Competing risks analysis on traffic accident duration time

Journal of Advanced Transportation

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 402-415

  Li, Ruimin ^a   Guo, Min ^b  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Beijing Traffic Management Bureau   (China)

Author keywords

accident duration time; competing risks; subdistribution regression hazard model; traffic accident management

Indexed keywords

HAZARDS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TAXICABS;

ACCIDENT MANAGEMENT; COMPETING RISKS; COMPETING RISKS ANALYSIS; CUMULATIVE INCIDENCE; DURATION TIME; HAZARD MODELING; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATES; SURVIVAL FUNCTION;

ACCIDENTS;

EID: 84926419255     PISSN: 01976729     EISSN: 20423195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/atr.1279     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Shao J, He B,. The seasons and countermeasures' analysis of road traffic jams in Beijing. Road traffic and safety 2008; 8 (1): 39-44.
2. Liu J, Zhang F,. Traffic congestion increased about 10% and most incident concentrated along the 2rd ring road. Changsha evening news, 2013.
3. Nam D, Mannering F,. An exploratory hazard-based analysis of highway incident duration. Transportation Research Part A 2000; 34 (1): 85-102.
4. Trb. Highway capacity manual (HCM 200). Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.
5. Owens N, Armstrong A, Sullivan P, et al,. Traffic Incident Management Handbook. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation: Washington, DC, 2010.
6. Golob TF, Recker WW, Leonard JD,. An analysis of the severity and incident duration of truck-involved freeway accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention 1987; 19 (5): 375-395.
7. Giuliano G,. Incident characteristics, frequency, and duration on a high volume urban freeway. Transportation Research Part A 1989; 23 (5): 387-396.
8. Hojati AT, Ferreira L, Charles P, Kabit MRB,. Analysing freeway traffic incident duration using an Australian data set. Road and Transport Research: A Journal of Australian and New Zealand Research and Practice 2012; 21 (2): 19-31.
9. Garib A, Radwan AE, Al-Deek H,. Estimating magnitude and duration of incident delays. Journal of Transportation Engineering 1997; 123 (6): 459-468.
10. Zhang H, Khattak AJ,. Analysis of cascading incident event durations on urban freeways. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2010; 2178: 30-39.
11. Kim HJ, Choi H-K,. A comparative analysis of incident service time on urban freeways. Journal of International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences 2001; 25 (1): 62-72.
12. Wang W, Chen H, Bell MC,. Vehicle breakdown duration modelling. Journal of Transportation and Statistics 2005; 8 (1): 75-84.
13. Knibbe WJJ, Alkim TP, Otten JFW, Aidoo MY,. Automated estimation of incident duration on Dutch highways. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, Toronto, Canada, 2006; 870-874.
14. Ozbay K, Noyan N,. Estimation of incident clearance times using Bayesian networks approach. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2006; 38: 542-555.
15. Jones B, Janssen L, Mannering F,. Analysis of the frequency and duration of freeway accidents in Seattle. Accident Analysis & Prevention 1991; 23 (4): 239-255.
16. Chung Y, Walubita LF, Choi K,. Modeling accident duration and its mitigation strategies on South Korean freeway systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2010; 2178: 49-57.
17. Alkaabi AMS, Dissanayake D, Bird R,. Analyzing clearance time of urban traffic accidents in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, with hazard-based duration modeling method. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2011; 2229: 46-54.
18. Kaabi AA, Dissanayake D, Bird R,. Response time of highway traffic accidents in Abu Dhabi investigation with hazard-based duration models. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2012; 2278: 95-103.
19. Ghosh I, Savolainen PT, Gates TJ,. Examination of factors affecting freeway incident clearance times: a comparison of the generalized f model and several alternative nested models. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2012. DOI: 10.1002/atr.1189
20. Hojati AT, Ferreira L, Washington S, Charlesa P,. Hazard based models for freeway traffic incident duration. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2013; 52: 171-181.
21. Wang J, Cong H, Qiao S,. Estimating freeway incident duration using accelerated failure time modeling. Safety Science 2013; 54: 43-50.
22. Ravani P, Tripepi G, Malberti F, Testa S, Mallamaci F, Zoccal C,. Asymmetrical dimethylarginine predicts progression to dialysis and death in patients with chronic kidney disease: a competing risks modeling approach. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2005; 16: 2449-2455.
23. Lau B, Cole SR, Moore RD, Gange SJ,. Evaluating competing adverse and beneficial outcomes using a mixture model. Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27 (21): 4313-4327.
24. Lau B, Cole SR, Gange SJ,. Competing risk regression models for epidemiologic data. American Journal of Epidemiology 2009; 170 (2): 244-256.
25. Fürstová J, Valenta Z,. Statistical analysis of competing risks: overall survival in a group of chronic myeloid leukemia patients. European Journal for Biomedical Informatics 2011; 7 (1): 2-10.
26. Lau B, Cole SR, Gange SJ,. Parametric mixture models to evaluate and summarize hazard ratios in the presence of competing risks with time-dependent hazards and delayed entry. Statistics in Medicine 2011; 30 (6): 654-665.
27. Haller B, Schmidt G, Ulm K,. Applying competing risks regression models: an overview. Lifetime Data Analysis 2013; 19: 33-58.
28. Gilbert CCS,. A duration model of automobile ownership. Transportation Research Part B 1992; 26 (2): 97-114.
29. Hensher DA,. The timing of change for automobile transactions: competing risk multispell specification. In Travel Behaviour Research: Updating the State of Play, Ortuzar JDD, Hensher DA, Jara-Diaz S, (eds). Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1998; 487-506.
30. Yamamoto T, Madre J-L, Kitamura R,. An analysis of the effects of french vehicle inspection program and grant for scrappage on household vehicle transaction. Transportation Research Part B 2004; 38: 905-926.
31. Ettema D, Borgers A, Timmermans H,. Competing risk hazard model of activity choice, timing, sequencing, and duration. Transportation Research Record 1995; 1493: 101-109.
32. Bhat CR,. A generalized multiple durations proportional hazard model with an application to activity behavior during the evening work-to-home commute. Transportation Research Part B 1996; 30 (6): 465-480.
33. Shyr F-Y, Ben-Akiva M,. Modeling rail fatigue behavior with multiple hazards. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 1996; 2 (2): 73-82.
34. Vlahogianni EI, Karlaftis MG,. Fuzzy-entropy neural network freeway incident duration modeling with single and competing uncertainties. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 2013; 28 (6): 420-433.
35. Kleinbaum DG, Klein M,. Survival Analysis: A Self-learning Text. Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.: 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA, 2005.
36. Washington SP, Karlaftis MG, Mannering FL,. Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis, Second Edition. Chapman&Hall/LLC, Taylor&Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, 2011.
37. Smith K, Smith BL,. Forecasting the clearance time of freeway accidents. Center for Transportation Studies, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 2001.
38. Prentice RL, Kalbfleisch JD, Peterson AV Jr, Flournoy N, Farewell VT, Breslow NE,. The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks. Biometrics 1978; 34: 541-554.
39. Fine JP, Gray RJ,. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1999; 94 (446): 496-509.
40. Akaike H,. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1974; 19 (6): 716-723.
41. Schwarz G,. Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics 1978; 6 (2): 461-464.
42. Scrucca L, Santucci A, Aversa F,. Regression modeling of competing risk using R: an in depth guide for clinicians. Bone Marrow Transplantation 2010; 45: 1388-1395.
43. Kim W, Chang G-L,. Development of a hybrid prediction model for freeway incident duration: a case study in Maryland. International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research 2012; 10 (1): 22-33.
44. Haas K,. Benefits of traffic incident management. National Traffic Incident Management Coalition, 2006.
45. Anastasopoulos PC, Haddock JE, Karlaftis MG, Mannering FL,. An analysis of urban travel times: a random parameters hazard-based approach. Transportation Research Record 2012; 2302: 121-129.