Tests of calibration and goodness-of-fit in the survival setting

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 34, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 1659-1680

  Demler, Olga V ^a   Paynter, Nina P ^a   Cook, Nancy R ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Calibration; Goodness of fit; Survival analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA MINING; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; FRAMINGHAM RISK SCORE; GREENWOOD NAM D' AGOSTINO METHOD; GRONNESBY BORGAN TEST; HEART INFARCTION; HOSMER LEMESHOW GOODNESS OF FIT TEST TO SURVIVAL METHOD; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAMPLE SIZE; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL CONCEPTS; WOMEN'S HEALTH; AGED; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORONARY DISEASE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PROCEDURES; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; STATISTICAL BIAS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ADULT; AGED; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CALIBRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORONARY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAMPLE SIZE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84926409919     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.6428     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, Corle DK, Green SB, Schairer C, Mulvihill JJ. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. Journal of National Cancer Institute 1989; 81(24):1879-1886.
2. D'Agostino RB, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, Wolf PA, Cobain M, Massaro JM, Kannel WB. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham heart study. Circulation 2008; 117:743-753.
3. Anderson KM, Odell PM, Wilson PWF, Kannel WB. Cardiovascular disease risk profiles. American Heart Journal 1991; 121:293-298.
4. Wilson PWF, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger A, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 1998; 97:1837-1847.
5. Pepe MS, Janes H. Methods for Evaluating Prediction Performance of Biomarkers and Tests The Selected Works of Margaret S Pepe PhD, 2013. Available at: http://works.bepress.com/margaret_pepe/38 [accessed on 28 January 2015].
6. Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB. Tutorial in biostatistics multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Statistics in Medicine 1996; 15:361-387.
7. D'Agostino RB, Byung-Ho N. Evaluation of the performance of survival analysis models: discrimination and calibration measures. Handbook of Statistics 2004; 23:1-25.
8. Grønnesby JK, Borgan Ø. A method for checking regression models in survival analysis based on the risk score. Lifetime Data Analysis 1996; 2:315-320.
9. Paynter NP, Peelen LM, Cook NR. Performance of Prediction Measures in a Survival Setting. JSM: Vancouver, Canada, 2010.
10. Guffey D, May S, Hosmer DW. Hosmer-Lemeshow Goodness-of-Fit Test: Translations to the Cox Proportional Hazards Model. JSM: Montreal, Canada, 2013.
11. May S, Hosmer DW. A cautionary note on the use of the Grønnesby and Borgan goodness-of-fit test for the Cox proportional hazards model. Lifetime Data Analysis 2004; 10:283-291.
12. May S, Hosmer DW. A simplified method of calculating an overall goodness-of-fit test for the Cox proportional hazards model. Lifetime Data Analysis 1998; 4:109-120.
13. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, May S. Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data (2nd edn). John Wiley and Sons Inc.: Hoboken, New Jersey, 2011.
14. Hastie T, Friedman J, Tibshirani R. The Elements of Statistical Learning, Vol. 2. No. 1. Springer: New York, 2009.
15. Cook NR, Ridker PM. Advances in measuring the effect of individual predictors of cardiovascular risk: the role of reclassification measures. Annals of Internal Medicine 2009; 150(11):795-802.
16. Sego LH, Reynolds MR, Woodall WH. Risk-adjusted monitoring of survival times. Statistics in Medicine 2009; 28(11):1386-1401.
17. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, New Jersey, 2002:171.
18. Crowson CS, Atkinson EJ, Terneau TM. Assessing calibration of prognostic risk scores. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2014. [Epub ahead of print]; PMID: 23907781.
19. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 1980; 9(10):1043-1069.
20. Cook NR, Paynter NP. Performance of reclassification statistics in comparing risk prediction models. Biometrical Journal 2011; 53(2):237-258.
21. Hosmer DW, Hosmer T, Le Cessie S, Lemeshow S. A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Statistics in Medicine 1997; 16(11):965-980.
22. Ridker PM, Buring JE, Rifai N, Cook NR. Development and validation of improved algorithms for the assessment of global cardiovascular risk in women: the Reynolds risk score. Journal of the American Medical Association 2007; 297:611-619. [PMID: 17299196].
23. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel III). Journal of the American Medical Association 285:2486-2497.
24. Available at: http://www.framinghamheartstudy.org/risk-functions/coronary-heart-disease/hard-10-year-risk.php [21 October 2014].
25. Harrell, Jr, FE. Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression and Survival Analysis. Springer-Verlag: New York, 2001.
26. Janssen KJM, Moons KGM, Kalkman CJ, Grobbee DE, Vergouwe Y. Updating methods improved the performance of a clinical prediction model in new patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008; 61:76-86.
27. Editorial Staff . Reducing our irreproducibility. Nature 2013; 496(7):398.
28. Lin DY, Wei LJ. Goodness-of-fit tests for the general Cox regression model. Statistica Sinica 1991; 1:1-17.
29. Parzen M, Lipsitz SR. A global goodness-of-fit statistic for Cox regression models. Biometrics 1999; 55:580-584.
30. SAS/STAT, Version 9.3 of the SAS System for Windows. Copyright ©2002-2010 SAS Institute Inc.
31. R Core Team (2014). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/.