Spousal overprotection is indirectly associated with poorer dietary adherence for patients with type 2 diabetes via diabetes distress when active engagement is low

British Journal of Health Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 360-373

  Johnson, Matthew D ^a   Anderson, Jared R ^b   Walker, Ann ^c   Wilcox, Allison ^c   Lewis, Virginia L ^c   Robbins, David C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; DIET; DIET THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MENTAL STRESS; MIDDLE AGED; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; SPOUSE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DIET; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; SELF EFFICACY; SPOUSES; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84926287922     PISSN: 1359107X     EISSN: 20448287     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12105     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Berg, C. A., & Upchurch, R. (2007). A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 920-954. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.6.920
2. Beverly, E. A., Miller, C. K., & Wray, L. A. (2008). Spousal support and food-related behavior change in middle-aged and older adults living with type 2 diabetes. Health Education & Behavior, 35, 707-720. doi:10.1177/1090198107299787
3. Buunk, A. P., Berkhuysen, M. A., Sanderman, R., Nieuwland, W., & Ranchor, A. V. (1996). Active engagement, protective behavior, and overprotection: Assessment of the spouse's role in heart revalidation. Gedrag & Gezondheid, 24, 304-313.
4. Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & MacKenzie, C. R. (1987). A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40, 373-383. doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
5. Coyne, J. C., & Smith, D. A. (1991). Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: A contextual perspective on wives' distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 404-412. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.404
6. Danaei, G., Finucane, M. M., Lu, Y., Singh, G. M., Cowan, M. J., Paciorek, C. J., ... & Ezzati, M. (2011). National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: Systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2.7 million participants. The Lancet, 378, 1-10. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60604-1
7. Franks, M. M., Hemphill, R. C., Seidel, A. J., Stephens, M. A. P., Rook, K. S., & Salem, J. K. (2012). Setbacks in diet adherence and emotional distress: A study of older patients with type 2 diabetes and their spouses. Aging & Mental Health, 16, 902-910. doi:10.1080/13607863.2012.674486
8. Franks, M. M., Sahin, Z. S., Seidel, A. J., Shields, C. G., Oates, S. K., & Boushey, C. J. (2012). Table for two: Diabetes distress and diet-related interactions of married patients with diabetes and their spouses. Families, Systems, & Health, 30, 154-165. doi:10.1037/a0028614
9. Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the couples satisfaction index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 572-583. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572
10. Hagedoorn, M., Keers, J. C., Links, T. P., Bouma, J., Maaten, J. C. T., & Sanderman, R. (2006). Improving self-management in insulin-treated adults participating in diabetes education. The role of overprotection by the partner. Diabetic Medicine, 23, 271-277. doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01794.x
11. Hagedoorn, M., Kuijer, R. G., Buunk, B. P., De Jong, G. M., Wobbes, T., & Sanderman, R. (2000). Marital satisfaction in patients with cancer: Does support from intimate partners benefit those who need it the most? Health Psychology, 19, 274-282. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.3.274
12. Henry, S. L., Rook, K. S., Stephens, M. A. P., & Franks, M. M. (2013). Spousal undermining of older diabetic patients' disease management. Journal of Health Psychology, 18, 1550-1561. doi:10.1177/1359105312465913
13. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
14. Johnson, M. D., Anderson, J. R., Walker, A., Wilcox, A., Lewis, V. L., & Robbins, D. C. (2013). Common dyadic coping is indirectly related to dietary and exercise adherence via patient and partner diabetes efficacy. Journal of Family Psychology, 27, 722-730. doi:10.1037/a0034006
15. Kleiboer, A. M., Kuijer, R. G., Hox, J. J., Jongen, P. J. H., Frequin, S. T. F. M., & Bensing, J. M. (2007). Daily negative interactions and mood among patients and partners dealing with multiple sclerosis (MS): The moderating effects of emotional support. Social Science & Medicine, 64, 389-400. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.07.016
16. Klein, A. G., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65, 457-474. doi:10.1007/BF02296338
17. Kuijer, R. G., Ybema, J. F., Buunk, B. P., de Jong, G. M., Thijs-Boer, F., & Sanderman, R. (2000). Active engagement, protective buffering, and overprotection: Three ways of giving support by intimate partners of patients with cancer. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 256-275. doi:10.1037//0278-6133.19.3.274
18. Ledermann, T., & Macho, S. (2009). Mediation in dyadic data at the level of the dyads: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 661-670. doi:10.1037/a0016197
19. Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., Nagengast, B., & Hau, K. T. (2012). Structural equation models of latent interaction. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 436-458). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
20. Mooijart, A., & Satorra, A. (2012). Moment testing for interaction terms in structural equation modeling. Psychometrika, 77, 65-84. doi:10.1007/s11336-011-9232-6
21. th ed.) Los Angeles, CA: The Authors.
22. Polonsky, W. H., Anderson, B. J., Lohrer, P. A., Welch, G., Jacobson, A. M., Aponte, J. E., & Schwartz, C. E. (1995). Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes Care, 18, 754-760. doi:10.2337/diacare.18.6.754
23. Satorra, A. (2000). Scaled and adjusted restricted tests in multi-sample analysis of moment structures. In R. Heijmans, D. Pollock & A. Satorra (Eds.), Innovations in multivariate statistical analysis (pp. 233-247). London, UK: Kluwer Academic.
24. Schokker, M. C., Links, T. P., Bouma, J., Keers, J. C., Sanderman, R., Wolffenbuttel, B. H. R., &Hagedoorn, M. (2011). The role of overprotection by the partner in coping with diabetes: A moderated mediation model. Psychology and Health, 26, 95-111. doi:10.1080/08870440903342325
25. Schokker, M. C., Stuive, I., Bouma, J., Keers, J. C., Links, T. P., Wolffenbuttel, B. H. R., Sanderman, R., & Hagedoorn, M. (2010). Support behavior and relationship satisfaction in couples dealing with diabetes: Main and moderating effects. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 578-586. doi:10.1037/a0021009
26. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27. Stephens, M. A. P., Franks, M. M., Rook, K. S., Iida, M., Hemphill, R. C., & Salem, J. K. (2013). Spouses' attempts to regulate day-to-day dietary adherence among patients with type 2 diabetes. Health Psychology, 32, 1029-1037. doi:10.1037/a0030018
28. Stephens, M. A. P., Rook, K. S., Franks, M. M., Khan, C., & Iida, M. (2010). Spouses use of social control to improve diabetic patients' dietary adherence. Families, Systems, & Health, 28, 199-208. doi:10.1037/a0020513
29. Toobert, D. J., Hampson, S. E., & Glasgow, R. E. (2000). The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: Results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care, 23, 943-950. doi:10.2337/diacare.23.7.943
30. Vijan, S., Stuart, N. S., Fitzgerald, J. T., Ronis, D. L., Hayward, R. A., Slater, S., & Hofer, T. P. (2004). Barriers to following dietary recommendations in type 2 diabetes. Diabetic Medicine, 22, 32-38. doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01342.x
31. West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209-231). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
32. Zagarins, S. E., Allen, N. A., Garb, J. L., & Welch, G. (2012). Improvement in glycemic control following a diabetes education intervention is associated with change in diabetes distress but not change in depressive symptoms. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 35, 299-304. doi:10.1007/s10865-011-9359-z