Revealing the intricate effect of collaboration on innovation

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2015, Pages

  Inoue, Hiroyasu ^a   Liu, Yang Yu ^b  

^a OSAKA SANGYO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COOPERATION; DATA MINING; HUMAN; INVENTION; INVENTOR; JAPAN; KNOWLEDGE; MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY; ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE; ORGANIZATIONAL EFFICIENCY; PRODUCTIVITY; QUALITY CONTROL; SOCIAL MARKETING; UNITED STATES; HISTORY; PATENT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; HUMANS; INVENTIONS; JAPAN; PATENTS AS TOPIC; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84925834745     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121973     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Simonton DK. Scientific genius: A psychology of science. Cambridge University Press; 1988.
2. Weisberg RW. Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2006.
3. Guimera R, Uzzi B, Spiro J, Amaral L. Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science. 2005; 308(5722):697-702. doi: 10.1126/science.1106340 PMID: 15860629
4. Porac JF, Wade JB, Fischer HM, Brown J, Kanfer A, Bowker G. Human capital heterogeneity, collaborative relationships, and publication patterns in a multidisciplinary scientific alliance: a comparative case study of two scientific teams. Research Policy. 2004; 33(4):661-678. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004. 01.007
5. Reagans R, Zuckerman E, McEvily B. How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Administrative Science Quarterly. 2004; 49(1):pp. 101-133.
6. Delmestri G, Montanari F, Usai A. Reputation and strength of ties in predicting commercial success and artistic merit of independents in the Italian feature film industry. Journal of Management Studies. 2005; 42(5):975-1002. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00529.x
7. Perretti F, Negro G. Mixing genres and matching people: a study in innovation and team composition in Hollywood. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2007; 586:563-586. doi: 10.1002/job.464
8. Uzzi B, Spiro J. Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology. 2005; 111(2):pp. 447-504. doi: 10.1086/432782
9. Skilton PF, Dooley KJ. The effects of repeat collaboration on creative abrasion. Academy of Management Review. 2010 Jan; 35(1):118-134. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2010.45577886
10. Li GC, Lai R, D'Amour A, Doolin DM, Sun Y, Torvik VI, et al. Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the US patent inventor database (1975-2010). Research Policy. 2014; 43(6):941-955. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.012
11. Hall B, Jaffe A. The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools; 2000. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 8498.
12. Tamada S, Kodama F, Gemba K. A study on science linkage of Japanese patents; an analysis on patents in the field of genetic technology by constructing a citation database. The Journal of Science Policy and Research Management. 2002; 17(3/4):222-230.
13. Griliches Z. R&D and productivity-The economic evidence. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1998.
14. Fleming L, Sorenson O. Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data. Research Policy. 2001; 30:1019-1039. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00135-9
15. Fleming L, Mingo S, Chen D. Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly. 2007; 52:443-475.
16. Lazer D, Pentland AS, Adamic L, Aral S, Barabasi AL, Brewer D, et al. Life in the network: the coming age of computational social science. Science (New York, NY). 2009; 323(5915):721. doi: 10.1126/science.1167742
17. Nonaka I, Lewin A. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science. 1994; 5(1):14-37. doi: 10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
18. Chesbrough HW. Open innovation. Harvard Business School; 2003.
19. Laursen K, Salter A. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal. 2006; 27(2):131-150. doi: 10.1002/smj.507
20. Grant R. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic management journal. 1996; 17:109-122. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250171110
21. Hicks D, Breitzman A Sr, Hamilton K, Narin F. Research excellence and patented innovation. Science and Public Policy. 2000; 27(5):310-320. doi: 10.3152/147154300781781805
22. Fleming L, Marx M. Managing creativity in small worlds. California Management Review. 2006; 48:6-27. doi: 10.2307/41166358
23. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature. 1998; 393:440-442. doi: 10.1038/30918 PMID: 9623998
24. Newman M. Assortative mixing in networks. Physical review letters. 2002; 89(20):208701. doi: 10. 1103/PhysRevLett.89.208701 PMID: 12443515
25. Wuchty S, Jones B, Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science. 2007; 316(5827):1036-1039. doi: 10.1126/science.1136099 PMID: 17431139
26. Singh J, Fleming L. Lone inventors as sources of technological breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Science. 2010; 56:41-56. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1090.1072
27. Trajtenberg M. A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. Rand Journal of Economics. 1990; 21(1):172-187. doi: 10.2307/2555502
28. Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern applied statistics with S. Springer; 2002.
29. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological). 1996;p. 267-288.
30. Bloom N, Reenen JV. Why do management practices differ across firms and countries? The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2010; 24(1):203-224. doi: 10.1257/jep.24.1.203
31. Ralston DA, Holt DH, Terpstra RH, Kai-Cheng Y. The impact of national culture and economic ideology on managerial work values: a study of the United States, Russia, Japan, and China. Journal of International Business Studies. 2007;p. 1-19.
32. Dyer JH. Does governance matter? Keiretsu alliances and asset specificity as sources of Japanese competitive advantage. Organization Science. 1996; 7(6):649-667. doi: 10.1287/orsc.7.6.649
33. Zaheer A, Mcevily B, Perrone V. Does of trust matter? Exploring the effects interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science. 1998; 9(2):141-159. doi: 10.1287/orsc.9.2. 141
34. Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1997; 42(1):35-67. doi: 10.2307/2393808
35. Wessner CW, editor. An assessment of the SBIR program. National Academies Press; 2008.
36. Fowler JH, Aksnes DW. Does self-citation pay? Scientometrics. 2007; 72(3):427-437. doi: 10.1007/s11192-007-1777-2