media technology and civic life

Communication Technology and Social Change: Theory and Implications

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 125-141

  Jeffres, Leo W ^a  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925819417     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410615411     Document Type: Chapter

References (91)

1. Agostino, D. (1980a, summer). New technologies: Problem or solution? Journal of Communication, 30, 198-206.
2. Agostino, D. (1980b). Cable television’s impact on the audience of public television. Journal of Broadcasting, 24, 347-365.
3. Atkin, D., & LaRose, R. (1991). Cable access: Market concerns amidst the marketplace of ideas. Journalism Quarterly, 68, 354-362.
4. Atkin, D. J., Neuendorf, K., & Jeffres, L. W. (1998). Reassessing public support for pub-lic access cablevision: A faded passion? Telematics and Informatics, 15, 67-84.
5. Aufderheide, P. (1992). Cable television and the public interest. Journal of Communication, 42(1), 52-65.
6. Bachman, K. (2005, August 3). TVB: Satellite TV continues gains against cable. Media Week. Retreived August 4, 2005, from http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/cabletv/ article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001008526
7. Baker, P. M. A., & Ward, A. C. (2002). Bridging temporal and spatial “gaps”: The role of information and communication technologies in defining communities. Information, Communication & Society, 5, 207-224.
8. Baldwin, T. F., Greenberg, B. S., Block, M. P., & Stoyanoff, N. (1978). Rockford, IL: Cognitive and affective outcomes. Journal of Communication, 28(2), 180-194.
9. Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipson, S. M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. New York: Harper & Row.
10. Brody, E. W. (1984). Impact of cable television on library borrowing. Journalism Quarterly, 61, 687-689.
11. Brownstein, C. N. (1978). Interactive cable television and social services. Journal of Communication, 28(2), 142-147.
12. Burns, R., & Elton, L. (1978). Reading, Pa.: Programming for the future. Journal of Communication, 28(2), 148-152.
13. Clarke, P., Kline, F. G., Schumacher, H., & Evans, S. (1978). Journal of Communication, 28(2), 195.
14. Cohen, J. (2004, November 14). Letting the Internet knock on the door. New York Times, late edition, p. 11.2
15. Crow, K. (2001, February 11). Neighborhood report: Soundview-Buzz. New York Times, p. 14.
16. Cunningham, W. H., Cunningham, I. C. M., & English, W. D. (1974). Sociopsychological characteristics of undergraduate marijuana users. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 125, 3-12.
17. Dalton, R. J., Jr. (2004, July 4). Libraries offer help: Trying to close digital divide. Newsday, p. 8A.
18. Dordick, H., & Lyle, J. (1971). Access by local political candidates to cable television: A report of an experiment. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
19. Doheny-Farina, S. (1996). The wired neighborhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20. Dutta-Bergman, M. J. (2005). Access to the Internet in the context of community partici-pation and community satisfaction. New Media & Society, 7, 89-109.
21. Edelstein, A. S., & Larsen, O. N. (1960). The weekly press’ contribution to a sense of urban community. Journalism Quarterly, 37, 489-498.
22. Fallows, J. (2004, May 16). The twilight of the information middlemen. New York Times, p. 3.
23. Fossi, C. (2004, July 20). Comporium to install fiber-optic cables in some neighborhoods. The (Rock Hill, S.C.) Herald, p. 4B.
24. Fountain, K. (2004, June 10). Antennas sprout, and a Bronx neighborhood goes online. New York Times, p. 8G.
25. Galloway, J. J. (1977). The analysis and significance of communication effects gaps. Communication Research, 4, 363-386.
26. Goldscheider, E. (2000, November 1). College initiates program to give back to its neigh-bors, New York Times, p. 15B.
27. Gore stumps for info highway bill. (1994, June 14). Broadcasting & Cable, p. 38.
28. Hamelink, C. J. (1985). High-tech transfer: Selling the canoe without the paddle. Development, 1, 28-37.
29. Harwood, P. (2005). People who use the Internet away from home and work. Accessed February 1, 2005, from Pew Internet & American Life Project, www.pewinternet.org
30. Higgins, J. W. (1999). Sense-making and empowerment: A study of the “vision” of com-munity television. Electronic Journal of Communication. 9(2).
31. Hindman, E. B. (1998). Community, democracy and neighborhood news. Journal of Communication,48, 27.
32. Jacobs, R. (1995). Exploring the determinants of cable television subscriber satisfaction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39, 262.
33. Jacobs, R., & Yousman, W. (1999). Understanding cable television community access viewership. Communication Research Reports, 16, 305-316.
34. Janowitz, M. (1967). The community press in an urban setting: The social elements of urban-ism (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1952)
35. Jeffres, L. W. (2002). Urban communication systems: Neighborhoods and the search for community. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
36. Jeffres, L. W., & Atkin, D. (1996). Predicting use of technologies for communication and consumer needs. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, 318-330.
37. Jeffres, L. W., Lee, J.-W., Neuendorf, K., & Atkin, D. (2003, August). Community and civic values, Communication and social capital: “Bowling alone” as a product of values and communication. Paper presented to the Communication Theory and Methodology Division at the annual conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Kansas City, MO.
38. Jeffres, L. W., Neuendorf, K. A., Bracken, C., & Atkin, D. (2002, November). Cosmopo- liteness in the Internet age. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Midwest Association for Public Opinion Research, Chicago, IL.
39. Jung, J.-Y., Qiu, J. L., & Kim, Y.-C. (2001). Internet connectedness and inequality: Beyond the divide. Communication Research, 28, 507-535.
40. Korengel, K. (2000, January 9). Neighborhood report: Greenpoint. New York Times, p. 14.
41. Knight, S. (2004, September 12). Neighborhood Report: New York Online. New York Times, p. 14.
42. Krim, J. (2004, August 9). Program aids urban poor in accessing the Internet. Washington Post, p. 1A.
43. Kubicek, H., & Wagner, R. M. (2002). Community networks in a generational perspective: The change of an electronic medium within three decades. Information, Communication & Society, 5, 291.
44. Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas (pp.32). New York: Harper.
45. Lin, C., & Atkin, D. (2002). Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
46. Lucas, W. A. (1978). Spartanburg, S.C.: Testing the effectiveness of video, voice and data feedback. Journal of Communication, 28(2), 168-179.
47. Malina, A., & Jankowski, N. (2002). Community-building in cyberspace. In N. W. Jankowski, with O. Prehn (Eds.), Community media in the information age: Perspectives and prospects (pp. 271-292). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
48. Matei, S., & Ball-Rokeach, S. (2003). The Internet in the communication infrastructure of urban residential communities: Macro- or mesolinkage? Journal of Communication,53, 642-657.
49. McCall, W. (2004, October 24). Network expert wires up free wi-fi access. Associated Press State & Local Wire, BC cycle, accessed via LexisNexis.
50. Mitchell, T. (2004, October 15). New map pinpoints crime in your area; anyone with Internet access can find police data about lawlessness on a neighborhood level. Florida Times-Union, p. 1A.
51. Moss, M. L. (1978). Reading, Pa.: Research on community uses. Journal of Communi-cation, 28(2), 160-167.
52. O’Grady, J. (2000, December 3). A web site reverberates with the din of urban life. New York Times, p. 14.
53. Osava, M. (2004, May 31). Latin America: Telecentres provide jobs and culture for the poor. IPS-Inter Press Service, accessed through LexisNexis.
54. Perse, E. M., Ferguson, D. A., & McLeod, D. M. (1994). Cultivation in the newer media environment. Communication Research, 21, 79-104.
55. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2000). Internet sapping broadcast news audience. Washington, DC: Author.
56. Phillips, M. A. (1972). CATELEVISION: A history of community antenna television. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
57. Pigg, K. E. (2001). Applications of community informants for building community and enhancing civic society. Information, Communication & Society, 4, 507-527.
58. Pinkett, R., & O’Bryant, R. (2003). Building community, empowerment and self-sufficiency. Information, Communication & Society, 6, 187.
59. Putnam, R. D. (1995a). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 34-48.
60. Putnam, R. D. (1995b). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearances of social capi-tal in America. PS: Political Science and Politics, 284, 664-683.
61. Putnam, R.D. (1996). The strange disappearance of civic America. The American Prospect, 24, 65-78.
62. Rainie, L. (2005). The mainstreaming of online life. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved August 18, 2005, from http://207.21.232.103/pdfs/ Internet_Status_2005.pdf
63. Ranerup, A. (2001). Online forums as a tool for people-centred governance: Experiences from local government in Sweden. In L. Keeble & B. D. Loader (Eds.), Community informatics: Shaping computer-mediated social relations (pp. 205). New York: Routledge.
64. Rennie, E. (2001). Community television and the transition to digital broadcasting. Australian Journal of Communication, 28, 57-68.
65. Rogers, E. M. (1976). New perspectives on communication and development. Communi-cation Research, 3, 99-106.
66. Rogers, E. M. (1978). The rise and fall of the dominant paradigm: New approaches to development. Journal of Communication, 28, 64-69.
67. Rogers, E. M. (2002). The information society in the new millennium: Captain’s log, 2001. In C. A. Lin & D. J. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 43). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
68. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
69. Schramm, W. (1964). Mass media and national development. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
70. Schramm, W., & Lerner, D. (Eds.). (1976). Communication and change: The last ten years-and the next. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii, East-West Center.
71. Schulman, M. (1985). Neighborhood radio as community communication (Harlem, New York, City College of New York, Local Media, Communication Theory). Dissertation Abstracts International, 47 (04), 1102A.
72. Shah, D., Schmierbach, M., Hawkins, J., Espino, R., Ericson, M., Donavan, J., & Chung, S. (2000, November). Untangling the ties that bind: The relationship between Internet use and engagement in public life. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Midwest Association for Public Opinion Research, Chicago.
73. Sidener, J. (2004, September 20). Neighborhood network; Free, wireless web comes to Golden Hill. San Diego Union-Tribune, p. 1E.
74. Smith, R. L. (1972). The wired nation. Cable television: The electronic communications highway. New York: Harper & Row.
75. Spooner, T. (2003). Internet use by region in the United States. Accessed February 1, 2005, from Pew Internet & American Life Project, www.pewinternet.org.
76. Stamm, K.R. (1985). Newspaper use and community ties: Toward a dynamic theory. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
77. Stein, L. (2002). Democratic “talk”: Access television and participatory political commu-nication. In N. W. Jankowski, with O. Prehn (Eds.), Community media in the informa-tion age: Perspectives and prospects (pp. 123-140) Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
78. Stevenson, H. (1991). A new entrepreneurial paradigm. In A. Etzioni & P. R. Lawrence (Eds.), Socio-economics: Toward a new synthesis (pp. 39-359). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
79. Taub, E. A. (2004, October 14). Satellite TV spreads its signals across the landscape. New York Times, late edition, p. G6.
80. Tichenor, P., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1980). Community conflict and the press. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
81. Tidhar, C. E., & Nossek, H. (2002). All in the family: The integration of a new media tech-nology in the family. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 27, 15-34.
82. Town Board Meetings, Live on Cable TV [letter]. (2004, December 12). New York Times, p. 14WC.
83. Uotinen, J. (2003). Involvement in (the information) society-The Joensuu Community Resource Centre Netcafe. New Media & Society,15, 335.
84. Viswanath, K., Finnegan, J. R., Rooney, B., & Potter, J. (1990). Community ties in a rural Midwest community and use of newspapers and cable television. Journalism Quarterly, 67, 899-911.
85. Wartella, E., Heintz, K. E., Aidman, A. J., & Mazzarella, S. R. (1990). Television and beyond: Children’s video media in one community. Communication Research, 17, 45-64.
86. Wartella, E., & Reeves, B. (1985). Historical trends in research on children and the media: 1900-1960. Journal of Communication, 35(2), 118-133.
87. Winett, R. A., Leckliter, I. N., Chinn, D. E., & Stahl, B. (1984). Reducing energy consumption: The long-term effects of a single television program. Journal of Communi-cation,34, 37-51.
88. Wright, C. R. (1960). Functional analysis and mass communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 605-620.
89. Wurtzel, A. (1975). Public-access cable television: Programming. Journal of Communi-cation, 25(3), 15-41.
90. Yahoo! Launches local search beta: An innovative way for people to search for local information online. (2004, August 3). Business Wire, Inc., accessed via LexisNexis Academic.
91. Zimmerman, E. (2004, October 3). Before applying, check out the blogs. New York Times, p. 10.