Fish transporters and miracle homes: How compositional distributional semantics can help NP parsing

EMNLP 2013 - 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1908-1913

  Lazaridou, Angeliki ^a   Vecchi, Eva Maria ^a   Baroni, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FISH; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

DISTRIBUTIONAL SEMANTICS; IMPROVE PERFORMANCE; LIVE FISH; SEMANTIC REPRESENTATION; STATE OF THE ART; SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITIES;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 84926364159     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Marco Baroni and Roberto Zamparelli. 2010. Nouns are vectors, adjectives are matrices: Representing adjective-noun constructions in semantic space. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pages 1183-1193, Boston, MA.
2. Michael Collins. 2003. Head-driven statistical models for natural language parsing. Computational linguistics, 29(4):589-637.
3. Georgiana Dinu, Nghia The Pham, and Marco Baroni. 2013. DISSECT: DIStributional SEmantics Composition Toolkit. In Proceedings of the System Demonstrations of ACL 2013, Sofia, Bulgaria.
4. Charles Fillmore. 1968. The case for case. In Emmon Bach and Robert Harms, editors, Universals in Linguistic Theory, pages 1-89. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
5. Christina Gagné and Thomas Spalding. 2009. Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures? Journal of Memory and Language, 60:20-35.
6. Emiliano Guevara. 2010. A regression model of adjective-noun compositionality in distributional semantics. In Proceedings of GEMS, pages 33-37, Uppsala, Sweden.
7. Dan Klein and Christopher D Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 423-430. Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. Mark Lauer. 1995. Corpus statistics meet the noun compound: Some empirical results. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 47-54, Cambridge, MA.
9. Phong Le, Willem Zuidema, and Remko Scha. 2013. Learning from errors: Using vector-based compositional semantics for parse reranking. In Proceedings of the ACL 2013 Workshop on Continuous Vector Space Models and their Compositionality, Sofia, Bulgaria.
10. Mitchell P Marcus, Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz, and Beatrice Santorini. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
11. Mitchell P Marcus. 1980. Theory of syntactic recognition for natural languages. MIT press.
12. Louise McNally. 2013. Modification. In Maria Aloni and Paul Dekker, editors, Cambridge Handbook of Semantics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. In press.
13. Jeff Mitchell and Mirella Lapata. 2010. Composition in distributional models of semantics. Cognitive Science, 34(8):1388-1429.
14. Preslav Nakov and Marti Hearst. 2005. Search engine statistics beyond the n-gram: Application to noun compound bracketing. In Proceedings of CoNLL, pages 17-24, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.
15. Slav Petrov, Leon Barrett, Romain Thibaux, and Dan Klein. 2006. Learning accurate, compact, and interpretable tree annotation. In Proceedings of COLING-ACL, pages 433-440, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.
16. Emily Pitler, Shane Bergsma, Dekang Lin, and Kenneth Church. 2010. Using web-scale n-grams to improve base NP parsing performance. In Proceedings of the COLING, pages 886-894, Beijing, China.
17. Richard Socher, Brody Huval, Christopher Manning, and Andrew Ng. 2012. Semantic compositionality through recursive matrix-vector spaces. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pages 1201-1211, Jeju Island, Korea.
18. Richard Socher, John Bauer, Christopher D. Manning, and Andrew Y. Ng. 2013. Parsing with compositional vector grammars. In Proceedings of ACL, Sofia, Bulgaria.
19. Peter Turney and Patrick Pantel. 2010. From frequency to meaning: Vector space models of semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 37:141-188.
20. David Vadas and James Curran. 2007a. Adding noun phrase structure to the Penn Treebank. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 240-247, Prague, Czech Republic.
21. David Vadas and James R Curran. 2007b. Large-scale supervised models for noun phrase bracketing. In Proceedings of the PACLING, pages 104-112.
22. David Vadas and James R. Curran. 2011. Parsing noun phrases in the penn treebank. Comput. Linguist., 37(4):753-809.
23. Eva Maria Vecchi, Marco Baroni, and Roberto Zamparelli. 2011. (Linear) maps of the impossible: Capturing semantic anomalies in distributional space. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Distributional Semantics and Compositionality, pages 1-9, Portland, OR.