An immersed structure approach for fluid-vegetation interaction

Advances in Water Resources

Volumn 80, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-16

  Mattis, Steven A ^a   Dawson, Clint N ^a   Kees, Christopher E ^b   Farthing, Matthew W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b US ARMY ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmental modeling; Fluid dynamics; Fluid structure interaction

Indexed keywords

DRAG; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FLUID DYNAMICS; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; POPULATION STATISTICS; REYNOLDS NUMBER; VEGETATION;

ELASTIC STRUCTURES; ENVIRONMENTAL MODEL; IMMERSED BOUNDARY; INTEGRAL TRANSFORM; INTERACTION MODEL; MEAN VELOCITY PROFILES; POPULATION DENSITIES; VEGETATION HEIGHT;

FLOW OF FLUIDS;

BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD; CHANNEL FLOW; DRAG COEFFICIENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FLUID DYNAMICS; FLUID FLOW; NUMERICAL MODEL; REYNOLDS NUMBER; VEGETATION; VELOCITY PROFILE;

EID: 84926337235     PISSN: 03091708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.02.014     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Christensen B. Open channel and sheet flow over flexible roughness. In: 21st IAHR congress, Melbourne, Australia: 1985. p. 19-23.
2. Wilson N., Shaw R. A higher order closure model for canopy flow. J Appl Meteorol 1977, 16:1197-1205. 10.1175/1520-0450(1977)016%3C1197:ahocmf%3E2.0.co;2.
3. Raupach M., Shaw R. Averaging procedures for flow within vegetation canopies. Boundary Layer Meteorol 1982, 22(1):79-90. 10.1007/bf00128057.
4. Raupach M., Coppin P., Legg B. Experiments on scalar dispersion within a model plant canopy part I: the turbulence structure. Boundary Layer Meteorol 1986, 35(1):21-52. 10.1007/bf00117300.
5. Burke R, Stolzenbach K. Free surface flows through salt marsh grass, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sea Grant College Program. Publication No. MITSG,1983. p. 83-16.
6. López F, Garcia M. Open-channel flow through simulated vegetation: turbulence modeling and sediment transport. Tech. Rep. WPR-CP 10, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station; August 1997.
7. López F., García M. Mean flow and turbulence structure of open-channel flow through non-emergent vegetation. J Hydraul Eng 2001, 127:392. 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2001)127:5(392).
8. Defina A., Bixio A. Mean flow and turbulence in vegetated open channel flow. Water Resour Res 2005, 41(7):W07006. 10.1029/2004wr003475.
9. Moeng C. A large-eddy-simulation model for the study of planetary boundary-layer turbulence. J Atmos Sci 1984, 41(13):2052-2062. 10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041%3C2052:alesmf%3E2.0.co;2.
10. Shaw R., Schumann U. Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow above and within a forest. Boundary Layer Meteorol 1992, 61(1):47-64. 10.1007/bf02033994.
11. Kanda M., Hino M. Organized structures in developing turbulent flow within and above a plant canopy, using a large eddy simulation. Boundary Layer Meteorol 1994, 68(3):237-257. 10.1007/bf00705599.
12. Dwyer M., Patton E., Shaw R. Turbulent kinetic energy budgets from a large-eddy simulation of airflow above and within a forest canopy. Boundary Layer Meteorol 1997, 84(1):23-43. 10.1023/A%3A1000301303543.
13. Cui J, Neary V. Large eddy simulation (LES) of fully developed flow through vegetation. In: Hydroinformatics 2002: proceedings of the 5th international conference on hydroinformatics, 2002.
14. Stoesser T, Liang C, Rodi W, Jirka G. Large eddy simulation of fully-developed turbulent flow through submerged vegetation. In: International conference on fluvial hydraulics, Lisbon, Portugal, vol. 1. Sep 06-08, 2006. p. 227-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781439833865.ch22.
15. Stoesser T., Salvador G., Rodi W., Diplas P. Large eddy simulation of turbulent flow through submerged vegetation. Transp Porous Media 2009, 78(3):347-365. 10.1007/s11242-009-9371-8.
16. Palau G, Stoesser T, Rummel A, Rodi W. Turbulent shallow flow through emergent vegetation. In: ICEH: international conference on eco-hydraulics, Tempe, Arizona: 2007.
17. Mattis S., Dawson C., Kees C., Farthing M. Numerical modeling of drag for flow through vegetated domains and porous structures. Adv Water Resour 2012, 39:44-59. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.01.002.
18. Kutija V., Thi H., Hong Minh A numerical model for assessing the additional resistance to flow introduced by flexible vegetation. J Hydraul Res 1996, 34(1):99-114. 10.1080/00221689609498766.
19. Timoshenko S. Strength of materials: advanced theory and problems 1956, D. Van Nostrand Company.
20. Saowapon C., Kouwen N. Physically based model for determining flow resistance and velocity profiles in vegetated channels. Symposium on manning's equation 1989, 559-568. B.C. Yen (Ed.).
21. Darby S. Effect of riparian vegetation on flow resistance and flood potential. J Hydraul Eng 1999, 125(5):443-454. 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1999)125:5(443).
22. Erduran K., Kutija V. Quasi-three-dimensional numerical model for flow through flexible, rigid, submerged and non-submerged vegetation. J Hydroinf 2003, 5(3):189-202.
23. Ikeda S., Yamada T., Toda Y. Numerical study on turbulent flow and honami in and above flexible plant canopy. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2001, 22(3):252-258. 10.1016/s0142-727x(01)00087-x.
24. Nepf H., Ghisalberti M. Flow and transport in channels with submerged vegetation. Acta Geophys 2008, 56(3):753-777. 10.2478/s11600-008-0017-y.
25. Velasco D., Bateman A., Medina V. A new integrated, hydro-mechanical model applied to flexible vegetation in riverbeds. J Hydraul Res 2008, 46(5):579-597. 10.3826/jhr.2008.2986.
26. Kubrak E., Kubrak J., Rowiński P. Influence of a method of evaluation of the curvature of flexible vegetation elements on vertical distributions of flow velocities. Acta Geophys 2011, 1-22. 10.2478/s11600-011-0077-2.
27. Li C., Xie J. Numerical modeling of free surface flow over submerged and highly flexible vegetation. Adv Water Resour 2011, 34(4):468-477. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.01.002.
28. Li C., Zeng C. 3D Numerical modelling of flow divisions at open channel junctions with or without vegetation. Adv Water Resour 2009, 32(1):49-60. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.09.005.
29. Al-Sadder S., Al-Rawi R. Finite difference scheme for large-deflection analysis of non-prismatic cantilever beams subjected to different types of continuous and discontinuous loadings. Arch Appl Mech 2006, 75(8):459-473. 10.1007/s00419-005-0422-5.
30. Petryk S., Bosmajian G. Analysis of flow through vegetation. J Hydraul Div 1975, 101(7):871-884.
31. Nepf H. Drag, turbulence, and diffusion in flow through emergent vegetation. Water Resour Res 1999, 35(2):479-489. 10.1029/1998wr900069.
32. Zdravkovich M. Review of flow interference between two circular cylinders in various arrangements. ASME Trans J Fluids Eng 1977, 99:618-633. 10.1115/1.3448871.
33. Zdravkovich M., Pridden D. Interference between two circular cylinders; series of unexpected discontinuities. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 1977, 2(3):255-270. 10.1016/0167-6105(77)90026-5.
34. Bokaian A., Geoola F. Wake-induced galloping of two interfering circular cylinders. J Fluid Mech 1984, 146(1):383-415. 10.1017/s0022112084001920.
35. Blevins R.D. Flow-induced vibration 1977, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, 377, p. 1.
36. Luo S., Gan T., Chew Y. Uniform flow past one (or two in tandem) finite length circular cylinder (s). J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 1996, 59(1):69-93. 10.1016/0167-6105(95)00036-4.
37. Zukausras A. Heat transfer from tubes in crossflow. Adv Heat Transfer 1973, 8:93. 10.1016/s0065-2717(08)70038-8.
38. Raupach M. Drag and drag partition on rough surfaces. Boundary Layer Meteorol 1992, 60(4):375-395. 10.1007/bf00155203.
39. Li R., Shen H. Effect of tall vegetations on flow and sediment. J Hydraul Div 1973, 99(5):793-814.
40. Klaassen G., Van der Zwaard J. Roughness coefficients of vegetated flood plains. J Hydraul Res 1974, 12(1):43-63. 10.1080/00221687409499757.
41. Seginer I., Mulhearn P., Bradley E., Finnigan J. Turbulent flow in a model plant canopy. Boundary Layer Meteorol 1976, 10(4):423-453. 10.1007/bf00225863.
42. Graf W., Ko S. Tests on cylinders in turbulent flow. J Hydraul Div 1971, 97(8):1265-1267.
43. Dunn C, López F, García M. Mean flow and turbulence in a laboratory channel with simulated vegetation, Hydrosystems Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: 1996.
44. Reid R., Whitaker R. Wind-driven flow of water influenced by a canopy. J Waterw Harbors Coastal Eng Div 1976, 102(1):61-77.
45. Tanino Y., Nepf H.M. Laboratory investigation of mean drag in a random array of rigid, emergent cylinders. J Hydraul Eng 2008, 134(1):34-41. 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2008)134:1(34).
46. Nepf H.M. Hydrodynamics of vegetated channels. J Hydraul Res 2012, 50(3):262-279. 10.1080/00221686.2012.696559.
47. Schoneboom T, Aberle J, Dittrich A. Hydraulic resistance of vegetated flows: contribution of bed shear stress and vegetative drag to total hydraulic resistance. In: Proceedings of the international conference on fluvial hydraulics river flow, 2010.
48. Aberle J., Järvelä J. Flow resistance of emergent rigid and flexible floodplain vegetation. J Hydraul Res 2013, 51(1):33-45. 10.1080/00221686.2012.754795.
49. Cheng N.-S. Calculation of drag coefficient for arrays of emergent circular cylinders with pseudofluid model. J Hydraul Eng 2012, 139(6):602-611. 10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0000722.
50. Wu W., Shields F.D., Bennett S.J., Wang S.S. A depth-averaged two-dimensional model for flow, sediment transport, and bed topography in curved channels with riparian vegetation. Water Resour Res 2005, 41(3). 10.1029/2004wr003730.
51. Naot D., Nezu I., Nakagawa H. Hydrodynamic behavior of partly vegetated open channels. J Hydraul Eng 1996, 122(11):625-633. 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1996)122:11(625).
52. Fischer-Antze T., Stoesser T., Bates P., Olsen N. 3d numerical modelling of open-channel flow with submerged vegetation. J Hydraul Res 2001, 39(3):303-310. 10.1080/00221680109499833.
53. Nicholas A.R., McLelland S.J. Computational fluid dynamics modelling of three-dimensional processes on natural river floodplains. J Hydraul Res 2004, 42(2):131-143. 10.1080/00221686.2004.9728377.
54. Choi S.-U., Kang H. Reynolds stress modeling of vegetated open-channel flows. J Hydraul Res 2004, 42(1):3-11. 10.1080/00221686.2004.9641178.
55. Stoesser T., Kim S., Diplas P. Turbulent flow through idealized emergent vegetation. J Hydraul Eng 2010, 136(12):1003-1017. 10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0000153.
56. Kim S.J., Stoesser T. Closure modeling and direct simulation of vegetation drag in flow through emergent vegetation. Water Resour Res 2011, 47(10). 10.1029/2011wr010561.
57. Love A. A treatise on the mathematical theory of elasticity 1920, University Press. 10.1038/105511a0.
58. Bisshopp K, Drucker D. Large deflection of cantilever beams, Appl. Math., vol. 3.
59. Steigmann D., Faulkner M. Variational theory for spatial rods. J Elast 1993, 33(1):1-26. 10.1007/bf00042633.
60. Fried I. Stability and equilibrium of the straight and curved elastica-finite element computation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 1981, 28:49-61. 10.1016/0045-7825(81)90026-8.
61. Dado M., Al-Sadder S. A new technique for large deflection analysis of non-prismatic cantilever beams. Mech Res Commun 2005, 32(6):692-703. 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2005.01.004.
62. Germano M., Piomelli U., Moin P., Cabot W. A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys Fluids A Fluid Dyn 1991, 3:1760. 10.1063/1.857955.
63. Voke P. Subgrid-scale modelling at low mesh reynolds number. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 1996, 8(2):131-143. 10.1007/bf00312367.
64. Meneveau C., Lund T. The dynamic Smagorinsky model and scale-dependent coefficients in the viscous range of turbulence. Phys Fluids 1997, 9:3932. 10.1063/1.869493.
65. Kees C, Farthing M, Fong M. Locally conservative, stabilized finite element methods for a class of variable coefficient Navier-Stokes equations, Technical Report TR-09-12, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory: 2009.
66. Hoerner S. Fluid-dynamic drag: practical information on aerodynamic drag and hydrodynamic resistance, Hoerner Fluid Dynamics, 1965.
67. Peskin C. The immersed boundary method. Acta Numer 2002, 11(1):479-517. 10.1017/s0962492902000077.
68. Borgesa A., Vedovotob J., Marianob F., da Silveira A. Fluid-structure interaction of cylinders by combining the cosserat beams theory and immersed boundary methodology. Mec Comput 2010, XXIX(32):3237-3255.
69. Griffith B, Luo X. Immersed boundary method with finite element elasticity, . http://www.cims.nyu/~/docs/griffith_ibfem_sub.pdf.
70. Lim S., Ferent A., Wang X.S., Peskin C.S. Dynamics of a closed rod with twist and bend in fluid. SIAM J Sci Comput 2008, 31(1):273-302. 10.1137/070699780.
71. Gambi M., Nowell A., Jumars P. Flume observations on flow dynamics in zostera marina(eelgrass) beds. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 1990, 61(1):159-169. Oldendorf. 10.3354/meps061159.
72. Kadlec R. Overland flow in wetlands: vegetation resistance. J Hydraul Eng 1990, 116:691. 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1990)116:5(691).
73. Kays W., London A. Compact heat exchangers: a summary of basic heat transfer and flow friction design data 1955, National Press.