UNITOR: Combining syntactic and semantic kernels for twitter sentiment analysis

*SEM 2013 - 2nd Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics

Volumn 2, Issue , 2013, Pages 369-374

  Castellucci, Giuseppe ^a,b   Filice, Simone ^a,b   Croce, Danilo ^a,b   Basili, Roberto ^a,b  

^a Dept of Electronic Engineering ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATA MINING; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); SYNTACTICS;

CLASSIFICATION TASKS; DISTRIBUTIONAL MODELS; FEATURE ENGINEERINGS; LATENT SEMANTICS; LEXICAL INFORMATION; LEXICAL SEMANTICS; MULTIPLE KERNELS; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84926013794     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Apoorv Agarwal, Boyi Xie, Ilia Vovsha, Owen Rambow, and Rebecca Passonneau. 2011. Sentiment analysis of twitter data. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Languages in Social Media, pages 30–38, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
2. Luciano Barbosa and Junlan Feng. 2010. Robust sentiment detection on twitter from biased and noisy data. In COLING, pages 36–44, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. Roberto Basili and Fabio Massimo Zanzotto. 2002. Parsing engineering and empirical robustness. Nat. Lang. Eng., 8(3):97–120, June.
4. Albert Bifet and Eibe Frank. 2010. Sentiment knowledge discovery in twitter streaming data. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Discovery science, pages 1–15, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer-Verlag.
5. Michael Collins and Nigel Duffy. 2001. Convolution kernels for natural language. In Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’2001), pages 625–632.
6. Nello Cristianini, John Shawe-Taylor, and Huma Lodhi. 2002. Latent semantic kernels. J. Intell. Inf. Syst., 18(2-3):127–152.
7. Danilo Croce and Roberto Basili. 2012. Grammatical feature engineering for fine-grained ir tasks. In IIR, pages 133–143.
8. Danilo Croce and Daniele Previtali. 2010. Manifold learning for the semi-supervised induction of framenet predicates: an empirical investigation. In GEMS 2010, pages 7–16, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
9. Danilo Croce, Alessandro Moschitti, and Roberto Basili. 2011. Structured lexical similarity via convolution kernels on dependency trees. In Proceedings of EMNLP, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
10. Dmitry Davidov, Oren Tsur, and Ari Rappoport. 2010. Enhanced sentiment learning using twitter hashtags and smileys. In COLING, pages 241–249, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
11. Jennifer Foster, Özlem Çetinoglu, Joachim Wagner, Joseph Le Roux, Stephen Hogan, Joakim Nivre, Deirdre Hogan, and Josef van Genabith. 2011. #hard-toparse: Pos tagging and parsing the twitterverse. In Analyzing Microtext.
12. Alec Go, Richa Bhayani, and Lei Huang. 2009. Twitter sentiment classification using distant supervision.
13. G. Golub and W. Kahan. 1965. Calculating the singular values and pseudo-inverse of a matrix. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics: Series B, Numerical Analysis, 2(2):pp. 205–224.
14. Mehmet Gönen and Ethem Alpaydin. 2011. Multiple kernel learning algorithms. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:2211–2268.
15. Bernard J. Jansen, Mimi Zhang, Kate Sobel, and Abdur Chowdury. 2009. Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 60(11):2169–2188, November.
16. Efthymios Kouloumpis, Theresa Wilson, and Johanna Moore. 2011. Twitter sentiment analysis: The good the bad and the omg! In ICWSM.
17. Tom Landauer and Sue Dumais. 1997. A solution to plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104.
18. Katharina Morik, Peter Brockhausen, and Thorsten Joachims. 1999. Combining statistical learning with a knowledge-based approach - a case study in intensive care monitoring. In ICML, pages 268–277, San Francisco, CA, USA. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
19. Alessandro Moschitti, Daniele Pighin, and Robert Basili. 2008. Tree kernels for semantic role labeling. Computational Linguistics, 34.
20. Alexander Pak and Patrick Paroubek. 2010. Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In LREC.
21. Bo Pang and Lillian Lee. 2008. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found. Trends Inf. Retr., 2(1-2):1–135, January.
22. Bo Pang, Lillian Lee, and Shivakumar Vaithyanathan. 2002. Thumbs up?: sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In EMNLP, volume 10, pages 79–86, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
23. Ryan Rifkin and Aldebaro Klautau. 2004. In defense of one-vs-all classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 5:101–141, December.
24. Magnus Sahlgren. 2006. The Word-Space Model. Ph.D. thesis, Stockholm University.
25. John Shawe-Taylor and Nello Cristianini. 2004. Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.
26. Erik F. Tjong Kim Sang and Sabine Buchholz. 2000. Introduction to the conll-2000 shared task: chunking. In ConLL’00, pages 127–132, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
27. Theresa Wilson, Zornitsa Kozareva, Preslav Nakov, Alan Ritter, Sara Rosenthal, and Veselin Stoyonov. 2013. Semeval-2013 task 2: Sentiment analysis in twitter. In Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. Association for Computational Linguistics.
28. Fabio Massimo Zanzotto, Marco Pennacchiotti, and Kostas Tsioutsiouliklis. 2011. Linguistic redundancy in twitter. In EMNLP, pages 659–669.