Detecting latent ideology in expert text: Evidence from academic papers in economics

EMNLP 2014 - 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1804-1809

  Jelveh, Zubin ^a   Kogut, Bruce ^b   Naidu, Suresh ^c  

^a POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b The Sanford C Bernstein Co Center for Leadership and Ethics   (United States)

^c Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

ACADEMIC PAPER; CURRENT TECHNOLOGY; N-GRAM MODELING; POLITICAL VIEWS; RESEARCH PAPERS;

ECONOMICS;

EID: 84926059750     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/v1/d14-1191     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Amr Ahmed and Eric P. Xing. 2010. Staying informed: supervised and semi-supervised multi-view topical analysis of ideological perspective. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1140- 1150. Association for Computational Linguistics.
2. A.S. 2010. Is economics a right-wing conspiracy? The Economist, August.
3. David M. Blei, Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. the Journal of machine Learning research, 3:993-1022.
4. Raj Chetty. 2013. Yes, economics is a science. The New York Times, October.
5. Jacob Eisenstein, Amr Ahmed, and Eric P. Xing. 2011. Sparse additive generative models of text. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-11), pages 1041-1048.
6. T. Fawcett. 2006. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern recognition letters, 27(8):861-874.
7. Matthew Gentzkow and Jesse M. Shapiro. 2010. What drives media slant? evidence from U.S. daily newspapers. Econometrica, 78(1):35-71.
8. Roger Gordon and Gordon B Dahl. 2013. Views among economists: Professional consensus or pointcounterpoint? American Economic Review, 103(3):629-635, May.
9. J. Grimmer and B. M. Stewart. 2013. Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis, 21(3):267-297, January.
10. David Hedengren, Daniel B. Klein, and Carrie Milton. 2010. Economist petitions: Ideology revealed. Econ Journal Watch, 7(3):288-319.
11. Zubin Jelveh, Bruce Kogut, and Suresh Naidu. 2014. Political language in economics.
12. Wei-Hao Lin, Eric Xing, and Alexander Hauptmann. 2008. A joint topic and perspective model for ideological discourse. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pages 17-32. Springer.
13. Drew Margolin, Yu-Ru Lin, and David Lazer. 2013. Why so similar?: Identifying semantic organizing processes in large textual corpora.
14. Peter McCullagh. 1980. Regression models for ordinal data. Journal of the royal statistical society. Series B (Methodological), pages 109-142.
15. Qiaozhu Mei, Xu Ling, Matthew Wondra, Hang Su, and Cheng Xiang Zhai. 2007. Topic sentiment mixture: modeling facets and opinions in weblogs. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 171-180. ACM.
16. National Bureau of Economic Research. 2010. Amended and restated by-laws of national bureau of economic research, inc.
17. Michael Paul and Roxana Girju. 2010. A two dimensional topic-aspect model for discovering multi-faceted topics. Urbana, 51.
18. Dani Rodrik. 2014. When ideas trump interests: Preferences, worldviews, and policy innovations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(1):189-208, February.
19. Matt Taddy. 2013. Multinomial inverse regression for text analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 108.
20. William Yang Wang, Elijah Mayfield, Suresh Naidu, and Jeremiah Dittmar. 2012. Historical analysis of legal opinions with a sparse mixed-effects latent variable model. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Long Papers-Volume 1, pages 740-749. Association for Computational Linguistics.