Predicting lung cancer prior to surgical resection in patients with lung nodules

Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Volumn 9, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1477-1484

  Deppen, Stephen A ^a,b   Blume, Jeffrey D ^d   Aldrich, Melinda C ^a   Fletcher, Sarah A ^d   Massion, Pierre P ^b,e   Walker, Ronald C ^e   Chen, Heidi C ^c   Speroff, Theodore ^f   Degesys, Catherine A ^b   Pinkerman, Rhonda ^b   Lambright, Eric S ^a   Nesbitt, Jonathan C ^a   Putnam, Joe B ^a   Grogan, Eric L ^a,b  

^a Tennessee Valley Healthcare System   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT INGRAM CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Department of Radiology ^*  (United States)

^f Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Diagnosis; Lung cancer; Prediction models

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BRIER SCORE; CALIBRATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SURGERY; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUNG CANCER; LUNG NODULE; LUNG RESECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDATION PROCESS; VETERAN; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL MODEL;

AGED; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84925822541     PISSN: 15560864     EISSN: 15561380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000287     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:212-236.
2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et al. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010;60:277-300.
3. CDC. Cigarette smoking among adults and trends in smoking cessation - US, 2008. Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ., 2009. Pp. 1227-1232.Available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/wk/mm5844.pdf.
4. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011;365:395-409.
5. Deppen S, Putnam JB Jr, Andrade G, et al. Accuracy of FDG-PET to diagnose lung cancer in a region of endemic granulomatous disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92:428-433.
6. Kozower BD, Meyers BF, Reed CE, et al. Does positron emission tomography prevent nontherapeutic pulmonary resections for clinical stage IA lung cancer? Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:1166-1170.
7. Veronesi G, Bellomi M, Scanagatta P, et al. Difficulties encountered managing nodules detected during a computed tomography lung cancer screening program. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136:611-617.
8. Starnes SL, Reed MF, Meyer CA, et al. Can lung cancer screening by computed tomography be effective in areas with endemic histoplasmosis? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;141:688-693.
9. Kuo E, Bharat A, Bontumasi N, et al. Impact of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery on benign resections for solitary pulmonary nodules. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;93:266-273.
10. Bach PB, Kattan MW, Thornquist MD, et al. Variations in lung cancer risk among smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:470-478.
11. Spitz MR, Etzel CJ, Dong Q, et al. An expanded risk prediction model for lung cancer. Cancer Prev Res 2008;1:250-254.
12. Cassidy A, Duffy SW, Myles JP, et al. Lung cancer risk prediction: a tool for early detection. Int J Cancer 2007;120:1-6.
13. Tammemägi MC, Katki HA, Hocking WG, et al. Selection criteria for lung-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2013;368:728-736.
14. Swensen SJ, Silverstein MD, Ilstrup DM, et al. The probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules. Application to small radiologically indeterminate nodules. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:849-855.
15. Schultz EM, Sanders GD, Trotter PR, et al. Validation of two models to estimate the probability of malignancy in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules. Thorax 2008;63:335-341.
16. Gurney JW, Lyddon DM, McKay JA. Determining the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with Bayesian analysis. Part II. Application. Radiology 1993;186:415-422.
17. rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2013;143(5 Suppl):e93S-e120S.
18. Isbell JM, Deppen S, Putnam JB Jr, et al. Existing general population models inaccurately predict lung cancer risk in patients referred for surgical evaluation. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;91:227-233.
19. Grogan EL, Jones DR. VATS lobectomy is better than open thoracotomy: what is the evidence for short-term outcomes? Thorac Surg Clin 2008;18:249-258.
20. Society of Thoracic Surgeons. General Thoracic Surgery Database. Available at: http://www.sts.org/sts-national-database/database-managers/general-thoracic-surgery-database. Accessed July 21, 2013.
21. Grogan EL, Weinstein JJ, Deppen SA, et al. Thoracic operations for pulmonary nodules are frequently not futile in patients with benign disease. J Thorac Oncol 2011;6:1720-1725.
22. Grogan EL, Deppen SA, Ballman KV, et al. Accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography within the clinical practice of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z4031 trial to diagnose clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;97:1142-1148.
23. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Lung Cancer Screening v1.2014. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) [serial online]. Available from National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Accessed October 27, 2011.
24. Harrell FEJ. Regression Modeling Strategies. Charlottesville, VA: Springer, 2001.
25. Potthoff RF, Tudor GE, Pieper KS, et al. Can one assess whether missing data are missing at random in medical studies? Stat Methods Med Res 2006;15:213-234.
26. Steyerberg EW. Clinical Prediction Models. New York: Springer, 2009.
27. Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE, Borsboom GJJM, et al. Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54:774-781.
28. von Meyenfeldt EM, Gooiker GA, van Gijn W, et al. The relationship between volume or surgeon specialty and outcome in the surgical treatment of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Oncol 2012;7:1170-1178.
29. Cheung MC, Hamilton K, Sherman R, et al. Impact of teaching facility status and high-volume centers on outcomes for lung cancer resection: an examination of 13,469 surgical patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:3-13.
30. Powell HA, Tata LJ, Baldwin DR, et al. Early mortality after surgical resection for lung cancer: an analysis of the English National Lung cancer audit. Thorax 2013;68:826-834.
31. Quarterman RL, McMillan A, Ratcliffe MB, et al. Effect of preoperative delay on prognosis for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:108-114.
32. Smith MA, Battafarano RJ, Meyers BF, et al. Prevalence of benign disease in patients undergoing resection for suspected lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1824-1829.
33. Cassidy A, Myles JP, van Tongeren M, et al. The LLP risk model: an individual risk prediction model for lung cancer. Br J Cancer 2008;98:270-276.
34. McWilliams A, Tammemagi MC, Mayo JR, et al. Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. N Engl J Med 2013;369:910-919.
35. Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences. Lung Cancer Prediction Models. May 2, 2013. Available at: http://epi.grants.cancer.gov/cancer-risk-prediction/lung.html. Accessed May 6, 2014.