Tree kernels for semantic role labeling

Computational Linguistics

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 193-224

  Moschitti, Alessandro ^a   Pighin, Daniele ^a   Basili, Roberto ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); FORESTRY; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; SYNTACTICS; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

ARGUMENT STRUCTURES; BOUNDARY RECOGNITION; FEATURE ENGINEERINGS; FEATURE REPRESENTATION; LARGE SCALE DATA SETS; MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; SEMANTIC ROLE LABELING;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 45749138033     PISSN: 08912017     EISSN: 15309312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/coli.2008.34.2.193     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Baker, Collin F., Charles J. Fillmore, and John B. Lowe. 1998. The Berkeley FrameNet project. In COLING-ACL '98: Proceedings of the Conference, pages 86-90, Montréal, Canada.
2. Carreras, Xavier and Lluiś Màrquez. 2004. Introduction to the CoNLL-2004 shared task: Semantic role labeling. In HLT-NAACL 2004 Workshop: Eighth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-2004), pages 89-97, Boston, MA.
3. Carreras, Xavier and Lluís Màrquez. 2005. Introduction to the CoNLL-2005 shared task: Semantic role labeling. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-2005), pages 152-164, Ann Arbor, MI.
4. Chen, John and Owen Rambow. 2003. Use of deep linguistic features for the recognition and labeling of semantic arguments. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 41-48, Sapporo, Japan.
5. Collins, Michael and Nigel Duffy. 2002. New ranking algorithms for parsing and tagging: Kernels over discrete structures, and the voted perceptron. In ACL02, pages 263-270, Philadelphia, PA.
6. Culotta, Aron and Jeffrey Sorensen. 2004. Dependency tree kernels for relation extraction. In ACL04, pages 423-429, Barcelona, Spain.
7. Cumby, Chad and Dan Roth. 2003. Kernel methods for relational learning. In Proceedings of ICML 2003, pages 107-114, Washington, DC.
8. Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The case for case. In Emmon Bach and Robert T. Harms, editors, Universals in Linguistic Theory. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, pages 1-210.
9. Gildea, Daniel and Daniel Jurafsky. 2002. Automatic labeling of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 28(3): 245-288.
10. Haghighi, Aria, Kristina Toutanova, and Christopher Manning. 2005. A joint model for semantic role labeling. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-2005), pages 173-176, Ann Arbor, MI.
11. Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures, Current Studies in Linguistics Series. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
12. Joachims, Thorsten. 1999. Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In B. Schölkopf, C. Burges, and A. Smola, editors, Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pages 169-184.
13. Kazama, Jun'ichi and Kentaro Torisawa. 2005. Speeding up training with tree kernels for node relation labeling. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2005, pages 137-144, Toronto, Canada.
14. Kudo, Taku and Yuji Matsumoto. 2003. Fast methods for kernel-based text analysis. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 24-31, Sapporo, Japan.
15. Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
16. Lin, H.-T., C.-J. Lin, and R. C. Weng. 2003. A note on Platt's probabilistic outputs for support vector machines. Technical report, National Taiwan University.
17. Litkowski, Kenneth. 2004. Senseval-3 task: Automatic labeling of semantic roles. In Senseval-3: Third International Workshop on the Evaluation of Systems for the Semantic Analysis of Text, pages 9-12, Barcelona, Spain.
18. Marcus, M. P., B. Santorini, and M. A. Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19:313-330.
19. th Conference on Association for Computational Linguistic (ACL-2004), pages 335-342, Barcelona, Spain.
20. Moschitti, Alessandro. 2006a. Efficient convolution kernels for dependency and constituent syntactic trees. In Proceedings of The 17th European Conference on Machine Learning, pages 318-329, Berlin, Germany.
21. Moschitti, Alessandro. 2006b. Making tree kernels practical for natural language learning. In Proceedings of 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL2006), pages 113-120, Treato, Italy.
22. Moschitti, Alessandro, Bonaventura Coppola, Daniele Pighin, and Roberto Basili. 2005a. Engineering of syntactic features for shallow semantic parsing. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Feature Engineering for Machine Learning in Natural Language Processing, pages 48-56, Ann Arbor, MI.
23. Moschitti, Alessandro, Ana-Maria Giuglea, Bonaventura Coppola, and Roberto Basili. 2005b. Hierarchical semantic role labeling. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-2005), pages 201-204, Ann Arbor, MI.
24. Moschitti, Alessandro, Daniele Pighin, and Roberto Basili. 2006. Tree kernel engineering in semantic role labeling systems. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Learning Structured Information in Natural Language Applications, EACL 2006, pages 49-56, Trento, Italy.
25. Palmer, Martha, Daniel Gildea, and Paul Kingsbury. 2005. The Proposition Bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics, 31(1): 71-106.
26. Platt, J. 1999. Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparison to regularized likelihood methods. In A. J. Smola, P. Bartlett, B. Schoelkopf, and D. Schuurmans, editors, Advances in Large Margin Classifiers. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pages 61-74.
27. Pradhan, Sameer, Kadri Hacioglu, Valerie Krugler, Wayne Ward, James H. Martin, and Daniel Jurafsky. 2005a. Support vector learning for semantic argument classification. Machine Learning, 60(1-3):11-39.
28. Pradhan, Sameer, Kadri Hacioglu, Wayne Ward, James H. Martin, and Daniel Jurafsky. 2005b. Semantic role chunking combining complementary syntactic views. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-2005), pages 217-220, Ann Arbor, MI.
29. Pradhan, Sameer, Wayne Ward, Kadri Hacioglu, James Martin, and Daniel Jurafsky. 2005c. Semantic role labeling using different syntactic views. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'05), pages 581-588, Ann Arbor, MI.
30. Pradhan, Sameer S., Wayne H. Ward, Kadri Hacioglu, James H. Martin, and Dan Jurafsky. 2004. Shallow semantic parsing using support vector machines. In HLT-NAACL 2004: Main Proceedings, pages 233-240, Boston, MA.
31. Punyakanok, Vasin, Peter Koomen, Dan Roth, and Wen-tau Yih. 2005. Generalized inference with multiple semantic role labeling systems. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-2005), pages 181-184, Ann Arbor, MI.
32. Shawe-Taylor, John and Nello Cristianini. 2004. Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
33. Shen, Libin, Anoop Sarkar, and Aravind K. Joshi. 2003. Using LTAG based features in parse reranking. In Empirical Methods for Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 89-96, Sapporo, Japan.
34. Thompson, Cynthia A., Roger Levy, and Christopher Manning. 2003. A generative model for semantic role labeling. In 14th European Conference on Machine Learning, pages 397-408, Cavtat, Croatia.
35. Tjong Kim Sang, Erik, Sander Canisius, Antal van den Bosch, and Toine Bogers. 2005. Applying spelling error correction techniques for improving semantic role labelling. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-2005), pages 229-232, Ann Arbor, MI.
36. Toutanova, Kristina, Aria Haghighi, and Christopher Manning. 2005. Joint learning improves semantic role labeling. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'05), pages 589-596, Ann Arbor, MI.
37. Toutanova, Kristina, Penka Markova, and Christopher Manning. 2004. The leaf path projection view of parse trees: Exploring string kernels for HPSG parse selection. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2004, pages 166-173, Barcelona, Spain.
38. Vapnik, Vladimir N. 1998. Statistical Learning Theory. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
39. Vishwanathan, S. V. N. and A. J. Smola. 2002. Fast kernels on strings and trees. In Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 569-576, Vancouver, British Columbia.
40. Xue, Nianwen and Martha Palmer. 2004. Calibrating features for semantic role labeling. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2004, pages 88-94, Barcelona, Spain.
41. Zelenko, D., C. Aone, and A. Richardella. 2003. Kernel methods for relation extraction. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:1083-1106.
42. Zhang, Min, Jie Zhang, and Jian Su. 2006. Exploring syntactic features for relation extraction using a convolution tree kernel. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, Main Conference, pages 288-295, New York, NY.