Novel genotype-phenotype associations in human cancers enabled by advanced molecular platforms and computational analysis of whole slide images

Laboratory Investigation

Volumn 95, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 366-376

  Cooper, Lee A D ^a,b,c   Kong, Jun ^a   Gutman, David A ^a,c   Dunn, William D ^a   Nalisnik, Michael ^a   Brat, Daniel J ^a,c  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE MUTATION; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; GLIOBLASTOMA; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT; CHEMISTRY; CYTOCHEMISTRY; GENETIC PROCEDURES; GENETICS; GENOMICS; NEOPLASMS; PATHOLOGY;

GENETIC TECHNIQUES; GENOMICS; HISTOCYTOCHEMISTRY; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84926326092     PISSN: 00236837     EISSN: 15300307     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2014.153     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. van den Bent MJ. Interobserver variation of the histopathological diagnosis in clinical trials on glioma: a clinician's perspective. Acta Neuropathol 2010;120:297-304.
2. Gurcan MN, Boucheron LE, Can A, et al. Histopathological image analysis: a review. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 2009;2:147-171.
3. Cooper LAD, Carter AB, Farris AB, et al. Digital Pathology: Data-Intensive Frontier in Medical Imaging: Health-information sharing, specifically of digital pathology, is the subject of this paper which discusses how sharing the rich images in pathology can stretch the capabilities of all otherwise well-practiced disciplines. Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng 2012;100:991-1003.
4. Kothari S, Phan JH, Stokes TH, et al. Pathology imaging informatics for quantitative analysis of whole-slide images. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:1099-1108.
5. Hsu W, Markey MK, Wang MD. Biomedical imaging informatics in the era of precision medicine: progress, challenges, and opportunities. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:1010-1013.
6. Chang H, Han J, Borowsky A, et al. Invariant delineation of nuclear architecture in glioblastoma multiforme for clinical and molecular association. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2013;32:670-682.
7. Chang H, Nayak N, Spellman PT, et al. Characterization of tissue histopathology via predictive sparse decomposition and spatial pyramid matching. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2013;16(Pt 2):91-98.
8. Hipp J, Smith SC, Cheng J, Tomlins SA, et al. Optimization of complex cancer morphology detection using the SIVQ pattern recognition algorithm. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) 2012;35:41-50.
9. Cheng J, Hipp J, Monaco J, et al. Automated vector selection of SIVQ and parallel computing integration MATLAB: Innovations supporting large-scale and high-throughput image analysis studies. J Pathol Inform 2011;2:37.
10. Janowczyk A, Chandran S, Madabhushi A. Quantifying local heterogeneity via morphologic scale: Distinguishing tumoral from stromal regions. J Pathol Inform 2013;4(Suppl):S8.
11. Janowczyk A, Chandran S, Singh R, et al. High-throughput biomarker segmentation on ovarian cancer tissue microarrays via hierarchical normalized cuts. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012;59:1240-1252.
12. Song Y, Treanor D, Bulpitt AJ, et al. Unsupervised content classification based nonrigid registration of differently stained histology images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2014;61(1):96-108.
13. Mosaliganti K, Janoos F, Irfanoglu O, et al. Tensor classification of N-point correlation function features for histology tissue segmentation. Med Image Anal 2009;13:156-166.
14. Cooper L, Saltz J, Machiraju R, et al. Two-point correlation as a feature for histology images: feature space structure and correlation updating. Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit Workshops 201079-86.
15. Qi X, Xing F, Foran DJ, et al. Robust segmentation of overlapping cells in histopathology specimens using parallel seed detection and repulsive level set. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012;59:754-765.
16. Samsi S, Krishnamurthy AK, Gurcan MN. An efficient computational framework for the analysis of whole slide images: application to follicular lymphoma immunohistochemistry. J Comput Sci 2012;3: 269-279.
17. Khan AM, Rajpoot N, Treanor D, et al. A nonlinear mapping approach to stain normalization in digital histopathology images using imagespecific color deconvolution. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2014;61:1729-1738.
18. Murakami Y, Abe T, Hashiguchi A, et al. Color correction for automatic fibrosis quantification in liver biopsy specimens. J Pathol Inform 2013;4:36.
19. Bautista PA, Hashimoto N, Yagi Y. Color standardization in whole slide imaging using a color calibration slide. J Pathol Inform 2014;5:4.
20. Bautista PA, Yagi Y.. Improving the visualization and detection of tissue folds in whole slide images through color enhancement. J Pathol Inform 2010;1:25.
21. Chappelow J, Tomaszewski JE, Feldman M, et al. HistoStitcher((c)): an interactive program for accurate and rapid reconstruction of digitized whole histological sections from tissue fragments. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2011;35:557-567.
22. Kothari S, Phan JH, Wang MD. Eliminating tissue-fold artifacts in histopathological whole-slide images for improved image-based prediction of cancer grade. J Pathol Inform 2013;4:22.
23. Kong J, Cooper LA, Wang F, et al. Machine-based morphologic analysis of glioblastoma using whole-slide pathology images uncovers clinically relevant molecular correlates. PLoS One 2013;8:e81049.
24. Beck AH, Sangoi AR, Leung S, et al. Systematic analysis of breast cancer morphology uncovers stromal features associated with survival. Sci Transl Med 2011;3108ra13.
25. Mosaliganti K, Pan T, Ridgway R, et al. An imaging workflow for characterizing phenotypical change in large histological mouse model datasets. J Biomed Inform 2008;41:863-873.
26. Network TCGAR. The Cancer Genome Atlas.
27. Roy Chowdhuri S, Hanson J, Cheng J, et al. Semiautomated laser capture microdissection of lung adenocarcinoma cytology samples. Acta Cytol 2012;56:622-631.
28. Cancer Genome Atlas N. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 2012;490:61-70.
29. Cancer Genome Atlas N. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 2012;487:330-337.
30. Cancer Genome Atlas Research N. Comprehensive molecular characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Nature 2013;499:43-49.
31. Cancer Genome Atlas Research NKandoth C, Schultz N, Cherniack AD, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature 2013;497:67-73.
32. Cancer Genome Atlas Research N. Comprehensive genomic characterization of squamous cell lung cancers. Nature 2012;489:519-525.
33. Rutledge WC, Kong J, Gao J, et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in glioblastoma are associated with specific genomic alterations and related to transcriptional class. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19:4951-4960.
34. Cancer Genome Atlas Research N. Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma. Nature 2011;474:609-615.
35. Cancer Genome Atlas Research N. Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma. Nature 2014;507: 315-322.
36. Verhaak RG, Hoadley KA, Purdom E, et al. Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell 2010; 17:98-110.
37. Noushmehr H, Weisenberger DJ, Diefes K, et al. Identification of a CpG island methylator phenotype that defines a distinct subgroup of glioma. Cancer Cell 2010;17:510-522.
38. Cooper LA, Gutman DA, Chisolm C, et al. The tumor microenvironment strongly impacts master transcriptional regulators and gene expression class of glioblastoma. Am J Pathol 2012;180:2108-2119.
39. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 2007;114: 97-109.
40. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:5116-5121.
41. Carro MS, Lim WK, Alvarez MJ, et al. The transcriptional network for mesenchymal transformation of brain tumours. Nature 2010;463: 318-325.
42. Aldape K, Burger PC, Perry A. Clinicopathologic aspects of 1p/19q loss and the diagnosis of oligodendroglioma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007;131:242-251.
43. Gupta M, Djalilvand A, Brat DJ. Clarifying the diffuse gliomas: an update on the morphologic features and markers that discriminate oligodendroglioma from astrocytoma. Am J Clin Pathol 2005;124: 755-768.
44. Peraud A, Watanabe K, Schwechheimer K, et al. Genetic profile of the giant cell glioblastoma. Lab Invest 1999;79:123-129.
45. Perry A, Aldape KD, George DH, et al. Small cell astrocytoma: an aggressive variant that is clinicopathologically and genetically distinct from anaplastic oligodendroglioma. Cancer 2004;101: 2318-2326.
46. Hegi ME, Janzer RC, Lambiv WL, et al. Presence of an oligodendroglioma-like component in newly diagnosed glioblastoma identifies a pathogenetically heterogeneous subgroup and lacks prognostic value: central pathology review of the EORTC-26981/NCIC-CE.3 trial. Acta Neuropathol 2012;123:841-852.
47. Appin CL, Gao J, Chisolm C, et al. Glioblastoma with oligodendroglioma component (GBM-O): molecular genetic and clinical characteristics. Brain Pathol 2013;23:454-461.
48. Cooper LA, Kong J, Gutman DA, et al. Integrated morphologic analysis for the identification and characterization of disease subtypes. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19:317-323.
49. Cooper LA, Kong J, Wang F, et al. Morphological Signatures and Genomic Correlates in Glioblastoma. Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging 20111624-1627.
50. Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 2009;4:44-57.
51. Jun K, Fusheng W, Teodoro G, et al. High-performance computational analysis of glioblastoma pathology images with database support identifies molecular and survival correlates. Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM). Proceedings (IEEE Int Conf Bioinformatics Biomed) 2013229-236.
52. Ju H, Hang C, Fontenay GV, et al. Molecular bases of morphometric composition in Glioblastoma multiforme.. Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on; 2012 2-5 May 2012.
53. Yuan Y, Failmezger H, Rueda OM, et al. Quantitative image analysis of cellular heterogeneity in breast tumors complements genomic profiling. Sci Transl Med 2012;4157ra43.
54. Wang C, Pecot T, Zynger DL, et al. Identifying survival associated morphological features of triple negative breast cancer using multiple datasets. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:680-687.
55. Gutman DA, Cobb J, Somanna D, et al. Cancer Digital Slide Archive: an informatics resource to support integrated in silico analysis of TCGA pathology data. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:1091-1098.
56. Wang F, Kong J, Cooper L, et al. A data model and database for highresolution pathology analytical image informatics. J Pathol Inform 2011;2:32.
57. Wang F, Kong J, Gao J, et al. A high-performance spatial database based approach for pathology imaging algorithm evaluation. J Pathol Inform 2013;4:5.
58. Gutman DA, Cooper LA, Hwang SN, et al. MR imaging predictors of molecular profile and survival: multi-institutional study of the TCGA glioblastoma data set. Radiology 2013;267:560-569.
59. Zinn PO, Mahajan B, Sathyan P, et al. Radiogenomic mapping of edema/cellular invasion MRI-phenotypes in glioblastoma multiforme. PLoS One 2011;6:e25451.
60. Jain R, Poisson L, Narang J, et al. Genomic mapping and survival prediction in glioblastoma: molecular subclassification strengthened by hemodynamic imaging biomarkers. Radiology 2013;267:212-220.
61. Gevaert O, Xu J, Hoang CD, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: identifying prognostic imaging biomarkers by leveraging public gene expression microarray data-methods and preliminary results. Radiology 2012;264:387-396.