The role of RADPEER™ in the joint commission ongoing practice performance evaluation

Journal of the American College of Radiology

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 6-7

  Steele, Joseph Rodgers ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCREDITATION; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; HUMAN; INTERNET; JOB PERFORMANCE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NOTE; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; RADIOLOGY; RADPEER; SCORING SYSTEM;

EID: 84926231967     PISSN: 15461440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.08.025     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. J.R. Steele, D.M. Hovsepian, and D.F. Schomer The Joint Commission practice performance evaluation: a primer for radiologists J Am Coll Radiol 7 2010 425 430
2. V.P. Jackson, T. Cushing, and H.H. Abujudeh RADPEER™scoring white paper J Am Coll Radiol 6 2009 21 25
3. J.P. Borgstede, R.S. Lewis, M. Bhargavan, and J.H. Sunshine RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates J Am Coll Radiol 1 2004 59 65
4. The Joint Commission Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation (MS.08.01.03) http://www.jointcommission.org/AccreditationPrograms/Hospitals/ Standards/09-FAQs/MS/Ongoing-Professional-Practice-Evaluation.htm Accessed October 5, 2010
5. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Outcome Project http://www.acgme.org/outcome/ Accessed August 20, 2010
6. The Joint Commission Using data from outside organizations to accomplish the Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation/low volume practitioners http://www.jointcommission.org/AccreditationPrograms/Hospitals/Standards/ 09-FAQs/MS/using+-outside-data-ongoing-eval-low-volume.htm Accessed August 20, 2010