Latent change score modeling as a method for analyzing the antidepressant effect of a psychosocial intervention in Alzheimer's disease

Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Volumn 84, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 159-166

  Werheid, Katja ^a   Köhncke, Ylva ^a,c   Ziegler, Matthias ^a   Kurz, Alexander ^b  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Dementia; Depression; Structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

AGED; ALZHEIMER DISEASE; ANTIDEPRESSANT ACTIVITY; ARTICLE; COGNITIVE REHABILITATION; COGNITIVE THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GERIATRIC DEPRESSION SCALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; LATENT CHANGE SCORE MODELING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; TREATMENT DURATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALZHEIMER DISEASE; COGNITIVE THERAPY; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DEPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 84926227653     PISSN: 00333190     EISSN: 14230348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000376583     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Knight BG, Sayegh P: Mental health and aging in the 21st century. J Aging Soc Policy 2011; 23: 228-243.
2. Laidlaw K: A deficit in psychotherapeutic care for older people with depression and anxiety. Gerontology 2013; 59: 549-556.
3. Nelson EA, Dannefer D: Aged heterogeneity - fact or fiction - the fate of diversity in gerontological research. Gerontologist 1992; 32: 17-23.
4. Baltes MM, Maas I: Intraindividual change and interindividual differences in change: the Berlin Aging Study, BASE. Z Gerontol Geriatr 1999; 32: 18.
5. Schmider E, Ziegler M, Danay E, Beyer L, Bühner M: Is it really robust? Reinvestigating the robustness of ANOVA against violations of the normal distribution assumption. Methodology (Gott) 2010; 6: 147-151.
6. Lix LM, Keselman JC, Keselman HJ: Consequences of assumption violations revisited: a quantitative review of alternatives to the oneway analysis of variance F test. Rev Educ Res 1996; 66: 579-619.
7. Tomarken AJ, Serlin RC: Comparison of ANOVA alternatives under variance heterogeneity and specific noncentrality structures. Psychol Bull 1986; 99: 90-99.
8. Vickers AJ, Altman DG: Statistics notes - analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow- up measurements. Br Med J 2001; 323: 1123-1124.
9. Kenny DA, Judd CM: Consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variance. Psychol Bull 1986; 99: 422-431.
10. Vasey MW, Thayer JF: The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology - a multivariate solution. Psychophysiology 1987; 24: 479-486.
11. Fava GA, Tomba E, Tossani E: Innovative trends in the design of therapeutic trials in psychopharmacology and psychotherapy. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2013; 40: 306-311.
12. Duncan TE, Duncan SC, Strycker LA, Li F: An Introduction to Latent Variable Growth Curve Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, ed 2. Mahwah, Erlbaum, 2006.
13. McArdle JJ: Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annu Rev Psychol 2009; 60: 577-605.
14. Baltes PB, Smith J: New frontiers in the future of aging: from successful aging of the young old to the dilemma of the fourth age. Gerontology 2003; 49: 123-135.
15. Dannefer D: Cumulative advantage/disadvantage and the life course: cross-fertilizing age and social science theory. J Gerontol 2003; 58: 327-337.
16. Ziegler M, Danay E, Heene M, Asendorpf J, Bühner M: Openness, fluid intelligence, and crystallized intelligence: toward an integrative model. J Res Pers 2012; 46: 173-183.
17. Moergeli H, Wittmann L, Schnyder U: Quality of life after traumatic injury: a latent trajectory modeling approach. Psychother Psychosom 2012; 81: 305-311.
18. Kurz A, Thöne-Otto A, Cramer B, Egert S, Frölich L, Gertz HJ, Kehl V, Wagenpfeil S, Werheid K: CORDIAL: cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive-behavioral treatment for early dementia in Alzheimer disease: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Alz Dis Assoc Dis 2012; 26: 246-253.
19. Hy LX, Keller DM: Prevalence of AD among whites - a summary by levels of severity. Neurology 2000; 55: 198-204.
20. Baron S, Ulstein I, Werheid K: Psychosocial interventions in Alzheimer's disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment: evidence for gender bias in clinical trials. Aging Ment Health 2015; 19: 290-305.
21. Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, Leirer VO: Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res 1983; 17: 37-49.
22. Gauggel S, Birkner B: Validität und Reliabilität einer deutschen Version der Geriatrischen Depressionsskala. Z Klin Neuropsychol 1999; 28: 18-27.
23. Kørner A, Lauritzen L, Abelskov K, Gulmann N, Marie Brodersen A, Wedervang-Jensen T, Marie Kjeldgaard K: The Geriatric Depression Scale and the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia. A validity study. Nord J Psychiatry 2006; 60: 360-364.
24. Debruyne H, Van Buggenhout M, Le Bastard N, Aries M, Audenaert K, De Deyn PP, Engelborghs S: Is the Geriatric Depression Scale a reliable screening tool for depressive symptoms in elderly patients with cognitive impairment? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009; 24: 556-562.
25. Muthén L, Muthén B: Mplus User's Guide. Los Angeles, Muthén & Muthén, 2008.
26. Kline RB: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York, Guilford, 2011.
27. Chen FF: Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling 2007; 14: 464-504.
28. Satorra A, Bentler P: A scaled difference chisquare test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika 2001; 66: 507-514.
29. Arbuckle JL: Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data; in Marcoulides GA, Schumacker RE (eds): Advanced Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996, pp 243-277.
30. Schafer JL, Graham JW: Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods 2002; 7: 147-177.
31. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG: Statistical power analyses using G∗Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 2009; 41: 1149-1160.
32. Cohen J: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, ed 2. Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
33. Ogrodniczuk JS, Piper WE, Joyce AS, McCallum M: Effect of patient gender on outcome in two forms of short-term individual psychotherapy. J Psychother Pract Res 2001; 10: 69-78.
34. Clarkin JF, Levy KN: The influence of client variables on psychotherapy; in Lambert MJ (ed): Bergin and Garfield's Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change. New York, Wiley, 2004, vol 5, pp 194-226.
35. Regitz-Zagrosek V, Oertelt-Prigione S, Seeland U, Hetzer R: Sex and gender differences in myocardial hypertrophy and heart failure. Circ J 2010; 74: 1265-1273.
36. Tomba E: Nowhere patients. Psychother Psychosom 2012; 81: 69-72.
37. Horwitz RI, Singer BH, Makuch RW, Viscoli CM: Can treatment that is helpful on average be harmful to some patients? J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 395-400.