Muscle extracellular matrix scaffold is a multipotent environment

International Journal of Medical Sciences

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 336-340

  Aulino, Paola ^a,b   Costa, Alessandra ^a,c,d   Chiaravalloti, Ernesto ^b   Perniconi, Barbara ^b,e   Adamo, Sergio ^a   Coletti, Dario ^b,e   Marrell, Massimo ^b   Tatullo, Marco ^b,f   Teodori, Laura ^c,g  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b Unit of Maxillofacial Surgery   (Italy)

^c Fondazione San Raffaele   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e Université Pierre et Marie Curie   (France)

^f Tecnologica Research Institute   (Italy)

^g ENEA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bone; Cartilage; ECM scaffold; Skeletal muscle; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

ALCIAN BLUE; TOLONIUM CHLORIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE TISSUE; CARTILAGINOUS TISSUE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL HOMING; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; MALE; MANDIBLE; MASSETER MUSCLE; MOUSE; MUSCLE ACELLULAR SCAFFOLD; MUSCLE DEVELOPMENT; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; TIBIA; TIBIALIS ANTERIOR MUSCLE; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE REGENERATION; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; TISSUE TRANSPLANTATION; ANIMAL; CELL MOTION; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; INBRED MOUSE STRAIN; MULTIPOTENT STEM CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REGENERATION; SKELETAL MUSCLE; SKELETAL MYOBLAST; STEM CELL NICHE;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL MOVEMENT; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FEMALE; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED STRAINS; MODELS, ANIMAL; MULTIPOTENT STEM CELLS; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; MYOBLASTS, SKELETAL; REGENERATION; STEM CELL NICHE; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84926469041     PISSN: 14491907     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7150/ijms.10761     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Faulk DM, Johnson SA, Zhang L, Badylak SF. Role of the extracellular matrix in whole organ engineering. Journal of cellular physiology. 2014;229:984-9.
2. Turner NJ, Badylak JS, Weber DJ, Badylak SF. Biologic scaffold remodeling in a dog model of complex musculoskeletal injury. The Journal of surgical research. 2012;176:490-502.
3. Perniconi B, Costa A, Aulino P, Teodori L, Adamo S, Coletti D. The pro-myogenic environment provided by whole organ scale acellular scaffolds from skeletal muscle. Biomaterials. 2011;32:7870-82.
4. Agrawal V, Kelly J, Tottey S, Daly KA, Johnson SA, Siu BF, et al. An isolated cryptic peptide influences osteogenesis and bone remodeling in an adult mammalian model of digit amputation. Tissue engineering Part A. 2011;17:3033-44.
5. Agrawal V, Tottey S, Johnson SA, Freund JM, Siu BF, Badylak SF. Recruitment of progenitor cells by an extracellular matrix cryptic peptide in a mouse model of digit amputation. Tissue engineering Part A. 2011;17:2435-43.
6. Ai-Aql ZS, Alagl AS, Graves DT, Gerstenfeld LC, Einhorn TA. Molecular mechanisms controlling bone formation during fracture healing and distraction osteogenesis. Journal of dental research. 2008;87:107-18.
7. Varma SR, Sharath Kumar LM, Vidyashankar S, Patki PS. Water Soluble Components of 'Osteocare' Promote Cell Proliferation, Differentiation, and Matrix Mineralization in Human Osteoblast-Like SaOS-2 Cells. Scientia pharmaceutica. 2014;82:375-91.
8. Perniconi B, Coletti D, Aulino P, Costa A, Aprile P, Santacroce L, et al. Muscle acellular scaffold as a biomaterial: effects on C2C12 cell differentiation and interaction with the murine host environment. Frontiers in physiology. 2014;5:354.
9. Li G, Peng H, Corsi K, Usas A, Olshanski A, Huard J. Differential effect of BMP4 on NIH/3T3 and C2C12 cells: implications for endochondral bone formation. Journal of bone and mineral research: the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2005;20:1611-23.
10. Billstrom GH, Blom AW, Larsson S, Beswick AD. Application of scaffolds for bone regeneration strategies: current trends and future directions. Injury. 2013;44 Suppl 1:S28-33.
11. Benders KE, van Weeren PR, Badylak SF, Saris DB, Dhert WJ, Malda J. Extracellular matrix scaffolds for cartilage and bone regeneration. Trends in biotechnology. 2013;31:169-76.
12. Suckow MA, Voytik-Harbin SL, Terril LA, Badylak SF. Enhanced bone regeneration using porcine small intestinal submucosa. Journal of investigative surgery: the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research. 1999;12:277-87.
13. Grimm WD, Dannan A, Giesenhagen B, Schau I, Varga G, Vukovic MA, et al. Translational Research: Palatal-derived Ecto-mesenchymal Stem Cells from Human Palate: A New Hope for Alveolar Bone and Cranio-Facial Bone Reconstruction. International journal of stem cells. 2014;7:23-9.
14. Barradas AM, Yuan H, van Blitterswijk CA, Habibovic P. Osteoinductive biomaterials: current knowledge of properties, experimental models and biological mechanisms. European cell and Materials, 2011; 21:407-29.
15. Fischer AH, Jacobson KA, Rose J, Zeller R. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of tissue and cell sections. CSH protocols. 2008;2008:pdb_prot4986.