Improving anaerobic digestion of a cellulosic waste via routine bioaugmentation with cellulolytic microorganisms

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 189, Issue , 2015, Pages 62-70

  Martin Ryals, Ana ^a   Schideman, Lance ^a   Li, Peng ^a   Wilkinson, Henry ^a   Wagner, Richard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b Microbial Energy Systems Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Bioaugmentation; Cellulosic; Hydrolysis; Two phase

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; HYDROLYSIS; METHANE; SUBSTRATES;

ACETIC ACID CONCENTRATION; BIO-AUGMENTATION; CELLULOSIC; METHANE PRODUCTION; SOLUBLE CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMANDS; SUBSTRATE HYDROLYSIS; TWO PHASE; TWO PHASE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

ACETIC ACID; CELLULOSE; METHANE; VOLATILE FATTY ACID;

ACETIC ACID; ANOXIC CONDITIONS; CELLULOSE; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; GAS PRODUCTION; HYDROLYSIS; METHANE; MICROORGANISM; SUBSTRATE; TWO PHASE FLOW; WASTE;

AGRICULTURAL WASTE; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; BIOAUGMENTATION; BIOREMEDIATION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; ECONOMICS; HYDROLYSIS; METHANOGENESIS; MICROORGANISM; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWEET CORN; WASTE; ANAEROBIC GROWTH; BACTERIUM; BATCH CELL CULTURE; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIOREACTOR; BIOSYNTHESIS; MAIZE; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SOLUBILITY; TIME; WASTE DISPOSAL;

ZEA MAYS;

ANAEROBIOSIS; BACTERIA; BATCH CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOLOGICAL OXYGEN DEMAND ANALYSIS; BIOREACTORS; CELLULOSE; FATTY ACIDS, VOLATILE; METHANE; REFUSE DISPOSAL; SOLUBILITY; TIME FACTORS; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84926479645     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.069     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. American Public Health Association, 1998. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater.
2. Angelidaki, Ahring B. Methods for increasing the biogas potential from the recalcitrant organic matter contained in manure. Water Sci. Technol. 2000, 41:189-194.
3. Chandra R., Takeuchi H., Hasegawa T. Methane production from lignocellulosic agricultural crop wastes: a review in context to second generation of biofuel production. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2012, 16:1462-1476.
4. Cirne D., Bjornsson L., Alves M., Mattiasson B. Effects of bioaugmentation by an anaerobic lipolytic bacterium on anaerobic digestion of lipid-rich waste. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2006, 81:1745-1752.
5. Costa J.C., Barbosa S.G., Alves M.M., Sousa D.Z. Thermochemical pre- and biological co-treatments to improve hydrolysis and methane production from poultry litter. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 111:141-147.
6. Gujer W., Zehnder A.J.B. Conversion processes in anaerobic digestion. Water Sci. Technol. 1983, 15:127.
7. Hoornweg, D., Bhada-Tata, P., 2012. What a waste: a global review of solid waste management. World Bank.
8. Khalid A., Arshad M., Anjum M., Mahmood T., Dawson L. The anaerobic digestion of solid organic waste. Waste Manage. 2011, 31:1737-1744.
9. Klass, D. L., Ghosh, S., Conrad, J. R., 1976. The conversion of grass to fuel for captive use. Paper presented at symposium on clean fuels from biomass, sewage, urban refuse and agricultural wastes. Institute of Gas Technology, Chicago, IL, pp. 229-252.
10. Klimiuk E., Pokoj T., Budzynski W., Dubis B. Theoretical and observed biogas production from plant biomass of different fibre contents. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101(24):9527-9535.
11. Lane A. Laboratory scale anaerobic-digestion of fruit and vegetable solid-waste. Biomass 1984, 5(4):245-259.
12. Metcalf, Eddy, 2003. Wastewater engineering treatment and reuse, 4th Ed., 1523.
13. Mladenovska, Z., Ishoy, Y., Mandiralioglu, A., Westermann, P., Ahring B. K., 2001. Bioaugmentation of a mesophilic biogas reactor by anaerobic xylanolytic- and cellulolytic bacteria, Anonymous Proceedings of the 9th World Congress of Anaerobic Digestion. Antwerp, Belgium, 183.
14. Mumme J., Linke B., Toelle R. Novel upflow anaerobic solid-state (UASS) reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:592-599.
15. Nielsen H., Mladenovska Z., Ahring B. Bioaugmentation of a two-stage thermophilic (68 degrees C/55 degrees C) anaerobic digestion concept for improvement of the methane yield from cattle manure. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2007, 97:1638-1643.
16. Park C., Lee C., Kim S., Chen Y., Chase H. Upgrading of anaerobic digestion by incorporating two different hydrolysis processes. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2005, 100:164-167.
17. Peng X., Borner R., Nges I., Liu J. Impact of bioaugmentation on biochemical methane potential for wheat straw with addition of Clostridium cellulolyticum. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 152:567-571.
18. Richards B.R., Cummings R.J., Jewell W. High-rate low solids methane fermentation of sorghum, corn and cellulose. Biomass Bioenergy 1991, 1(5):249-260.
19. Ruggeri B. Chapter 2: pretreatment to increase hydrogen producing bacteria (HPB). BioH2 & BioCH4 through anaerobic digestion. Green Energy Technol. 2015, 25-36.
20. SCAP: Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works. 2013, 2012 SCAP Biosolids Trends Survey.
21. Stewart D.J., Bogue M.J., Badger D.M. Biogas production from crops and organic wastes. 2. Results of continuous digestion tests. N. Z. J. Sci. 1984, 27:285-294.
22. Tong X.L., Tong X.L., Smith P., McCarty Methane fermentation of selected lignocellulosic materials. Biomass 1990, 21(4):239-255.
23. United States Energy Information Administration, 2015. U.S. price of natural gas delivered to residential consumers.
24. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2002. Solid waste management: a local challenge with global impacts.
25. Weiss S., Tauber M., Somitsch W., Meincke R., Muella H. Enhancement of biogas production by addition of hemicellulolytic bacteria immobilised on activated zeolite. Water Res. 2010, 44:1970-1980.