Common dyadic coping is indirectly related to dietary and exercise adherence via patient and partner diabetes efficacy

Journal of Family Psychology

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 722-730

  Johnson, Matthew D ^a   Anderson, Jared R ^b   Walker, Ann ^c   Wilcox, Allison ^c   Lewis, Virginia L ^c   Robbins, David C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Chronic illness; Couple relationship; Dietary adherence; Dyadic coping; Exercise adherence; Type 2 diabetes

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; AGED; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIET THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; KINESIOTHERAPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SELF CONCEPT; SPOUSE;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; AGED; CHRONIC DISEASE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; SELF EFFICACY; SPOUSES;

EID: 84887551728     PISSN: 08933200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0034006     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman and Company.
3. Berg, C. A., & Upchurch, R. (2007). A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 920-954. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.6.920
4. Beverly, E. A., Miller, C. K., & Wray, L. A. (2008). Spousal support and food-related behavior change in middle-aged and older adults living with type 2 diabetes. Health Education & Behavior, 35, 707-720. doi: 10.1177/1090198107299787
5. Beverly, E. A., & Wray, L. A. (2010). The role of collective efficacy in exercise adherence: A qualitative study of spousal support and type 2 diabetes management. Health Education Research, 25, 211-223. doi: 10.1093/her/cyn032
6. Bodenmann, G. (2000). Stress and coping in couples. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
7. Bodenmann, G. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In T. Revenson, K. Kayser, & G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 35-50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11031-002
8. Bodenmann, G. (2008). Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI): Test Manual. Bern, Göttingen: Huber & Hogrefe Testverlag.
9. Bodenmann, G., Charvoz, L., Cina, A., & Widma, K. (2001). Prevention of marital distress by enhancing the coping skills of couples: 1-year follow-up study. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 60, 3-10. doi:10.1024//1421-0185.60.1.3
10. Bodenmann, G., Meuwly, N., & Kayser, K. (2011). Two conceptualizations of dyadic coping and their potential for predicting relationship quality and individual well-being: A comparison. European Psychologist, 16, 255-266. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000068
11. Bodenmann, G., Perrex, M., Cina, A., & Widmer, K. (2002). The effectiveness of a coping-focused prevention approach: A two-year longitudinal study. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 61, 195-202. doi:10.1024/1421-0185.61.4.195
12. Bodenmann, G., & Shantinath, S. D. (2004). The couples coping enhancement training (CCET): A new approach to prevention of marital distress based upon stress and coping. Family Relations, 53, 477-484. doi: 10.1111/j.0197-6664.2004.00056.x
13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). National diabetes fact sheet: National estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States, 2011. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
14. Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & MacKenzie, C. R. (1987). A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40, 373-383. doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
15. Cox, M. J., Mills-Koonce, R., Propper, C., & Gariepy, J. L. (2010). Systems theory and cascades in developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 497-506. doi:10.1017/S0954579410000234
16. Danaie, G., Finucane, M. M., Lu, Y., Singh, G. M., Cowan, M. J., & Paciorek, C. J., . . . Ezzati, M. (2011). National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: Systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2.7 million participants. The Lancet, 378, 1-10. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60679-X
17. de Ridder, D. T. D., Schreurs, K. M. G., & Kuijer, R. G. (2005). Is spousal support always helpful to patients with asthma or diabetes? A prospective study. Psychology and Health, 20, 497-508. doi:10.1080/14768320500098699
18. Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the couples satisfaction index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 572-583. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572
19. Hagedoorn, M., Kuijer, R. G., Buunk, B. P., De Jong, G. M., Wobbes, Th., & Sanderman, R. (2000). Marital satisfaction in patients with cancer: Does support from intimate partners benefit those who need it the most? Health Psychology, 19, 274-282. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.3.274
20. Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap): A metadatadriven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42, 377-381. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
21. Heisler, M., Smith, D. M., Hayward, R. A., Krein, S. L., & Kerr, E. A. (2003). How well do patients' assessments of their diabetes selfmanagement correlate with actual glycemic control and receipt of recommended diabetes services? Diabetes Care, 26, 738-743. doi:10.2337/diacare.26.3.738
22. Hessler, D. M., Fisher, L., Mullan, J. T., Glasgow, R. E., & Masharani, U. (2011). Patient age: A neglected factor when considering disease management in adults with type 2 diabetes. Patient Education and Counseling, 2011, 154-159. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.030
23. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
24. Khan, C. M., Stephens, M. A. P., Franks, M. M., & Rook, K. S. (in press). Influences of spousal support and control on diabetes management through physical activity. Health Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0028609
25. King, D. K., Glasgow, R. E., Toobert, D. J., Strycker, L. A., Estabrooks, P. A., Osuna, D., & Faber, A. J. (2010). Self-efficacy, problem solving, and social-environmental support are associated with diabetes selfmanagement behaviors. Diabetes Care, 33, 751-753. doi:10.2337/dc09-1746
26. Kuijer, R. G., Ybema, J. F., Buunk, B. P., de Jong, G. M., Thijs-Boer, F., & Sanderman, R. (2000). Active engagement, protective buffering, and overprotection: Three ways of giving support by intimate partners of patients with cancer. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 256-275. doi:10.1521/jscp.2000.19.2.256
27. Ledermann, T., Bodenmann, G., Gagliardi, S., Charvoz, L., Verardi, S., Rossier, J., . . . Iafrate, R. (2010). Psychometrics of the dyadic coping inventory in three language groups. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 69, 201-212. doi:10.1024/1421-0185/a000024
28. Ledermann, T., & Macho, S. (2009). Mediation in dyadic data at the level of the dyads: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 661-670. doi:10.1037/a0016197
29. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus User's Guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
30. Nakahara, R., Yoshiuchi, K., Kumano, H., Hara, Y., Suematsu, H., & Kuboki, T. (2006). Prospective study on influence of psychosocial factors on glycemic control in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Psychosomatics, 47, 240-246. doi:10.1176/appi.psy.47.3.240
31. Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. R. (2005). Gender differences in social support: A question of skill or responsiveness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 79-90. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.79
32. Nouwen, A., Ford, T., Balan, A. T., Twisk, J., Ruggiero, L., & White, D. (2011). Longitudinal motivational predictors of dietary self-care and diabetes control in adults with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. Health Psychology, 30, 771-779. doi:10.1037/a0024500
33. Plotnikoff, R. C., Trinh, L., Courneya, K. S., Karunamuni, N., & Sigal, R. J. (2011). Predictors of physical activity in adults with type 2 diabetes. American Journal of Health Behavior, 35, 359-370. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.35.3.9
34. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
35. Schokker, M. C., Links, T. P., Bouma, J., Keers, J. C., Sanderman, R., Wolffenbuttel, B. H. R., & Hagedoorn, M. (2011). The role of overprotection by the partner in coping with diabetes: A moderated mediation model. Psychology and Health, 26, 95-111. doi:10.1080/08870440903342325
36. Schokker, M. C., Stuive, I., Bouma, J., Keers, J. C., Links, T. P., Wolffenbuttel, B. H. R., . . . Hagedoorn, M. (2010). Support behavior and relationship satisfaction in couples dealing with diabetes: Main and moderating effects. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 578-586. doi: 10.1037/a0021009
37. Stephens, M. A. P., Franks, M. M., Rook, K. S., Iida, M., Hemphill, R., & Salem, J. K. (in press).Spouses' attempts to regulate day-to-day dietary adherence among patients with type 2 diabetes. Health Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0030018
38. Stephens, M. A. P., Rook, K. S., Franks, M. M., Khan, C. M., & Iida, M. (2010). Spouses' use of social control to improve diabetic patients' dietary adherence. Families, Systems, & Health, 28, 199-208. doi: 10.1037/a0020513
39. Talbot, F., Nouwen, A., Gingras, J., Gosselin, M., & Audet, J. (1997). The assessment of diabetes-related cognitive and social factors: The multidimensional diabetes questionnaire. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 20, 291-312. doi:10.1023/A:1025508928696
40. Toobert, D. J., Hampson, S. E., & Glasgow, R. E. (2000). The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: Results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care, 23, 943-950. doi:10.2337/diacare.23.7.943
41. Trief, P. M., Himes, C. L., Orendorff, R., & Weinstock, R. S. (2001). The marital relationship and psychosocial adaption and glycemic control of individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care, 24, 1384-1389. doi:10.2337/diacare.24.8.1384
42. Trief, P. M., Ploutz-Snyder, R., Britton, K. D., & Weinstock, R. S. (2004). The relationship between marital quality and adherence to the diabetes care regimen. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 27, 148-154. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2703_2
43. Trief, P. M., Wade, M. J., Britton, K. D., & Weinstock, R. S. (2002). A prospective analysis of marital relationship factors and quality of life in diabetes. Diabetes Care, 25, 1154-1158. doi:10.2337/diacare.25.7.1154
44. West, S. G., Taylor, A. B., & Wu, W. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209-231). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
45. Wing, R. R., Goldstein, M. G., Acton, K. J., Birch, L. L., Jakicic, J. M., & Sallis, J. F., . . . Surwit, R. S. (2001). Behavioral science research in diabetes: Lifestyle changes related to obesity, eating behavior, and physical activity. Diabetes Care, 24, 117-123. doi:10.2337/diacare.24.1.117
46. Wing, R. R., Marcus, M. D., Epstein, L. H., & Jawad, A. (1991). A "family-based" approach to the treatment of obese type II diabetic patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 156-162. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.156
47. Zulman, D. M., Rosland, A. M., Choi, H., Langa, K. M., & Heisler, M. (2012). The influence of diabetes psychosocial attributes and selfmanagement practices on changes in diabetes status. Patient Education and Counseling, 87, 74-80. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.013