a philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
42. Norton BG, Toman MA (1997) Sustainability: ecological and economic perspectives. Land Econ 73(4):553–568
43. Norton B, Costanza R, Bishop RC (1998) The evolution of preferences: why sovereign preferences may not lead to sustainable policies and what to do about it. Ecol Econ 24(2):193–211
44. Nyborg K (2000) Homo economicus and homo politicus: interpretation and aggregation of environmental values. J Econ Behav Organ 42(3):305–322
45. Padilla E (2002) Intergenerational equity and sustainability. Ecol Econ 41(1):69–83
46. Page T (1977) Conservation and economic efficiency: an approach to materials policy. Resources for the future Washington DC
47. Page T (1997) On the problem of achieving efficiency and equity, intergenerationally. Land Econ 73(4):580–596
48. Persky J (2001) Retrospectives: cost-benefit analysis and the classical creed. J Econ Perspect 15(4):199–208
49. Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge
50. Robinson J (2003) Future subjunctive: backcasting as social learning. Futures 35(8):839–856
51. Saez CA, Requena JC (2007) Reconciling sustainability and discounting in cost–benefit analysis: a methodological proposal. Ecol Econ 60(4):712–725
52. Salas-Zapata WA, Rios-Osorio LA, Trouchon-Osorio AL (2013) Typology of scientific reflections needed for sustainability science development. Sustain Sci 8:607–612
53. Sen AK (2009) The idea of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
54. Söderbaum P (1999) Values, ideology and politics in ecological economics. Ecol Econ 28(2):161–170
55. Spangenberg JH (2011) Sustainability science: a review, an analysis and some empirical lessons. Environ Conserv 38(3):275–287
56. Spash CL (2012) New foundations for ecological economics. Ecol Econ 77:36–47
57. Stavins RN, Wagner AF, Wagner G (2003) Interpreting sustainability in economic terms: dynamic efficiency plus intergenerational equity. Econ Lett 79(3):339–343
58. Sugden R (2005) Coping with preference anomalies in cost–benefit analysis: a market-simulation approach. Environ Resource Econ 32(1):129–160
59. Turner RK, Paavola J, Cooper P, Farber S, Jessamy V, Georgiou S (2003) Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions. Ecol Econ 46(3):493–510
60. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2014) Benefit–cost analysis. http://www.epa.gov/sustainability/analytics/benefit-cost.htm#how. Accessed 18 March 2014
61. U.S. Office of Management and Budget (2003) Circular A-4: regulatory analysis. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_a004_a-4. Accessed 18 March 2014
62. van Kerkhof L, Lebel L (2006) Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:445–477
63. Wan JJ, Jing YY, Zhang CF, Zhao JJ (2009) Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(9):2263–2278
64. Wiek A, Withycombe L, Redman CL (2011) Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustain Sci 6(2):203–218
65. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, New York
66. Ziegler R, Ott K (2011) The quality of sustainability science: a philosophical perspective. Sustainability: science, practice & policy 7(1):31–44