The tool as the last piece of the athlete's gesture imagery puzzle

Neuroscience

Volumn 265, Issue , 2014, Pages 196-203

  Bisio, A ^a   Avanzino, L ^a   Ruggeri, P ^a   Bove, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Motor imagery; Motor representation; Tennis; Tool use

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; ATHLETE; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGERY; MALE; MOTOR IMAGERY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; TENNIS; TOOL USE; IMAGINATION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATHLETES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84896722890     PISSN: 03064522     EISSN: 18737544     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.01.050     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bakker M., de Lange F.P., Stevens J.A., Toni I., Bloem B.R. Motor imagery of gait: a quantitative approach. Exp Brain Res 2007, 179(3):497-504.
2. Berlucchi G., Aglioti S. The body in the brain: neural bases of corporeal awareness. Trends Neurosci 1997, 20(12):560-564.
3. Berlucchi G., Aglioti S.M. The body in the brain revisited. Exp Brain Res 2010, 200(1):25-35.
4. Cardinali L., Frassinetti F., Brozzoli C., Urquizar C., Roy A.C., Farnè A. Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema. Curr Biol 2009, 19(12):R478-R479.
5. Cerritelli B., Maruff P., Wilson P., Currie J. The effect of an external load on the force and timing components of mentally represented actions. Behav Brain Res 2000, 108(1):91-96.
6. Decety J., Jeannerod M. Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitt's law hold in motor imagery?. Behav Brain Res 1995, 72(1):127-134.
7. Decety J., Jeannerod M., Prablanc C. The timing of mentally represented actions. Behav Brain Res 1989, 34(1):35-42.
8. Decety J. The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery. Behav Brain Res 1996, 77(1-2):45-52.
9. Driskell J.E., Copper C., Moran A. Does mental practice enhance performance?. J Appl Psychol 1994, 79(4):481.
10. Fitts P.M. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 1954, 47(6):381.
11. Fourkas A.D., Ionta S., Aglioti S.M. Influence of imagined posture and imagery modality on corticospinal excitability. Behav Brain Res 2006, 168:190-196.
12. Fourkas A.D., Bonavolonta V., Avenanti A., Aglioti S.M. Kinesthetic imagery and tool-specific modulation of corticospinal representations in expert tennis players. Cereb Cortex 2008, 18(10):2382-2390.
13. Gentili R., Cahouet V., Ballay Y., Papaxanthis C. Inertial properties of the arm are accurately predicted during motor imagery. Behav Brain Res 2004, 155(2):231-239.
14. Grezes J., Decety J. Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 2001, 12(1):1-19.
15. Gueugneau N., Mauvieux B., Papaxanthis C. Circadian modulation of mentally simulated motor actions: implications for the potential use of motor imagery in rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009, 23(3):237-245.
16. Hall C.R., Martin K.A. Measuring movement imagery abilities: a revision of the movement imagery questionnaire. J Ment Imagery 1997, 21:143-154.
17. Hetu S., Gregoire M., Saimpont A., Coll M.P., Eugene F., Michon P.E., Jackson P.L. The neural network of motor imagery: an ALE meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2013, 37(5):930-949.
18. Holmes P., Calmels C. A neuroscientific review of imagery and observation use in sport. J Mot Behav 2008, 40(5):433-445.
19. Holmes N.P., Spence C. The body schema and the multisensory representation(s) of peripersonal space. Cogn Process 2004, 5(2):94-105.
20. Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage 2001, 14(1):S103-S109.
21. Johnson P. The functional equivalence of imagery and movement. Q J Exp Psychol 1982, 34(3):349-365.
22. Lotze M., Halsband U. Motor imagery. J Physiol Paris 2006, 99(4-6):386-395.
23. Louis M., Collet C., Guillot A. Differences in motor imagery times during aroused and relaxed conditions. J Cogn Psychol 2011, 23(3):374-382.
24. Maravita A., Iriki A. Tools for the body (schema). Trends Cogn Sci 2004, 8(2):79-86.
25. Mercier C., Aballea A., Vargas C.D., Paillard J., Sirigu A. Vision without proprioception modulates cortico-spinal excitability during hand motor imagery. Cereb Cortex 2008, 18:272-277.
26. Mizuguchi N., Sakamoto M., Muraoka T., Nakagawa K., Kanazawa S., Nakata H., Moriyama N., Kanosue K. The modulation of corticospinal excitability during motor imagery of actions with objects. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(10):e26006. 10.1371/journal.pone.0026006.
27. Oldfield R. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
28. Papaxanthis C., Pozzo T., Skoura X., Schieppati M. Does order and timing in performance of imagined and actual movements affect the motor imagery process? The duration of walking and writing task. Behav Brain Res 2002, 134(1):209-215.
29. Papaxanthis C., Schieppati M., Gentili R., Pozzo T. Imagined and actual arm movements have similar durations when performed under different conditions of direction and mass. Exp Brain Res 2002, 143(4):447-452.
30. Personnier P., Kubicki A., Laroche D., Papaxanthis C. Temporal features of imagined locomotion in normal aging. Neurosci Lett 2010, 476(3):146-149.
31. Reed C.L. Chronometric comparisons of imagery to action: visualizing versus physically performing springboard dives. Mem Cognit 2002, 30(8):1169-1178.
32. Rosenbaum D.A., Engelbrecht S.E., Bushe M.M., Loukopoulos L.D. Knowledge model for selecting and producing reaching movements. J Mot Behav 1993, 25(3):217-227.
33. Sposito A., Bolognini N., Vallar G., Maravita A. Extension of perceived arm length following tool-use: clues to plasticity of body metrics. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50(9):2187-2194.
34. Vargas C.D., Olivier E., Craighero L., Fadiga L., Duhamel J.R., Sirigu A. The influence of hand posture on corticospinal excitability during motor imagery: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cereb Cortex 2004, 14:1200-1206.
35. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z., Flanagan J.R. Perspectives and problems in motor learning. Trends Cogn Sci 2001, 5(11):487-494.
36. Wolpert D.M. Computational approaches to motor control. Trends Cogn Sci 1997, 1(6):209-216.