Emissions trading at Kyoto: From EU resistance to union innovation

Environmental Policy in the European Union, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 253-278

  Damro, Chad ^a   Méndes, Pilar Luaces ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925827570     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781849771221     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Banks, F. E. (2000) ‘The Kyoto Negotiations on Climate Change: An Economic Perspective’, Energy Sources, Vol.22, pp481–496.
2. Brack, D., Grubb, M. and Vrolijk, C. (1999) The Kyoto Protocol: A Guide and Assessment, London: Earthscan.
3. Campbell, K. (1998) ‘From Rio to Kyoto. The Use of Voluntary Agreements to Implement the Climate Change Convention’, RECIEL, Vol.7, No.2, pp159–169.
4. Carr, D. A. and Thomas, W. L. (1998) ‘The Kyoto Protocol and US Climate Change Policy: Implications for American Industry’, RECIEL, Vol.7, No.2, pp191–201.
5. Dawson, G. (1999) ‘Market Exchange, Social Contract and the Kyoto Protocol’, Risk Decision and Policy, Vol.4, No.3, pp63–77.
6. Dobes, Leo (1999) ‘Kyoto: Tradable Greenhouse Emission Permits in the Transport Sector’, Transport Review, Vol.19, No.1, pp81–97.
7. Dolowitz, D. and Marsh, D. (1996) ‘Who Learns What from Who?’ Political Studies, Vol.XLIV, pp343–357.
8. Dolowitz, D. and Marsh, D. (2000) ‘Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy Making’, Governance, Vol.13, No.1 (January) pp 5–24.
9. Eizenstat, S. (1998) ‘Statement before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’, Washington, DC, 11 February, State Department web page archive(www. state.gov) printed 23 January 2001.
10. Environment Watch (2001) ‘Operational Rulebook For Kyoto Protocol Agreed at Marrakech’, Environment Watch: Europe, Vol.10, No.22 (23 November) pp 1–2.
11. Golub, J. (ed) (1998) New Instruments for Environmental Policy in the EU, London: Routledge.
12. Haigh, N. (1996) ‘Climate Change Policies and Politics in the European Community’, in O’Riordan and Jager (1996).
13. Hall, P. (1993) ‘Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policy Making in Britain’, in Comparative Politics, Vol.25, No.3, pp275–296.
14. Huber, M. (1997) ‘Leadership in European Climate Policy: Innovative Policy Making in Policy Networks’, in Liefferink, D. and Andersen, M. S. (eds) TheInnovation of EU Environmental Policy, Copenhagen: Scandinavian University Press.
15. International Chamber of Commerce (1997) ‘Statement by the International Chamber of Commerce, the World Business Organization, at the Conclusion of the Third Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change’, Kyoto, 11 December.
16. Johnston, J. L. (1998) ‘Emissions Trading for Global Warming’, Regulation: The CATO Review of Business and Government, Vol.21, No.4 (Fall), pp19–23.
17. Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. and Zito, A. (2000) ‘Innovating with “New” Environmental Policy Instruments: Convergence or Divergence in the European Union?’ paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 31 August – 3 September.
18. Jupille, J. and Caporaso, J. (l998) ‘States, Agency and Rules: The European Community in Global Environmental Politics’, in Rhodes, C. (ed) The EuropeanUnion in the World Community, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
19. Macrory, R. and Hession, M. (1996) “The European Community and Climate Change: The Role of Law and Legal Competency’, in O’Riordan and Jager (1996, p106–154).
20. Majone, G. (1996) Regulating Europe, London: Routledge.
21. May, P. (1992) ‘Policy Learning and Failure’, Journal of Public Policy, Vol.12, No.4, pp331–354.
22. Missfeldt, F. (1998) ‘Flexibility Mechanisms: Which Path to Take After Kyoto’, RECIEL Vol.7, No.2, pp128–139.
23. Nolin, J. (1999) Time and Sponsorship: The Research to Policy Process and the European Union’s Kyoto Proposal’, Minerva, Vol.37, pp165–181.
24. O’Riordan, T. and Jager, J. (eds) (1996) Politics of Climate Change: A European Perspective, London: Routledge.
25. Page, E. E. (2000) ‘Future Governance and the Literature on Policy Transfer and Lesson Drawing’, paper prepared for the ESRC Future Governance Programme Workshop on Policy Transfer, London.
26. Parson, E. A. and Fisher-Vanden, K. (1999) ‘Joint Implementation of Greenhouse Gas Abatement Under the Kyoto Protocol’s “Clean Development Mechanism”: Its Scope and Limits’, Policy Sciences, Vol.32, pp207–224.
27. Pressman, J. and Wildavsky, A. (1973) Implementation, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
28. Rose, R. (1993) Lesson Drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning Across Time and Space, Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
29. Sabatier, P. (ed) (1993) Theories of the Policy Process, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
30. Sabatier, P. and Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993) Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
31. Sbragia, A., Damro, C. (1999) ‘The Changing Role of the European Union in International Environmental Politics: Institution Building and the Politics of Climate Change’, Environment and Planning C, Government Policy, Vol.17, pp53–68.
32. Schneider, S. H. (1998) ‘Kyoto Protocol: The Unfinished Agenda’, Climate Change, Vol.39 pp1–21.
33. Stokes, B. F. and Berry, W. D. (1999) ‘Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research’ in Sabatier (ed) (1999).
34. Trexler, M. C. and Kosloff, L. H. (1998) ‘The 1997 Kyoto Protocol: What Does It Mean for Project-Based Climate Change Mitigation?’ Mitigation and AdaptationStrategies for Global Chang, Vol.3, pp1–58.
35. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2001) ‘The Kyoto Protocol – Introduction’, 26 Feb, www.epa.gov/globalwarming/publications/reference/kyoto/.
36. US Government (1995) Climate Action Report: Submission of the United States of America Under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
37. Werksman, J. (1998) ‘The Clean Development Mechanism: Unwrapping the “Kyoto Surprise”,’ RECIEL, Vol.7, No.2, pp147–158.
38. Worika, I., Lucky, T. W., Brown, M. and Vinogradov, S. (1999) ‘Contractual Architecture for the Kyoto Protocol: From Soft and Hard Laws to Concrete Commitments’, RECIEL, Vol.8, No.2, pp180–190.
39. Yamin, F. (1998) ‘The Kyoto Protocol: Origins, Assessment and Future Challenges’, RECIEL, Vol.7, No.2, pp113–126.
40. Council Conclusions (1998) ‘2106 Council Meeting of Environment’, Luxembourg, 16–17 June 1998, Pres/98/205 in www.eel.nl/counciy2106.htm.
41. EC Commission (1988) The Greenhouse Effect and the Commission’, COM (88)656.
42. EC Commission (1991) ‘Commission Strategy to Limit Carbon Dioxide Emissions and to Improve Energy Efficiency’, SEC (91) 1744 final.
43. EC Commission (1992) ‘Proposal for a Council Directive Introducing a Tax on CO2 Emissions and Energy’, COM (92) 266.
44. EU Commission (1996) Communication from the Commission under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change’, COM (96) 217 final.
45. EU Commission (1997) ‘Proposal for a Council Directive Restructuring the Commission Framework for the Taxation of Energy Products’, COM (97) 30 final.
46. EU Commission (2002) ‘Report from the Commission under Council Decision 93/389/EEC, as amended by Decision 99/2966/EC for a Monitoring Mechanism of EU Greenhouse Gas Emissions’, COM (02) 702 final, in www.europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/environment.
47. European Commission (1997) Climate Change: EU Strategy Towards the Kyoto Conference’, COM (97) 481 final. Brussels, 1 Oct. 1997.
48. European Commission (1998) Climate Change: Towards a Post-Kyoto Strategy’, COM (98) 353, in www.europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/environment.
49. European Commission (1999) EC Economic and Development Cooperation: Responding to New Challenges of Climate Change’, COM (99) 676.
50. European Commission (1999) ‘Preparing for the Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol’, COM (99) 230 final, in www.europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/environment.
51. European Commission (2000) ‘Green Paper on Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading within the EU’, COM (00) 87, in www.europa.eu.int/cornm/dgs/environment.
52. European Commission (2001) ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Framework for Greenhouse Emission Trading within the European Community and Amending Council Directive 96/61/EC’, COM (01) 581, in www.europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/environment.