An introduction to mill’s utilitarian ethics

An Introduction to Mill's Utilitarian Ethics

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-216

  West, Henry R ^a  

^a MACALESTER COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926098810     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511616570     Document Type: Book

References (297)

1. The Cambridge Companion to Mill, John Skorupski, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
2. Aiken, Henry David. “Definitions, Factual Premises, and Ethical Conclusions.” Philosophical Review 61 (1952): 331-48.
3. Albee, Ernest. A History of English Utilitarianism. London: Sonnenschein; New York: Macmillan, 1902.
4. Alican, Necip Fikri. Mill’s Principle of Utility: A Defence of John Stuart Mill’s Notorious Proof. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 1994.
5. Anderson, Susan Leigh. On Mill. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2000.
6. Anschutz, R. P. The Philosophy of J. S. Mill. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1953.
7. Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. W. D. Ross, trans. Vol. 9 of The Works of Aristotle. London: Oxford University Press, 1925.
8. Ashmore, Robert B., Jr. “Deriving the Desirable from the Desired.” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 44 (1970): 152-60.
9. Atkinson, R. F. “J. S. Mill’s ’Proof’ of the Principle of Utility.” Philosophy 32 (1957): 158-67.
10. Baier, Annette. “Hume, David.” Encyclopedia of Ethics. 2nd ed. 3 vols. Lawrence C. Becker and Charlotte B. Becker, eds. New York and London: Routledge, 2001.
11. Bain, Alexander. John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections. 1882. Reprint, New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1969.
12. Baker, John. “Mill’s Captivating ‘Proof’ and the Foundations of Ethics.” Social Theory and Practice 6 (1980): 299-310.
13. Baker, John M. “Utilitarianism and Secondary Principles.” Philosophical Quarterly 21 (1971): 69-71.
14. Baumgardt, David. Bentham and the Ethics of Today with Manuscripts Hitherto Unpublished. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1952. Reprint, New York: Octagon Books, 1966.
15. Bayles, Michael D. “Mill’s ‘Utilitarianism’ and Aristotle’s ‘Rhetoric.’” Modern Schoolman 51 (1974): 159-70.
16. Bentham, Jeremy. Constitutional Code. Vol. 9 of Works of Jeremy Bentham. John Bowring, ed. Edinburgh, 1841.
17. Bentham, Jeremy. Book of Fallacies. Vol. 2 of Works of Jeremy Bentham. John Bowring, ed. Edinburgh, 1843.
18. Bentham, Jeremy. Works of Jeremy Bentham. 11 vols. John Bowring, ed. Edinburgh, 1838-43.
19. Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. 1789. J. H. Burns and H. L. A. Hart, eds. London: University of London, Athlone Press, 1970.
20. Berger, Fred R. “Mill’s Concept of Happiness.” Interpretation 7 (1978): 95-117.
21. Berger, Fred R. “John Stuart Mill on Justice and Fairness.” In New Essays on John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism, Wesley E. Cooper, Kai Nielsen, and Steven C. Patten, eds. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supp. vol. 5 (1979): 115-36.
22. Berger, Fred R. “Mill’s Substantive Principles of Justice: A Comparison with Nozick.” American Philosophical Quarterly 19 (1982): 373-80.
23. Berger, Fred R. Happiness, Justice, and Freedom: The Moral and Political Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984.
24. Billings, John R. “J. S. Mill’s Quantity-Quality Distinction.” The Mill NewsLetter 7 (1971): 6-16.
25. Bradley, F. H. Ethical Studies. 1876. 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press, 1927.
26. Brandt, Richard B. Ethical Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1959.
27. Brandt, Richard B. A Theory of the Good and the Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.
28. Brandt, Richard B. Facts, Values, and Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
29. Brink, David O. “Mill’s Deliberative Utilitarianism.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 21 (1992): 67-103. Reprinted in Mill’s Utilitarianism: Critical Essays, David Lyons, ed. 149-83. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 1997.
30. Britton, Karl. John Stuart Mill. 2nd ed. New York: Dover, 1969.
31. Bronaugh, Richard. “The Quality in Pleasures.” Philosophy 49 (1974): 320-2.
32. Bronaugh, Richard. “The Utility of Quality: An Understanding of Mill.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (1974): 317-25.
33. Brown, D. G. “What Is Mill’s Principle of Utility?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1973): 1-12.
34. Brown, D. G. “Mill’s Act-Utilitarianism.” Philosophical Quarterly 24 (1974): 67-8.
35. Brown, D. G. “Mill’s Criterion of Wrong Conduct.” Dialogue 21 (1982): 27-44.
36. Carmichael, Peter A. “Mill and ‘Desirable.’” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 34 (1974): 435-6.
37. Carritt, E. F. Ethical and Political Thinking. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1947.
38. Chamblin, T. S., and A. D. M. Walker. “Tendencies, Frequencies and Classical Utilitarianism.” Analysis 35 (1974): 8-12.
39. Clark, George A. “Mill’s ‘Notorious Analogy.’” Journal of Philosophy 56 (1959): 652-6.
40. Cohen, Elliot David. “J. S. Mill’s Qualitative Hedonism: A Textual Analysis.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 18 (1980): 151-8.
41. Cohen, Stephen. “Proof and Sanction in Mill’s Utilitarianism.” History of Philosophy Quarterly (1990): 475-87.
42. Collingwood, R. G. An Essay on Philosophical Method. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1933.
43. Coope, Christopher Miles. “Was Mill a Utilitarian?” Utilitas 10 (1998): 33-67.
44. Cooper, Neil. “Mill’s ‘Proof’ of the Principle of Utility.” Mind 78 (1969): 278-9.
45. Cooper, Wesley E., Kai Nielsen, and Steven C. Patten, eds. New Essays on John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supp. vol. 5. Guelph: Canadian Association for Publishing in Philosophy, 1979.
46. Copp, David. “The Iterated-Utilitarianism of J. S. Mill.” In New Essays on John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism, Wesley E. Cooper, Kai Nielsen, and Steven C. Patten, eds. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supp. vol. 5 (1979): 75-98.
47. Cowan, J. L. Pleasure and Pain. London: Macmillan; New York: St. Martin’s, 1968.
48. Crisp, Roger. “Mill on Virtue as a Part of Happiness.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 4 (1996): 367-80.
49. Crisp, Roger. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Mill on Utilitarianism. London and New York: Routledge, 1997.
50. Cupples, Brian. “A Defence of the Received Interpretation of J. S. Mill.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50 (1972): 131-7.
51. Dahl, Norman O. “Is Mill’s Hedonism Inconsistent?” American Philosophical Quarterly, Monograph 7 (1973): 37-54.
52. Dancy, Jonathan. “Mill’s Puzzling Footnote.” Utilitas 12 (2000): 219-22.
53. Den Uyl, Douglas, and Tibor R. Machan. “Recent Work on the Concept of Happiness.” American Philosophical Quarterly 20 (1983): 115-34.
54. Dewey, John. Ethics. 1932. In vol. 7 of John Dewey: The Later Works, 1925-1953, Jo Ann Boydston, ed. Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1985.
55. Donner, Wendy. “John Stuart Mill’s Concept of Utility.” Dialogue 22 (1983): 479-94.
56. Donner, Wendy. The Liberal Self: John Stuart Mill’s Moral and Political Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.
57. Donner, Wendy. “Mill’s Utilitarianism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Mill, John Skorupski, ed. 255-92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
58. Douglas, Charles. Introduction to The Ethics of John Stuart Mill, with introductory essays by Charles Douglas, ed. i-cxxvi. Edinburgh and London: Blackwood, 1897.
59. Douglas, Charles.John Stuart Mill: A Study of His Philosophy. 1895. Folcroft, PA:Folcroft Library Editions, 1973.
60. Downie, R. S. “Mill on Pleasure and Self-Development.” Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1966): 69-71.
61. Dryer, D. P. “Mill’s Utilitarianism.” In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, by John Stuart Mill. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. lxiii-cxiii. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969.
62. Dryer, D. P. “Justice, Liberty and the Principle of Utility in Mill.” In New Essays on John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism, Wesley E. Cooper, Kai Nielsen, and Steven C. Patten, eds. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supp. vol. 5 (1979): 63-73.
63. Ebenstein, L. “Mill’s Theory of Utility.” Philosophy 60 (1985): 539-43.
64. Edwards, Rem B. “Do Pleasures and Pains Differ Qualitatively?” Journal of Value Inquiry 9 (1975): 270-81.
65. Edwards, Rem B. Pleasures and Pains: A Theory of Qualitative Hedonism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1979.
66. Edwards, Rem B. “J. S. Mill and Robert Veatch’s Critique of Utilitarianism.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 (1985): 181-200.
67. Edwards, Rem B. “The Principle of Utility and Mill’s Minimizing Utilitarianism.” Journal of Value Inquiry 20 (1986): 125-36.
68. Ellis, Brian. “Retrospective and Prospective Utilitarianism.” Nous 15 (1981): 325-39.
69. Falk, W. D. “‘Ought’ and Motivation.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, N. S. 48 (1947-8): 111-38.
70. Feagin, Susan L. “Mill and Edwards on the Higher Pleasures.” Philosophy 58 (1983): 244-52.
71. Frankena, William. “Obligation and Motivation in Recent Moral Philosophy.” In Essays in Moral Philosophy, A. I. Melden, ed. 40-81. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1958.
72. Frankena, William. Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
73. Fullinwider, Robert K. “On Mill’s Analogy between Visible and Desirable.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 10 (1972): 17-22.
74. Galle, Peter. “Gruzalski and Ellis on Utilitarianism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (1981): 332-7.
75. Gaus, Gerald F. “Mill’s Theory of Moral Rules.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (1980): 265-79.
76. Gerrard, Steve. “Desire and Desirability: Bradley, Russell and Moore versus Mill.” In Early Analytic Philosophy, William W. Tait, ed. 37-74. Chicago: Open Court, 1997.
77. Gibbs, B. R. “Higher and Lower Pleasures.” Philosophy 61 (1986): 31-59.
78. Goldinger, Milton. “Mill’s Attack on Moral Conservatism.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 1 (1976): 61-7.
79. Gordon, Scott. “The Quality Problem in Utilitarianism.” The Mill News Letter 10 (1975): 9-13.
80. Graff, J. A. “Mill’s Quantity-Quality Distinction: A Defence.” The Mill News Letter 7 (1972): 14-18.
81. Green, T. H. Prolegomena to Ethics. 1883. 5th ed., 1906. Oxford: Clarendon, 1929.
82. Griffin, James. Well-Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
83. Griffin, N. “A Note on Mr. Cooper’s Reconstruction of Mill’s ‘Proof.’” Mind 81 (1972): 142-3.
84. Grote, John. An Examination of the Utilitarian Philosophy. Joseph Bickersteth Mayor, ed. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell, and Co., 1870.
85. Gruzalski, Bart. “Foreseeable Consequence Utilitarianism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (1981): 163-76.
86. Gunderson, Martin. “A Millian Analysis of Rights.” Ideas y Valores 106 (April 1998): 3-17.
87. Habibi, Don. “J. S. Mill’s Revisionist Utilitarianism.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 6 (1998): 89-114.
88. Hall, E. W. “The ‘Proof’ of Utility in Bentham and Mill.” Ethics 60 (1949-50): 1-18.
89. Hancock, Roger. “Mill, Saints and Heroes.” The Mill News Letter 10 (1975): 13-15.
90. Harcourt, Edward. “Mill’s ‘Sanctions,’ Internalization and the Self.” European Journal of Philosophy 6 (1998): 318-34.
91. Hare, R. M. Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.
92. Harris, George W. “Mill’s Qualitative Hedonism.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 21 (1983): 503-12.
93. Harrison, Jonathan. “Utilitarianism, Universalisation, and Our Duty to Be Just.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society N. S. 53 (1952-3): 105-34.
94. Harrison, Jonathan. “The Expedient, the Right and the Just in Mill’s Utilitarianism.” In New Essays in the History of Philosophy, Terence Penelhum and Roger A. Shiner, eds. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supp. vol. 1 (1974): 93-107.
95. Harrod, R. F. “Utilitarianism Revised.” Mind 45 (1936): 137-56.
96. Hearns, S. J. “Was Mill a Moral Scientist?” Philosophy 67 (1992): 81101.
97. Himma, Kenneth Einer. “The Interpretation of Mill’s Utilitarianism.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 15 (1998): 455-73.
98. Himmelfarb, Gertrude. Introduction to Essays on Politics and Culture, by John Stuart Mill. Gertrude Himmelfarb, ed. New York: Doubleday, 1962; New York: Anchor Books, 1963.
99. Hoag, Robert W. “Mill on Conflicting Moral Obligations.” Analysis 43 (1983): 49-54.
100. Hoag, Robert W. “Happiness and Freedom: Recent Work on John Stuart Mill.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (1986): 188-99.
101. Hoag, Robert W. “Mill’s Conception of Happiness as an Inclusive End.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 25 (1987): 417-31.
102. Hoag, Robert W. “J. S. Mill’s Language of Pleasures.” Utilitas 4 (1992): 247-78.
103. Hoffman, Christopher A. “Desires and the Desirable.” Philosophical Forum 25 (1993): 19-32.
104. Holbrook, Daniel. Qualitative Utilitarianism. Lanham, MD and London: University Press of America, 1988.
105. Hutcheson, Francis. A System of Moral Philosophy. 1755. Reprinted in part in British Moralists, L. A. Selby-Bigge, ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1897.
106. Jenkins, Joyce I. “Desires and Human Nature in J. S. Mill.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 14 (1997): 219-34.
107. Jones, Ernest. The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1964.
108. Jones, Hardy. “Mill’s Argument for the Principle of Utility.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38 (1978): 338-54.
109. Jones, Hardy. “John Stuart Mill as Moralist.” Journal of the History of Ideas 53 (1992): 287-308.
110. Joy, Glenn C., and Audrey M. McKinney. “On a Supposed Inconsistency in J. S. Mill’s Utilitarianism.” Southwest Philosophical Studies 14 (1992): 84-91.
111. Kamm, Josephine. John Stuart Mill in Love. London: Gordon and Cremonesi Publishers, 1977.
112. Kelly, P. J. “Utilitarian Strategies in Bentham and John Stuart Mill.” Utilitas 2 (1990): 245-66.
113. Kleining, J. “The Fourth Chapter of Mill’s Utilitarianism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48 (1970): 197-205.
114. Kraut, Richard. “Two Conceptions of Happiness.” Philosophical Review 88 (1979): 167-97.
115. Kretzman, N. “Desire as Proof of Desirability.” Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1958): 246-58.
116. Kupperman, J. “Do We Desire Only Pleasure?” Philosophical Studies 34 (1978): 451-4.
117. Lachs, John. “Two Views of Happiness in Mill.” The Mill News Letter 9 (1973): 16-20.
118. Lange, Berel and Gary Stahl. “Mill’s ‘Howlers’ and the Logic of Naturalism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 29 (1968-9): 562-74.
119. Lecky, William Edward Hartpole. History of European Morals. 2 vols. 1869. 3rd ed. New York: D. Appleton, 1890.
120. Levi, A. W. “The Mental Crisis of John Stuart Mill.” Psychoanalytic Review 32 (1945): 86-101.
121. Levin, David Michael. “Some Remarks on Mill’s Naturalism.” Journal of Value Inquiry 3 (1969): 291-7.
122. Long, Douglas G. “‘Utility’ and the ‘Utility Principle’: Hume, Smith, Bentham, Mill.” Utilitas 2 (1990): 12-39.
123. Long, Roderick. “Mill’s Higher Pleasures and the Choice of Character.” Utilitas 4 (1992): 279-97.
124. Long, W. H. “The Legend of Mill’s Proofs.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 5 (1967): 36-47.
125. Loren, L. M. “Moore’s Criticism of Mill.” Ratio 9 (1967): 84-90.
126. Lyons, David. Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965.
127. Lyons, David. “Mill’s Theory of Morality.” Nous 10 (1976): 101-20.
128. Lyons, David. “Mill’s Theory of Justice.” In Values and Morals: Essays in Honor of William Frankena, Charles Stevenson, and Richard Brandt, A. I. Goldman and J. Kim, eds. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1978.
129. Lyons, David. “Benevolence and Justice in Mill.” In The Limits of Utilitarianism, Harlan B. Miller and William H. Williams, eds. 42-70. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.
130. Lyons, David. Rights, Welfare, and Mill’s Moral Theory. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
131. Lyons, David. “Human Rights and the General Welfare.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (1996-7): 113-29.
132. Lyons, David., ed. Mill’s Utilitarianism: Critical Essays. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 1997.
133. Mabbott, J. D. “Interpretations of Mill’s Utilitarianism.” Philosophical Quarterly 6 (1956): 115-20.
134. MacKensie, John S. A Manual of Ethics. 1883. 6th ed. London: University Tutorial Press, 1929.
135. Malinovich, Stanley. “The Happiness Criterion.” Philosophia 2 (1972): 195-203.
136. Malthus, Thomas. Principles of Political Economy. 1820. Reprint, New York: Augustus M. Kelly, 1951.
137. Malthus, Thomas. An Essay on the Principle of Population. 1798.
138. Mandelbaum, Maurice. “On Interpreting Mill’s Utilitarianism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 6 (1968): 35-46.
139. Mandelbaum, Maurice. “Two Moot Issues in Mill’s Utilitarianism.” In Mill: A Collection of Critical Essays, J. B. Schneewind, ed. 206-33. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1968.
140. Margolis, Joseph. “Mill’s Utilitarianism Again.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 45 (1967): 179-84.
141. Marshall, John. “The Proof of Utility and Equity in Mill’s Utilitarianism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1973-4): 13-26.
142. Marshall, John. “Egalitarianism and General Happiness.” In The Limits of Utilitarianism, Harlan B. Miller and William H. Williams, eds. 35-41. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.
143. Martin, Rex. “A Defence of Mill’s Qualitative Hedonism.” Philosophy 47 (1972): 140-51.
144. Martineau, James. Types of Ethical Theory. 1855. 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1901.
145. Mazlish, Bruce. James and John Stuart Mill. New York: Basic Books, 1975.
146. McCloskey, H. J. “An Examination of Restricted Utilitarianism.” The Philosophical Review 66 (1957): 466-85.
147. McCloskey, H. J. John Stuart Mill: A Critical Study. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1971.
148. McGreal, Ian Philip. “Mill.” Chap. 2 in Analyzing Philosophical Arguments. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing, 1967.
149. McNaughton, Robert. “A Metrical Conception of Happiness.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 14 (1953-4): 172-83.
150. McNeilly, F. S. “Pre-moral Appraisals.” The Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1958): 97-111.
151. Melden, A. I., ed. Essays in Moral Philosophy. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1958.
152. Mill, James. Analysis of the Phenomena of the Human Mind. 2 vols. 1829; 2nd ed., John Stuart Mill, ed. 1869. Reprint, New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1967.
153. Mill, John Stuart. The Letters of John Stuart Mill. 2 vols. H. S. R. Elliot, ed. London: Longmans, Green, 1910.
154. Mill, John Stuart. Principles of Political Economy. 1848; 6th ed., 1871. Vols. 2-3 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1965.
155. Mill, John Stuart. Auguste Comte and Positivism. 1865. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969.
156. Mill, John Stuart. “Blakey’s History of Moral Science.” 1833. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969.
157. Mill, John Stuart."Nature.” In Three Essays on Religion. 1874. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969.
158. Mill, John Stuart. “Remarks on Bentham’s Philosophy.” 1833. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969.
159. Mill, John Stuart."Sedgwick’s Discourse.” 1835. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969.
160. Mill, John Stuart. “Theism.” In Three Essays on Religion. 1874. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969.
161. Mill, John Stuart. Three Essays on Religion. 1874. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969.
162. Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarianism. 1861. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969.
163. Mill, John Stuart. “Utility of Religion.”’ In Three Essays on Religion. 1874. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969.
164. Mill, John Stuart. The Later Letters of John Stuart Mill 1849-1873. Vols. 14-17 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Francis E. Mineka and Dwight N. Lindley, eds. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1972.
165. Mill, John Stuart. “Whewell on Moral Philosophy.” 1852. In Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969.
166. Mill, John Stuart. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. 1843; 8th ed., 1871. Vols. 7-8 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1974.
167. Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. 1859. In Essays on Politics and Society. Vol. 18 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1977.
168. Mill, John Stuart. “The Protagoras.” 1834. In Essays on Philosophy and the Classics. Vol. 11 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press, 1978.
169. Mill, John Stuart. An Examination of Sir William Hamilton’s Philosophy. 1865; 4th ed., 1872. Vol. 9 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1979.
170. Mill, John Stuart. Autobiography. 1873. Published with parallel texts of the Early Draft, John M. Robson and Jack Stillinger, eds. In Autobiography and Literary Essays. Vol. 1 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson and Jack Stillinger, eds. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1981.
171. Mill, John Stuart. The Subjection of Women. 1869. In Essays on Equality, Law, and Education. Vol. 21 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, John M. Robson, ed. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1984.
172. Mill, John Stuart. Miscellaneous Writings. Vol. 31 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, John M. Robson, ed. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1989.
173. Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarianism. Roger Crisp, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
174. Miller, Dale E. “Internal Sanctions in Mill’s Moral Psychology.” Utilitas 10 (1998): 68-82.
175. Miller, Harlan B., and William H. Williams, eds. The Limits of Utilitarianism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.
176. Millgram, Elijah. “Mill’s Proof of the Principle of Utility.” Ethics 110: 281-310.
177. Mitchell, Dorothy. “Mill’s Theory of Value.” Theoria 36 (1970): 100-15.
178. Monro, David Hector. “Mill’s Third Howler.” In Contemporary Philosophy in Australia, R. Brown and C. D. Rollins, eds. 190-203. London: Allen and Unwin, 1969.
179. Moore, G. E. Principia Ethica. 1903. London and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1959.
180. Moser, Shia. “A Comment on Mill’s Argument for Utilitarianism.” Inquiry 6 (1963): 308-18.
181. Nagoka, Shigeo. “On Mill’s Qualitative Distinction of Pleasures.” The Mill News Letter 20 (1985): 15-26.
182. Nakhnikian, G. “Value and Obligation in Mill.” Ethics 62 (1951): 33-40.
183. Nielsen, Kai. “Monro on Mill’s ‘Third Howler.’” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 (1973): 63-9.
184. Nowell-Smith, P. H. Ethics. Baltimore: Penguin Books, 1954.
185. Ossowska, Maria. “Remarks on the Ancient Distinction between Bodily and Mental Pleasures.” Inquiry 4 (1961): 123-7.
186. Owen, Robert. A New View of Society: or, Essays on the Formation of Character. 1813; 4th ed., 1818. London: J. M. Dent and Sons, 1972.
187. Packe, Michael St. John. The Life of John Stuart Mill. London: Secker and Warburg, 1954.
188. Patten, S. C. “Some Are Base, Some Are Sublime: A Defence of Hedonistic Utilitarianism.” Journal of Value Inquiry 14 (1980): 275-86.
189. Persson, Ingmar. “Mill’s Derivation of the Intrinsic Desirability of Pleasure.” History of Philosopohy Quarterly 17 (2000): 297-310.
190. Peterfreund, Sheldon P. “On Mill’s Higher and Lower Pleasures.” Personalist 57 (1976): 411-12.
191. Philips, Michael. “A Pleasure Paradox.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (1981): 323-31.
192. Plamenatz, John. “John Stuart Mill.” Chap. 8 in The English Utilitarians.2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 1958.
193. Plato. Protagoras. In The Dialogues of Plato. B. Jowett, trans. 1892. New York: Random House, 1937.
194. Popkin, R. H. “A Note on the ‘Proof’ of Utility in J. S. Mill.” Ethics 61 (1950-1): 66-8.
195. Quinton, Anthony. Utilitarian Ethics. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1973.
196. Raphael, D. D. “Fallacies in and about Mill’s Utilitarianism.” Philosophy 30 (1955): 344-57.
197. Raphael, D. D. “J. S. Mill’s Proof of the Principle of Utility.” Utilitas 6 (1994):55-63.
198. Rawls, John. “Two Concepts of Rules.” The Philosophical Review 64 (1955): 3-32.
199. Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
200. Regan, Donald. Utilitarianism and Co-operation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.
201. Rescher, Nicholas. Distributive Justice. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1966.
202. Rice, Philip Blair. On the Knowledge of Good and Evil. New York: Random House, 1955.
203. Riley, Jonathan. Liberal Utilitarianism: Social Choice Theory and J. S. Mill’s Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
204. Riley, Jonathan.“On Quantities and Qualities of Pleasure.” Utilitas 5 (1993): 291-300.
205. Riley, Jonathan. “Is Qualitative Hedonism Inconsistent?” Utilitas 11 (1999): 347-58.
206. Robson, J. M. The Improvement of Mankind: The Social and Political Thought of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1968.
207. Robson, J. M. Textual Introduction to Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969.
208. Robson, John M., and Michael Laine, eds. James and John Stuart Mill: Papers of the Centenary Conference. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976.
209. Rogers, Reginald A. P. A Short History of Ethics. 1911. Reprint, London: Macmillan, 1964.
210. Rohatyn, Dennis A. “Hall and Mill’s Proof.” Southwest Journal of Philosophy 2 (1971): 113-18.
211. Rohatyn, Dennis A. “A Note on Kaufmann and Justice.” The Mill News Letter 6 (1971): 23-5.
212. Rohatyn, Dennis A. “Mill, Kant, and Negative Utility.” Philosophia 5 (1975): 515-22.
213. Ross, W. D. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930.
214. Russell, Bertrand. A History of Western Philosophy. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1946.
215. Ryan, Alan. “Mill and the Naturalistic Fallacy.” Mind 75 (1966): 422-5.
216. Ryan, Alan. J. S. Mill. London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974.
217. Ryan, Alan. The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. London: Macmillan; New York: Pantheon Books, 1970; 2nd ed., New York: Macmillan, 1988.
218. Sabine, George H. A History of Political Theory. 3rd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1961.
219. Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey. “Mill’s ‘Proof’ of the Principle of Utility: A More Than Half-Hearted Defense.” Social Philosophy and Policy 18: 330-60.
220. Scarre, Geoffrey. “Happiness for a Millian.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7 (1999): 491-502.
221. Scarre, Geoffrey. “Donner and Riley on Qualitative Hedonism.” Utilitas 9 (1997): 355-60.
222. Schaller, Walter E. “Punishment and the Utilitarian Criterion of Right and Wrong.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (1991): 109-26.
223. Schneewind, J. B. “Concerning Some Criticisms of Mill’s Utilitarianism, 1861-76.” In James and John Stuart Mill: Papers of the Centenary Conference, John M. Robson and Michael Laine, eds. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1976.
224. Schneewind, J. B., ed. Mill’s Ethical Writings. London: Collier-Macmillan; New York: Collier Books, 1965.
225. Schneewind, J. B., ed. Mill: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, NY: Doubleday; London: Macmillan, 1968.
226. Selby-Bigge, L. A., ed. British Moralists, Being Selections from Writers Principally of the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Clarendon, 1897.
227. Sellars, Wilfred, and John Hospers, eds. Readings in Ethical Theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1952.
228. Semmel, Bernard. John Stuart Mill and the Pursuit of Virtue. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984.
229. Seth, James. “The Alleged Fallacies in Mill’s ‘Utilitarianism.’” Philosophical Review 17 (1908): 469-88.
230. Seth, James. A Study of Ethical Principles. 12th ed. New York: 1911.
231. Shaw, William H. Contemporary Ethics: Taking Account of Utilitarianism. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1999.
232. Sheldon, Mark. “Community, History and Proof.” The Mill News Letter 14 (1979): 9-14.
233. Sidgwick, Henry. Outlines of the History of Ethics. 1886; 6th ed., 1931. London: Macmillan, 1954.
234. Sidgwick, Henry.Methods of Ethics. 1874; 7th ed., 1907. London: Macmillan,1967.
235. Sidgwick, Henry. Practical Ethics: A Collection of Addresses and Essays. London: S. Sonnenschein; New York: Macmillan, 1898. Reprint, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
236. Singer, Marcus G. “Actual Consequence Utilitarianism.” Mind 86 (1977): 67-77.
237. Singer, Marcus G.“Incoherence, Inconsistency and Moral Theory: More on Actual Consequence Utilitarianism.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 20 (1982): 375-91.
238. Singer, Marcus G. “Mill’s Stoic Conception of Happiness and Pragmatic Conception of Utility.” Philosophy 75 (2000): 25-47.
239. Skorupski, John. “The Parts of Happiness.” Philosophical Books 26 (1985): 193-202.
240. Singer, Marcus G.John Stuart Mill. London and New York: Routledge, 1989.
241. Singer, Marcus G., ed. The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
242. Slote, Michael. “Consequentialism.” In Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd ed., 3 vols. Lawrence C. Becker and Charlotte B. Becker, eds. New York and London: Routledge, 2001.
243. Smart, J. J. C. “Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism.” Philosophical Quarterly 4 (1956): 344-54.
244. Smart, J. J. C. “An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics.” In Utilitarianism: For and Against, J. J. C. Smart and Bernard Williams, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.
245. Sobel, J. Howard. “‘Everyone,’ Consequences, and Generalization Arguments.” Inquiry 10 (1967): 373-404.
246. Soles, David E. “Yet Another Paper on Mill’s Proof.” Southwest Philosophy Review 14 (1998): 29-44.
247. Sorley, W. R. The Ethics of Naturalism. 2nd ed. Edinburgh, 1904.
248. Sorley, W. R. A History of British Philosophy to 1900. 1920. Reprint, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965.
249. Sosa, Ernest. “Mill’s Utilitarianism.” In Mill’s Utilitarianism: Text and Criticism, James M. Smith and Ernest Sosa, eds. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1969.
250. Spence, G. W. “The Psychology behind J. S. Mill’s ‘Proof.’” Philosophy 43 (1968): 18-28.
251. Stephen, Leslie. The English Utilitarians. 3 vols. 1900. Reprint in one vol., New York: Peter Smith, 1950.
252. Stewart, Robert Scott. “Art for Argument’s Sake: Saving Mill from the Fallacy of Composition.” Journal of Value Inquiry 27 (1993): 443-53.
253. Stocker, Michael. “Mill on Desire and Desirability.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 7 (1969): 199-201.
254. Stout, A. K. “But Suppose Everyone Did the Same.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 32 (1954): 1-29.
255. Strasser, Mark. “Mill’s Higher and Lower Pleasures Reexamined.” International Studies in Philosophy 17 (1985): 51-72.
256. Strasser, Mark. “Actual versus Probable Utilitarianism.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 27 (1989): 585-97.
257. Strasser, Mark. The Moral Philosophy of John Stuart Mill: Toward Modifications of Contemporary Utilitarianism. Wakefield, VT: Longwood Academic Publishers, 1991.
258. Sumner, L. W. “More Light on the Later Mill.” The Philosophical Review 83 (1974): 504-27.
259. Sumner, L. W. “The Good and the Right.” In New Essays on John Stuart Mill and Utilitarianism, Wesley E. Cooper, Kai Nielsen, and Steven C. Patten, eds. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supp. vol. 5 (1979): 99-114.
260. Sumner, L. W. “Welfare, Happiness, and Pleasure.” Utilitas 4 (1992): 199-223.
261. Sutherland, J. “An Alleged Gap in Mill’s Utilitarianism.” Mind 11 (1886): 597-9.
262. Sylvester, Robert P. “Pleasures: Higher and Lower.” Personalist 56: 129-37.
263. Taylor, Helen. Introductory Notice to Three Essays on Religion. 1874. In Essays on Ethics, Religion, and Society. Vol. 10 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, J. M. Robson, ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969.
264. Ten, C. L. “Mill and Utilitarianism.” Utilitas 13 (2001): 112-22.
265. Thomas, Laurence. “Moral Psychology.” In Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd ed., 3 vols. Lawrence C. Becker and Charlotte B. Becker, eds. New York and London: Routledge, 2001.
266. Thomas, William. Mill. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.
267. Toulmin, S. E. An Examination of the Place of Reasonin Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950.
268. Urmson, J. O. “The Interpretation of the Philosophy of J. S. Mill.” Philosophical Quarterly 3 (1953): 33-40.
269. Urmson, J. O. “A Defence of Intuitionism.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 75 (1974-5): 111-19.
270. Waldron, J. “Kagen on Requirements, Mill on Sanctions.” Ethics 54 (1994): 310-24.
271. Wall, Grenville. “Mill on Happiness as an End.” Philosophy 57 (1982): 537-41.
272. Walter, Edward. “Revising Mill’s Utilitarianism.” Journal of Social Philosophy 12 (1981): 5-11.
273. Walter, Edward. “Mill on Happiness.” Journal of Value Inquiry 16 (1982): 303-9.
274. Walter, Edward. “A Concept of Happiness.” Philosophy Research Archives 13 (1987-8): 137-50.
275. Warke, Tom. “Multi-Dimensional Utility and the Index Number Problem: Jeremy Bentham, J. S. Mill, and Qualitative Hedonism.” Utilitas 12 (2000): 176-203.
276. Warnock, Mary. Ethics Since 1900. London: Oxford University Press, 1960.
277. Warnock, Mary. Introduction to Utilitarianism and On Liberty, by John Stuart Mill, with an Introduction by Mary Warnock, ed. 2nd ed. 1-16. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2003.
278. Wedar, Sven. Duty and Utility: A Study in English Moral Philosophy. Lund: Berlingska Boktryckeriet, 1951.
279. Wellman, Carl. “A Reinterpretation of Mill’s Proof.” Ethics 69 (1958-9): 268-76.
280. Wertz, S. K. “Composition and Mill’s Utilitarian Principle.” Personalist 52 (1971): 417-31.
281. West, Henry Robison. “Act-Utilitarianism and Rule-Utilitarianism.” Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, 1964.
282. West, Henry Robison."Reconstructing Mill’s ‘Proof’ of the Principle of Utility.” Mind 81 (1972): 256-7.
283. West, Henry Robison. “Mill’s Naturalism.” Journal of Value Inquiry 9 (1975): 67-9.
284. West, Henry Robison. “Mill’s Moral Conservatism.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 1: 71-80.
285. West, Henry Robison. “Mill’s Qualitative Hedonism.” Philosophy 51 (1976): 101-5.
286. West, Henry Robison. “Mill’s ‘Proof’ of the Principle of Utility.” In The Limits of Utilitarianism, Harlan B. Miller and William H. Williams, eds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.
287. West, Henry Robison.“Consequentialism.” In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Supplement. 101-2. New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan, 1996.
288. West, Henry Robison. “Mill, John Stuart.” In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Supplement. 346-7. New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan, 1996.
289. West, Henry Robison. “Mill, John Stuart.” In Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd ed., 3 vols.
290. Lawrence C. Becker and Charlotte B. Becker, eds. 1098-1104. New York and London: Routledge, 2001.
291. White, Morton. “Desire and Desirability: A Rejoinder to a Posthumous Reply by John Dewey.” Journal of Philosophy 93 (1996): 229-42.
292. Wilson, Fred. “Mill’s Proof That Happiness Is the Criterion of Morality.” Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1982): 59-72.
293. Wilson, Fred. “Mill’s ‘Proof’ of Utility and the Composition of Causes.” Journal of Business Ethics 2 (1983): 135-58.
294. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. G. E. M. Anscombe, trans. 3rd ed. New York: The Macmillan Company, 1971.
295. Wolf, Jean Claude. John Stuart Mill’s ‘Utilitarismus.’ Freiburg and Munich: Alber, 1992.
296. Zimmerman, Michael J. “Mill and the Consistency of Hedonism.” Philosophia 13 (1983): 317-35.
297. Zinkernagel, Peter. “Revaluation of J. S. Mill’s Ethical Proof.” Theoria 18 (1952): 70-7.