Whose molecule is it anyway? private and social perspectives on intellectual property

New Perspectives on Property Law: Obligations and Restitution

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 279-304

  Picciotto, Sol ^a   Campbell, David ^b  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925813171     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781843145714     Document Type: Chapter

References (58)

1. A Plant, 'The economic theory concerning patents for inventions,' in A Plant, Selected Economic Essays and Addresses (London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1974) 35, p 35.
2. D Hume, Enquiries (3rd edn, Oxford, OUP, 1975).
3. P Torremans, Holyoak and Torremans Intellectual Property Law (3rd edn, Sevenoaks, Butterworths, 2001) pp 13-14.
4. K Shell, 'A model of inventive activity and capital accumulation,' in K Shell (ed), Essays on the Theory of Optimal Economic Growth (Cambridge, USA, MIT Press, 1967) 67.
5. K Marx, Capital, Vol I, in K Marx and F Engels, Collected Works, Vol 35 (London, Lawrence and Wishart, 1996) p 94.
6. RH Coase, 'The institutional structure of production,' in RH Coase, Essays on Economics and Economists (Chicago, USA, University of Chicago Press, 1994) 3, p 11.
7. RA Musgrave, The Theory of Public Finance (Princeton, USA, Princeton University Press, 1959) p 9.
8. KJ Arrow, 'The organisation of economic activity,' in KJ Arrow, Collected Papers, Vol 2 (Cambridge, USA, Belknap Press, 1983) 133, p 149.
9. IR Macneil, The New Social (Contract (New Haven, USA, Yale University Press, 1980) pp 1, 14).
10. CB Macpherson, 'A political theory of property,' in CB Macpherson, Democratic Theory (Oxford, OUP, 1973) 120, pp 123-31.
11. K Marx, Grundrisse, in K Marx and F Engels, Collected Works, Vol 28 (London, Lawrence and Wishart, 1986), p 156.
12. M Boldrin and DK Levine, 'The case against intellectual property' (2002) 92 American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 209.
13. P Romer, 'When should we use intellectual property rights?' (2002) 92 American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 213, 214.
14. A Smith, The Wealth of Nations (Oxford, OUP, 1976) 754. See further n 69 to this passage supplied by the editors of the Glasgow Edition.
15. RH Coase, 'The lighthouse in economics,' in RH Coase, The Firm, the Market and the Law (Chicago, USA, University of Chicago Press, 1986) 187.
16. Laddie, 'Copyright: over-strength, over-regulated, over-rated' (1996) 5 European Intellectual Property Review 253.
17. W Nordhaus, Invention, Growth and Welfare (Cambridge, USA, MIT Press, 1969).
18. D Quah, 'Matching demand and supply in a weightless economy: market-driven creativity with and without IPRs' (LSE Economics Department, 2002).
19. P Samuelson et al, 'A manifesto concerning the legal protection of computer programs' (1994) 94 Columbia Law Review 2308.
20. B Sherman and L Bently, The Making of Modern Intellectual Property Law: The British Experience, 1760-1911 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999), eg, p 38.
21. FD Prager, 'A history of intellectual property from 1545 to 1787' (1944) 26 Journal of the Patent Office Society 711.
22. HI Dutton, The Patent System and Inventive Activity During the Industrial Revolution 1750-1852 (Manchester, Manchester University Press, 1984).
23. GA Evans, 'The human genome project and public policy' (1999) 8 Public Understanding of Science 161.
24. EW Kitch, 'The nature and function of the patent system' (1977) 20 Journal of Law and Economics 265.
25. MD McKelvey, Evolutionary Innovation: The Business of Biotechnology (Oxford, OUP, 1996).
26. S McDonald, 'Exploring the hidden costs of patents,' in P Drahos and R Mayne (eds), Global Intellectual Property Rights: Knowledge, Access and Development (New York, USA, Palgrave Macmillan-Oxfam, 2002) 13, p 34.
27. JH Reichman, 'Legal hybrids between the patent and copyright paradigms,' in WF Korthals et al (eds), Information Law Towards the 21st Century (Deventer, Netherlands, Kluwer, 1992) 325, 329.
28. www. eldred. com.
29. S Ricketson, The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (Deventer, Netherlands, Kluwer and Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary College, 1987) Ch 15.
30. RS Eisenberg, 'Bargaining over the transfer of proprietary research tools: is this market failing or emerging?,' in RC Dreyfuss et al (eds), Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property: Innovation Policy for the Information Society (Oxford, OUP, 2001) 223.
31. G Calabresi and AD Melamed, 'Property rules, liability rules and inalienability: one view of the cathedral' (1972) 85 Harvard Law Review 1089.
32. L Kaplow and S Shavell, 'Property rules versus liability rules: an economic analysis' (1996) 109 Harvard Law Review 713.
33. MA Heller, 'The tragedy of the anticommons: property in the transition from Marx to markets' (1998) 111 Harvard Law Review 621.
34. MA Heller and RS Eisenberg, 'Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research' (1998) 280 Science 698.
35. E Talley, 'Solomonic bargaining: dividing a legal entitlement to facilitate Coasean trade' (1995) 104 Yale Law Journal 1027.
36. RP Merges, 'Contracting into liability rules: intellectual property rights and collective rights organizations' (1996) 84.
37. A Schmidt, Les Sociétés d'Auteurs SACEM-SACD: Contrats de Représentation (Paris, France, Pichon and Durand-Audias, 1971).
38. JM Kernochan, 'Music performance rights organizations in the United States of America: special characteristics, restraints, and public attitudes' (1985) 21 Copyright 389, 398.
39. HC Jehoram. 'The future of copyright collecting societies' (2001) 23 European Intellectual Property Review 134, 136.
40. T Gallagher, 'Copyright, compulsory licensing and incentives' (Oxford Intellectual Property Research Centre Working Paper Series No 2, 2001).
41. S Picciotto, 'Copyright licensing: the case of higher education photocopying in the UK' (2002) 9 European Intellectual Property Review 438.
42. M Kretschmer, 'The failure of property rules in collective administration: rethinking copyright societies as regulatory instruments' (2002) 24 European Intellectual Property Review 126.
43. D Sinacore-Guinn, Collective Administration of Copyrights and Neighbouring Rights: International Practices, Procedures and Organizations (Boston, USA, Little Brown, 1993).
44. MP Ryan, Knowledge Diplomacy: Global Competition and the Politics of Intellectual Property, (Washington DC, USA, Brookings Institution Press, 1998).
45. P Drahos and J Braithwaite, Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? (London, Earthscan, 2002) Chs 4-9.
46. S Sanghera, 'Executives worry about piracy, but their preoccupation with marketing and inability to develop enduringly successful bands may pose a bigger threat' (2002) Financial Times, 15 November.
47. C May, A Global Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights: The New Enclosures? (London, Routledge, 2000).
48. D Nimmer. 'A riff on fair use in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act' (2000) 148 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 673.
49. J Sheets, 'Copyright misused: the impact of the DMCA anti-circumvention measures on fair and innovative markets' (2000) 22 Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal 1.
50. LA Bygrave, 'The technologization of copyright: implications for privacy and related interests' (2002) 24 European Intellectual Property Review 51.
51. M Jackson, 'Using technology to circumvent the law: the DMCA's push to privatize copyright' (2001) 23 Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal 607, 608.
52. P Brown, 'Digital rights management technologies' [2002] Practising Law Institute (Patents) 691.
53. C Field, 'Copyright co-ownership in cyberspace: the digital merger of content and technology in digital rights management and e-commerce' (2001) 19 Entertainment and Sports Lawyer 3.
54. PW Grubb, Patents for Chemicals, Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology: Fundamentals of Global Law, Practice and Strategy (Oxford, OUP, 1999) p 226.
55. P Temin, 'Technology, regulation and market structure in the modern pharmaceutical industry' (1979) 10 Bell journal of Economics 429.
56. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, The Ethics of Patenting DNA (London, Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2002).
57. DF Noble, America by Design (New York, USA, Knopf, 1977) and Drahos and Braithwaite, Ch 3.
58. D Campbell and S Picciotto, 'Exploring the interaction between law and economics: the limits of formalism' (1998) 18 Legal Studies 249.