Correction to: Behavioral Modeling of Human Choices Reveals Dissociable Effects of Physical Effort and Temporal Delay on Reward Devaluation (PLOS Computational Biology, (2015), 11, 3, (e1004116), 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004116);Behavioral Modeling of Human Choices Reveals Dissociable Effects of Physical Effort and Temporal Delay on Reward Devaluation

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2015, Pages

  Klein Flügge, Miriam C ^a,b,c   Kennerley, Steven W ^a   Saraiva, Ana C ^a   Penny, Will D ^b   Bestmann, Sven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS;

ANIMAL SPECIES; BEHAVIORAL MODEL; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DECISION COST; DECISIONS MAKINGS; DELAY DISCOUNTING; ENERGETIC COSTS; FORMAL DESCRIPTION; HUMAN POPULATION; MODEL ASSUMPTIONS;

DECISION MAKING;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BEHAVIORAL MODELING; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; DELAY DISCOUNTING; EXERCISE; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL DISSOCIATION; GRIP STRENGTH; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MENTAL DISSOCIATION; MENTAL TASK; REINFORCEMENT; RESPONSE TIME; REWARD; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; HAND STRENGTH; PHYSIOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ANIMALIA;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REWARD; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84926304996     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005401     Document Type: Erratum

References (102)

1. Kahneman D, Tversky A, Prospect theory—analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 1979;47: 263–291.
2. Stephens DW, Krebs JR, Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press; 1986.
3. Bateson M, Kacelnik A, Rate currencies and the foraging starling: the fallacy of the averages revisited. Behavioral Ecology. 1996;7: 341–352. doi: 10.1093/beheco/7.3.341
4. Bautista LM, Tinbergen J, Kacelnik A, To walk or to fly? How birds choose among foraging modes. PNAS. 2001;98: 1089–1094. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.3.1089 11158599
5. Stephens DW, Anderson D, The adaptive value of preference for immediacy: when shortsighted rules have farsighted consequences. Behavioral Ecology. 2001;12: 330–339. doi: 10.1093/beheco/12.3.330
6. Stevens JR, Rosati AG, Ross KR, Hauser MD, Will travel for food: spatial discounting in two new world monkeys. Curr Biol. 2005;15: 1855–1860. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.016 16243033
7. Fehr E, Rangel A, Neuroeconomic Foundations of Economic Choice—Recent Advances. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2011;25: 3–30. doi: 10.1257/jep.25.4.3 21595323
8. Jo S, Kim K-U, Lee D, Jung MW, Effect of orbitofrontal cortex lesions on temporal discounting in rats. Behavioural Brain Research. 2013;245: 22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.02.014 23434604
9. Lee D, Decision making: from neuroscience to psychiatry. Neuron. 2013;78: 233–248. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.04.008 23622061
10. Mazur J, Commons M, Mazur J, Nevin J, Rachlin H, An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In: Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol 5 The effect of delay and of intervening events on re- inforcement value. Erlbaum; 1987.
11. Laibson D, Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1997;112: 443–478. doi: 10.1162/003355397555253
12. Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T, Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature. 2002;40: 351–401.
13. Tversky A, Kahneman D, Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1992;5: 297–323.
14. Drevets WC, Price JL, Simpson JR, JrTodd RD, Reich T, Vannier M, et al. Subgenual prefrontal cortex abnormalities in mood disorders. Nature. 1997;386: 824–827. doi: 10.1038/386824a0 9126739
15. Frank MJ, Scheres A, Sherman SJ, Understanding decision-making deficits in neurological conditions: insights from models of natural action selection. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci. 2007;362: 1641–1654. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2058 17428775
16. Paulus MP, Decision-making dysfunctions in psychiatry—altered homeostatic processing? Science. 2007;318: 602–606. doi: 10.1126/science.1142997 17962553
17. Winstanley CA, Olausson P, Taylor JR, Jentsch JD, Insight into the relationship between impulsivity and substance abuse from studies using animal models. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010;34: 1306–1318. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01215.x 20491734
18. Der-Avakian A, Markou A, The neurobiology of anhedonia and other reward-related deficits. Trends Neurosci. 2012;35: 68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2011.11.005 22177980
19. Paulus MP, Yu AJ, Emotion and decision-making: affect-driven belief systems in anxiety and depression. Trends Cogn Sci (Regul Ed). 2012;16: 476–483. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.07.009 22898207
20. Sinha N, Manohar S, Husain M. Impulsivity and apathy in Parkinson’s disease. J Neuropsychol. 2013; doi: 10.1111/jnp.12013
21. Roesch MR, Takahashi Y, Gugsa N, Bissonette GB, Schoenbaum G, Previous cocaine exposure makes rats hypersensitive to both delay and reward magnitude. J Neurosci. 2007;27: 245–250. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4080-06.2007 17202492
22. Walton ME, Kennerley SW, Bannerman DM, Phillips PEM, Rushworth MFS, Weighing up the benefits of work: behavioral and neural analyses of effort-related decision making. Neural Netw. 2006;19: 1302–1314. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.03.005 16949252
23. Floresco SB, St Onge JR, Ghods-Sharifi S, Winstanley CA, Cortico-limbic-striatal circuits subserving different forms of cost-benefit decision making. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008;8: 375–389. doi: 10.3758/CABN.8.4.375 19033236
24. Hauber W, Sommer S, Prefrontostriatal circuitry regulates effort-related decision making. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19: 2240–2247. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn241 19131436
25. Kennerley SW, Dahmubed AF, Lara AH, Wallis JD, Neurons in the frontal lobe encode the value of multiple decision variables. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009;21: 1162–1178. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21100 18752411
26. Salamone JD, Correa M, Farrar AM, Nunes EJ, Pardo M, Dopamine, behavioral economics, and effort. Front Behav Neurosci. 2009;3: 13. doi: 10.3389/neuro.08.013.2009 19826615
27. Salamone JD, Correa M, Nunes EJ, Randall PA, Pardo M, The behavioral pharmacology of effort-related choice behavior: dopamine, adenosine and beyond. J Exp Anal Behav. 2012;97: 125–146. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.97-125 22287808
28. Endepols H, Sommer S, Backes H, Wiedermann D, Graf R, Hauber W, Effort-Based Decision Making in the rat: An [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Micro Positron Emission Tomography Study. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2010;30: 9708–9714. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1202-10.2010 20660253
29. Prévost C, Pessiglione M, Météreau E, Cléry-Melin M-L, Dreher J-C, Separate valuation subsystems for delay and effort decision costs. J Neurosci. 2010;30: 14080–14090. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2752-10.2010 20962229
30. Cocker PJ, Hosking JG, Benoit J, Winstanley CA, Sensitivity to cognitive effort mediates psychostimulant effects on a novel rodent cost/benefit decision-making task. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37: 1825–1837. doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.30 22453140
31. Burke CJ, Brünger C, Kahnt T, Park SQ, Tobler PN, Neural Integration of Risk and Effort Costs by the Frontal Pole: Only upon Request. J Neurosci. 2013;33: 1706–1713. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3662-12.2013 23345243
32. Cummings JL, Anatomic and behavioral aspects of frontal-subcortical circuits. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995;769: 1–13. 9729206
33. Treadway MT, Buckholtz JW, Schwartzman AN, Lambert WE, Zald DH, Worth the “EEfRT”? The effort expenditure for rewards task as an objective measure of motivation and anhedonia. PLoS ONE. 2009;4: e6598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006598 19672310
34. Treadway MT, Bossaller NA, Shelton RC, Zald DH, Effort-based decision-making in major depressive disorder: a translational model of motivational anhedonia. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012;121: 553–558. doi: 10.1037/a0028813 22775583
35. Cléry-Melin M-L, Schmidt L, Lafargue G, Baup N, Fossati P, Pessiglione M, Why don’t you try harder? An investigation of effort production in major depression. PLoS ONE. 2011;6: e23178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023178 21853083
36. Hartmann MN, Hager OM, Reimann AV, Chumbley JR, Kirschner M, Seifritz E, et al. Apathy But Not Diminished Expression in Schizophrenia Is Associated With Discounting of Monetary Rewards by Physical Effort. Schizophr Bull. 2014; doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu102
37. Phillips PEM, Walton ME, Jhou TC, Calculating utility: preclinical evidence for cost-benefit analysis by mesolimbic dopamine. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007;191: 483–495. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0626-6 17119929
38. Grossbard CL, Mazur JE, A comparison of delays and ratio requirements in self-control choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986;45: 305–315. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-305 3711777
39. Sugiwaka H, Okouchi H, Reformative self‐control and discounting of reward value by delay or effort1. Japanese Psychological Research. 2004;46: 1–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5884.2004.00231.x
40. Hartmann MN, Hager OM, Tobler PN, Kaiser S, Parabolic discounting of monetary rewards by physical effort. Behav Processes. 2013;100: 192–196. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.09.014 24140077
41. Stevens JC, Cain WS, Effort in isometric muscular contractions related to force level and duration. Perception & Psychophysics. 1970;8: 240–244. doi: 10.3758/BF03210214
42. STEVENS SS, On the psychophysical law. Psychol Rev. 1957;64: 153–181. 13441853
43. Rangel A, Hare T, Neural computations associated with goal-directed choice. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2010;20: 262–270. doi: 16/j.conb.2010.03.001 20338744
44. Haith AM, Reppert TR, Shadmehr R, Evidence for hyperbolic temporal discounting of reward in control of movements. J Neurosci. 2012;32: 11727–11736. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0424-12.2012 22915115
45. Shadmehr R, Control of movements and temporal discounting of reward. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2010;20: 726–730. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.08.017 20833031
46. Rudebeck PH, Walton ME, Smyth AN, Bannerman DM, Rushworth MFS, Separate neural pathways process different decision costs. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9: 1161–1168. doi: 10.1038/nn1756 16921368
47. Meier S, Sprenger C. Present-Biased Preferences and Credit Card Borrowing [Internet]. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network; Report No.: ID 1412276. Available: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1412276
48. Bickel WK, Odum AL, Madden GJ, Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999;146: 447–454. 10550495
49. Petry NM, Delay discounting of money and alcohol in actively using alcoholics, currently abstinent alcoholics, and controls. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001;154: 243–250. 11351931
50. Dixon MR, Jacobs EA, Sanders S, Contextual control of delay discounting by pathological gamblers. J Appl Behav Anal. 2006;39: 413–422. 17236338
51. Chabris CF, Laibson D, Morris CL, Schuldt JP, Taubinsky D, Individual laboratory-measured discount rates predict field behavior. J Risk Uncertain. 2008;37: 237–269. doi: 10.1007/s11166-008-9053-x 19412359
52. Kim S, Lee D, Prefrontal Cortex and Impulsive Decision Making. Biological Psychiatry. 2011;69: 1140–1146. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.005 20728878
53. Andrade LF, Petry NM, Delay and probability discounting in pathological gamblers with and without a history of substance use problems. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012;219: 491–499. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2508-9 21952671
54. Chivers LL, Higgins ST, Some observations from behavioral economics for consideration in promoting money management among those with substance use disorders. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2012;38: 8–19. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2011.643979 22211484
55. Hamilton KR, Potenza MN, Relations among delay discounting, addictions, and money mismanagement: implications and future directions. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2012;38: 30–42. doi: 10.3109/00952990.2011.643978 22211535
56. Mitchell SH, Wilson VB, Differences in delay discounting between smokers and nonsmokers remain when both rewards are delayed. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012;219: 549–562. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2521-z 21983917
57. Wu S-W, Delgado MR, Maloney LT, The Neural Correlates of Subjective Utility of Monetary Outcome and Probability Weight in Economic and in Motor Decision under Risk. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2011;31: 8822–8831. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0540-11.2011 21677166
58. Abdellaoui M, Barrios C, Wakker PP, Reconciling introspective utility with revealed preference: Experimental arguments based on prospect theory. Journal of Econometrics. 2007;138: 356–378.
59. Kirby KN, Bidding on the future: Evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1997;126: 54–70. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.126.1.54
60. Behrens TEJ, Woolrich MW, Walton ME, Rushworth MFS, Learning the value of information in an uncertain world. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10: 1214–1221. doi: 10.1038/nn1954 17676057
61. Benzion U, Rapoport A, Yagil J. Discount Rates Inferred from Decisions: An Experimental Study [Internet]. 1 Mar 1989 [cited 16 Dec 2013]. Available: http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.35.3.270
62. Green L, Fry AF, Myerson J, Discounting of Delayed Rewards: A Life-Span Comparison. Psychological Science. 1994;5: 33–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00610.x
63. Raineri A, Rachlin H, The effect of temporal constraints on the value of money and other commodities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 1993;6: 77–94. doi: 10.1002/bdm.3960060202
64. Thaler RH, Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Economics Letters. 1981;8: 201–207.
65. Mitchell SH, Measures of impulsivity in cigarette smokers and non-smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999;146: 455–464. 10550496
66. Milner-Brown HS, Stein RB, The relation between the surface electromyogram and muscular force. J Physiol. 1975;246: 549–569. 1133787
67. Kukulka CG, Clamann HP, Comparison of the recruitment and discharge properties of motor units in human brachial biceps and adductor pollicis during isometric contractions. Brain Research. 1981;219: 45–55. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)90266-3 7260629
68. Ishiwari K, Weber SM, Mingote S, Correa M, Salamone JD, Accumbens dopamine and the regulation of effort in food-seeking behavior: modulation of work output by different ratio or force requirements. Behav Brain Res. 2004;151: 83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.08.007 15084424
69. Mingote S, Weber SM, Ishiwari K, Correa M, Salamone JD, Ratio and time requirements on operant schedules: effort-related effects of nucleus accumbens dopamine depletions. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;21: 1749–1757. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03972.x 15845103
70. Walton ME, Groves J, Jennings KA, Croxson PL, Sharp T, Rushworth MFS, et al. Comparing the role of the anterior cingulate cortex and 6-hydroxydopamine nucleus accumbens lesions on operant effort-based decision making. Eur J Neurosci. 2009;29: 1678–1691. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06726.x 19385990
71. Ghods-Sharifi S, Floresco SB, Differential effects on effort discounting induced by inactivations of the nucleus accumbens core or shell. Behav Neurosci. 2010;124: 179–191. doi: 10.1037/a0018932 20364878
72. Coffey SF, Gudleski GD, Saladin ME, Brady KT, Impulsivity and rapid discounting of delayed hypothetical rewards in cocaine-dependent individuals. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2003;11: 18–25. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.11.1.18 12622340
73. Green L, Myerson J, Exponential Versus Hyperbolic Discounting of Delayed Outcomes: Risk and Waiting Time. Amer Zool. 1996;36: 496–505. doi: 10.1093/icb/36.4.496
74. Eisenberg DT, MacKillop J, Modi M, Beauchemin J, Dang D, Lisman SA, et al. Examining impulsivity as an endophenotype using a behavioral approach: a DRD2 TaqI A and DRD4 48-bp VNTR association study. Behavioral and Brain Functions. 2007;3: 2. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-3-2 17214892
75. Calvert AL, Green L, Myerson J, Discounting in Pigeons When the Choice is between Two Delayed Rewards: Implications for Species Comparisons. Front Neurosci. 2011;5: 96. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00096 21887130
76. Green L, Myerson J, Holt DD, Slevin JR, Estle SJ, Discounting of Delayed Food Rewards in Pigeons and Rats: Is There a Magnitude Effect? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 2004;81: 39–50. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2004.81–39 15113132
77. Madden GJ, Bickel WK, Jacobs EA, Discounting of delayed rewards in opioid-dependent outpatients: Exponential or hyperbolic discounting functions? Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 1999;7: 284–293. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.7.3.284 10472517
78. Walton ME, Bannerman DM, Alterescu K, Rushworth MFS, Functional specialization within medial frontal cortex of the anterior cingulate for evaluating effort-related decisions. J Neurosci. 2003;23: 6475–6479. 12878688
79. Winstanley CA, Theobald DEH, Cardinal RN, Robbins TW, Contrasting roles of basolateral amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex in impulsive choice. J Neurosci. 2004;24: 4718–4722. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5606-03.2004 15152031
80. Zeeb FD, Floresco SB, Winstanley CA, Contributions of the orbitofrontal cortex to impulsive choice: interactions with basal levels of impulsivity, dopamine signalling, and reward-related cues. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010;211: 87–98. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-1871-2 20428999
81. Mar AC, Walker ALJ, Theobald DE, Eagle DM, Robbins TW, Dissociable Effects of Lesions to Orbitofrontal Cortex Subregions on Impulsive Choice in the Rat. J Neurosci. 2011;31: 6398–6404. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6620-10.2011 21525280
82. Kennerley SW, Behrens TEJ, Wallis JD, Double dissociation of value computations in orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14: 1581–1589. doi: 10.1038/nn.2961 22037498
83. Hillman KL, Bilkey DK, Neurons in the rat anterior cingulate cortex dynamically encode cost-benefit in a spatial decision-making task. J Neurosci. 2010;30: 7705–7713. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1273-10.2010 20519545
84. Hosokawa T, Kennerley SW, Sloan J, Wallis JD, Single-neuron mechanisms underlying cost-benefit analysis in frontal cortex. J Neurosci. 2013;33: 17385–17397. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2221-13.2013 24174671
85. Shidara M, Richmond BJ, Anterior cingulate: single neuronal signals related to degree of reward expectancy. Science. 2002;296: 1709–1711. doi: 10.1126/science.1069504 12040201
86. Denk F, Walton ME, Jennings KA, Sharp T, Rushworth MFS, Bannerman DM, Differential involvement of serotonin and dopamine systems in cost-benefit decisions about delay or effort. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005;179: 587–596. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-2059-4 15864561
87. Floresco SB, Tse MTL, Ghods-Sharifi S, Dopaminergic and glutamatergic regulation of effort- and delay-based decision making. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33: 1966–1979. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301565 17805307
88. Salamone JD, Correa M, Farrar A, Mingote SM, Effort-related functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine and associated forebrain circuits. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007;191: 461–482. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0668-9 17225164
89. Stahl SM, The psychopharmacology of energy and fatigue. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63: 7–8. 11838630
90. Demyttenaere K, De Fruyt J, Stahl SM, The many faces of fatigue in major depressive disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005;8: 93–105. doi: 10.1017/S1461145704004729 15482632
91. Taylor MM, Creelman CD, PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2005;41: 782–787. doi: 10.1121/1.1910407
92. Ward NS, Frackowiak RSJ, Age‐related changes in the neural correlates of motor performance. Brain. 2003;126: 873–888. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg071 12615645
93. Penny W, Kiebel S, Friston K, Variational Bayesian inference for fMRI time series. Neuroimage. 2003;19: 727–741. 12880802
94. Friston K, Mattout J, Trujillo-Barreto N, Ashburner J, Penny W, Variational free energy and the Laplace approximation. Neuroimage. 2007;34: 220–234. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.035 17055746
95. Penny WD, Comparing dynamic causal models using AIC, BIC and free energy. Neuroimage. 2012;59: 319–330. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.039 21864690
96. Gelman A, Bayesian data analysis. Boca Raton, Fla.; London: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2011.
97. MacKay DJC, Information theory, inference, and learning algorithms. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
98. Penny WD, Roberts SJ, Bayesian neural networks for classification: how useful is the evidence framework? Neural Netw. 1999;12: 877–892. 12662663
99. Penny WD, Stephan KE, Mechelli A, Friston KJ, Comparing dynamic causal models. Neuroimage. 2004;22: 1157–1172. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.026 15219588
100. Raftery A. Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research (with Discussion by Andrew Gelman & Donald B. Rubin, and Robert M. Hauser, and a Rejoinder). 1995.
101. Stephan KE, Penny WD, Daunizeau J, Moran RJ, Friston KJ, Bayesian model selection for group studies. Neuroimage. 2009;46: 1004–1017. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.025 19306932
102. Penny WD, Stephan KE, Daunizeau J, Rosa MJ, Friston KJ, Schofield TM, et al. Comparing families of dynamic causal models. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010;6: e1000709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000709 20300649