River Basin Management in Germany: Past Experiences and Challenges Ahead

Advances in the Economics of Environmental Resources

Volumn 7, Issue , 2007, Pages 11-42

  Petry, Daniel ^a   Dombrowsky, Ines ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247355476     PISSN: 15693740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1569-3740(07)07002-2     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Apolinarski I. Wasserwirtschaft in der DDR. In: Moss T. (Ed). Das Flussgebiet als Handlungsraum. Institutionenwandel durch die EU-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie aus raumwissenschaftlichen Perspektiven (2003), LIT-Verlag, Münster 47-87
2. Behrendt H., Huber P., Ley M., Opitz D., Schmoll O., Scholz G., and Uebe R. Nährstoffbilanzierung der Flußgebiete Deutschlands (1999), UBA-Texte 75/99, Berlin
3. Bernauer T. The international financing of environmental protection: Lessons from efforts to protect the river Rhine against chloride pollution. Environmental Politics 4 3 (1995) 369-390
4. Bernauer T. Protecting the Rhine river against chloride pollution. In: Keohane R., and Levy M. (Eds). Institutions for Environmental Aid: Pitfalls and Promises (1997), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 201-232
5. Bernauer T., and Moser P. Reducing pollution of the river Rhine: The influence of international cooperation. Journal of Environment and Development 5 4 (1996) 389-415
6. CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (1996). European Community Policy: Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament of 21 February 1996. Brussels.
7. CIS WFD (2001). Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive. Strategic Document as Agreed by the Water Directors under Swedish Presidency, 2 May 2001.
8. CIS Working Group 2.1 (2002). Analysis of Pressures and Impacts. Guidance for the Analysis of Pressures and Impacts in Accordance with the Water Framework Directive.
9. CIS Working Group 2.9 (2002). Best Practices in River Basin Planning. Guidance on Public Participation in Relation to the Water Framework Directive.
10. De Wit, M., Behrendt, H., Bendoricchio, G., Bleuten, W., & van Gaans, P. (2002). The contribution of agriculture to nutrient pollution in three European rivers, with reference to the European Nitrates Directive. European Water Management Online.
11. Dombrowsky, I. & Holländer, R. (2004). Erfahrungen im integrierten Management grenzüberschreitender Flüsse in Europa: Das Beispiel des Rheins. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Umweltpolitik 15/16 (Special edition of issues 3-5 (2003/04)): 443-459.
12. Durth R. Grenzüberschreitende Umweltprobleme und regionale Integration: Zur Politischen Ökonomie von Oberlauf-Unterlauf-Problemen an internationalen Flüssen (1996), Nomos, Baden Baden
13. EC (European Commission) (2001). Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Strategic Document as Agreed upon by the Water Directors under Swedish Presidency, 2 May 2001.
14. Epiney, A., & Felder, A. (2002). Überprüfung Internationaler Wasserwirtschaftlicher Übereinkommen im Hinblick auf die Implementierung der Wasserrahmenrichtlinie, Umweltbundesamt, Texte 17-02, Berlin.
15. European Communities (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities, 22 December 2002, L327, 1-72.
16. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (1978). Systematic Index of International Water Resources Treaties, Declarations, Acts and Cases by Basin. Agriculture and Food Organization of the United Nations. Rome.
17. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (1984). Systematic Index of International Water Resources Treaties, Declarations, Acts and Cases by Basin (Vol. II). Agriculture and Food Organization of the United Nations. Rome.
18. FGG Elbe (Flussgebietsgemeinschaft Elbe) (2005). Bericht an die EU-Kommission nach Art. 3 Wasserrahmenrichtlinie für die Flussgebietseinheit Elbe.
19. GWP (Global Water Partnership) (2000). Integrated Water Resources Management. Technical Advisory Committee Background Papers No. 4. Stockholm: GWP.
20. Holm K. Wasserverbände im Internationalen Vergleich: Eine ökonomische Analyse der Französischen Agences Financières de Bassin und der Deutschen Wasserverbände im Ruhrgebiet (1988), ifo-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, München
21. Holtrup, P. (1999). Der Schutz grenzüberschreitender Flüsse in Europa: Zur Effektivität internationaler Umweltregime. Dissertation Universität Bonn, "Berichte des Forschungszentrums Jülich - 3642" - Programmgruppe Technologiefolgenforschung - Kenn-Nr.: Jül-3642.
22. Huppert W. Was ist IWRM? Plädoyer für ein differenziertes Verständnis des Konzepts Integriertes Wasserressourcen-Management. In: Neumann S., Scheumann W., Edig A.v., and Huppert W. (Eds). Integriertes Wassermanagement: ein Konzept in die Praxis überführen (2005), Nomos, Baden Baden 15-30
23. IKSE (Internationale Kommission zum Schutz der Elbe) (Eds). (2005). Internationale Flussgebietseinheit Elbe. Merkmale der Flussgebietseinheit, Überprüfung der Umweltauswirkungen menschlicher Tätigkeiten und wirtschaftliche Analyse der Wassernutzungen. Bericht an die Europäische Kommission.
24. IKSR (Internationale Kommission zum Schutz des Rheins) (2002). Vergleich des Istzustandes des Rheins 1990 bis 2000 mit den Zielvorgaben. Bericht Nr. 123-d.doc. 68. Plenarsitzung, Luxemburg, 2./3.7.2002.
25. Kahlenborn W., and Kraemer R.A. Nachhaltige Wasserwirtschaft in Deutschland (1999), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg
26. Kaika M., and Page B. The EU water framework directive: Part 1. European policy making and the changing topography of lobbying. European Environment 13 (2003) 314-327
27. Kallis G., and Nijkamp P. Evolution of EU water policy: A critical assessment and a hopeful perspective. Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht (ZfU) 3 (2000) 301-335
28. Knill C., and Lenschow A. On deficient implementation and deficient theories: The need for an institutionalist perspective in implementation research. In: Knill C., and Lenschow A. (Eds). Implementing EU Environmental Policy. New Directions and Old Problems (2000), Manchester University Press, Manchester, NY 9-35
29. LAWA (Länderarbeitsgemeinschaft Wasser) (2003). German Guidance Document for the Implementation of the EC Water Framework Directive, April 30, 2003, at http://www.lawa.de/pub/kostenlos/wrrl/Arbeitshilfe_englisch.pdf, visited April 4, 2005.
30. Moss, T. (2001). Solving Problems of 'Fit' at the Expense of Problems of 'Interplay'? The Spatial Reorganisation of Water Management following the EU Water Framework Directive (draft). Discussion paper 5/2001. Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning, Erkner.
31. Moss T. Solving problems of 'fit' at the expense of problems of 'interplay'? The spatial reorganisation of water management following the EU water framework directive. In: Breit H., Engels A., Moss T., and Troja M. (Eds). How Institutions Change: Perspectives on Social Learning in Global and Local Environmental Contexts (2003), Leske und Budrich, Opladen 85-121
32. Moss T. The governance of land use in river basins: Prospects for overcoming problems of institutional interplay with the EU water framework directive. Land Use Policy 21 (2004) 85-94
33. Newson M.D. Land, water and development: River basin systems and their sustainable management (1992), Routledge, London
34. Oterdoom, H. (2002). The International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine. In: Deutsche Stiftung für Internationale Entwicklung (DSE), The Nile: Sharing Experiences, Sharing Visions. Berlin: DSE.
35. Petry, D. (2005). Institutional change in river basins induced by WFD implementation - A success story? A case study from the Elbe river basin. In: EWRA European Water Resources Association (Ed.), Sharing a common vision for our water resources, 6th International Conference, September 2005 in Menton, Conference Proceedings.
36. Petry D., and Klauer B. Umweltbewertung und politische Praxis in der Bundesverkehrswegeplanung (2005), Metropolis-Verlag, Marburg
37. Reinhardt M. Deutsches Verfassungsrecht und Europäische Flussgebietsverwaltung. Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht, Sonderheft 12 (2001) 124-128
38. SRU (The German Advisory Council on the Environment) (2004). Environmental Report 2004 - Ensuring Environmental Protection Capacity. Summary, (p. 115). Berlin.
39. Strathenwerth T. Die Bewirtschaftung nationaler und internationaler Flussgebiete. In: von Keitz S., and Schmalholz M. (Eds). Handbuch der EU-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie: Inhalte, Neuerungen und Anregungen für die nationale Umsetzung (2002), Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin 324-342
40. UBA (Federal Environmental Agency). (Ed.) (2001a). Water Resources Management in Germany, Part 1: Fundamentals. Berlin: The Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety.
41. UBA (Federal Environmental Agency). (Ed.) (2001b). Water Resources Management in Germany, Part 2: Quality of Inland Surface Waters. Berlin: The Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety.
42. UBA (Federal Environment Agency) (Eds). (2005). Online access to water quality monitoring data at: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/index-e.htm, visited February 15, 2006.
43. Unnerstall H., and Köck W. The implementation of the EU water framework directive into federal and regional law in Germany. Journal of European Environmental Policy and Legislation 1 3 (2004) 207-217