Impact of organic loading rate on psychrophilic anaerobic digestion of solid dairy manure

Energies

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 1990-2007

  Saady, Noori M Cata ^a   Massé, Daniel I ^a  

^a SHERBROOKE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cow manure; Dry anaerobic digestion; High solids content; Psychrophilic

Indexed keywords

BIOREACTORS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; EFFLUENTS; FATTY ACIDS; LOADING; MANURES; METHANE; PH EFFECTS; VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION TECHNOLOGY; COW MANURE; DRY ANAEROBIC DIGESTIONS; HIGH-SOLIDS; ORGANIC LOADING RATES; PSYCHROPHILIC; VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS (VFAS); VOLATILE SOLIDS REDUCTIONS;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

EID: 84926312125     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19961073     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/en8031990     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Laguë, C. Challenges and Opportunities in Livestock Manure Management. Available online: http://agrienvarchive.ca/bioenergy/download/an-lague-A2.pdf (accessed on 7 October 2014).
2. Hindrichsen, I.K.; Wettstein, H.R.; Machmuller, A.; Jorg, B.; Kreuzer, M. Effect of the carbohydrate composition of feed concentratates on methane emission from dairy cows and their slurry. Environ. Monitor. Assess. 2005, 107, 329-350.
3. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Revised IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories; IPCC: Bracknell, UK, 1996.
4. Abbassi-Guendouz, A.; Brockmann, D.; Trably, E.; Dumas, C.; Delgenès, J.; Steyer, J.; Escudié, R. Total solids content drives high solid anaerobic digestion via mass transfer limitation. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 111, 55-61.
5. El-Mashad, H.M.; Zeeman, G.; van Loon, W.K.P.; Bot, G.P.A.; Lettinga, G. Effect of temperature and temperature fluctuation on thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure. Bioresour. Technol.2004, 95, 191-201.
6. Ferrer, I.; Garfí, M.; Uggetti, E.; Ferrer-Martí, L.; Calderon, A.; Velo, E. Biogas production in low-cost household digesters at the peruvian andes. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35, 1668-1674.
7. Martí-Herrero, J.; Chipana, M.; Cuevas, C.; Paco, G.; Serrano, V.; Zymla, B.; Heising, K.; Sologuren, J.; Gamarra, A. Low cost tubular digesters as appropriate technology for widespread application: Results and lessons learned from bolivia. Renew. Energy 2014, 71, 156-165.
8. Ahn, H.K.; Smith, M.C.; Kondrad, S.L.; White, J.W. Evaluation of biogas production potential by dry anaerobic digestion of switchgrass-animal manure mixtures. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 160, 965-975.
9. Kusch, S.; Oechsner, H.; Jungbluth, T. Biogas production with horse dung in solid-phase digestion systems. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 1280-1292.
10. Di Maria, F.; Gigliotti, G.; Sordi, A.; Micale, C.; Massaccesi, L. Start up of a pre-industrial scale solid state anaerobic digestion cell for the co-treatment of animal and agricultural residues. In Proceedings of the ECOS 2012-The 25th International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems, Perugia, Italy, 26-29 June 2012.
11. Luning, L.; van Zundert, E.H.M.; Brinkmann, A.J.F. Comparison of dry and wet digestion for solid waste. Water Sci. Technol. 2003, 48, 15-20.
12. Hall, S.J.; Hawkes, D.L.; Hawkes, F.R.; Thomas, A. Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of high solids cattle waste in a packed bed digester. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 1985, 32, 153-162.
13. Jha, A.K.; Li, J.; Zhang, L.; Ban, Q.; Jin, Y. Comparison between wet and dry anaerobic digestions of cow dung under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Adv. Water Resour. Prot. (AWRP) 2013, 1, 28-38.
14. Jha, A.K.; Li, J.; Ban, Q.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, B. Dry anaerobic digestion of cow dung for methane production: Effect of mixing. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 15, 1111-1118.
15. Brown, D.; Shi, J.; Li, Y. Comparison of solid-state to liquid anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic feedstocks for biogas production. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 124, 379-386.
16. Massé, D.I.; Saady, N.M.C. Psychrophilic dry anaerobic digestion of dairy cow feces: Long-term operation. Waste Manag. 2015, 36, 86-92.
17. Massé, D.I.; Rajagopal, R.; Singh, G. Technical and operational feasibility of psychrophilic anaerobic digestion biotechnology for processing ammonia-rich waste. Appl. Energy 2014, 120, 49-55.
18. Massé, D.I.; Masse, L.; Croteau, F. The effect of temperature fluctuations on psychrophilic anaerobic sequencing batch reactors treating swine manure. Bioresour. Technol. 2003, 89, 57-62.
19. American Public Health Association (APHA). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th ed.; APHA: Washington, DC, USA, 1992.
20. Bauer, A.; Bösch, P.; Friedl, A.; Amon, T. Analysis of methane potentials of steam-exploded wheat straw and estimation of energy yields of combined ethanol and methane production. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 142, 50-55.
21. Karthikeyan, O.; Visvanathan, C. Bio-energy recovery from high-solid organic substrates by dry anaerobic bio-conversion processes: A review. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2013, 12, 257-284.
22. Møller, H.B.; Sommer, S.G.; Ahring, B.K. Methane productivity of manure, straw and solid fractions of manure. Biomass Bioenergy 2004, 26, 485-495.
23. Somayaji, D.; Khanna, S. Biomethanation of rice and wheat straw. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.1994, 10, 521-523.
24. Shyam, M. Agro-residue-based renewable energy technologies for rural development. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2002, 6, 37-42.
25. Schäfer, W.; Lehto, M.; Teye, F. Dry Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Residues on-Farm-A Feasibility Study. 2006. Available online: http://orgprints.org/6590/1/MET77.pdf (accessed on 10 October 2014).
26. Varel, V.H.; Hashimoto, A.G.; Chen, Y.R. Effect of temperature and retention time on methane production from beef cattle waste. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1980, 40, 217-222.
27. Zhu, J.; Li, W.; Shen, R. Theoretical models of reaction mechanisms in solid anaerobic digestion: A review. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 347, 1247-1250.
28. Borhan, M.S.; Rahman, S.; Ahn, H.K. Dry anaerobic digestion of fresh feedyard manure: A case study in a laboratory setting. Int. J. Emerg. Sci. 2012, 2, 509-525.
29. Ahring, B.K.; Ibrahim, A.A.; Mladenovska, Z. Effect of temperature increase from 55 to 65 °C on performance and microbial population dynamics of an anaerobic reactor treating cattle manure. Water Res. 2001, 35, 2446-2452.
30. Labatut, R.A.; Angenent, L.T.; Scott, N.R. Biochemical methane potential and biodegradability of complex organic substrates. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 2255-2264.
31. Preeti Rao, P.; Seenayya, G. Improvement of methanogenesis from cow dung and poultry litter waste digesters by addition of iron. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1994, 10, 211-214.
32. Güngör-Demirci, G.; Demirer, G.N. Effect of initial cod concentration, nutrient addition, temperature and microbial acclimation on anaerobic treatability of broiler and cattle manure. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 93, 109-117.
33. Angelidaki, I.; Ellegaard, L.; Ahring, B.K. A mathematical model for dynamic simulation of anaerobic digestion of complex substrates: Focusing on ammonia inhibition. Biotechnol. Bioeng.1993, 42, 159-166.
34. Salces, B.M. Anaerobic Digestion of Livestock Wastes: Vegetable Residues as Co-Substrate and Digestate Post-Treatment. Ph.D. Thesis. Available online: https://uvadoc.uva.es/bitstream/10324/845/1/TESIS114-110719.pdf (accessed on 9 October 2014).