The relevance of EPA guidance papers in the framework of the European Psychiatric Association

European Psychiatry

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 357-359

  Heun, R ^a   Gaebel, W ^b  

^a ROYAL DERBY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b Department of Orthopedic Surgery   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; EDITORIAL; EUROPE; EUROPEAN; EUROPEAN UNION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; MENTAL PATIENT; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); MEDICAL SOCIETY; MENTAL DISORDERS; MENTAL HEALTH; PSYCHIATRY; STANDARDS;

EUROPE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS; MENTAL HEALTH; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PSYCHIATRY; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 84926206573     PISSN: 09249338     EISSN: 17783585     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.02.001     Document Type: Editorial

References (15)

1. Brito J.P., Tsapas A., Griebeler M.L., Wang Z., Prutsky G.J., Domecq J.P., et al. Systematic reviews supporting practice guideline recommendations lack protection against bias. J Clin Epidemiol 2013, 66(6):633-638.
2. Feldstein D.A. Clinician's guide to systematic reviews and meta-analyses. WMJ 2005, 104(3):25-29.
3. Gaebel W., Möller H.J. European guidance: a project of the European Psychiatric Association. Eur Psychiatry 2012, 27(2):65-67.
4. Gaebel W., Becker T., Janssen B., Munk-Jorgensen P., Musalek M., Rössler W., et al. EPA guidance on the quality of mental health services. Eur Psychiatry 2012, 27(2):87-113.
5. Gaebel W., Muijen M., Baumann A.E., Bhugra D., Wasserman D., van der Gaag R.J., et al. EPA guidance on building trust in mental health services. Eur Psychiatry 2014, 29(2):83-100.
6. German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AMWF) Standing Guidelines Commission. AMWF Guidance Manual and Rules for Guidelines Development 2012, [English Version]. 1st Edition.
7. Greenhalgh T., Howick J., Maskrey N., Evidence-Based Medicine Renaissance Group Evidence-based medicine: a movement in crisis?. BMJ 2014, 348:g3725.
8. Höschl C., Fialová L. European Psychiatric Association guidance on the conflicts of interest. Eur Psychiatry 2012, 27(2):142-146.
9. Kung J., Chiappelli F., Cajulis O.O., Avezova R., Kossan G., Chew L., et al. From Systematic Reviews to Clinical Recommendations for Evidence-Based Health Care: Validation of Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) for Grading of Clinical Relevance. Open Dent J 2010, 4:84-91.
10. Liberati A., Altman D.G., Tetzlaff J., Mulrow C., Gøtzsche P.C., Ioannidis J.P., et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 2009, 62(10):e1-e34.
11. Phi L., Ajaj R., Ramchandani M.H., Brant X.M., Oluwadara O., Polinovsky O., et al. Expanding the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (Ex-GRADE) for Evidence-Based Clinical Recommendations: Validation Study. Open Dent J 2012, 6:31-40.
12. Saltman D., Jackson D., Newton P.J., Davidson P.M. In pursuit of certainty: can the systematic review process deliver?. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013, 13:25.
13. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) SIGN 50 A guideline developer's handbook. Revised 2011, Edinburgh, UK.
14. Shea B.J., Hamel C., Wells G.A., Bouter L.M., Kristjansson E., Grimshaw J., et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2009, 62(10):1013-1020.
15. Wasserman D., Rihmer Z., Rujescu D., Sarchiapone M., Sokolowski M., Titelman D., et al. The European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance on suicide treatment and prevention. Eur Psychiatry 2012, 27(2):129-141.