The effect of somatosensory input on motor imagery depends upon motor imagery capability

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 6, Issue FEB, 2015, Pages

  Mizuguchi, Nobuaki ^a   Yamagishi, Takahiro ^a   Nakata, Hiroki ^a,b   Kanosue, Kazuyuki ^a  

^a WASEDA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NARA WOMEN'S UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Mental chronometry; Mental practice; Tactile; Tennis; Tool use

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926469910     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00104     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Allami, N., Paulignan, Y., Brovelli, A., and Boussaoud, D. (2008). Visuo-motor learning with combination of different rates of motor imagery and physical practice. Exp. Brain Res. 184, 105-113. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1086-x.
2. Anderson, W. S., and Lenz, F. A. (2011). Review of motor and phantom-related imagery. Neuroreport 22, 939-942. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834ca58d.
3. Bisio, A., Avanzino, L., Ruggeri, P., and Bove, M. (2014). The tool as the last piece of the athlete's gesture imagery puzzle. Neuroscience 265, 196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.01.050.
4. Feltz, D. L., and Landers, D. M. (1983). The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: a meta-analysis. J. Sport Psychol. 5, 25-57.
5. Gao, Q., Duan, X., and Chen, H. (2011). Evaluation of effective connectivity of motor areas during motor imagery and execution using conditional granger causality. Neuroimage 54, 1280-1288. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.071.
6. Gentili, R., Han, C. E., Schweighofer, N., and Papaxanthis, C. (2010). Motor learning without doing: trial-by-trial improvement in motor performance during mental training. J. Neurophysiol. 104, 774-783. doi: 10.1152/jn.00257.2010.
7. Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: motor control, imagery, and perception. Behav. Brain Sci. 27, 377-396; discussion 396-442. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X04000093.
8. Guillot, A., and Collet, C. (2005). Duration of mentally simulated movement: a review. J. Mot. Behav. 37, 10-20. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.37.1.10-20.
9. Guillot, A., Collet, C., Nguyen, V. A., Malouin, F., Richards, C., and Doyon, J. (2009). Brain activity during visual versus kinesthetic imagery: an fMRI study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 2157-2172. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20658.
10. Hanakawa, T., Dimyan, M. A., and Hallett, M. (2008). Motor planning, imagery, and execution in the distributed motor network: a time-course study with functional MRI. Cereb. Cortex 18, 2775-2788. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn036.
11. Hanakawa, T., Immisch, I., Toma, K., Dimyan, M. A., Van Gelderen, P., and Hallett, M. (2003). Functional properties of brain areas associated with motor execution and imagery. J. Neurophysiol. 89, 989-1002. doi: 10.1152/jn.00132.2002.
12. Hashimoto, R., and Rothwell, J. C. (1999). Dynamic changes in corticospinal excitability during motor imagery. Exp. Brain Res. 125, 75-81. doi: 10.1007/s002210050660.
13. Imazu, S., Sugio, T., Tanaka, S., and Inui, T. (2007). Differences between actual and imagined usage of chopsticks: an fMRI study. Cortex 43, 301-307. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70456-8.
14. Isaac, A. R. (1992). Mental practice-does it work in the field? Sport Psychol. 6, 192-198.
15. Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage 14, S103-S109. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0832.
16. Kasai, T., Kawai, S., Kawanishi, M., and Yahagi, S. (1997). Evidence for facilitation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by motor imagery. Brain Res. 744, 147-150. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(96)01101-8.
17. Lacourse, M. G., Orr, E. L., Cramer, S. C., and Cohen, M. J. (2005). Brain activation during execution and motor imagery of novel and skilled sequential hand movements. Neuroimage 27, 505-519. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.025.
18. Lebon, F., Byblow, W. D., Collet, C., Guillot, A., and Stinear, C. M. (2012). The modulation of motor cortex excitability during motor imagery depends on imagery quality. Eur. J. Neurosci. 35, 323-331. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07938.x.
19. Lotze, M., and Halsband, U. (2006). Motor imagery. J. Physiol. Paris 99, 386-395. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.012.
20. Mizuguchi, N., Nakata, H., Hayashi, T., Sakamoto, M., Muraoka, T., Uchida, Y., et al. (2013a). Brain activity during motor imagery of an action with an object: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neurosci. Res. 76, 150-155. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2013.03.012.
21. Mizuguchi, N., Umehara, I., Nakata, H., and Kanosue, K. (2013b). Modulation of corticospinal excitability dependent upon imagined force level. Exp. Brain Res. 230, 243-249. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3649-3.
22. Mizuguchi, N., Nakata, H., Uchida, Y., and Kanosue, K. (2012a). Motor imagery and sport performance. J. Phys. Fitness Sports Med. 1, 103-111. doi: 10.7600/jpfsm.1.103.
23. Mizuguchi, N., Sakamoto, M., Muraoka, T., Moriyama, N., Nakagawa, K., Nakata, H., et al. (2012b). Influence of somatosensory input on corticospinal excitability during motor imagery. Neurosci. Lett. 514, 127-130. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.02.073.
24. Mizuguchi, N., Sakamoto, M., Muraoka, T., and Kanosue, K. (2009). Influence of touching an object on corticospinal excitability during motor imagery. Exp. Brain Res. 196, 529-535. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1875-5.
25. Mizuguchi, N., Sakamoto, M., Muraoka, T., Nakagawa, K., Kanazawa, S., Nakata, H., et al. (2011). The modulation of corticospinal excitability during motor imagery of actions with objects. PLoS ONE 6:e26006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026006.
26. Pascual-Leone, A., Nquyet, D., Cohen, L. G., Brasil-Neto, J. P., Cammarota, A., and Hallett, M. (1995). Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills. J. Neurophysiol. 74, 1037-1045.
27. Sirigu, A., Duhamel, J. R., Cohen, L., Pillon, B., Dubois, B., and Agid, Y. (1996). The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage. Science 273, 1564-1568. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5281.1564.
28. Stevens, J. A. (2005). Interference effects demonstrate distinct roles for visual and motor imagery during the mental representation of human action. Cognition 95, 329-350. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.02.008.
29. Wang, Z., Wang, S., Shi, F. Y., Guan, Y., Wu, Y., Zhang, L. L., et al. (2014). The effect of motor imagery with specific implement in expert badminton player. Neuroscience 275, 102-112. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.06.004.